TECHNICAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET - MATERIALS HANDLING STUDY

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP79B00873A001800010033-9
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 13, 2012
• Sequence Number: 33
• Content Type: MISC

Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873A001800010033-9
TECHNICAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET - MATERIALS i1DfING STUDY
_
INSTRULTIONS: Grade each proposal in terms of the major items listed below,. giving
consideration to ideas such as those in the sub-paragraphs. Grade
each major item 1 through 5 based on (1) Unsatisactory; (2) Poor;
(3) Average; (4) Very Good; (5) Excellent.
1. UNDERSTANDING OF PROBLEM:
Level of comprehension of the problem areas as defined in the Development
Objective (2.1, 2.2, 2.3).
?
I-
-...)
:;-...
'1_.;
?
,
?
r-
l
i
2. SOUNDNESS OF APPROACH:
Technical quality of their approach - does it appear to fill the opera-
tional voids - how specific does the approach relate to NPIC problems.
3-
-II
.
,q
?
_'?
3
/
3. COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS:
Does the proposal comply with the requirements as defined in the
Development Objective (4.0). .
4. SPECIAL FACTORS: -
Identification and solutions of Phase I and Phase II ?- does the bidder ?
realize the possibility or existance of interface with other programs. -
is the level of effort commensurate with time estimates-- does the
the alternative method approach of conceptual design in ?
Phase I and detailed system configuration in Phase II. _
_.5
",;1..
if
1
)-
_
LI
g
C)1,
5. NARRATIVE:
jt
fi
In addition to the above ratings, it is requested a comprehensive paragraph (s) be submitted on each proposal covering details of the major
items, relative importance of the major problems as seen by the evaluator and how the bidder proposes to handle them, any knowledge of the
company such as past contracts, competence of proposed personnel, program management, overrun history, consultants, sub-contractors, etc. ?
Generally, any information you wish to submit not covered above.
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873A001800010033-9