CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT ASPHERIC LENS STUDY
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP78B04770A001500060058-8
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date:
September 26, 2005
Sequence Number:
58
Case Number:
Publication Date:
April 28, 1965
Content Type:
FORM
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 100.11 KB |
Body:
25X1
25X1
UNCLASSIFIED
^ SECRET - -j 2005111 1W -ep, ~
CONTRACT NO. TASK NO.
CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT
I J
2
TO:
-
28 April 1965
ENGINEERING SECTION/CB/PD/OL
INSPECTION REPORT NO
f f
. (I
inal, so state)
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
NAME OF CONTRACTOR
TYPE
AuDbaria liens Study
THE CONTRACTOR IS ON SCHEDULE
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROBABLY REMAIN WITHIN ALLOCATED
^
?
Y
FUNDS ? YES 0 NO IF ANSWER IS "NO" ADVISE REC-
REC-
Np
ES
OMMENDATION AND/OR ACTION OF SPONSORING OFFICE
ON
.
REVERSE HEREOF. IF KNOWN. INDICATE MAGNITUDE Of AD-
PER CENT OF WORK COMPLETED ? %
DITIONAL FUNDS INVOLVED.
PER CENT OF FUNDS EXPENDED
HAS AN INTERIM REPORT, FINAL REPORT, PROTOTYPE. OR OTHER END ITEM BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE CONTRACTOR
DURING THE PERIOD?, ^ YES ? No (If yes, give details on reverse side.)
HAS GOVERNMENT-OWNED PROPERTY BEEN DELIVERED TO CONTRACTOR DURING THIS PERIOD? C1 YES NO
(If yes, indicate items, quantity, and cost on reverse side.)
INCENTIVES
IS THIS AN INCENTIVE CONTRACT 0 YES NO
NOTE:
IF YES, CHECK TYPE
USE REVERSE SIDE FOR COMMENTS.
COST PERFORMANCE O DELIVERY
FINAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INCENTIVE EVALUATION.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR
1 OUTSTANDING 3. U ABOVE AVERAGE 5. BELOW AVERAGE 7. ^ UNSATISFAC=TORY
2. a EXCELLENT 4. ? AVERAGE 6. ^ BARELY ADEQUATE
IF OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR IS UNSATISFACTORY OR BARELY ADEQUATE, INDICATE REASONS ON
REVERSE SIDE.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
O CONTINUE AS PROGRAMMED ^ WITHHOLD PAYMENT PENDING
SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE
^ TERMINATE ^ OTHER (Specify)
IF TERMINATION IS RECOMMENDED OR IF THIS IS A FINAL REPORT PUT COMMENTS ON REVERSE IN NARRATIVE
FORM ON CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND CERTIFY THAT ALL DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN
RECEIVED. THESE INCLUDE. WHERE APPLICABLE, THE FOLLOWING: _
ITEM
RECD
DOES NOT
ITEM
DOE::; NOT
APPLY
RECD
APPLY
PROTOTYPES
MANUALS
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FINAL REPORT
PRODUCTION AND/OR OTHER
SPECIAL TOOLING
END ITEMS
OTHER GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
DATE OF LAST CONTACT WITH CONTRACTOR
23 A - ril 1965, Monitoring
SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR
DIVISION
NGA Review Complete
PILDE
INSPECT
SIGNATU
Approved
For Release 2005/11/21 CI
RDP78
04770A001500060058-8
FORM Q7 USE
10-64 I"Q`~? EDITIONS
^ UNCLASSIFIED ? CONFIDENTIAL ^ SECRET (12.36)
X1
5X1
25X1
25X1
25X1 N%W
^ SECRET
L] CONFIDENTIAL ^ UNCLASSI'FIED
Approved For Release 2005/11/21: CIA-RD
NARRATIVE REPORT
taring trip iat
of NPICfi eaten .
A coot
on 22 April
Q INTERIM ^ FINAL
2JX1
2 X1
The first topic of business s ccancerne d the aepheric :I=* study.
reviewed t A* nos to date. The project at present is at
a stand still. is developing a new leas design program
for a larger computer and will not be able to proceed Until it is
finisl ; since, this program is required to work our a zpherie prc1e ns .
It .gas eeuggeuted that ire went the period of the contract for 9 1-months
(at no additional cost to us) in order to better utilise the time and
fund,& involved.. After considerable thinking on this a jest it was
decided to rooommend this action. The rest of the session involved pba;3e
111 of that contract; i.e., uti.lizie services se a 2X1
consultaant. Be was asked to evaluate the Zoo Tube Magnifier developed
for us under in.d the inatrumeent sad 2 X 1
gave us his tapres ions and reocs iien6ations.
Approved For Release 9nn9i11171 ? (`IA-RInP7RB04770A001500060058-8
^ UNCLASSIFIED N%W,; J CONFIDENTIAL ^ SECRET