Study on Criteria for Promotability List

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79-00317A000100020037-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 22, 1998
Sequence Number: 
37
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79-00317A000100020037-8.pdf46.63 KB
Body: 
SECRET Approved F.p,C'Release')Q3/oNA-RDP79-00A000100020037-8 SUBJECT: Study on Criteria for Promotability List b. Professional Experience GS Points Equivalent per Year Max.. No. Max. of Years. Points Jr. Engineer or Scientist 7 - 1 2 2 9 1 2 2 Jr. Engineer or Scientist 11 1 3 3 Engineer 12 2 3 6 peri~nze $e,N 6e~' 1uP6R 13 2 3 6 Years in Grade 2 3 6 c. Performance Rating (Division Chief) W - 0 Points A - 10 " P - 15 S - 20 0 - 25 " d. General Impression on Panel Members In the competitive evaluation, the first three elements, education and training, professional experience, and supervisor's rating, would all be taken from the individual's personnel folder. The fourth category - general impression on Panel members - would be derived at the scheduled Panel meeting for the appropriate grade. 5. Promotability List At the April, August, and December Panel meetings, the Promotability List for all ORD personnel would be reviewed; it is still recommended that a Division Chief make a promotion recommendation whenever he deems it appropriate. Recommendation and consideration Approved For Release 2006EY S : DtfP79-00317A000100020037-8 SECRET SECRET Approved F@ReleasjffOOIA-RDP79-003, jA000100020037-8 , fif should be a two-month process. The D/ORD's recommendation is strongly endorsed that there be no minimum time in grade criteria for a promotion.- the qualified is thus not held back and the unqualified is no encouraged to raise the point periodically. EY S 0EY Approved For Release 2006/03/T6 : IA- 9-00317A000100020037-8 SEC SUBJECT: Study on Criteria for Promotability List