MEETING WITH(Sanitized) RE DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CLAIM FOR OVERPAYMENT

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP79-00498A000100030030-4
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 6, 2000
• Sequence Number: 30
• Publication Date: January 27, 1976
• Content Type: MFR

?,~ - DDfA 1e3istry
STATINTL
STATINTL
STATINTL
STATINTL
STATINTL
STATINTL
Approved For Release 2000/09./1,-1 ~..qFQ RDP79-00498,A000100,Q,3f 030
YY Yd Y~ljLY rL~ r' ~RYY ~ L J ~:a ab~ fj rc~:~ ? uiu VJ WYAY IY$~ ^
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
2rl'JAN1076
Re istry
File
SUBJECT: Meeting With Re Denial of Request for
Waiver of Claim for Overpayment
1. Mr. visited the undersigned on 27 January 1976
to protest the denial of his request for waiver of claim for overpayment
of salary. The undersigned reviewed with Mr. the Report of
Investigation of his case and all supporting memoranda. Mr.
was also acquainted with the three GAO criteria applied in evaluation
of requests for waiver, and advised of the Agency review process which
in his case involved the Director of Finance, the Deputy Director for
Administration and the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence.
2. Mr. stated that he was dissatisfied with the ruling
in his case and asked if there was any appeal channel available to
him. He was referred to the Inspector General and assured that the
IG would have access to our total file on his case. Mr. also
stated that he might seek private legal counsel in this matter and
inquired if pertinent data could be made available to an outside
attorney. He was advised that this was possible provided the documents
were appropriately sterilized. Mr. then asked if the IG was
cleared for the sensitive activity with which he was connected at
the time of overpayment. He was advised that the IG was privy to
all activities of the Agency.
3. It is the opinion of the undersigned that Mr.~ was
seeking reversal of the denial of waiver at the Director of Finance
level and that he cannot present additional evidence to the IG which
would enable him to gain waiver on appeal. This opinion is based on
Mr. - statements that he had offerred to work for no compensation;
that his function was highly sensitive (and therefore the IG might
not have access); that he was the only person trained in his specialty;
that he presumed that the offset of annuity and the 90% of active duty
pay provisions had been waived in his case; that he had been given a
Certificate of Merit for past performance; and that, in view of all
the foregoing, that he had not studied the provisions of his contract.
4. No statement of Mr. was persuasive that the Overpayment
Review Committee recommendation was incorrect or unjust. Based on the
facts at hand, %.is. the judgement of the undersigned that Mr.
could reasonably been expected to know that his hourly rate of pay
was in excess o1 his entitlements.
t. '.8 WF,7 lit
Approved For Release 2000/09/11 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000100030030-4