OFFICIAL DIARY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79-01041A000100040186-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 22, 1998
Sequence Number: 
186
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 24, 1953
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79-01041A000100040186-6.pdf198.31 KB
Body: 
Approved For R*as DP79-011A000100040186-6 r~earrity Information Official Diary Tuesday, 2! February 1953 1. Spoke by phone to WN M N and requested that he defer Mr. Dulles' talk before the velar College until the last week in March. undertook to phone back on this. 25X9A6 2. At the morning meeting: a. Announced that the IAC meeting was being cancelled for this week. b. Informed Mr. Dulles of the action that had been taken by G-2 and Representative Lodge on the matter raised at the recent special LSCIB meeting. c . Vile n raised. suggested that a memorandum of facts be prepared by 25X1A8a 25X1A9a I offered the assistance of M Later re uested to assist- who was designated by ~to 25X1A9a prepare this memorandum. 25X1 A9a 25X9A6 d. Mentioned certain suggested members of the NSC staff and advised against the appointment of upon the ground that he was an extremely controversial figure in the Pentagon, and it was essential that the staff have excellent relations with the Pentagon. ~teported to Mir. Dulles on my talk Saturday evening tth and advised him that it would be unnecessaryX9A6 make a written answer to - memorandum of conversation. e. Commented on the possible implications of a transfer of the rirst Chinese Communist parachute division to the Canton area and requested that DD/P cable the field requesting closest possible watch on any Chinese OB movements in the Canton area and in South- west China. f. Reported to Mr. Dulles on the progress made at the NSC Senior Staff on NSC-143 and the South American paper. 2. At the morning meeting indicated that NSC-lOO might 25X1A9a be raised again in the NSC. should review the record on this paper. 3. Attended briefing of Mr. Dulles in preparation for his presenta- tion before the NSC. This week's briefing was much better organized as a result of the arrangements made last week. (contId) ent is part of an iniegrated Approved For Release 200019AIgg i,f~m~i RDP79-~ilc tlc a, 19Q4 Eili tl 6 t be subjected to it"i-.iduai systsmatic review. Approved For Release 200040 S DP79-0%41 A000100040186-6 s -iirity Information 4. Met with Amory, respecting the noise stening problem. After considerable discus- sion it was agreed: 25X1A9a a. That a study as to the existing allocation of functions, C \ botch in the collecting and the anal sis fields, would be made by 0/SI, with the assistance of f 0/IC. I asked that A Y, Mr. Drain be brought in so that he could make suggestions as to alternate methods of coordinating these functions. 25X1A9a b. That CIA would concur with the request of ATIC that a certain activity in this general area be undertaken by NSA with the under- standing: (1) That this was an ad hoc concurrence and would not 25X9tlish a precedent for any other activities, and c. That 0/S I, with. the assistance of should proceed with the preparation of a paper advocating the ester lishment of a coordinating mechanism in the field of evaluation of noise listening data, the same to be suitable for presentation to the IAC. 0/Si would informally clear this paper at the working level and have each of the other working level groups indicate the attitude of his chief on the subject. In the event that any of the IAC members demurred to this suggestion, Mr. Amory and myself would have a talk with him before the paper was presented to the IAC. d. 0/SI would check with DD/P to ascertain exactly how DD/P intended to allocate operating responsibilities in the field of covert over-flights for noise listening purposes. iii" 25X1C10b 5. phoned me respecting the discussion at the morning meeting on and asked whether or not I had seen State Department reports on intelligence picked up there. When I indi- cated that T had not, he undertook to have a sample of such reports sent to 6. consulted me with respect to any plans on replacing the Inspector General or Assistant inspector General. I indicated that.,,, was not aware of any such plans but would check withMr. Dulles. 2 X1 A9a al''so raised the question of supergrades in 0/NE. I assured him that 0 NE was not prejudiced by the fact that a number of GS-18s are carried on the Board, since that was a special situation. In response to his question of whether Board members havinlower than 18 grade should be raised to 18, I advised against such a step-at this time. It seemed to me more advisable to move a Board member having a 17, for example, into an 18 slot when one (cont'd) Approved For Release A'% 8/p` IA-RDP79-01041 A0001 00040186-6 ruity Infra = 6 , Approved For RQJ#ase 20001 : b 4P79-0141 A000100040186-6 Security Information Official Diary 2L February 1953 of the Board members having an 18 moved out. This could be done upon the understanding that the next recruited Board member would take the 17 slot. with respect to the position. of the NSC representative, I suggested that decision be deferred until reorganization of the NSC staff was completed. With respect to the 0/NE Chief of Production, intermediate between the staff and the Board, it seemed to me that the best analogy was the 0/CI Chairman of the Publication Board. If he were to become a supergrade, I would favorably consider a similar move with respect to the corresponding 0/NE 7. In the evening, spoke to 25X1X7 25X1X7 attitude on one item on the agenda of the forthcoming conference being held under the auspices of USCIB. I explained to him very clearly that CI.A.'s position on this item was governed primarily by intelligence 25X1X7 rather than by technical considerations. Since the epresentatives at this conference did not include representatives of the intelli- 25X1X7 gence services, CIA might ask that final resolution of this point be deferred. Later informed f this discussion. 25X1A9a ADD/I received message from M SA, that Senator McCarthy was investigating Soviet bloc seaborne trade, particularly the participation therein by Western ships. Passed this information to DCI. Authorized 0/RP. to assist Hanson behind the scenes in preparing for this investigation. He assured me that he would strictly observe the third Agency rule and not pass anything of ours to the Committee without specific clearance. Lost of the data presently sought is under 0/NI jurisdiction anyway. He further assured me that there would be no disclosure by him of CIA's activities in this area. W lter Pforzheimer attended a meeting in his office together with- of 0/RR at which the details were worked out. 25X1A9a 25X1A9a +=h SECRET Security Information -3- Approved For Release 2000/08/29 : CIA-RDP79-01041A000100040186-6