HIGH PRECISION STEREO COMPARATOR, NPIC PROJECT 11038

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B05171A000100010146-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 9, 2003
Sequence Number: 
146
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 2, 1968
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B05171A000100010146-7.pdf197.11 KB
Body: 
1 X38 Approved For Release 2003UQ Lk -RDP78 0 171A000100010146 ? R4 ? NPIC/TSSG/DED-1382-68 2 October 1968 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: High Precision Stereo Comparator, NPIC Project 11038 1. 1 P__ e nical Director, visited NPIC on 24 and 25 September 1968 anProject Manager for the Comparator, visited NPIC on 25 and 2 September 1968. 2. In the AM of 24 September,II and the technical monitor attended a meeting in TSSG/TSD at which math models for strip photography were discussed? I :J and three members of his branch along with of IEG/PHD were able to provide with a great deal of valuable information for use in his computer programmin of correlation and stage tracking functions of the comparator system. also arranged for to get a briefing and further information on the math model work t Ln lace in the Center. This took place in the PM of 25 September andreports that it was most helpful. 3. In the PM of 24 September, met with of TSSG/TPD. The electrical interfacing of the Model 35 teletype with the On-Line Central Computer was examined and information exchanged. This pro- blem seems to be pretty well resolved. 4. During the last two hours of 24 September, of IEG/PHD provided Skiff with additional information on pan photography. 5. On 25 September, gave I Ia our of the TSSG/TSD clean room. The laminar I ow and tile Kozitron Filter units. were inspected. This is somewhat like the system that will house the Comparator. A short tour was also made of the proposed site for the com- parator on the first floor. Problems of bringing in the granite slabs were discussed. and they do not seem to be too serious. 6, and e technical monitor also had a meeting with I Io ID. I Istated that their Model 35 teletype was wired for an level code an as ed if tlis was acceptable to the central computer. I I stated that they used a 7 level code but this was no serious problem since the 8th level is only a parity bit. inquired about the stereo program for the central computer and stated that it is still not on-line. II stated that part o e program- mi.ngwas completed an that the on- ine o eration will be ready when the comparator is delivered next year. II stated that the answers or distances computed for the stereo program will not be instantaneous as they are on the mono program. The stereo program will store some of the items in memory and later send back the answer to the computation. Declass Review by NIMA/DOD Approved For Release 2003/12/04: CIA-RDP78BO5171A000100010146- SECRET .;c-udia ttom autom~tie 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 I 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 SE.GRLI Approve or Release 2003/12/04: CIA-RDP78EW171A000100010146-7 SUBJECT: High Precision Stereo Comparator, NPIC Project 11038 Some time was spent discussing how the Central Computer and the small DDP-516 computer will share the input/output capability of the Model 35 e sugg .. ..Jp . I 1 g auainted with the 516 computer assign aprogrammer to the task of etti - ____ L_ prey paring.yyvllyagreed to this proposal but the tec nlca ltor said that he would have to queryl _j Chief of Photogrammetry Division, to see if IEG/PHD, TSSG/TSD, or PSG/AID will do the DDP-516 programming for any future acquisition systems. 7. In the PM of 25 September, 0 and the technical monitor met with to discuss the conceptual design for the site pre- paration and the clean room for the comparator. Copies of drawings on the site re aration, air conditioning, and power requirements had been submitted to e for review prior to this meeting. The plans and performance for the "black box" were studied and= promised to supply copies of the two bids that are due 27 September 1968. Plans call for the black box to be completed within 120 days of contract date. The possibility of sending the "black box" to for checkout with the optical system was discussed. Several modifications were made to the power requirements to insure that overloads would not occur during certain critical operations. Several changes were also made to the air flow around the operator to insure that a dead space did not occur that would allow dirt to build up. The rate of flow of air from certain lines was modified to insure adequate cooling of critical items. The machine room was thoroughly reviewed and plans made to allow room for the vacuum pumps and other ancillary equipment. Ore sted that the height of the room be increased from 8 ft. to 9 or 10 ft. said this would greatly increase the cost of operating the room an d ue sal he would attempt to increase the height to a minimum of 8 ft. 6 inches. To provide overhead room for removing the covers of the optical bridge for maintenance on the optics, provisions will be made for an eight foot section of the ceiling to fold back on hinged panels over the bridge of the compara- tor. 0 stated that he was concerned about getting the 85 inch high electronic cabinets through the security vault doors used in stated that 96" high vault doors would be installe e weep hat would allow free movement of the cabinets into the site. Indications are that the close coordination with Logistics and r have paid of. It looks as though the site and clean room will provide zoi all the requirements of the Comparator. 0 asked when actual construc- tion would begin on the site. stated that Logistics was still awaiting NPIC authorization to usel on an Architectural and Engineering Contract to design the site and clean room. 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/12/04: CIA-RDP78BO5171A000100010146-7 SECRET SECRET Approved For Release 2003/12/04: CIA-RDP78BO5171A000100010146-7 0-1 111W SUBJECT: High Precision Stereo Comparator, NPIC.Project 11038 8. spent most of 26 September in IEG/PHD. 25X1 I Ishowed him how some of the mensuration instruments were operated an allowed him to work on some of the instruments that were not busy with production items. 0 also spent time observing operators performing mensuration operations on actual production jobs on several different instruments. Some time was spent discussing just how and why operators perform certain functions in specific orders. The concensus of opinion, with which the technical monitor agrees, is that it might be a good idea forlI to spend some time in November working in IEG/PHD. Teach him the usual measur- ing procedures and allow him to perform measuring tasks on actual jobs that have been run by IEG/PHD. While he is quite com etent to check the quality of the optical system being fabricated b e should have a working knowledge of its intended use so as to determine if it is operatin ro erl . Since he will be checking out these operations as a sole judge at he shou e t.raine to.-opera e stereo-instruments-so that he can evaluate from an operational standpoint. If approval is granted by both and NPIC management, t_he week of 18 November 1968 might be a good time or to work in IEG/PHG. 9. Arrangements have been madn for to visit on 9 October 1968 and for and the technical monitor to visit on 9 and October 1966. 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 TSSG/DED/R4DB-11 Distribution: Orig - Rt & File 2 - DED Chronos Approved For Release 2003/12/04: CIA-RDP78BO5171A000100010146-7 SECRET