HPSC PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN SUBMITTED BY(Sanitized)DATED 15 JUNE 1970

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B05171A000100010162-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 9, 2003
Sequence Number: 
162
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 15, 1970
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B05171A000100010162-9.pdf105.3 KB
Body: 
Approved F?pr Release 200 I ffm 1 -RDP78B0S1A000100010162-9 t r_ 1 TSG/ESD-L+0/70 15 July 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Research & Engineering Division, TSG SUBJECT : HPSC Preliminary Acceptance Test Plan Submitted by REFERENCES (a) TSSG/ESD Memorandum, dtd 23 June 70 (b) TSSG/RED/SDB-026-70 Memorandum dtd 9 July 70 1. We want to reiterate that the "Acceptance Test" document dated 15 June submitted by is unacce table as fulfillment of the statement of work incorporated in no contract The document appears to be neither a test plan nor a test procedure. To help clarify the situation we consider a test plan to be a document meant primarily to identify what tests, preacceptance, acceptance, etc., will be conducted when, where and by whom. A test plan therefore does not contain the technical detail required to render judgments from quality and engineering stand- points, but at the very least, it should be a road map to the accomplish- ment of the task. It is recommended that Oplace their emphasis and efforts on test procedures, manual and automated, with attention directed to the criticisms already presented in reference (a). 2. Regarding test instruments and procedures ESD has a rather com- prehensive inventory of standard equipment. We believe0 to be similarly equipped and see no reason to discuss standard equipment and methods at the risk of further delay in test procedure formulation. It should be noted that if any specialized test equipment has been developed by 0 or their subcontractors in the course of contract such equipment needs identification at the earliest possible time for delivery with the Comparator for use during the test and evaluation project. The need for specialized equipment, if any, should be made clear in the next test procedure forwarded for our review. 3. We feel that the contractor's engineering designers and quality control and assurance personnel are best equipped at this time to write the detailed test procedure because of their intimate knowledge of the comparator design. It is recommended that the "Acceptance Test" docu- ment be returned for revision without waiting for any further ESD input. L GROUP t Declass Review by SECRET Excluded from auromatlc downgrading aad NI MA/DO D declassificatlaf Approved For Release 2003/12/04: CIA-RDP78B 10162-9 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved FQ,Release 2003/~?(q~~CIA-RDP78B05 A000100010162-9 SUBJECT: HPSC Preliminary Acceptance Test Plan Submitted by 0 4+. In order that we continue to be fully informed in all matters involving the test and evaluation of the HPS it is requested that a copy of the IEG/PHD review mentioned in reference (b) be forwarded to this Division. 25X1 Chief Engineering Support Division, TSG Distribution: Original - Addressee 1 - Ch/ESD/TEB 1 - TSG/ESD 1 - :Project File Approved For Release 2003SE1GR#i-RDP78BO5171A000100010162-9 Approved For Release 2009AMP 5171 nnn01 nnnl 0162 9 App ro PQ~ a ea FROM CC DATE TO I NITIALS DATE REMARKS DIRECTOR DEP/DIRECTOR EXEC/DIRECTOR SPECIAL ASST ASST TO DIR HISTORIAN CH/PP BS DEP CH/PPBS I'O/P P BS CH/IEG DEP CH/IEG EO/IEG CH/PSG DEP CH/PSG EO/PSG CH/TSSG C e ~~Y DEP CH/TSSG EO/TSSG CH/SSD/TSSG ~ PERSONNEL LOGISTICS 4t TRAINING RECORDS MGT SECURITY FINANCE DIR/IAS/DDI CH/DIAXX-4 CH/DIAAP-9 e 2 0 3/12/ 0 : CIA - DP78B05171A000100010162-9 25X1