THE EFFECTS OF PHOTOGRAPHIC GROUND RESOLUTION ON PHOTO INTERPRETATION, PROGRESS REPORT #2

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79B00873A001600040036-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 22, 2012
Sequence Number: 
36
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 19, 1969
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79B00873A001600040036-5.pdf124.94 KB
Body: 
~~~~~ y. i ~ _ O Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 :CIA-RDP79B00873A001600040036-5 ~7 THE EFFECTS OF PHOTOGRAPHIC GROUND RESOLUTION ON PHOTOINTERPRETATION Progress Report No. 2, 19 November 1969 The proposal,to conduct the work under this contract was submitted on 18 April 1969. The proposal was entitled, "Proposal to Conduct Additional Research on the Effects of Photographic Ground Resolution on Photointerpretation." The proposal, which was incorporated in the contract, con- tains the following statements: "...it is proposed that two studies be done in the following two phases: Ia. A study of the effects of ground resolu- tion on the interpretation of military vehicles using scale models as targets (the 'model' study). lb. The preparation of materials for a study of the effects of ground resolution on the. interpretation of ground forces, using real ground force equipment and personnel as targets (the 'field' study). Execution of the 'field' study. This pro- posal is to conduct Phase I only." Phase Ia, the "model" study, was actually in progress at the-time the 18 April 1969 proposal to conduct additional research was submitted. The work was being done under Contract We expected that the funds to conduct the additional proposed research would simply be added to the existing contract so the "model" study was STAT STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 :CIA-RDP79B00873A001600040036-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 :CIA-RDP79B00873A001600040036-5 included in the work statement to establish the continuity of the work. 1. Completed the "model" study. A draft of the technical report, "A Comparison of Line- Scan and Photographic Images for Target Identification," was delivered to the sponsor on 28 October. and two briefings on the results of the study were given in Washington on the same day. A critique of the draft of the report was obtained from the technical monitor and the final version of the report is currently being prepared. The results of the study showed the effects on target-identification performance of .photographic ground resolution, and the effects on such performance of line-scan image signal-to-noise ratio and number-of- scans per target. The study was the first known attempt to relate line-scan and photo- graphic images in terms of photointerpreter performance. Although models were used as targets rather than real vehicles, the data are undoubtedly. useful and indicate clearly the importance of continuing the work.. 2. Gathered high resolution photography over Aberdeen Proving Ground. The photography contains a large number of ground-order-of- battle targets, tanks, and artillery pieces. It also contains test targets and other objects--triangles, squares, etc.--that may be used in mensuration and psychophysical studies. We are examining the photography to select the targets to be used in the next study so that the ground-truth re- quirements can be specified. We have discussed preparing the line-scan and photo- graphic images with As we explained in the previous progress report, obtaining the photography over Aberdeen Proving Ground was STAT STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 :CIA-RDP79B00873A001600040036-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 :CIA-RDP79B00873A001600040036-5 more time consuming than we expected. .First, it was found that few aircraft/camera systems could fulfill the .photographic requirements. Then, after an appropriate system had been obtained,-the flight plans prepared, and the test targets placed on the ground, there were delays due to camera malfunctions and poor weather. For these reasons, we request an extension in time of six months, without additional funds. , A proposal is currently being prepared for "Phase. II: Execution of the'^~field'=study." The phrase "eXe- cution of the t''field?'; study" may be misleading. It is .not intended to mean collecting the photography, as that has already-been done. Rather, we propose to conduct an experimental study including a).collecting performance data from PIs, b) analyzing the data, and c) preparing the technical report. The original contract costs) As of STAT STAT 1 November 1969 Thad been spent, leaving costs remaining in the contract. These funds STAT will be used to prepare the line-scan and photographic images to be used in the experimental study (Phase II). They will be made from the Aberdeen photography. As mentioned, discussions have been h'e1d with people at~ about the preparation of the images. We STAT are seeking the most economical method of obtaining them, but we recognize that they must be thoroughly specified in physical terms, including specifications in terms of both photographic and line-scan image parameters. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 :CIA-RDP79B00873A001600040036-5