CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT ASPHERIC LENS STUDY

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04770A001500060058-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 26, 2005
Sequence Number: 
58
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 28, 1965
Content Type: 
FORM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04770A001500060058-8.pdf100.11 KB
Body: 
25X1 25X1 UNCLASSIFIED ^ SECRET - -j 2005111 1W -ep, ~ CONTRACT NO. TASK NO. CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT I J 2 TO: - 28 April 1965 ENGINEERING SECTION/CB/PD/OL INSPECTION REPORT NO f f . (I inal, so state) ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE NAME OF CONTRACTOR TYPE AuDbaria liens Study THE CONTRACTOR IS ON SCHEDULE THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROBABLY REMAIN WITHIN ALLOCATED ^ ? Y FUNDS ? YES 0 NO IF ANSWER IS "NO" ADVISE REC- REC- Np ES OMMENDATION AND/OR ACTION OF SPONSORING OFFICE ON . REVERSE HEREOF. IF KNOWN. INDICATE MAGNITUDE Of AD- PER CENT OF WORK COMPLETED ? % DITIONAL FUNDS INVOLVED. PER CENT OF FUNDS EXPENDED HAS AN INTERIM REPORT, FINAL REPORT, PROTOTYPE. OR OTHER END ITEM BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE CONTRACTOR DURING THE PERIOD?, ^ YES ? No (If yes, give details on reverse side.) HAS GOVERNMENT-OWNED PROPERTY BEEN DELIVERED TO CONTRACTOR DURING THIS PERIOD? C1 YES NO (If yes, indicate items, quantity, and cost on reverse side.) INCENTIVES IS THIS AN INCENTIVE CONTRACT 0 YES NO NOTE: IF YES, CHECK TYPE USE REVERSE SIDE FOR COMMENTS. COST PERFORMANCE O DELIVERY FINAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INCENTIVE EVALUATION. OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR 1 OUTSTANDING 3. U ABOVE AVERAGE 5. BELOW AVERAGE 7. ^ UNSATISFAC=TORY 2. a EXCELLENT 4. ? AVERAGE 6. ^ BARELY ADEQUATE IF OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR IS UNSATISFACTORY OR BARELY ADEQUATE, INDICATE REASONS ON REVERSE SIDE. RECOMMENDED ACTION O CONTINUE AS PROGRAMMED ^ WITHHOLD PAYMENT PENDING SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE ^ TERMINATE ^ OTHER (Specify) IF TERMINATION IS RECOMMENDED OR IF THIS IS A FINAL REPORT PUT COMMENTS ON REVERSE IN NARRATIVE FORM ON CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND CERTIFY THAT ALL DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. THESE INCLUDE. WHERE APPLICABLE, THE FOLLOWING: _ ITEM RECD DOES NOT ITEM DOE::; NOT APPLY RECD APPLY PROTOTYPES MANUALS DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FINAL REPORT PRODUCTION AND/OR OTHER SPECIAL TOOLING END ITEMS OTHER GOVERNMENT PROPERTY DATE OF LAST CONTACT WITH CONTRACTOR 23 A - ril 1965, Monitoring SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR DIVISION NGA Review Complete PILDE INSPECT SIGNATU Approved For Release 2005/11/21 CI RDP78 04770A001500060058-8 FORM Q7 USE 10-64 I"Q`~? EDITIONS ^ UNCLASSIFIED ? CONFIDENTIAL ^ SECRET (12.36) X1 5X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 N%W ^ SECRET L] CONFIDENTIAL ^ UNCLASSI'FIED Approved For Release 2005/11/21: CIA-RD NARRATIVE REPORT taring trip iat of NPICfi eaten . A coot on 22 April Q INTERIM ^ FINAL 2JX1 2 X1 The first topic of business s ccancerne d the aepheric :I=* study. reviewed t A* nos to date. The project at present is at a stand still. is developing a new leas design program for a larger computer and will not be able to proceed Until it is finisl ; since, this program is required to work our a zpherie prc1e ns . It .gas eeuggeuted that ire went the period of the contract for 9 1-months (at no additional cost to us) in order to better utilise the time and fund,& involved.. After considerable thinking on this a jest it was decided to rooommend this action. The rest of the session involved pba;3e 111 of that contract; i.e., uti.lizie services se a 2X1 consultaant. Be was asked to evaluate the Zoo Tube Magnifier developed for us under in.d the inatrumeent sad 2 X 1 gave us his tapres ions and reocs iien6ations. Approved For Release 9nn9i11171 ? (`IA-RInP7RB04770A001500060058-8 ^ UNCLASSIFIED N%W,; J CONFIDENTIAL ^ SECRET