DIARY

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP79-01041A000100010006-8
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: T
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 17, 1998
• Sequence Number: 6
• Publication Date: December 4, 1952
• Content Type: NOTES

Executive Officer, DD/I
79-010 1 A000100010006-8
Thursday,, 4 December 1952
25X1A5a1
1. - informed A/DD/I that the A 25X1C
a subsidiary of is planning to drop
25X1C goverment agency (probably . ) has checked with CIA to
25X1C determine w .ether or not we wish these_ to be continued for their intelli-- 25X1A9a
Bence collection potential. I checked with who said 25X1A8a
that his Office deals with the parent company and he would have to check further
Jbr the specific answer to these questions. In later talking to of
25X1A9a Office, I learned that the entire matter has been turned over to
of 0/CD, thus taking the covert people out of the picture. So
25X1A9ainformed who will follow to completion.
25X1A9a
2. O/IC3 talked at considerable length on his recommenda-
rrence or non-concurrence
-_7 tion CIA take and record an official positica of concu
He points out' using D--5/30 as reference, that
WO a. when commenting on IAC papers. He has checked this by tele--
ONI both disc ree in the proposals made.
phone with 0/CI and 07CI disagrees as also ands O~hes to He gr~' :on feels that this
record on the
should constitute an official CIA position
memorandum to this effect. I queried him as to why it was necessary for CIA
nr-r +n r-o on record in that we had never done so in the past. He said that
no nau LCCii i"ci;c.i. v _u.ab .. y . -o -- - - rla G 1 S e LTi
that these might develop into official inqueries. I told i
hed with considerable caution as I did not know what
this matter should be approac
documentation and approval might be required before an official CIA position could be recorded. - wishes to discuss this with A/DD/I.
3. Attended an ad hoc meeting of representatives of Commo training, DD/A 25X1A9a
25X1A9a and DD/I, in room to discuss, with the proposal that
individuals with technical specialization, in particular Finance, Personnel,
Budget, etc., be followed by a Career Board of the technical Office concerned
rather than the Board of the substantive Office on whose T/O they work. I was
assured that no decisions regarding an individual would be made without full
approval of all three; the substantive board, the technical office board, and
the individual himself. DD/P has already undertaken the job of categorizing
all of his employees of this nature and it is requested that those of us at the
meeting have our components categorize their people by early January. ~5X1A9a
undertook to draft a Directive to accomplish this and I requested that a
second meeting of this group be held to consider the draft when ready. Any
VVJ1 discussion as to the desirability of this should be at this meeting and I
recommend that become ivolved for DD/I. 25X1A9a
25X1A9a 5X9A2
g,vJ' 4. called to inform s that State Department has received an
answer to its inquest -regarding the and this reply
nd a high-level
indicates, as did D Pts reply, tha
25X1A interrogator to I suggested that ME' study the problem and give 25X1A9a
us a recommendation as to who should go and under tat circumstances,
Approved For Rel
M fs part of an integrated %
IL ~_d f
th
Iii. If
u.i be
rom
e
m
subjected to individual systematic review.