THE INDIAN - PAKISTANI IMPASSE OVER CONTROL OF KASHMIR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
14
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3.pdf1.93 MB
Body: 
25X1 )F THE INDIAN-PAKISTANI IMPASSE ;OVER CONTROL OF KASHMIR CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICE OF 25x1 GROUP.# Excluded from autofnatic Downgrading and declossification Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 HE NATIONAL DEFENSE OF THE UNITED STATES USC, SECTIONS 793 AND 794, THE TRANSMIS- REVELATION OF WHICH IN ANY MANNER TO MINATION CONTROLS If marked with specific dissemination 25X1 cctro s in accordance with the provisions of DCID 1/7, the document must be handled within the framework of the limitation so imposed. ST NOT BE RELEASED Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 SECRET THE INDIAN-PAKISTANI IMPASSE OVER CONTROL OF KASHMIR The Kashmir dispute remains one of the bitter- est legacies of the partition of British-ruled India in 1947. After fifteen year;, neither Pakistan nor India is any more willing to accept a solution which would leave the other country in control of the cen- tral Vale of Kashmir, regardless of other inducements to compromise. Pakistan's frustration over its in- ability to wrest the Vale from India is still the basic emotion pervading its entire foreign policy. India's policy too, even though given expression in appealingly statesmanlike utterances, rests as far as Kashmir is concerned on a foundation composed of a mixture of intense patriotic and communal senti- ment. While each side adopts legal arguments derived from the events of 1947, when India took over the Vale, the roots of the dispute go. far back into the past. Historical Background Kashmir is a rugged land, lying across the western in- vasion route from Tibet and Sinkiang into the Indian sub- continent. The heart of the country is a beautiful valley, 85 miles long by 25 miles wide and a mile above sea level. This is the Vale of Kashmir, surrounded by inhospitable moun- tains which include, on the north, the Karakoram, the world's high- est range. Outside the Vale, the population is sparse and pov- erty-ridden, and the docile people of the main valley have long feared the more warlike tribes from the neighboring hills. Although this whole region is in dispute, it is the Vale that is the heart of the matter. nexed to the Moslem Moghul Em- pire by the Emperor Akbar in 1587. The re-establishment of Hindu control is a relatively modern development; the British turned Kashmir over to the Hindu ruler of Jammu, which lies just to the south, creating the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir in 1846. During the rest of the 19th century the Hindus took revenge for 500 years of Moslem rule, and the Moslems felt themselves cruelly oppressed. More direct British control over the state gave the Moslems somewhat greater freedom to resist the Hindu ruler's re- gime, and agitation gradually increased during the period be- fore World War II. In the 14th century, Moslem invaders converted the Kashmiris to Islam, and the area was an- When the British gave India and Pakistan their independence in August 1941 and the subcontinent SECRET Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 SECRET "Kashmir is a garden of eternal spring, or an iron fort to a palace of kings--- a delightful flower-bed, and a heart-expanding heritage for dervishes. Its pleasant meads and enchanting cascades are beyond alI description." --Jehangir, Moghul Emperor was partitioned, the status of Kashmir, like that of a number of other areas, was still un- decided. Under the terms of the partition operation, the Hindu maharaja of Kashmir had the right to opt; for either Pakistan or India. When he delayed, many of his Moslem subjects--who then comprised an estimated 93 per- cent of the population--agitated for accession to Pakistan. By October, the maharaja was faced with a revolt, and, as the re- volt spread, Pushtoon tribesmen from Pakistan's Northwest Fron- tier region invaded Kashmir with Pakistani encouragement. Unable to cope with the situation himself, the maharaja opted for India, and New Delhi immediately sent troops who drove back the tribesmen and suppressed the local Moslem agitation. India's claim to the state thus has a technically strong legal foundation in the maharaja's act of accession. The Pakistani advocates point out, however, that the basic SECRET Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 JAM MU ^ AND KASHMIR USSR Arabian Sea Bay of Benpai Boundary set by Sino-Pakistani agreement Boundary shown on Indian maps Boundary shown on Western maps Area of Sino-Indian clashes Motorable road rinagar CHINA CLASSIFIED MATERIAL ON REVERSE OF PAGE AFGHA ,JITAN Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 SECRET concept of partition was that Pakistan was to comprise the contiguous Moslem-majority areas of British India. They insist that Kashmir is such an area, that the Kashmiri people with- out question would have pre- ferred to join Pakistan, and that they were prevented from doing so only by Hindu troops, first those of the maharaja and then those sent by New Delhi. Since the cease-fire, each side has organized its Kashmir territory along quite different lines. Although Pakistan has done less administratively and materially, its regime probably enjoys more popular acceptance than.the government in Indian- held Kashmir. Subsequent mediation efforts and negotiations have not moved the parties from these positions, nor from the territory that the respective forces occupied. In 1948 and 1949, the UN Commission for India and Pakistan secured the agreement of both parties to a cease-fire, demilitarization, and a plebiscite. With minor interruptions, the cease-fire has remained in effect. The demilitarization agreement, however, was never carried out, and in :1956 India announced that it therefore no longer held it- self bound to conduct a pleb- iscite. At that time, India gave Pakistani membership in Western military pacts as its main reason for this stand. Last summer, it gave improved Pakistani rela- tions with Communist China as a reason for not negotiating. In each case the real reason is In- dia's determination to hold the Vale. Pakistan controls several mountain districts comprising about one third of the total area of Jammu and Kashmir. The districts to the north had relatively tenuous ties with the old princely state and are administered as special politi- cal agencies under the Central Pakistani Government at Rawal- pindi. The districts lying along the western edge of the Vale make up what is known as Azad ("Free") Kashmir, supposedly a separate, provisional govern- ment pending the settlement of the dispute, but actually under the control of Rawalpindi. It enjoys purely local autonomy, even though President Khurshid talks pretentiously about the possibility of receiving mili- tary aid directly from Commu- nist China. In its internal structure, Azad Kashmir has its own ver- sion of Pakistani President Ayub's Basic Democracies program, 4 SECRET Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 SECRET Present Population (Approximate) Percent Moslem Azad 1,000,000 100 Vale of Kashmir 2,000,000 90 Entire Indian-he Jammu and Kas ld hmir 3,500,000 70 plus the usual official politi- cal. pressures and election ir- regularities. Opposition forces nonetheless have enjoyed enough freedom to seriously challenge Khurshid in elections two years ago. The most popular political appeal. among the Azad Kashmiris is to demand or promise to re- vive the Kashmir liberation move- ment and march on the cease-fire line. Pakistan has not attempted to make Azad Kashmir a showplace; the local administration is sup- ported mainly by local taxation, and Pakistan's financial contribu- tion seems to be limited to a few million dollars for agri- cultural extension services and food subsidies. Economic de- velopment consequentlyis negligi- ble. As part of this integra- tion, New Delhi is furnishing over $44 million in various forms--an amount equal to about 60 percent of the state gov- ernment's planned revenues for 1963-64. This help, plus re- sources notably superior to those of Azad Kashmir, has en- abled the Srinagar administra- tion to support a relatively impressive program of economic development, including infrastruc- ture and light industry projects. Per capita expenditures in the ordinary and capital develop- ment budgets of the state are in fact twice the average for the rest of India. Relative prosperity and India's economic support may have reduced the Kashmiri Mos- lems' hostility toward New Delhi's control, but most Kash- miris probably would still pre- fer to be free of Indian author- ity. The Indian Government evidently senses that this is India's portion of Kashmir, on the other hand, includes the famous Vale and the capital city of Srinagar, by all odds the most desirable part of the state and the traditional center of power where the "true" Kashmiri lives. The Nehru government over the years has been gradually in- tegrating the Vale into the In- dian Union. SECRET Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 SECRET the situation, since it keeps in jail Nehru's old friend, Sheik Abdullah. This "Lion of Kashmir" has been in prison for ten years because he ad- vocates independence for the Vale, and New Delhi apparently feels that he would quickly re- build his following and chal- lenge its authority if he were released. The local Moslem leadership thus remains essentially a ve- neer for Indian authority. For- mer Prime Minister'Ghulam Moham- med i3aakshi, the new incumbent K. Shamsuddin, and their asso- ciates all have a personal eco- nomic stake in the preservation of the status quo, and thus are genuinely pro-Indian, but they would not long remain in power if Indian troops were withdrawn. Although India, like Paki- stan, claims the whole of the old Jammu and Kashmir state, in fact it is fairly well satis- fied with the present situation, and is ready to "settle" if Pakistan would accept only minor adjustments of the cease-fire line. Any proposal or develop- ment that seems to threaten Indian control of the Vale, however, meets adamant opposi- tion from the New Delhi govern- ment generally and from Nehru in particular. It has often been suggested that Nehru is personally committed to Kashmir because of his family background. While it is true that his family is of Kashmiri Brahman origin, having left there in the 18th century, and that he is particularly fond of vacationing in the Vale, a more significant factor seems to be his strong commitment to the concept that Indian government and politics cannot be based on communal--i.e., religious--con- siderations. To admit that Indian-held Kashmir should now, fifteen years after partition and the communal strife that accompanied it, be removed from Indian con- trol because its population is overwhelmingly Moslem would undercut the whole secular, anticommunal philosophy of the Indian Government which Nehru's statements symbolize and sup- port. Such an admission, more- over, would tend to make illogi- cal the government's and Nehru's running battle against the signs of life that communalism con- tinues to show in India--agita- tion for new linguistic states, for example. At the same time that Nehru cannot admit the force of an argument based on communalism, he cannot ignore the strength of communal anti-Moslem senti- ment among the Indian Hindu voters. In contrast to Nehru's SECRET Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 SECRET ideals and to his sense of trag- edy over the partition of 1947, the average Hindu probably rel- ishes the Moslem's outrage over Kashmir. And the Pakistani Mos- lem knows the Indian Hindu's at- titude. The additional challenge from Communist China in the La- dakh region of Jammu and Kashmir has, if anything, further hard- ened New Delhi's determination to hold Kashmir. Overland sup- ply routes to the Ladakh front pass through the Vale. But be- yond any strategic implications, India's frustration over its in- ability to repel the Chinese "aggressors"--strongly reminis- cent of Pakistani feelings to- ward India--makes the Indian leaders all the more stubborn in resisting proposals that might dilute their authority in Kashmir. While the Kashmir dispute is only one of India's foreign policy problems--and by no means the one that occupies the largest share of attention in New Delhi --Kashmir often seems to come close to being the very raison d'etre for Pakistan's foreign policy. Every Pakistani leader has known that he could assure his place in national history if he could somehow bring Kash- mir under Pakistani control. This is especially true of Presi- dent Ayub, who has already promulgated a new constitution and would like to rival the late Mohammed Ali Jinnah as the "fa- ther" of the country. Unable to take steps which seemed to be leading toward a success on Kashmir, Ayub has made politi- cal capital out of denouncing SECRET Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 SECRET the West for undercutting Paki- stan's, interests. This situation springs from the fact that, whatever arguments Rawalpindi may bring forward, Kashmir is simply a blight on Pakistan's national honor and a perpetual reminder that the Pald - stani Moslem, whose heritage in- cludes the glory of the Moghul Empire, is now a citizen of a country that is weaker, poorer, less skilled, and generally in- ferior to its "Hindu" counterpart. The Pakistani, with something of a warrior tradition behind him, is further infuriated over his relative impotence in the face of India's military supe- riority. Proposals aimed at saving face for Pakistan--but leaving India in control of the Vale-- therefore have not had much ap- peal in Rawalpindi, since pos- session of the Vale is the es- sence of the question. Faced with these frustra- tions and seemingly insurmount- able difficulties, Pakistani leaders have cast about for new means of exerting leverage on New Delhi. In 1959, Ayub first tried to capitalize on the Sino- Indian border difficulties by proposing a joint Indian-Paki- stani defense of the subcontinent --obviously predicated on a Kash- mir settlement. Nehru received this coolly. Another strategy apparently was then developed: to wait un- til.. Chinese pressure on the In- dian border would oblige India to secure its flank with Pakistan by offering real concessions in Kashmir. The Pakistanis evi- dently feel, however, that this maneuver has been upset by Paki-- stan's Western allies, who brought military assistance to India fol- lowing the Chinese invasion in the fall of 1962 and thereby, in the Pakistani view, freed India from the necessity of entering serious negotiations. Although the Pakistanis in their diplo- matic statements have emphasized their fears that India might use new Western equipment to attack them, it is more probable that disappointment over this lost opportunity is what really lies behind their complaints. Most recently, Pakistan's worry that time is on the side of India in Kashmir has been sharpened by announcements from Srinagar that further steps are Nehru and Ayub Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 CLASSIFIED MATERIAL ON REVERSE OF PAGE Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 being taken to tighten the con- stitutional bonds between Kash- mir and India. In the face of this development and the failure of their other strategies, Paki- stanimmilitary leaders may again be giving some consideration to limited paramilitary action as a means of generating international pressure for a settlement. In- cidents at two points on the cease-fire line in late October appear to reflect Pakistan's promotion of new tensions there. At the same time, however, the Pakistanis would probably want to avoid any broad military con- frontation, in which India would enjoy a heavy superiority. The Military Situation The cease-fire line lies mainly in the mountain districts shirting the western and northern edges of the Vale. On both the Indian. and Pakistani sides out- posts are placed roughly 500 yards back from the line. On the Indian side these are manned by regular Indian Army units, while on the Pakistani side they are manned by locally recruited Azad K:ashmiris, who serve under regular Pakistani Army officers. The Indian units apparently have a running fight with Kash- miris from their own side who do not understand the prohibition against grazing in the no-man's land. Attitudes apparently are more relaxed toward the local citizenry on the Pakistani side, and in some areas the Azad forces allow peasants to graze their livestock right up to the line. Firing exchanges are not unusual, but they are ordinarily small-scale. Company-size or larger border clashes are more serious politically and less frequent in Kashmir than they are on the East Pakistan border with India, because the im- portance of the issue and the depth of emotion in Kashmir are so much greater that each side has been wary of a real. incident there. A United Nations military observer group has been on the scene since 1949 to help pre- vent such clashes. Of the forces deployed near the cease-fire line, Paki- stan's are much the weaker. There is one Pakistan Army bri- gade, numbering some 3,000 men, and 18 Azad Kashmir battalions, comprising 22,000 men, for a total of 25,000, all under the command of Pakistan's 12th Division. Across the line, the Indian Army has three divisions, total- ing about 45,000 men, deployed against Pakistani-held Kashmir. Even during the height of the Chinese advance in the fall of 1962, the Indians maintained this deterrent force at about 40,000 men, drawing on other areas for reinforcement. This force has since been restored to about 45,000. The Indian units have a strong advantage in quality as well as in numbers. The Azad troops, which make up the bulk of the Pakistani forces, have good. esprit but are poorly SECRET Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 SECRET trained and are not comparable to the regular army forces, on either side. The Pakistani Army brigade is probably about equal in quality to the Indian troops, although it does not receive modern equipment under the US military assistance pro- gram. Outlook Intermittent attempts since 1947 to reach a settlement, or even to put Pakistani and Indian leaders on the road toward one, have proven consistently futile. Pakistan's own ploys to exact concessions from India have been rebuffed by New Delhi or countered by circumstances be and the Pakistanis' control. "Like some supremely beautiful woman, whose beauty is almost impersonal and above human desire, such was Kashmir in all its feminine beauty of river and valley and lake and graceful trees." 25X1 ers in neither capital are very optimistic that new diplomatic moves will lead them out of the present impasse--an impasse, moreover, which India gives every sign of believing is 25X1 about the most satisfactory situation-it can C rJ I SECRET Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927A004200110003-3 Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3 SECRET SE CRET Approved For Release 2006/12/27: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04200110003-3