SPECIAL MEETING Career Service Panel Office of Research and Development 22 February 1972

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP79-00317A000100050020-3
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: November 11, 2016
• Document Release Date: January 15, 1998
• Sequence Number: 20
• Publication Date: February 22, 1972
• Content Type: AG

Approved For Release 199
P79-00317A000100050020-3
Career Service Panel
Office of Research and Development
22 February 1972
Room 607 - Conference Room
1. Delay of competitive evaluation of
GS-12s until 3 April 1972.
2. Review of GS-12s aided by a series
of 1/2 hr briefings by the GS-12.
3. Organize schedule for personnel
folders distribution.
4. Consider a 3-man Sub-Panel Evaluation
Committee.
""~ G~:rograding ahd_
?1!, G^ciaa iua31u1
Approved For Release 1999/09/01: CIA-RDP79-001"OG0100050020-3
 Approved For Release1999/09~CP79-00317An00100050020-3
EYES O 1tY
Ati119a :
he meeting before adjournment)
ft the meeting at 1015 hours)
Secretary
25X1A9a
25X1A9a
25X1A9a
25X1A9a
25X1A9a
called the meeting to order at 0955 hours.
2. The Acting Chairman stated that the AC/AP/ORD had
asked for a delay on the com etitive evaluation of GS-12s
until 3 April 1972. pointed out that if the CSP
were to delay competitive evaluation on GS-12s until April,
this would "slip" the competitive evaluation on GS-13s,
GS-14s, and providing backup information to D/ORD on the
GS-15s.
3. stated he had discussed delaying the GS-12s
competitive evaluation until April with the D/ORD. Mr. Chapman
was not in favor of the delay, and he asked that the CSP
follow the schedule as set up.
4. told the CSP that Mr. Chapman was not in
favor of the 1 2 hour briefings by GS-12s because he felt
the reviewers would be influenced by just the 1/2 hour
observation of the individual as compared to the many hours
of work performed by the employee.
5. informed the Panel that in order to use
the ranking plan designated in memorandum to CSP members
dated 17 February 1972 on Competitive Evaluation-GS-12s,
he was distributing an additional matrix. This matrix
would assist the reviewer in ranking the employee's job
performance by introducing a weighing factor in re the
CAREER SERVICE PANEL
Minutes of the Meeting
22 February 1972
EYES ILY
OrnlFrT eea+R I
Ex a ? tram aUta n fly
Approved For Release 1999/09/01 : CIA-RDP7 -Oi 3 diiAfl0 100050020-3
decla-3flcaaan f
 Approved For Release 199 IA-RDP79-00317A000100050020-3
11 -
5. (Copt' d)
25X1A9a
25X1A9a
25X1A9a
evaluator's knowledge of the individuals, their performance
and capabilities.
6. moved that if the CSP doesn't follow
the proce ures they discussed as a Panel relative to ranking
the GS-12s, the CSP should put off that kind of evaluation
until a later time and continue the present ORD method of
evaluation, seconded the motion.
seconded the motion. Four members voted in favor of the
motion, one member opposed the action and one member
abstained. Motion carried. 25X1A9a
way using the forms supplied by
7. moved to amend the motion made in
Item 5 to rea at t e CSP rev'e t GS- hhe ORD
standard way and use the rankin 4 in tal
8. The CSP then voted on the motion made by
in Item 6 which was as follows:
25X1A9a moved that if the CSP doesn't
follow t e procedures they discussed as a Panel
relative to ranking the GS-12s, the CSP should
put off that kind of evaluation until a later
25X1A9a time and continue the present ORD method of
evaluation. econded the motion.
Four members vo e in avor of the motion; two
members opposed the action. Motion carried.
25X1A9a
9. The requirement date as specified by in
memorandum dated 17 February 1972 - Competitive Evaluation -
GS-12s, paragraph 5 was changed from 28 February 1972 to
2 March 1972.
10. CSP members were asked to delete (Quarterly)
from the Projected Promotion Sheet under the PROJECTED
PROMOTION DATE Column. Promotion actions are reviewed twice
a year.
11. It was the decision of the Panel to review the GS-12s
official file folder in the Support Staff office where
accommodations would be provided rather than circulate to
the reviewers.
2
.p
EYES OP
Approved For Release 1999/09/01: CIA-RDP79-00317A000100050020-3
 Approved For Release 41999/09 9-00317A000100050020-3
[s
12. The Recording Secretary was asked to include on
the agenda for the next CSP meeting the following item:
Consider a 3-man Sub-Panel
25X1A9a Evaluation Committee.
moved that the meeting adjourn.
seconded the motion. Vote unanimous. Motion
25X1A9a
14. Meeting adjourned at 1045 hours.
25X1A9a
Executive Secretary
Career Service Panel/ORD
25X1A9a
Acting Chair; CSP/ORD
EYES
Approved For Release 19 9-00317A000100050020-3