NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

SPHERICAL CURTAIN ANTENNA ARRAY FACILITIES PODOLSK AND ODESSA, USSR

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78T04759A001200010074-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
10
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 10, 2011
Sequence Number: 
74
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 1, 1965
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78T04759A001200010074-3.pdf1.37 MB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 I UI' St(-Kt I 25X1 Copy .A_O6 ::1 8 Pages June W6 HOTOGRAPHI (INTERPRETATION REPO T SPHERICAL CURTAIN ANTENNA ARRAY FACILITIES PO DO LSK AND O D ESSA, USSR /////_ Sanitized_Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10 :_CIA= RD P78TO4759A001200010074.3 TOP SECRET r. arc ... u,_... ci..c Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 SPHERICAL CURTAIN ANTENNA ARRAY FACILITIES PODOLSK AND ODESSA, USSR has revealed a new antenna installation at o o s , approximately 24 nauti- cal miles (nm) south-southwest of Moscow (Figure 1). Subsequent analysis has shown that the antenna array at this facility has a configura- tion similar to but smaller than the spherical curtain antenna arrays previously reported at Taldom and Nikolayev. 1/ On photography of an additional in- FIN1 ANO t l j BALTIC LENINGRAD 'SEA'-r ~.-+, `` 11? L L V O V VO RONEZZ stallation-- situated near Odessa and in the early stages of construction--was noted to hear n strong resemblance to the one at Podo i sk This report presents a detailed photographic analysis of the facility at Fodolsk and a morc concise description of the facility under con struction near Odessa; it then very briefly sure marizes, for the convenience of the reader, th,, previously published comprehensive analysis or the Taldom-Nikolayev arrays; 1/ it concludes with a comparison of the antenna arrays them selves. Associated Krug Sites A Krug high frequency direction- tin(lin-4 (HF DF) site, just to the north of the FodolsK facility (Figure 2), was noted during the origina 1 scan but was not at first thought to be of any par ticular significance. However, when it was sub sequently observed that the Odessa facility also had a Krug site situated in its immediately vicini ty (Figure 4), and that in both instances the new facilities apparently shared a common suppoi t area with the Krug site, then these collocations assumed additional importance and the new fa cilities are now considered to be associated with the Krug sites. 25X1 25X1 The HF spherical curtain antenna array facility at Podolsk (55-22-20N 37 -27-50E) is surrounded by a low, pentagon-shaped wail measuring 780 feet on each side and apparently constructed in a dike shape (Figures 2 and 3 . Podolsk Krug DF Site Klimovsk i(: K'I~fiO 16 /fi51 FIGURE 1. LOCATION OF ANTENNA FACILITIES. is 5, 875 feet north, and a pro a e suppoi t 25X1 are s approximately 5,000 feet northeast; indi cations are that the probable support area serves )OD TOP SECRET RUFF Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78T04759A001200010074-3 PODOLSK KRUG DF SITE KLIMOVSK TOP SECRET RUFF Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 both installations. Inside the walled area of the facility are 3 probably self-supporting lattice-type towers (Figure 3, items A, B, and C), each 130 feet high, with 14 thin masts, also 130 feet high, uniformly spaced 65 feet apart in 2 slight arcs between the lattice-type towers. The small scale of the pho- tography precludes positive evidence of tower or mast guying, or of the design of any complex PROBABLE CONCRETE PAD 90' X 70' 25X1 25X1 2-rail track Road Trail Wall ^ Probably self-supporting lattice-type tower (130' high) ? Probable footing for lattice-type tower Probable feed tower Mast (130' high) 500 0 1000 FEET (APPROXIMATE) rigging between the towers and masts. There is also a probable footing for another tower (item D), but no sign of any masts between there and Tower C. Probable self-supporting feed towers (items E and F) are positioned opposite each arc on a 2 - rail track laid out parallel to lines drawn between the 3 towers, A to B and B to C. The calculated ratio of (1) the distance from the probable feed UNDJSCERNIBLE ~.;`#2 TOP SECRET RUFF Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 1 ..I V L' .\V I .., V. . tower to the center arc- mast and (2) the assumed radius of a circle formed by the arc of masts, is 46:100, or 46 percent. The orientation of the array between lowers A and B is of that between 'l'owers placed between C and D, its orientation would be Immediately west of a line between Towers B and C is a probable concrete pad measuring 90 by 70 feet. A probable control building (item 1), 120 by 35 feet, is in the approximate center of the walled area; the shadow cast by this building indicates that the eastern portion of the building is higher than the rest. Approximately 2,350 feet east-northeast of Building 1 is a T- shaped building (item 2) which is possibly another control building for the antenna system. The main section of this second building measures 145 by 45 feet, but mensuration could not be accomplished on the wing because of poor build- ing-corner definition. A probable conduit paral- lels the road into the facility but its exact origin or terminus cannot be definitely estab- lished from available photography. Also, on each side of the approach road approximately 1,330 feet northeast of Building 1 there is an earth mound supporting an unidentified object. The probable HF spherical curtain antenna array facility near Odessa (Figure 4) is situ- ated at 46-26-30N 30-30-OOE, approximately 2,400 feet north of Odessa Krug DF Site No 1 and abou! 8 nm west of Odessa. The facility is in the early stages of construction, with no towers, masts, or antennas yet visible. However, although no absolute statements concerning intended con- figuration can be made, all available data and appearances strongly suggest i hat, when com- pleted, this facility will be similar to the one at Podolsk. Presently possible mensuration is shown in Figure 4, together with likely future antenna orientations. l'his facility also has a probable central control building similar to that at Podolsk both in dimensions and con- figuration (i.e., in having a raised section at I end of the roof). Approximately 1,500 feet to the northeast is a support area and HF com- munications site, which probably serves both the Krug site and the antenna facility. TALDOM-NIKOLAYEY FACILITIES Six antennas of an unusual configuration (spherical curtain array) were noted some while ago at broadcast/communications facil- ities near Taldom and Nikolayev (Figure 1). These antennas, of which the larger and more complex Taldom facility has 4 and the smaller Nikolayev facility only 2, consist basically of either 9 or 13 guyed towers arranged ina slight are that faces a self-supporting feed tower which is either fixed or mounted on a low gantry-like structure on a 2-rail track laid out parallel to a line drawn between the end towers of the arc (the longest chord). "These general characteristics are shown in the upper portion of Figure 5 (which is re-run intact from the earlier report, NPIC/R-901, 1/ and happens to illustrate a 13-tower array, of which there are 2 as compared to 4 - - 3 at Taldom and I at Nikolayev -- having 9 towers). COMPARISON OF ANTENNA ARRAYS As shown graphically in Figure 5, the "Taldom-Nikolayev arrays (top) and the Podolsk arrays (bottom) have a striking resemblance (the Odessa facility is not yet far enough ad- vanced in its construction to be considered further). More specifically, it can be pointed 25X1 25X1 T(')P :SF(-RFT RUFF Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 1 I VI Vt_t.I L. I I I I out that the Podolsk arrays contain exactly of this arc is naturally smaller at Podolsk, the same number of towers/masts as 4 of nevertheless the calculated ratio of the radius the 6 Taldom-Nikolayev arrays, and that in and of the feed tower to center arc tower/mast all cases, the towers/masts ar:, laid out In distance remains approximately 46 units to 100 a slight arc. Although the assumed radius units in all cases. FIGURE 5. PERSPECTIVE VIEWS OF SPHERICAL CURTAIN ANTENNA ARRAYS. (NOTE: both drawings are not at same scale.) TC)P S;FC'RFT RUFF 25X1 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 As has been mentioned, the Taldom- Nikolayev antennas are larger in actual measurements. But, as shown in Table 1, the Podolsk arrays equate almost exactly to one third of several significant Taldom- Nikolayev dimensions, namely the separation distance between individual towers/masts in the arc, the height of these towers/masts, and the longest-chord distance between end towers. The most noticeable difference found in a detailed photographic observation of these arrays was that the end towers at Podolsk appear considerably larger in cross section than those at Taldom-Nikolayev. A possible explanation for this may be that less extensive guying is used on the smaller Podolsk arrays than is required for the larger Taldom-Nikolayev arrays. In regard to frequency, it is believed that the antenna arrays at Taldom-Nikolayev are designed to operate in the HF range, a con- clusion suggested by their overall appearance and arrangement, and by the apparent large size of both illumination (feed source) and antenna aperture. 1/ Even though the Podolsk facility is smaller, it would still appear likely that it also operates within the HF band, though possibly with a somewhat higher range than the Taldom-Nikolayev arrays. ONE- THIRD AVERAGE Antenna Location Taldom (1)** 9 Taldom (3)** 9 Taldom (4)** 9 Nikolayev (5)** 9 Taldom - Nikolayev Longest Chord* (ft) 330 1,475 395 1,470 330 1,185 320 1,-135 Podolsk (A-B) 9 65 130 480 Podolsk (B-C) 9 65 130 480 *Straight-line distance between end towers. **Refers to numbering used in previous report. I. TOP SECRET RUFF 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 1 V I ~ v rl\ V I 1\ V I 1 DIA. ITS Air Target Chart, Series 200, Sheet 0167-5HL, 2d ed, Apr 33, scale 1:200,00 (SECRET) Odesaa SAC. US Air Target Chart, Series 2Ou. Sheet 0250-8HL, 3d ed, Sep 62, scale 1:200,000 (SECRET) 1. NPIC. R-901/64, Unusually Conj;riured Antennacr at Facilities Near Ta%i/or2 and Nikolaye z', Oct 64 (TOP SECRET RUFF) TOP SECRET RUFF Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78TO4759AO01200010074-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78T04759A001200010074-3 ^ w^ vrv%a_ I TOP SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/10: CIA-RDP78T04759A001200010074-3