TRANSFER OF COPIER MANAGEMENT FROM ISAS TO OL/P&PD

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 35
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: May 8, 2002
• Sequence Number: 50
• Publication Date: February 11, 1976
• Content Type: MF

DD{A RR6ist"
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498AOj~00
11 February 197f
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Information Systems and Analysis Staff
SUBJECT Transfer of Copier Management from ISAS to
OL/P&PD
1. On 9 February 1976 the DDA approved the transfer
of the Copier Management Program from ISAS to OL/P&PD as
has been discussed previously by DDA and OL representatives.
2. Mr. Blake stipulated in his approval that while he
had no objection to OL approving requisitions for new copier
equipment in any instance where they felt competent to do so,
ho desires that disapprovals of such requests remain the re-
sponsibility of the O/DDA. It is requested, therefore, that
in any instance where P&PD feels that a request for copier
equipment not be approved, the appropriate paperwork
forwarded to Chief, ISAS with that recommendation.
3. It is requested that OL and ZSAS proceed with the STATINT
determination of an effective date of the transfer of the
function and the one position w; tlz 4 nauChant that is involved,,
cc: Director of Logistics
,Attn: DDA 75-5131 & 75-3786
TATINTL AL/DDA:ydc (11 February 1976)
Distribu
Original - Addressee
1 - D/Log w/o attn.
%Z-- DDA Subject w/atts.
1 - IIGB Chrorx w/o atts.
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 low_
UNCLASSMF*&Dved F
STATI N
T
A roved For Relea e 2002/ 6/05: C -RDP79 00498A000400050050-7
FORM USE PREVIOUS INTERNAL
3-62 610 EDITIONS r_1 SECRET ^ CONFIDENTIAL ^ USE ONLY [:1 UNCLASSIFIED
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
FROM:
EXTENSION
NO
.
Assistant for Information
DATE 14 JAN 1976 STATINTL
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
1.
MR. McMAHON
Attached are the papers I men-
tinned at the 8:15 on Monday deal-
ing with the proposal to transfer
2?
the responsibility of copier man-
agement from ISAS to P&PD. When
-
this subject first came u
I
-
3.
-
p,
strongly endorsed the transfer. I
am not now as convinced as I was
then
I think there is the
ossi-
4.
.
p
bility that the "pros" of freeing
some ISAS professional manpower for
other tasks might be offset b
the
5
y
"con" of a decreased level of atten-
tion being given to the problem.
6.
As illustrated by the chart I
showed you the other day, this
copier problem is bi
business and
7.
g
even though we have suffered set-
backs because of the unusual copy
requirements of 1975
I think
B.
,
we
should still push control most
vigorously. Whether OL is in as
strong a
osition to do this
i
9
p
as
s
0/DDA is very debatable.
-
Should
ou desire
l
C
d I
10?
-
y
,
a
an
would be happy to discuss this
matter with you after you have had
h
t
l
k
"
11.
a c
ance
o
oo
at thes
papers.
STATINTL
12.
A
13.
tt: DDA 75-5131 & 75-3786
14.
15.
2/06/05: CIA-RDP79 849@@0jt50-7
SECRET
 C A
A IM
LAS 1:I
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
TO
NAME AND ADDRESS
DATE
INITIALS
I
AI/DDA
2
3
4
5
6
ACTION
DIRECT REPLY
PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL
DISPATCH
RECOMMENDATION
COMMENT
FILE
RETURN
CONCURRENCE
INFORMATION
SIGNATURE
Remarks :
Hal -
The attached correspondence relates to an ISAS
proposal to transfer the management of Agency
copiers to OL/P&PD, as the logical component to
handle copiers and to free Records Branch assets
for its primary task of records management, and
P&PD's acceptance of the proposed if a GS-6
position and its incumbent are transferred with
the responsibility.
ISAS is willing to accept this condition. The
job now consumes the full time of one GS-13 and
one GS-11 officer and considerable attention of one
GS-15, in addition the the GS-6 clerk. Even with
(over)
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM- NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.
DATE
C/ISAS
11/12/76
FOR"' No. 237 Use previous editions crq : 1104 0 - 335-857 (40)
1-67 J /
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
the loss of the GS-6 we will be ahead of the game.
(The loss of the GS-6 will be accommodated when
we consolidate the ISAS branches.)
I solicit your opinion, and that of the front
office, to this proposal.
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
28OCT1975
MEMORANDUM FOR: Assistant for Information, DD/A
SUBJECT : Transfer of Copier Management from ISAS to OL/PFPD
REFERENCE : Memo dtd 11 Aug 75 to Acting DD/A fr C/ISAS, subject:
Office Copiers
STATINTL 1. I Irecommendation that the management of Agency copiers
be transferred from the Information Systems Analysis Staff (ISAS) to the
Office of Logistics, Printing and Photography Division (P$PD), is accepted
with the following clarifications:
a. At least one position must be transferred to PFPD to
enable a maintenance of activities presently performed jointly
by ISAS and P&PD. A minimum transfer would be the GS-06
position on ISAS to P&PD. The ISAS position is now devoted
full time to the clerical work associated with monitoring
copier use. Preferably, the incumbent of this position would
also be transferred due to her accumulated experience with
this subject.
b. Deputy Director for Administration (DD/A) support may
be required to control copier activities in certain areas of
the Agency.
c. P&PD, with the support of'ISAS, will require component
Records Management Officers (RMO's) to do much of the basic
spadework in analysis and justification. PFPD will provide
technical assistance and the final review and technical judgment.
2. The professional effort necessary to provide administrative
and technical oversight has been split between ISAS and P&PD. Until
recently, ISAS dedicated a full-time GS-12 level position to the pro-
gram. Approximately 50 percent of a GS-12 level P&PD position was also
required. This arrangement resulted in some duplication; e.g., meetings
with vendors, equipment examination, and overlapping liaison with copier
users in the Agency.
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A0004b0$006
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
SUBJECT: Transfer of Copier Management from ISAS to OL/PFPD
3. Much of the effort in ISAS over the past year was expended
in developing the inventory, the systems for centralized collection and
analysis of basic data on copier use and costs, and the necessary
coordination procedures with key personnel such as component RMO's.
This effort has reached a plateau which, although not perfect in exe-
cution, has presumably satisfied management that a necessary degree of
control has been established. Although these activities will require
some nurturing, it is now more a question of maintenance rather than the
concerted initial effort. I, therefore, feel that a reasonable level of
ongoing support can be provided by P$PD without the transfer of a
professional position.
STATINTL 4. Attachment 1 tol memorandum lists a number of
activities that are required for a reasonable copier management program
for the Agency. Items 1 through 3 relate to inventory and costs. These
are essentially clerical tasks, with some professional supervision.
Items 4 and 5 relating to survey, i.e., systems analysis of new requests
and review of ongoing usage, require the most professional manpower. If
PEjPD, with the support of ISAS, can call upon component RMO's to do much
of the basic spadework in analysis and justification, PTPD can provide
final review and technical judgment.
5. Most of the successes in the existing program have been achieved
through customer acceptance of sound technical and economic advice, often
mixed with a fair amount of persuasion. We anticipate times when blatant
disregard for economics or technology will require management support at
the DD/A level to avoid costly mistakes. I am sure that this support
will be forthcoming. The remaining items on the list in Attachment 1 are
either already being accomplished by PFPD or are attainable with a minimal
level of professional support.
6. There are several advantages to PEPD management of this program.
Continuity in customer relations and technical competence can better be
achieved in the line organization. The technical line between copier/
duplication and printing is rapidly blurring. The Xerox 9200, recently
installed in PIPD, is a copier/duplicator and also a major "printing
system." We have office copiers, new printing systems such as the Xerox
9200, duplicating presses, printing presses, COM (Computer Output Micro-
film) and hard copy printing from computer tape (Xerox 1200). Options
are many. The choice of the correct option becomes critical both
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
SUBJECT: Transfer of Copier Management from ISAS to OL/P&PD
economically and in recognition of Agency requirements. Centralized
management and control of these functions, although not absolute
control in recognition of those continuing special and uniquerequ'rIATINTL
ments that do arise, does make sense.
Michael J//Malanick
Director q;r Logistics
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIASRDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 STAT Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 D,D/A,
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
11 August 1975
MEMORANDUM FOR: Acting Deputy Director for Administration
SUBJECT: Office Copiers
1. For more than a year, the Records Administration
Branch, ISAS, with assistance from the Systems Staff, P&PD,
has been developing a program for managing the Agency's
copiers. Now that a .data. kas_e_h.as__been established and
proceduresaeveloped, it is recommended thaw the OTf ce of
Logistics take full control of this effort so that Records
Administration Branch can devote its limited resources to
its primary responsibility for managing the Agency's records
systems and conducting records surveys.
2. A chronology of events relating to the copier
problem and a list of items which, in my opinion, is essen-
tial to a successful program are attached for your info r
tion and consideration. S~IaATINTL
Chief, Information Systems Analysis Staff
Attachments:
1. Activities That are Essential
to a Copier Management Program
2. Report on Office Copiers
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 STAT Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
TAB
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
ACTIVITIES THAT ARE ESSENTIAL TO A COPIER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
1. Maintain an inventory of all copiers in use in the Agency. The
inventory should be listed:
a. By Manufacturer and model,
b. By location,
c. By component, and
d. By rental number.
2. Maintain monthly volumes on each copier. (One method is to
have all meter cards pass through a central point in the Agency prior to
going to the vendors so that the meter readings can be recorded.)
3. Maintain annual cost of copiers and related supplies so that
comparisons can be made with prior years to evaluate the copier management
program.
y/ 4. Survey the requirements for all requested copiers. Establish
the need for and recommend the copier best suited for each application.
V' 5. Continue to review copiers currently in use and recommend
changes where necessary to reduce cost and/or do a more efficient job.
6. Keep current with developments in copier industry and investigate
all new copiers that seem to have applications in the Agency by visiting
vendors' showrooms for demonstrations on testing copiers in house.
7. Prepare comparative cost and utilization charts on the various
copiers that have applicability in the Agency.
8. Maintain liaison with copier sales representatives and inter-
face with these representatives and Agency personnel. Maintain informa-
tion on copiers so that Agency personnel will have a contact point for
copiers without going direct to vendors.
9. Distribute information on copiers and CIA copier use to
Directorate Copier Representatives, Records Management Officers and
other Agency employees as appropriate.
10. Keep Agency employees and all levels of management aware of
the problem and of possible solutions by reporting progress, by putting
posters on bulletin boards, by writing articles for newsletters and
other Agency publications, by writing memos and notices to all Agency
personnel and by speaking at training courses.
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
TAB
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
OFFICE COPIERS
1. According to available records, concern for the uncontrolled
use of copying machines in the Agency was first voiced by the Office of
Planning, Programming and Budgeting (OPPB) in June 1968. OPPB developed
a Copy Machine Study as an adjunct to the Agency-wide Communication
Study Commissioned by the Executive Director, (DDS 68-3159). The study
called attention to the rapid growth of copiers and predicted that
unless some controls were established on the use of copiers, the cost
would exceed one million dollars by 1972. The DD/S response to the
study recognized the problem but concluded that controls over the use of
copying machines must be with the Directorates. He did, however, offer
the assistance of the Records Administration Branch (RAB) and the Office
of Logistics, OL. (DD/S 68-3659)
2. From June 1968 to September of 1972, there was little indication
that the Directorates had asserted any control over copier utilization
and expenditures increased from $500,000 to more than a million dollars
per year as predicted. This spectacular growth in copying volume and
related cost remained the concern of OL/P&PD. However, P&PD had no
regulatory power over the rental or purchase of copiers, but rather, it
has served since 1954 only as a technical advisor on requests for printing
and reproduction equipment. Although RAB's services were offered by the
DDS, the Branch was not assigned any responsibility for copiers until
much later. Coupled with this lack of controls was the introduction of
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
the Xerox model 4000 in August 1971 and the tactics used by the Xerox
salesmen to rent it to Agency components. The Xerox salesmen had lists
of Agency employees' names and phone numbers, locations of current Xerox
equipment and locations of competitive copiers. (Many of the employees
were under cover and some of the locations were classified.) They
contacted each user directly and persuaded many to upgrade their equip-
ment to the new Model 4000.
3. In November 1972, the DDS made the Executive Director-Comptroller
aware of the copier problem and recommended that the CIA Records Manage-
ment Board look into it and develop more efficient procedures for manage-
ment of copying operations. The recommendation also stated that the
management of copying operations is an appropriate function of the
Office of Logistics. The Executive Director-Comptroller approved the
recommendation with enthusiasm. (DDS 72-4205)
4. RAB's involvement with the management of copiers started in
February 1973 when the CIA Records Administration Officer, who was also
Chairman of the CIA Records Management Board, included copiers as part
of the Annual Inventory of Records Volumes and Equipment. Inventories
were prepared from the reports and for the first time since the OPPB
study in 1968 there was a centrally located record of copiers in the
Agency.
5. The next step was to review the use of each copier. Two pro-
grams were undertaken to collect usage information: (1) all Xerox meter
cards were directed to be sent to RAB so meter readings could be recorded
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
prior to mailing the cards to the vendor
and (2) in co
kTINTL
ation with Xerox, a week-long usage survey was conducted of each copier
(DDM&S 73-4172). The meter cards have been collected by RAB since 1973
and monthly volume statistics are available on most rented copiers.
The survey of usage started in November 1973 and was concluded in April
of 1974.
6. The DDM&S was personally concerned about the use of copiers and
asked for a preliminary report on RAB's progress through 31 December
1973. A sampling was made which showed that during the last three
months of CY 73 there was a decline of 11.3% in the total number of
copies reproduced over the previous three months. Also, an analysis was
made of the Xerox paper consumption which showed a decline of 15.3% in
the same time frame. At the direction of the DDM&S, a campaign was
conducted to increase the utilization of the two-side copy feature on
the Xerox Model 4000. In December 1973 posters furnished by Xerox were
put on all 4000's.
7. Cost analyses were made of the various copiers and charts were
prepared comparing the per copy costs of this equipment. Meetings were
held with vendors to discuss possible alternatives to existing copiers.
The cost charts and literature on the various types of copiers were
disseminated to the Agency's Records Management Officers.
8. The use or misuse of copiers drew considerable attention during
the paper shortage crisis and the Energy Conservation Programs. Reducing
copier usage was specifically mentioned in
dated Septemb&TATINTL
3
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 1 -
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
1973 on Conservation Programs, from the standpoint of energy and paper
conservation. The centralization of reproduction machines and the
reduction of copies reproduced were specifically spelled out in corres-
pondence from the DDM&S to the Director of Logistics in February 1974.
(DDM&S 74-0709 & 74-0486)
9. One major reason for the oversell and in many instances over-
kill by Xerox, was the direct hard sell approach to Agency personnel
from the secretarial to the Division Chief level, or for that matter to
anyone who would listen. Other vendors were using the same tactics to a
lesser degree and many Agency employees complained to the Office of
Logistics. These complaints were about IBM and SCM as well as Xerox.
The sales representatives representing these firms had names and phone
numbers of Agency personnel and used every excuse to get into the
offices. The main purpose, of course, was to sell or rent additional or
bigger and better copiers. To overcome this problem, RAB prepared a
memorandum from the DDM&S to the Deputy Directors for Intelligence,
Operations, Science and Technology and DDM&S Office Directors advising
all Agency employees to refer calls from copy machine vendors to RAB and
stating that potential users should not contact vendors direct. This
action improved the situation to some extent, however, Xerox sales
representatives continued their attempt to sell and the IBM representa-
tives who had obtained Agency Badges for other purposes, were using the
free access to sell copiers. The smaller vendors, SCM, Saxon, Savin,
Apeco, 3M, Cannon, and others conformed to the new policy and only
contacted RAB or P&PD. The situation with Xerox improved consider-
ably when the sales representatives to the Agency changed in March
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
1975, and the problem with IBM has eased since the badges were taken
away from their sales representatives in April 1975.
10. In January 1974 the Chief, ISAS worked out an informal agree-
ment with the Chief, P&PD for RAB to review jointly with the Systems
Staff, P&PD all requests for copiers. During the period January-June
1974, RAB received 40 requests, 10 for new applications and 30 for
replacements. Each request was carefully reviewed by RAB and recom-
mendations were made to C/ISAS. During this same period, a review was
made of existing copiers that were obviously not being used or were
being misused. This review resulted in the relocation of seven existing
copiers and the cancellation of contracts for six Xerox copiers. The
six cancelled consisted of one Model 7000, two 2400's, one 3600 III, one
4000 and one 660.
11. A Copy Center was established by RAB, in February 1974, in
Room 2E37, Headquarters Building. The Center was to be used by DDO/FR/
OJCS, CRS, OIG, OL/RECD/HEB, OTR, Regulations Control Branch
and ISAS. It was established as a model to test the Copy Center concept
for use throughout the Agency and to evaluate equipment by RAB. Since a
full report of the Copy Center has already been prepared, it will not be
repeated here. The Center has proven successful and has been useful to
RAB in testing various copiers.
12. In May 1974, members of RAB and the Office of Finance met with
Xerox representatives to discuss testing a two-ply meter card which
would result in a summary billing system for all Xerox copiers rented by
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
the Agency. This new system offered many advantages to the Agency, so
RAB with the concurrence of 0/Finance agreed to test the card for six
months starting in October 1974. The Agency did not receive all of the
benefits expected from the cards and related system during the test
period because Xerox did not make all the changes in the billing system
that were promised. Some benefits were realized. At the end of the
test period in March 1975, we agreed to continue with the two-ply card
because of its potential and because Xerox again promised to fulfill the
original agreement. Three months after the test period there were still
many problems and it was decided that RAB could not continue to devote
manpower to develop a system that appeared to have little chance of
success. Therefore, the C/ISAS asked Xerox to review the status of the
two-ply meter card system. RAB has been notified informally by Xerox
representatives that the new card will be discontinued.
13. RAB's involvement in office copying equipment management was
formalized under DCI Objective A57002 which called for managing the
utilization of copier/duplicator equipment, including rental and sup-
plies, to achieve an overall cost reduction of 8% in FY 1975, measured
in terms of FY 74 dollars. The responsibility for approval and manage-
ment of office copying equipment was formally assigned to the C/ISAS by
issued in August 1974. Since the reduction was to be measured
in terms of 1974 expenditures, RAB had to know the total cost to the
Agency for copiers and related supplies during FY 1974. To establish
this data base, the C/ISAS, in a memorandum to the Director of Logistics,
dated 7 June 1974, requested the 1974 cost figures for copiers and
6
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
supplies and for a quarterly report of these same costs during FY 75.
This information was not readily available in OL so the Director of OL
sent a memorandum (OL4-3204) to each Deputy Director, each DDA Office
Head and the DCI Administrative Officer requesting the needed infor-
mation. The Plans and Program Staff/OL was assigned the responsibility
of pulling this information together into a usable report. There was
such an uproar from several components that the C/ISAS in a memorandum
dated 12 July 1974 withdrew the requirement for the quarterly report
during FY 75. This data will be gathered by other means.
14. Due to the additional copiers found during the usage survey in
late 1973 and early 1974, RAB had reason to believe that the inventories
of copiers furnished in the 1973 annual Records Volume and Equipment
report were not complete. To obtain a complete record of all copiers
in-the Headquarters area, two actions were taken by RAB: (1) Lists
of copiers currently identified were prepared and forwarded to the
component Records Management Officers for verification, and (2) RAB
personnel went to the Rosslyn area, Chamber of Commerce Building,
STATINTL Building and
STATINTL
actual inventory. Additional copiers
were found and added to the inventory.
15. After RAB was reasonably sure that the information was
accurate, it was punched in tab cards. With this information on
tab cards, RAB could easily have copier inventories printed in various
formats. The 1 July 1974 inventory was printed three ways; (1) by
manufacturer, which grouped the copiers by manufacturer and model by
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
serial number; (2) by component, which grouped the copiers by Director-
ate and Office or Staff; and (3) by location, which grouped the copiers
by building and room number. Copies of these inventories were furnished
to Systems Staff/P&PD/OL and to the Records Management Officers.
16. Using Fiscal Year 1975 catalogs and pricing information
obtained from the various copier vendors, three charts were prepared
comparing the costs of the copiers; one chart compared the per copy cost
of various coated-paper and plain-paper copiers used or available for
use in the Agency; one showed the monthly rental costs for plain-paper
copiers at various volume levels; and the other showed the monthly
rental costs for plain-paper copiers with sorters. These charts also
included supply costs, monthly minimums and copier speed.
17. In RAB's continuing effort to get Records Management Officers
involved in the management of copier utilization, copies of the cost
charts and vendor catalogs were given to the RMO's. Meetings were held
with RMO's and the problem with office copiers was explained with
emphasis on the fact that reproducing the copy is only the beginning of
the problem. Each copy that is made is usually read, sorted, stapled,
routed, mailed, analyzed, copied, filed, retired, declassified, and
destroyed or preserved.
18. Several actions were undertaken by RAB to make all Agency
personnel and all levels of Agency management aware of the copier
problem and of the DCI Objective to reduce costs. These actions were:
(1) a memorandum from the DDA to all Deputy Directors and Heads of
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
Independent Offices dated 8 October 1974 (DDA 74-3814) stating the
problem, recommending solutions and asking that a Copier Representative
be named in each Directorate to work with RAB; (2) five posters reflecting
the use and misuse of copiers in the Agency were displayed on bulletin
boards during the period November 1974 through January 1975; (3) articles
were printed in the Records Management Newsletter; (4) a seminar on
copiers was conducted at the Annual Records Management Conference in
October 1974, and (5) students in Records Management Training courses
were briefed on the proper use of copiers.
19. Meetings were held with the newly appointed Directorate Copier
Representatives and the copier problem was discussed and solutions
recommended. Each representative was provided with cost and utilization
information on all copiers in their areas and were asked to review the
usage and recommend changes where warranted. The changes that were
recommended by RAB were coordinated with them and they were asked to
help implement the recommendations. There have been almost no changes
recommended by the Copier Representatives nor have they been much help
in implementing RAB recommendations. Although some Records Management
Officers in the components have initiated actions, for the most part,
they too have been unable to reduce their copier expenditures.
20. The failure to reduce copying cost was not due to a lack of
"Top Level" support. The DCI specifically mentioned the reduction of
copier expenditures in his memorandum to the Deputy Director and Heads
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
of Independent Offices on "fighting inflation" dated 8 November 1974.
And two Deputy Directors, the DDO and the DDA, wrote to their Office
Heads on the same subject and both specifically mentioned reducing
copying cost. Either the word didn't get to the people responsible for
copier management or they do not take the program seriously. Many
Records Officers, Logistic Officers, and Support Officers still request
and insist on copiers without regard to cost and need.
21. As RAB got more and more involved in the billing system and
with the replacement and rearrangement of copiers, it was apparent that
there was still one item of information needed when communicating with
the Office of Finance and Office of Logistics. The needed information
was the rental number of the copier which was added to the punched
cards. A printout in rental number order was added to the January 1975
inventory, and the 0/Finance and 0/Logistics/Procurement Division were
added to the list of components receiving the inventories. Xerox was
also furnished a copy of the inventory dealing with their equipment
since our records were more accurate than theirs. The list doesn't seem
to have helped Xerox because the same incorrect information continues
to be printed on bills and other listings received from them.
22. RAB has tested or sponsored testing of several copiers that
seemed to have potential use in the Agency including the SCM 412 and
6740, the 3M Model VQC, the Saxon Model P-50 and PPC-1, the Savin Model
300, the AB Dick Model 901, the Apeco Model 200, the Xerox Model 4500,
6500 (color copier) and 3100 LDC. The Savin, the SCM 412 and 6740, the
10
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
AB Dick 901, the Apeco Model 200, and the Xerox 4500 were all rejected
because they were too expensive or unreliable or both. The Saxon P-50
is a roll-fed coated-paper copier that has replaced 3M Thermofax copiers
in one component and is used by two others because of the continuous
roll capability. The Saxon PPC-l is a plain paper copier that has
replaced or is used in lieu of the Xerox 3100 and 4000. There are 12
Saxons now used in the Agency. The length of time in use varies from
two months to one year and over. These have saved the Agency approxi-
mately $5,000 over comparable Xerox copiers in FY 75. The 3M VQC is a
reliable coated-paper copier and is used in the RAB Copy Center, CRS and
NPIC. The Xerox Model 6500, color copier, was not cost effective as a
convenience office copier. The one tested has been transferred to the
Graphic and Visual Aids Staff/P&PD/OL and is effectively used as a
graphics tool. The Xerox Model 3100 LDC is a special purpose machine to
copy large documents up to 14 x 17 inches. There are two in use; one in
P&PD for galley proofs and one in Space Maintenance/LSD/OL for large
drawings and floor plans. In addition to the in-house testing of
copiers, RAB personnel attended showroom demonstrations of the Pitney
Bowes plain-paper copier, the Dennison copiers, the 3M color copier, the
3M Model VHR, and the Canon copiers. The Canon and Pitney Bowes copiers
will be tested in-house in FY 76 when they go on GSA Schedule.
23. RAB has implemented and is monitoring an Employee Suggestion
that calls for the retention by key operators of illegible copies made
on Xerox copiers so that credit can be. given by the Xerox Corporation.
These credits are recorded on the machine meter card by the Service
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
Technicians. In the past, credit has only been given for copies run by
the Technician while he is working on the machine. The unsatisfactory
copies made as a result of minor problems not requiring the services of
a technician or those made before he arrives have been destroyed in the
past. RAB discussed the suggestion with Xerox representatives and
arrangements have been made to receive credit for all poor copies
brought to the attention of the Xerox Technicians. To implement the
suggestion and to provide an estimate of savings, RAB sent a memorandum
to each key operator describing the new procedures and will record the
savings for the first two months of the program.
24. RAB personnel have attended shows, demonstrations, seminars,
and discussed copier management with officials in other government
agencies to become as knowledgeable and as experienced as possible in
copier utilization and management. The Records Administration Officer
in charge of the copier program attended a three-day conference given by
the Institute for Graphic Communication and a two-day seminar given by
the General Services Administration. Contact was established with the
personnel in the Administrative System Division, Office of the Adjutant
General, Department of the Army who are responsible for reviewing office
copiers. RAB was put on distribution for copies of their Office Manage-
ment Information Letters and Equipment Information Letters. These
publications evaluate copiers and have been helpful to RAB. Discussions
have been held with members of the National Archives and Records Service
who are responsible for advising federal agencies on the proper use of
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
copiers. We have learned through these discussions that our current
program is excellent. What we are lacking is the authority to enforce
the concepts of the program that have been developed.
25. Several charts were prepared to show machine usage and dis-
tribution in the Agency. Some charts were used for the Bi-monthly
management meetings and others were disseminated to Directorate Copier
Representatives. The representatives wanted still more detail on the
monthly usage of each machine and the total for their respective area.
To satisfy this requirement, RAB added the monthly volumes for each
rented copier to the punched cards and was able to print a listing
that reflected the volume for each rented copier for January, February,
and March 1975. The list also provided the totals for each Directorate
and the Agency. The April, May and June volumes have been added so
these statistics are available for the six month period January-June
1975.
26. RAB has encouraged and promoted the use of P&PD services for
printing long runs and large jobs. Printing jobs that are not big
enough to be run on a press, but are too big to be printed in an office,
can be sent to P&PD in Headquarters Building and reproduced on P&PD
copiers. This will not only save the office manhours required to run
the copiers, but will save the Agency the difference between an average
of $.03 per copy on office copiers and $.006 per copy in P&PD. This
effort had results and the Xerox Model 3100 in P&PD was exchanged for a
Model 36001. The 36001 has made 954,892 copies since it was installed
in August 1974.
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 STAT Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
(OC) was asked to evaluate the proposal because of the high volume
copiers in the Signal Center and the Cable Secretariat. OC rejected the
proposal because of a concern about service after purchase and the fear
that technological advances would make current copiers obsolete.. After
conversations with P&PD, RAB notified Xerox that the Agency would continue
its rental policy. Early this year Xerox representatives again started
talking about selling Xerox copiers to the Agency. RAB recommended that
they prepare a formal proposal to present to Agency top management. On
5 June 1975 the Associate DDA, the Director of Logistics, the Chief,
ISAS and an RAB Staff member went to the Xerox Training Headquarters in
Leesburg, Virginia for a three-hour presentation on purchase versus
rental of Xerox copiers. After considerable study and discussions between
OL, ISAS and O/DDA personnel, the purchase proposal was rejected. The
main reason was the fear of OL that Xerox or another company would come
out with new bigger and/or better copiers that would make the purchased
Xerox copiers obsolete.
29. During FY 1975, RAB reviewed 35 requests for copiers, 24 for
replacements and eleven for new applications. Three of the new appli-
cations were for the FOIA effort and two were to support the Presidential
Commission and Congressional investigation task forces. Recommendations
made by RAB to cancel or modify these 35 requests had a possible annual
cost avoidance of $27,434. Five of these recommendations were accepted
for an actual cost avoidance of $15,782. Since these actions occurred
at various times during FY 75 the actual FY 75 savings is only $4,610.
There are four recommendations still pending.
15
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
30. During FY 1975, RAB reviewed the usage of 56 existing copiers.
Recommendations were made to cancel or replace 48 of these copiers for a
possible annual savings of $83,659. Twenty-three of these recommendations
were accepted for an actual annual savings of $48,732. Since these
actions occurred at different times during the year, the actual FY 1975
savings were only $23,522.
31. Next to establishing a data base and program for managing the
utilization of copiers/duplicators in the Agency, RAB's greatest accom-
plishment during FY 75 was in holding the line on copier rentals. In the
past, when a new Xerox model entered the market, Agency components
immediately rented several, often without seriously evaluating the need.
For example, when RAB started its review program there were twelve Model
7000's (the most expensive Xerox duplicator at $675 per month minimum).
Five have already been replaced with less expensive copiers and one has
been recommended for replacement by a cheaper machine. Another example
is the Model 4000 that was introduced in August 1971. In the first two
years, there were 40 Model 4000's brought into the Agency. In July
1974, before the RAB review there were 53 Model 4000's and now there are
50. Since RAB has been involved, Xerox introduced the Models 3100 LDC,
4500 and 6500. There are only two 3100 LDC's, no 4500's and only one
6500 rented by the Agency today.
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 :1c iA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
OPERATED BY THE RECORDS ADMINISTRATION BRANCH
1. After a lengthy search for space and much negotiating, an STATINTL
unmanned Copy Center was finally opened in Room 2E37 in March 1974 using
a Xerox 4000, a plain-paper copier, and an SCM 412, a coated-paper
copier. In addition to ISAS, seven other components agreed to assist us
in evaluating the Center concept. These included the Offices of the
Inspector General, Director of Central Reference, DDO/
Director of Joint Computer Services, DDA Regulations Control ~Staff,
OTR/OPS Training Program, and Headquarters Engineering Branch/OL. These
two machines replaced a Xerox 2400 in OJCS, a Xerox 4000 in RCS and a
Xerox 3100 in ISAS. Although D/CRS retained a purchased Xerox 813 and
FR,Oretained a Savin 220, the majority of their copying is now done in
the Center. As a means of determining the number of copies made on the
SCM 412 by each of the users, we installed an Auditizer, a device requiring
the use of a "credit card" to activate the machine. The number of
copies made by each user is recorded on a separate meter. This system
began on 1 April 1974. Because of the high cost of installing this
system on the Xerox 4000, we opted for the Auditron, a device which
activates the machine by inserting a cartridge-type control into a
receptacle. Unfortunately, we were not able to secure and install this
device until 1 June 1974. With control devices on both copiers in the
Center, the June volume decreased by 11,040 copies or 24 percent over
previous months. The July volume increased slightly over June but was
still less than earlier months. We are not naive enough to believe that
this reflects a net reduction in copying by the users, but are convinced
that control devices do reduce the number of copies made.
2. During Fiscal Year 1975 the type and model of the copiers in
the Copy Center were changed as the requirements changed and to give RAB
an opportunity to test different copiers. When the SALT Staff joined
the Copy Center users, a sorter was needed. To satisfy this requirement,
a Xerox Model 4500 was rented to replace the Model 4000. In addition to
providing the needed sorter capability, this action gave RAB an oppor-
tunity to evaluate the Model 4500. The Model 4500 was not reliable nor
cost effective. This,plus the increase in the volume copied in the
Center, caused RAB to replace the Model 4500 with a Model 36001. The
SCM Model 412 was replaced by 3M Model VQC in October 1974 due to service
problems.
3. As mentioned earlier, the test Center is unmanned. Since the
equipment is operated by the customer, a variety of problems have been
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
identified. Machine breakdown, while not excessive, occurs frequently
because of the number of operators each doing their own thing. Some
supplies are being wasted, the proper machine isn't always used for the
copying needed and -the ability of the Xerox 4000 to do two-sided copy was
frequently overlooked. In addition, the need for much of what is being
copied is questionable. All of the operators have been trained in
proper machine usage by the vendor and/or representatives of this Staff
and periodic meetings are held to receive their comments and provide
suggestions on improving the use of the Center. Another problem encoun-
tered is the reluctance of users to copy on the coated-paper copier. We
believe this stems, not from the people actually operating the equipment
but to a great extent from supervisors with a built-in reluctance to use
coated-paper. Although the percentage of coated-paper copying has been
increasing, emphasis from senior management throughout the Agency is
essential to break with custom. This is a very real concern since
coated-paper copy can be produced at one-half to one-third less than
plain paper copy, depending upon the volume.
4. The success of this unmanned Copy Center is due to the fact
that it is managed by RAB personnel. In any unmanned Center, someone
has to be responsible for budgeting for the copiers, ordering supplies,
keeping the room clean and orderly, and calling for the service tech-
nicians when the copiers malfunction. For this reason, unmanned Copy
Centers would probably be more successful if all of the users were from
the same office or division. The other alternative would be for the
Office of Logistics to man and operate Copy Centers.
5. The concept of manned Copy Centers has been investigated with
several possibilities available. One alternative would be to acquire a
staff position for each Center and assign a full-time staff employee to
operate the equipment. With current ceiling problems, this alternative
seems remote. Another possibility would be to contract with a company
to provide the services of a machine operator. This could be prohibit-
ively expensive unless the Copy Center volume was very high. For instance,
Dennison quotes a per-copy cost of $.025 for 1-100,000 copies with a
minimum charge of $2,500 per month. Xerox charges are less specific
since they prefer to tailor a program to the customers' needs and then
quote a price. However, an estimate of $3,000 to $3,500 per month was
quoted for a volume of 50,000 copies. Additionally, these firms are
either reluctant to or refuse to use equipment in the Center other than
their own which obviously limits the mixture of plain- and coated-paper
copiers. Since the operators provided receive a small salary (approxi-
mately GS-04), turnover could be a problem with resulting additional
expense to clear a replacement. A third possibility, and the one we
think most reasonable, would be to hire part-time employees who would
not count against ceiling to share the Center operation. This option
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
would provide personnel fully controlled by the Agency, operating equip-
ment selected by the responsible Agency component. (This might be a
way to use handicapped employees.)
6. The cost effectiveness of the Copy Center is difficult to
evaluate because some of the users changed during the year, volumes
increased dramatically these last six months as a result of FOIA and
Investigation Task Force activity, and there was a several month
delay in securing the new Auditron for the Xerox 3600. To simplify
these calculations, we have assumed that during FY 75, each component
copied the same percentage of the total fiscal year volume as copied in
the month of June. Three tables have been prepared using these statistics
and are attached.
Attachment A FY 75 Copy Center Volumes & Expenditures
Month and Copier.
Attachment B Copy Center Cost Analysis for June 1975
Component and Copier.
The actual costs are pro-rated among using
components and are compared to costs which
would have been incurred had each component
used its own Xerox copier which was best
suited to the volume copied by that component.
Attachment C FY 75 Copy Center Analysis by Component.
The actual FY 75 volumes are pro-rated among
the users based upon their percentage of
total June usage. Actual fiscal year usage
by component is unknown since the Auditron
was not in use for several months.
Those components who used the Copy Center for a part of the fiscal year
are included in Attachments B and C as "Other."
7. Both Attachments B and C show costs in the Copy Center to be
less expensive that other arrangements. This is due primarily to the
copier pricing structure. The minimum cost per copy on Xerox copiers
averages about $.04 and decreases as the volume increases. For example,
the Model 3600-I starts at $.0315 per copy and gradually decreases to
$.006 for all copies over 50,000. This can further be illustrated by
the fact that two Model 4000's at 25,000 copies each per month will cost
$1,482, while the total 50,000 copies can be made on one Model 3600-I
for $1,101.
Attachments:
A, B, & C
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
XEROX 4000 1 XEORX 4500 1 XEROX 3600-I
5CM 412 3 M VQC II
COPIES COST I COPIES , COST
26,492
$ 864
9,281
$112.05
35,773
25,110
6,382
112.05
31,492
30,272
5,246
112.05
35,518
39,146
2,742
41,888
38,220
6,814
45,034
26,148
6,529
32,677
36,975
9,127
46,102
42,009
5,591
47,600
58,527
13,193
71,720
43,803
12,442
56,245
35,078
8,294
43,372
55,809
8,643
64,452
TOTAL
COPIES
51,602
133,786
272,201
20,909
73,375
551,873
TOTAL
RENTAL
$1523
$3978
$5974
$336
$ 785
$12,596
"SUPPLIES
242
628
1361
418
1467
4,116
TOTAL
$1765
$4606
$7335
$754
$2252
$16,712
COST
Approved
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400(t$Q(tt NT B
COPY CENTER COST ANALYSIS FOR JUNE 1975
BY COMPONENT AND COPIER
COPIER
NUMBER OF COPIES
ACTUAL COST
COST ON SEPARATE
COPIER
3600-I
3 M
18,445
5,466
$ 451
180
3600-I
Supplies
$ 657
102
23,911
$ 631
$ 759
3600-I
3 M
23,224
1,704
$ 568
56
3600-I
Supplies
$ 680
107
24,927
$ 624
$ 787
3600-I
3 M
4,679
468
$ 114
15
3100
Supplies
$ 193
30
5,147
$ 129
$ 223
3600-I
3 M
1,987
-0-
$ 48
660
Supplies
$ 63
10
1.987
$ 48
$ 73
3600-I
3 M
3,053
190
$ 74
6
3100
Supplies
$ 135
18
TOTAL
3,243
$ 80
$_153
3600-I
3 M
3,279
152
$ 80
5
3100
S Plies
$ 135
20
3,431
$ 85
$ 155
OTHERS
3600-I
1,142
$ 28
Any Xerox
Copier $ 54
Supplies 10
TOTAL
1,806
$ 49
$ 64
OVERALL
TOTALS
3600-I
3 M
55,809
8,643
$1,363
283
JUNE TOTALS
64,452
$1,646
$2,214
Cost Per Copy in Copy Center $ .0255
Cost Per Copy on Separate Copier $ .0343
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7
FY-75 COPY CENTER ANALYSIS BY COMPONENT
COMPONENT
JUNE VOLUME
% OF JUNE
FY-75 VOLUME
BASED ON %
AVERAGE
MONTHLY
FY-75
PRORATED
COPIER USED
PRIOR TO
MONTHLY
RENTAL
ANNUAL COST
INCLUDING
COST
DIFFERENCE DUE
VOLUME
JUNE VOLUME
VOLUME
COST
INCLUDING
SUPPLIES
COPY CENTER
COST
SUPPLIES
TO COPY CENTER
ISAS/RCB
IRS
23,911
37%
204,193
17,016
$ 6,183
Xerox 3100
$ 135
$ 1,849
- $ 1,973
Xerox 4000
461
6,307
OJCS
24,927
39%
215,230
17,935
6,517
Xerox 2400
8,848
DDO/FR
1,987
3%
16,556
1,379
501
OL/HEB
3,243
5%
27,593
2,299
837
OTHERS
1,806
3%
16,556
1,379
501 J
CRS
5,147
8%
44,150
3,679
1,336
Owned
Xerox 813
671
+ 665
SALT
3,431
5%
27,594
2,299
837
Xerox 4000
240
3,009
- 2,172
551,873
$16,712
$20,684
- $3,972
Cost per copy in Copy Center
Cost if existing equipment used
Approved For Release 2002/06/05 : CIA-RDP79-00498A000400050050-7