CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78B04770A000700040090-3
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: October 28, 2004
• Sequence Number: 90
• Publication Date: November 1, 1964
• Content Type: FORM

SECRET
(When Filled In)
Approved For Tease 2004/11/30: CI
CONTRACT INSPECTION RE
R&R?8BQ477 O
5-"
PORT
7
TO:
DATE
l Nov 64
ENGINEERING SECTION/CB/PD/OL
INSPECTION REPORT NO
(If fi
l
.
na
, ao state)
4
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
19 June 66
NAME OF CONTRACTOR
Declass Review by NGA.
TYPE OF COMMODIT
Study on PI Performance
THE CONTRACTOR IS ON SCHEDULE
? YES No
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROBABLY REMAIN WITHIN ALLOCATED
FUNDS ? YES P
IF ANSWER IS "NO" ADVISE REC-
OMMENDATION
T
15 of
2-
r effort
OR
AND OR AC
ION OF SPONSORING OFFICE, ON
y
PER CENT OF WORK COMPLETED p
REVERSE HEREOF. IF KNOWN, INDICATE MAGNITUDE OF ADDI-
5 o accelerated st
yFIONAL FUNDS INVOLVED.
HAS AN INTERIM REPORT, FINAL REPORT, PROTOTYPE. OR OTHER END ITEM BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE CONTRACTOR
DURING THE PERIOD? O YES M No (If yes, give details on reverse aide.) PI test and
response sheets
HAS GOVERNMENT-OWNED PROPERTY BEEN DELIVERED TO CONTRACTOR DURING THIS PERIOD? ? YES El ND
(If yes, Indicate Items, quantity, and cost on reverse aide.)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR
1. ^ OUTSTANDING S. a ABOVE AVERAGE 5. ^ BELOW AVERAGE T. a UNSATISFACTORY
2? EXCELLENT 4. ? AVERAGE 6. a BARELY ADEQUATE
IF OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR IS UNSATISFACTORY OR BARELY ADEQUATE. INDICATE REASONS ON
REVERSE SIDE.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
? CONTINUE AS PROGRAMMED ^ WI'THHOLD PAYMENT PENDING
SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE
^ TERMINATE _ ^ OTHER (Specify)
IF TERMINATION IS RECOMMENDED OR IF THIS IS A FINAL REPORT ATTACH COMMENTS IN NARRATIVE FORM ON
CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND CERTIFY THAT ALL DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
THESE INCLUDE. WHERE APPLICABLE. THE FOLLOWING:
ITEM
RECD
DOES NOT
ITEM
RECD
DOES NOT
APPLY
APPLY
PROTOTYPES
MANUALS
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FINAL REPORT
PRODUCTION AND/OR OTHER
SPECIAL TOOLING
END ITEMS
OTHER GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
DATE OF LAST CONTACT WITH CONTRACTOR
.21 Oct 64
DIVISION
P&DS
1A-RDP78B04770A000700040090-3
FORM 1897 PUSE
REVIDU
SE
S
6.84
EDITION (When Filled In Ead
"OT 0="c
down wn
p~adlnp and
5X1
5X1
 of Approved Forlease 2004111/30 : CIA-RDP78B0477A00700040090-3
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
In-house testing did not commence until the week of 19 October,
.but since the contractor is working on an accelerated study at our
special request, the time schedule is a product of his best effort,
which is being..closely monitored.
to Human Factors. Scoring evidently required at least six of
I worked at NPIC facilities the
weeks of 12-16 and 19-21 October drawing up the final tests, which
they-administered for the R#st three day's sessions. Administering
of tests was from then on assumed by in-house personnel, and
I Ireturned to the West Coast to begin
scoring completed es s. ach day's tests were thereafter airmailed
rofessional staff members since the test was open-ended
in design and required careful ,analysis of individual responses.
reported to us on 27 October that responses
on the tests which, had been scored to that date were of low efficiency
and showed confusion and failure to discriminate on the part of the PI's
participating. Tests could therefore not be scored as originally
intended, and any scoring key would involve extreme. complexities
Modifications to the experimental design e d immediately
and testing was to be resumed 2 November with ladminis- 25X1
"tering. The change involved a focusing down of the questions from open
target areas to individual circled aircraft. (Modification was justified
on the basis thata scanning task is not part of the problem of detail IL L E GIB
identificationcalled for by the range of resolutions being"considered.)
Approved For Release 2004/11/30 : CIA-RDP78B04770A000700040090-3