(C) CHINESE COMMUNIST MILITARY LOGISTICS AND CAPABILITIES TAB A- CAPABILITIES ON THE SINO-INDIAN/NEPALESE FRONTIER

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78T05439A000400210031-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
75
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 12, 2003
Sequence Number: 
31
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 4, 1964
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78T05439A000400210031-4.pdf3.77 MB
Body: 
ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78T05439A000400210031-4 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78T05439A000400210031-4 ???? ToppsECRETelease 2003/12n9 ? cIA-Pnthalaus.119A000100210031 4 SAO/PC 465/2-1-64 PANELED NOV 4 1964 /z/96 ,DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Special Activity Office? Reference Facility Rm 1D918, Pentagon ? (C) CH1NE,SE COMMUNIST - MILITARY LOGISTICS AND CAPABILITIES TAB _A- CAPABILITIES ON THE SINO-INDIAN/NEPALESE FRONTIER DIA, JCS reviews completed 7? Itir SUM ed For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RD P78T05439A000400210031-4 , CHICOM MILITARY LOGISTICS AND CAPABILITIES TAB "A" SOUTHWEST THEATER S I NO - INDIAN - NE .PALESE FRONTIER f OP SECRET TOP SEC S. oved For Release 2003/12/1 'Statement of .the Problem ? TAB A - P78T05439A000400210031-4 II . Summary of Study and Conclusions Facts Bearing on the Problem A, 4 IV Assumptions A-5 Capability to Supply Tibet ,from Railheads in China A-6 V VI Supply Support from Tibet of CCA Attack on India and Nepal A-_11 VIII Capability of the Chinese to Attack India and Nepal Over the Himalayas; Location and Timing of Attacks IX Interdiction Targets X Intelligence Cups GAZETTEER - List of place names and locations* Appendix A Interdiction Targets List Appendix B Average Tonnages Delivered by MSRrs Appendix C Terrain and Climate Limitations to Logistic and Air Operations on the Sino-Indian Nepalese Frontiers A-20 A-33 A-37 A-39 AA-1 AA-3 AA-4 t Appendix p Estimated Daily Supply Requirements for ? "Unit in Tibet.and S. W. .China AA-13 Appendix E Twelve Month Stockpile Capabilities at MSR- Terminus Depots at "Maxirrium" and_TrProbable" Scales of Attack AA-14 Appendix F Estimated Net Seasonal Capacities of Supply Routes from NiLSR Terminus Depots to Frontier Crossing Points AA-15 Appendix G Estimated Net Seasonal Capacities of Attack Routes South of the Sino-Indian/Nepal Frontiers AA-17 ANNEXES - Data used as a basis to calculations: Annex IA Annex. IB Annex IC Annex ID Annex 11A Annex 11B Personnel and Material, Infantry Division (Standard). CCA Personnel and Materiel, Infantry DivisiOn (Light), -CCA Personnel and Materiel, Infantry Regiment (Standard and -Light), CCA Personnel and Equipment, BD/MIS Division: PLA Average- Daily Resupply Requirements for Selected CCA Units Daily Ammunition Requirements of Selected CCA Units :Gazetteer in this study is a draft which will be replaced by a vex-i cod TOP SECRET in final: repr)rt. - TOP Sagd For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78T05439A000400210021M3 A I. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM To determine the maximum forte which the Chinese Communists can logistically support in a sustained attack on India through the Himalayas and the most favorable areas and timing for such. an attack. II: SUMMARY OF STUDY AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Ground, Capabilitie s Assuming a one-year stockpiling program prior to the attack . and no interdiction Qf supply lines, the Chinese Communists could deploy and support for one or two months a maximum of nine Infantry divisions arc 1 t-sy, le: :;eparate regiments, totalling about 153, 000 men, for attacks / against India and Nepal. The best weather for a probable main attack in .the Northeast Frontier Agency (NEFA) area exists in October and November. Limited objectives would likely be attained, but the logistic-support require- . merits on supply routes supporting a main attack through NEFA are assessed ip7tr's--.soun lo sustain operations at this maximum level to the initial objectives. (Section VIII and Appendix C). b. We expect Chinese attacks would be directed to those border areas ? claimed by Communist China, rather than in areas not in dispute, such as - the Churnbi Valley, where prepared Indian defenses-also exist. Further,' we believe it unlikely that China would attack India and Nepal simultaneously. We therefor'believe that a more realistic assessment of the force the Chinese could employ and sustain to their initial objectives would be three light in1antry4 divisions and fifteen separate reniments;! tioi:oThaig approximately 72, 000 men, on the whole Sino-InCian frontier. The main attacks would probably be towards the .Gauhati/Tezpur area of Assam through the NEFA and in Ladakh towards Leh, with only a diversionary move in the ChUmhi Valley. Further ac_IN:rances v.-o r c_ e additional improvements of the routes, through the Himalayas. (Section VIII). Z. Air Capabilities The Chinese are hampered by having only three airfields close to the ci locations. See Gazetteer, Page A39, and Map 2 for place names TOP SECRET TOP SEC oved For Release 2003/12/19 : CI -RDP78T05439A00040021003aB A frontier which can a.ccorrirnocate jet aif craft, and one of these (NagclahL. Dzong) is temporarily unserviceable. The Chinese could deploy a maximum of 175 tactical aircraft to forward airfields in the Tibetan area, although tactical aircraft have not been detected to .date in this area. This fce could consist of 90 jet fighters, 25 jet light bombers, and 60 propeller _light bombers. operating beyond the range of fighter cover, the Chinese could employ their 15 TU-4 bombers against Calcutta, New Delhi, and possibly Bombay. Considering their limited facilities, and in order to avoid retaliatory attacks, the Chicoms might elect to limit their use of aircraft in such an operation to that of air defense. In such event, only fighter aircraft would be deployed. (Section VII). 3. Military Situation (Jan 1964) a. Ground Order of Battle The Chinese Communist Army forces now in the Sino-India border area consist of five divisions, eleven seParate combat regiments, ? - a'separa.te artillery regiment, six border defense regiments, and adrninis- . trative and support troops, totalling about 114, 000 men. A maximum offensive would require the redeployment of additional divisions from ? elsewhere in China, which the Chinese 'Communist Army could accomplish without jeopardizing its overall military posture. (Section VI). b. ,Logistic Situation (1) The remoteness of Tibet makes logistic support difficult. ? From rail transhipment points at Ch'eng-tu, Hsi-ning, La.n-chou, Hung- . liu-yuan, and Urumchi-Turfan, supplies, must be trucked more than a thousand miles over difficult rytairt uppl =tit:es (MSRs) to depots and units on the Sino-Indian and Sino-Nepalese frontiers. This creates asevere demand on vehicles, fuel, and the supply organization. (2) Used to capacity, the four MSRs could deliver a maximum of 1:840 short tons per day, requiring some 12, 900 trucks. Available evidence indicates that -the People's Liberation Army las from 3, 000 to 4, 004 trucks in Tibet supplying the four MSRs and delivering between 700 TOP SECRET A"-2 TOP SECRET roved For Release 2003/12/19: CIA-RDP78T05439A000400216tV4 and 800 short tons per day for a garrison requiring approximately 570 short tons per day. Any excess tonnage capacities above garrison requirements is probably being allocated to the expansion of facilities in the 'Tibet area rather than stockpiling. Considerable improvement of lines of 'communication, barracks and stOrage areas, and vehicle workshops has been noted since 1960. (3) We have found no indications that the Chinese are having undue difficulties ivrith the logistic.support of this area. The facilities identified, though not elaborate, are assessed aS adequate for the 114, 000 troops we estimate now in the area. The proximity of four petroleum refining and stora*e areas close to the railheads supplying the .MSRs assures adequate POL, supplies. 4.. Vulnerability to interdiction a. Transportation Chinese transportation ties with Tibet are very vulnerable to long long range interdiction. The simultaneous destruction of key rail ,and road bridges and rail classification yards would cut supply to Tibet for not less than a month. The destruction of facilities at selected rail- .- to-Opad transhipment points would furthe'r handicap the supply effort. b. Logistic base Because of the almost total dependence of units in the Tibet area on supply by road, serious damage tiE; the oil refineri-es at Lan-chou, Yu-men, Leng-hii, and Tu-shan-tzu would very severely affect any military operation launched by China through the Himalayas. Further, such damage would result in serious and long-term disOrganization of the country's industrial base. Close to the Sino-Indian frontier, the only I critac.alhort-range logistical support installation so far identified is the Central Transportation Headquarters and vehicle workshops in Lhasa. (Section IX). 5. Intelligence gaps The reliability of the intelligence used in this sturiv VA ries from OCCI TOP SECRET A-3 d For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA- MP SEGO to poor. RDP78T05439A000400210031-4 TAB A Road, railroad, and airfield intelligence is considered good. Intelligence derived from collateral and communications intelligence sources in this area is generally poor. Continued exploitation and analysis of the latest photography, which was not completed in time for this study, will improve the reliability .and scope of inte?ligence on logistic facilities used in the preparation of this paper. ? III. FACTS BEARING ON THE PROBLEM 1. There are limited access routes into India and Nepal. Therefore attacks in the following area-s are considered: ?? a. Western Area (1) Ladakh (2) Through the passes south of Ladakh and northwest of Nepal b. Central Area Through the five 'principal passes into Nepal Eastern Area ,(1) Through- the Chumbi Valley towards Siliguri (2) Through western Bhutan to Paro Dzong Through eastern Bhutan to Lhuntsi Dzong Through western North East Frontier Agency (NEFA) to Tezpur Through central and eastern NEFA to the Brahmapt:tra Valley 2. The capability described in this study is based on the ability of the Chinese Communists to Iogistical4yLw,tplacrrt:2attacks,:throcaugh:the Iithaa.L4y_as iitc India and the border states. 3. "Optimum" and_"minimum" road capacities adjusted-for climatic conditions as well as all available intelligence on the availability of supplies ? and transportation have been used to determine logistic capability. 4. Tonnages are expressed in short tons. 25X1 C "Optimum" road capacities are those calculated from the agreed u road methodology for normal usage in fair weather over a long period. "Minimum" road capacities are calculat,_-_-6 :ram the methodology using figures for wet base and sub-bas-e. -25 A-4 TOP SECRET TOP SECR4proved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78T05439A000400210031-4 ' TAB "A"- IV.As6leTioNs ? Although not necessarily 'launched simultaneously, major attacks .on India and Neoa continue concurrently in all areas of possible attack. ? The supply trement for- such areas will therefore be simultaneous once all attacks ha, e, begun 'The Chinese Communist Army (CCA) can train, equip and acclimatize sufficieptlfores to provide the maximum number of troops that could be logisticall4 supplied in all areas of attack. In order to meet maximum troop, requirements for attack, aagmentation of CCA forces no'- % in Tibet willl take place so that reinforcements have at least one month to a-_:cimatize to Tibetan altitudes before being committed' to the attack During The period of reinforcement normal-supply t0 Tibet will be interrupted and troops in the region will be supplied from stockpiles. Without disrupting essential civilian air schedules, the Chinese will-use ta-:tica: air-supply and airborne forces The Chinese wirl] beg'in a stockpiling program one year before under- taking a major attack on-India and the border states. The amount of supply required for formations and units-engaged in attacks-on India will be based on "light combat rates * except for forces operating, t,hrouah the Chumbd Valley5 ithich.will be at "average combat rates".." Reserve forces in the forward staying areas will total in number about a (fttarterof those engaged in combat The Chinese Communists are prepared to violate the neutrality of- Sikkim and. Bhutan lc, ? The .light infantry-division and the independent infantry regiment will loe the standard units to be employed.. Organizations and tonnagrequire'-- ments are gi,:en at Annexes T and II. "Light Combat rates" Based upon average ammunition expenditure over a . period of one year in a combat zone. (See Annex-TM) . "Average Combat rates" ? p- sed upon ammunition consumption for minor skirmishes between small units over a period of one year.- (See Annex, IIB) TOP SECRET IOP SECRETPIpproved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78T05439A000400210031-4 CAPABILITY TO SUPPLY TIBgT FROM RAILHEADS IN CHINA Railroads ? There areno railroads in the Tibet area Railheads ? The main railheads for the supply of forces? in Tibet are Lan-chou Hsi-fling (Th'engtu Hung-liu-yuan and Urumchi/Turfan 'From those points, ? suppies must be mo,:?ed by truck over great distances; for example Lan-chou L'Ilmchi and Ch'engtu are about CC, 900, and airkine miles respectively TAB "A" . "rem Lhasa, Lan-hoJ-UrUMchi Both Lan-hound Urumchi'are on the standard-gauge Lung-hal line ,which extends to ? the east a-:ross mainland China. from the north a brai7h line from which also joins the Urumchi line at - , This line JS jointe'd at Lanchou by a standard-gauge line Ian choli-Hsi-ning Line - The short standard-gauge line extending from Lan-chouwest to Hai-yen . generally .follows the Huang Shill River valley. Ihe present terminals on the line are:Ho-K'onan and Hsi-ning. ? Ch'enotu ? Ch'engtu is served- by a standard-gaugeiline which branches from the Lung-hai line at Pao-chi to the 'southeast of Lanchou:- There is no railhead to the v.:est from Ch'ellgtu. 5 Status al.' RaitToads- - The condition and efficiency of railways in West China-are not accurately known,. Communist China has made significant imp_rovement during the past decade in railroad plan/ and operation, but operations ate hampered.by: (1) poorly engineered roadbeds, light or overage tack construction _(?) low-qu;41ity initia, installation and inadequate maintenance of the right of way deterioration of all plant through overloading, (5) insufficient length and the too great distance between passing tracks, (6) insufficient doubly-tracking and TOP SEC 101) SEC RET1 Approved For Release 2003/1 /19 : CIA-RDP78T05439A000400210031-4 TAB "A" (7) .inadequate.motive power and rolling stock inventories. All the effects of the foregoing shortcomings are.felt.On the lines included in this study Gradual elimination of these deficiencies may be expected if the economy continues to recover. Tonnage Capabilities . ; The railroads serving Lanchou- Hsi-ning. Hung-liu-yuan Ch'emgtu, and Urumchi/Turfan can delil'er tonnages to railheads in excess Of the tonnages, which the. SR' no Tibet can carry ? Road Transportation - a ? There art. :c.)u- main supply routes (M5Rs) into :Tibet from China _ roper *.11"e are ol?er 000 miles long' The MSRs originate at the rail- heads mentioried above. From west to east the MSRs are: the Urumchi-Kashgar-Aksai Chin road, which extends from Kashgar, in neighboring Sinkiang. to Tashigong in western Tibet (2) the central MSR which extends from Hsi-ning and Hung-liu-yuan to Lhasa; the northeastern MSR, goes from Hsi-ning to Choma Wong The eastern MSR from Ch'engtu in Szectiwan to the. area of Tibet north of India's Northeast Frontier Agency (NEFA), b The central MSR receives 'traffic from two initial-points which cOnve,rge at Golmo,(Ka-erh-mu) The central MSR is the best and highest- capacity route into Tibet ? It is also the easiest to keep in operation.- The eastern MSR has been extremely difficult to maintain because of. the cross- compartmented nature of the terrainand the many rivers which it crosses.- 6-1 Nature and Condition o( Road -Net a Tibet has'a rudimentary and low-capacity 'road network.- There are no significant inland waterways in Tibet ,-The Tsangpot(Brahmaputra) River is navigable to small Craft for short sections: but is ofmore importance as an obstacle notih-south transportation. The Tsangpo is not navigable through the Northeast Frontier Agency into India, ? ? b ? The basic weakness of Tibet's road network is its lack of development. In many of the areas'. roads have been built merely by removing' rock and large stones from the natural .surface followed by improvement A-7 TOP SECRET TOP SECRET, roved For Release 2003/12/19 : C A-RDP78T05439A000400210031-4 TAB P'A"- c Because of poorly constructed subgrades inadequate surfacing and poar drainage facilities. roads deteriorate constantly and require continuous repair. A major weakness of the regiOn's road system is the absence or poor . construction of bridges Although bridging in-the desert basins is not of year-round importance. spring runoff or summer flash floods often makeford sites unusable for short periods. High level cable suspension bridges which cross the deep ravines of the Yang-tze Mekong'and Salween rivers are vulnerable to attack ? Almost without excePtion bridges, in Tibet are on ,lane wide with estimated gross load capacities varying from to 12 short tops. '9 ? Specific Routes- The Main Supply,Routes -(MSR) are as follows: a - Fastern MSR: Ch'engtu-Chomo Dzong'brdinarily serving eastern Tibet b Nor heastern MSR! Chomo Dzong. also serving eastern Tibet. Central MSR: .Lanchatt/Hsi-ning/Hung-liu-yu?an-Lhasa via Golmo, ordinarily serving Lhasa and the central setor_ d. Western MSR: .Urumchi/Turfan-Kashgar/Yeh-ch'eng. usually SerVing only the western sector 10 Supply Flov., Northeast,-7D and Eas' 7n MSIls From the base supply depotsai\Ch'engtu and Hsi-ning, supplies are delivered by road to Chomo Dzong depot area serving. the Ch'engtO and Lin-chih Military Sub-. Districts From IChomO Dwong jupplyldepot: supplies are distributed to: (a) The northv,est-garrison area (units employed on internal security in the Ting-ch'ing area -(b) Li-ma (units operating in eastern NA).