CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT PHASE I DESIGN STUDY AND DEMONSTRATION/AUTOMATIC MULTIPLE IMAGE INTEGRATION STUDY

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78B04770A000200010033-4
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 1, 2004
• Sequence Number: 33
• Publication Date: October 12, 1966
• Content Type: FORM

? I
^ 5ECRETApproved For lease 2004/07M CQMi4 ROMM0477 00200010033? UNC LASS IF I ED
TASK NO.
CONTRACT NO.
ON
R
INSPECTI
CONTRACT
EPORT
11
25
T0:
DATE
October 1,-,66
ADMINISTRATION
&
CONTRACT
SETTLEMENT
INSPECTION REPORT NO. (If final, so state)
BRANCH/PD/OL
6
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE Phase I - coapiete
1 July 1,167 - P't:t se II
NAME OF CONTRACTOR
___--
1
F
~
TYPE OF COMMODITY OR SERVICE
_
Phase I Desi n Stu -kTd Dwonstratiorx/ auto uie Multiple Iz .tge
Integration 6tudy
THE CONTRACTOR IS ON SCHEDULE
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROBABLY REMAIN WITHIN ALLOCATED
REC
"
"
,j
ADVISE
-
NO
FUNDS 91 YES [j NO IF ANSWER IS
ON
OFFICE
NO
YES
,
OMMENDATION AND/OR ACTION OF SPONSORING
n ~y~!1~
1
p1
REVERSE HEREOF. IF KNOWN. INDICATE MAGNITUDE OF AD-
Be
PER CENT OF WORK COMPLETED . 7G'
*+" 2
laae
DITIONAL FUNDS INVOLVED.
j
PER CENT OF FUNDS EXPENDED
HAS AN INTERIM REPORT. FINAL
REPORT. PROTOTYPE. OR OTHER END ITEM BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE CONTRACTOR
DURING THE PERIOD? ^ YES .? N
O (If yes, give details on reverse side.)
HAS GOVERNMENT-OWNED PROPERTY BEEN DELIVERED TO CONTRACTOR DURING THIS PERIOD? ^ YES p NO
(If yes, indicate items, quantity,
and cost on reverse side.)
INCENTIVES'
IS THIS AN INCENTIVE CONTRACT YES ^ No
NOTE:
CHECK TYPE
IF YES
USE REVERSE SIDE FOR COMMENTS.
.
cos, ^ PERFORMANCE
El
DELIVERY
FINAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INCENTIVE EVALUATION.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR
1. ^ OUTSTANDING 3. 11 ABOVE AVERAGE 5. ^ BELOW AVERAGE 7. ^ UNSATISFACTORY
2. ^ EXCELLENT 4
. ? AVERAGE 6. ^ BARELY ADEQUATE
IF OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CO
NTRACTOR IS UNSATISFACTORY OR BARELY ADEQUATE. INDICATE REASONS ON
REVERSE SIDE.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
? CONTINUE AS PROGRAMMED
^ WITHHOLD PAYMENT PENDING
CTORY PERFORMANCE
SATISFA
^ TERMINATE -
^ OTHER (Specify)
IF TERMINATION IS RECOMMENDED OR IF THIS IS A FINAL REPORT PUT COMMENTS ON'REVERSE IN NARRATIVE
FORM ON CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE
AND CERTIFY THAT ALL DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN
RECEIVED. THESE INCLUDE. WHERE APPLICABLE. THE FOLLOWING:
ITEM
REC D
DOES NOT
ITEM
RECD
DOES NOT
APPLY
APPLY
PROTOTYPES
MANUALS
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FINAL REPORT
PRODUCTION AND/OR OTHER
SPECIAL TOOLING
END ITEMS
OTHER GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
DATE OF LAST CONTACT WITH CONTRACTOR
6 October 1966
SI
GNATURE OF INSPECTOR
DIVISION
IN
Declass
Approved For Release 2004/07/29 CIA-RDP78BO477OA000200010033-4
Rewiew by
 ^ SECRET ? CONFIDENTIAL ^ UNC LASS I F I ED
Approved For Release 2004/07/29: IA- 8 -
NARRATIVE REPORT F ? INTERIM ^ FINAL
,t, a meeting held early in .September at
was informed that the Proposed Cla nj a of Scope, dated
10 August 1966 bad been rejected, He was informed that t good wzny
of the proposed study areas would be cc Bred under the EROS and
contracts, H; ar:~g instructed to prepare a proposal and work staate-
went from the electronic approach to integration defit .z ; tx:c l: rrit.
aationa in terms of W, 2/fl and B W wit e v art.atl na :pan%, .4s reaolszt .oa.,
attitude aistortion, focal lengh, s~..adow, rel .e: , etc. C
asked to think in terms of a printer approach and not of opti
viewing.
The project monitor net with
on G October 1966 to review the ro
proposal. 3 1- was rejected.
row rehensive and factual. They were asked to indicate t`,.ae areas
they intended to study and run test in, They were asked to ;sli f't
from straight NITS .curves and indicate tine net gain that might be
achieved by electronic image integration, They were also asked to
ach this with the ide of using xav,tr ri al of input, in the 150-?'010
copy of their
was tnfor'ac i to make L.:ei - pr+ i*n4i. .r4 work state eiat more
on, Dvas asked to include w hat the limitations of
ad SIN are, since trh..ey see, nmuc ' more aez-i gas than B:andwidtt:.
II
4greed to come with a c rej~aens ve proposal t:-,e week of
3 October 1966.
Amok,
^ UNCLAS IY ON L ^ SECRET