REAR PROJECTION SCREEN MATERIALS STUDY

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
175
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 6, 2012
Sequence Number: 
116
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 1, 1962
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6.pdf7.98 MB
Body: 
Li Li Li Li Li Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Final Report REAR PROJECTION SCREEN MATERIALS STUDY F. 0. 046564 Project Closed: March 1, 1962 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Final Report. REAR PROJECTION SCREEN MATERIALS STUDY F. 0. 046564 By February 12, 1962 STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 STAT EDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT I TECHNICAL DISCUSSION A. Literature Survey 1 B. Diffusing Screens in Rear Projection 1 C. Description of Samples 2 II EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION AND TESTS OtttCntzi> 3 Test Approach and Method Selection 3 Definition Threshold Test Equipment 3 Contact Resolution Test 4 Luminance Tests and Equipment 4 Transmission Tests and Equipment 5 Polarization Tests and Equipment 5 Miscellaneous and Selected Tests 6 1. Profilometer Tests 6 2. Photomicrographic Tests 6 3. Microdensitometer Scanning Tests 6 III EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 8 A. General Tabulation and Recording 8 B. Results by Specific Tests 8 1. Definition Threshold Test 8 2. Contact Resolution Test 8 3. Luminance Tests 8 4. Transmission Tests 9 5. Polarization Tests 9 6. Miscellaneous Tests 9 IV SUMMARY OF RESULTS 10 V CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 REFERENCES 12 APPENDICES A. Tables B. Data Sheets C. Photomicrographs and Microdensitometric Traces D. Diffusing Screen Properties E. Definition Threshold Test Equipment F. Profilometer Tests G. Shape Factor H. Bibliography I. Glossary of Terms and Definitions Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 PDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 ABSTRACT The Photographic Systems Development Department (G-53) of Bausch & Lomb has conducted an evaluation of rear projection screen materials suitable for viewing high definition photographic transparencies and prints. The program included the assembly of test apparatus, the use of this equipment in measuring screen sample definition, distribution of illumination, and polarization characteristics. Conclusions are in terms of: a) Best group viewing screen. b) Best individual viewing screen. c) Best stereo group viewing screen. d) Best individual stereo viewing screen. rDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 fl In Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 I TECHNICAL DISCUSSION ? A. Literature Survey A literature survey was conducted in which fifty-one published papers Were selected as generally applicable to the characteris- tics and/or evaluation of rear projection screens. The majority of this material pertains to luminance distribution factors as applied principally to theater projection and background screens for television studio work or process photography. Although many of4hepapers offered information that was of partial interest and value, there was little in the literature which indicated prior con- centration on high definition projection. The bibliography is in- cluded as Appendix B. Diffusing Screens in Rear Projection The basic purpose of this prograni.was to evalitate the performance of various screen materials in. the rear projection of high definition photographic records. The term "high definition" photography in this use is construed to mean quality in the order of 100 to 200 medium cOntrast lines per millimeter. To understand this problem we 'must first visualize the process of image formation in a,iturbid or ,diffusing medium. Basically a pro- jection optical system forms an image at the screen plane and this pattern, because of scattering .of 'light within the medium, is seen multidirectionally at the ssreen.; This scattering process may be caused by any one or a combination of such physical properties as surface roughness, pigmentation; layers of small spheres, or other,, types of light scattering particles. The ground surface, as an example, has two optical characteristics - an array of microsurfaces of random, tilt with respect to the datum and a random depth or layer thickness A light bundle striking this surface is therefore scattered by a combined prismatic - lenticular action in:that each micro surface deviates the rays intercepted by its area as a function of air index of refraction, angle of incidence on the microsurface and the material index. The random devia- tions within the material direct the rays in all angles from the points of incidence, to the condition wherein the critical angle is exceeded. Thus the angle of the emergent cone indicates the dis- tance off the optical axis the observer may see the image. The image spread in a rear projection screen as a result,. Of light scattering and diffusion is similar in Concept to the spread which occurs in the image formation process of a photographic' emulsion. The photographic situation has been exhaustively discussed as a result of theoretical and experimental studies 1, 2. Therefore, the apparent "granularity" or a,screen becomes the major factor controlling the image fidelity presented to the viewer in terms of dimensional alteration of the image and its contrast. To function as a rear Oojectipn screen, it must always present an image that is distorted in size and contrast with reference to the original object, otherwise the characteristics causing the screen to serve its function approach zero as image fidelity is maximized. In 1 - Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 It therefore follows that, in the presence of a granular structure, the screen image fidelity is dependent on the size of the incident image structure. As this micro structure approaches granularity magnitudes, the spreading increases in terms of size and shape distortion and contrast reduction until a "threshold' of apparent detection or recognition is reached, beyond which, with decreasing incident image size, the screen structure is incapable of definition. Variation of projection magnification is a method whereby the image size may be varied for determination of this threshold region. The change from the "micro" condition to the threshold condition, should be continuous,- thereby permitting the operator to seek the "image breakup threshold" without thg error inducing distractions of "stepped" magnification changes. Since the determination of the granular threshold is a visual func- tion, there enters the problem of eliminating experimental errors induced by human acuity limitations. Auxiliary magnification must therefore be provided in amount to insure that visual acuity is not a restricting factor. The use of such a projection technique would differ from a contact situation, wherein the target is placed in direct contact with the diffusion surface of the sample and read With a microscope view- ing through the sample. This difference is evident by the fact that "granularity" is the major factor controlling the image fidelity of a rear projection screen, and as it is decreased the spread effect is decreased and the function of the material as a screen decreases to zero. However, in the case of the "contact situation", as the granularity is decreased, the capability to read higher resolutiOns increases to the point where at maximum image fidelity, there would be no granularity present on the screen. It is obvious that the technique of "contact resolution", testing that is, examination of a resolving power target in contact with the screen sample, of materials is of limited, if not misleading value. No basis for assessing the better screens exists other than the loss of information as compared to the target. Also, the position at the image is fixed at the target itself, not in or on the screen. As a result the diffusion process acts as a filter rather than an image transducer. C. Description of Samples. A total of 114 specimens were collected for the program as a result of a survey of 17 organizations, advertising the produc- tion or marketing of rear projection screens. Particular effort was made to obtain representative types of materials and diffusing surfaces, such as ground glass, matte plastic, beads on glass, chemicals deposited on plastic, single layer, double layer, and homogeneous type and lenticular con- figuration. These materials were cut and mounted in 2" by 2" photographic slide holders. A coded listing is given in Table I. Throughout the remainder of the body of the report, the number or type of screen only will be used. 2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 - Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 V .CJ _ fl Controlled, auxiliary visual magnification is necessary to maintain a.cOnstant- apparent image scale. Thus a basic test fixture was outlined requiring the projection of high definition, target-- objects with a lens capable of 200 lines per milli- meter quality at the short conjugate. Semi-automatic mechanical and oLi fl A. Test Approach and Method Selection The following experimental philosophy was adopted: 1. A test utilizing projection techniques most realistically indicates a screen's performance as ultimately used. fl The performance of the projection test equipment must be that of a high definition system. 3. - A Variable magnification ratio technique provides the necessary means to establish the screen sample's threshold. of definition. ptical features were provided to maintain consistent image quality during the operation of the equipment. Other 'test, providing thignifica.nt information were considered to be: Contact Resolution Test Luminance Tests Transmission Tests fl Polarization Tests Profilometer 'Tests Photomicrographic Tests fl Microdenthitdmeter Tests The equipment and operations will be discussed in the following sections. B. Definition Threshold Test Equipment fl The variable 'projection test fixture constructed for the screen sample evaluation is illustrated in Figure 1. The components of the projection system were located on a double rail nine foot lens bench. A carriage which could be moved along the rails by a pulley arrangement held the target-object, the lens, and the fl autofocusing arid manual focusing mechanism. The light source was located to one side but unattached to the fixture because of the need for vibration isolation. The sample holder and viewing miCroscope were located'at one end of the bed. The target object was a reduced positive transparency of 200 fl line per millimeter quality, on Minicard emulsion, of a vertical aerial photograph. The portion of the image selected for this test is shown outlined in the enlarged copy of the target object, reproduced here as Figure 2. The image was projected with a representative 50mm f/2 lens working at f/2.8, which is capable of 202 visual lines per millimeter on axis using a high contrast USAF resolution target. 3 ' - Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06 : CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 The projection magnification range of the instrument was from 40:1 to 1:1 with a coarse autofocus by a cam-activated mechanism and a manual fine focus override. Thus the image focus was moni- tored on the sample plane throughout the range of magnification. The image at the sample plane was viewed by the operator with a StereoZoom Microscope with a calibrated, continuously variable range of 14x to 50 x. The apparatus was used in the following manner to determine the definition threshold of each screen material sample. A specimen was placed in the slide holder with its diffuse side toward the operator. The movable carriage was set at the indexed position of 401 and the projected image viewed with the StereoZoom Microscope at 14x. The best focus' was selected by remote ad- justment with the fine focus knob. The munification ratio of the projected image was then reduced by carriage movement, result- ing in the image becoming progressively smaller in size on the sample plane. The operator varied the magnification of the view- ing microscope, maintaining the apparent' image size equal to that of the 40:1 condition. This process was continued until the operator determined the image to be degraded at which point the magnification ratio was recorded as the "definition threshold," for that sample. The method of arriving at a decision of definition threshold there- fore included assessment of the overall quality, edge sharpness, contrast and the recognition of fine detail. The ability to search for the region of apparent image disintegration was found to be a critical factor in the evaluation process. The results are re- corded in Table II of Appendix A and the data sheets of Appendix B. C. Contact Resolution Test The contact resolution test method was used in this study as a supplemental means of screen performance evaluation. Since this method is simple and easily reproduced with reservations indicated by the more elegant projection method, possibilities of correlation for future sample assessment are provided. The tests were performed on each screen material using a resolution target with black bars on a clear background and a B&L StereoZoom Microscope with a variable magnification range of 7x to 60x. (Figure 3.) The results of this test for each sample are shown graphically, resolution versus magnification, in the data sheets in Appendix B. D. Luminance Tests and Equipment The brightness ratio or fall-off with angle is an important factor in the performance of a rear projection system because of the common requirement of off-axis viewing by multiple observers. In such cases where there is more than one observer, this fac- tor becomes a prime condideration. 4 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 To determine the distribution of photometric brightness of each of the sample screen materials as a function of angle from the normal, a breadboard goniophotorneter was assembled. (Fig- ure 4) The pholometer portion of the apparatus was a Photo Research Spectra', 5 Brightness Spotmeter,, Model SB - 1-1/2?. The b rightness meter was mounted to pivot in an arc around a point beneath the screen sample. The illumination of the sample, pro- vided by a 750 watt projection source, was measured at the sample plane as 1600 foot candles with a Weston foot-candle meter. Read- ings were made of a 0.4 inch diameter portion. The results of the luminance tests for each sample are shown, luminance in percent versus angle of measurement, in the data sheets in Appendix B. E. Transmission Tests and Equipment Transmission values of the screen samples are necessary data in the selection and evaluation of screen material because of the interdependence of the projection source illumination, the density of the original record, lens speed,. and the screen brightness re- quirements of a system. The illumination analyzer, shown in Figure 5, was used to obtain the transmission readings of the screen samples. Two sets of reading were made for each sample; one with the diffusing or matte surface of the sample toward the analyzer and one with the smooth surface toward the light source. These values are recorded on the individual data sheets in Appendix B. F. Polarization Tests and Equipment The purpose of the polarization examination was in anticipation of use with polarizing stereoscopic rear projection viewers. Jenkins and White discuss the basic thebries of polarization in reference 7. Two tests were performed, the first to sort out those samples which wholly depolarized, and the second to measure the amount of depolarization of those samples whichindicated partial depolar- ization. A visual process with a simple polariscope was used in the initial process in which the sample was placed between a polar- izer and an analyzer, type HN32, on a light table as shown in Fig- ure 6. The polarizers were crossed and uncrossed and the change in appearance or lack thereof indicated whether or not the material required further test and measurement. Those samples which had a minimum of depolarizing qualities were further tested with an apparatus which was a combination of the goniophotometer and the polariscope. The technique is basically similar to the above test except that the photometer permits the measurement of the efficiency by the amount of light passing through the system under crossed and uncrossed condi- tions of the polarizer and analyzer. This efficiency is a ratio of the two values. The results are included in Table II of Appendix A. 5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 f. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 e Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 7 The aerial image of the pinhole is then focused with the pickup microscope and the focusing eyepiece scanned and recorded. The samples that had been photographed were scanned and a basis for measuring their spreads was established since the trace of each sample could be overlaid with the trace of the aerial image. In each case the qualitative results of the photomicrographs were confirmed quantitatively by this scanning method. 7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 E III EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. General Tabulation and Recording The test series results are catalogued in terms of each of the 114 samples in Appendix B. In addition, the data are shown in tabular form in TABLE II, which lists each sample by number in the order or rating of performance for each test. B. Specific Tests Results Definition Thresholds Because of the nature of the testing equip- ment, the data results are given in the form of magnification ratios. Of the 114 samples tested, 78 were within the range of the instrument with readings from 40:1 to 11:1. The remainder were of such quality that they were beyond the 40:1 limitation. In the data sheets this "definition threshold" value has been termed "image breakup magnification. " Contact Resolution Contact resolution performance is given in lines per millimeter and range from 142 to less than 3. The individual graphs each show the resolution values plotted against microscope magnification. The tabular form records the peak values in de- creasing order according to their performance. Luminance Tests A total of the readings of the luminance or photometric brightness for each screen is plotted graphically with the relative luminance expressed in percent versus the angle of observation. The 100% value is the axial reading as shown. Thus each plot shows graphically the relative distribu- tion of illumination throughtout the 00 to 45? area of interest. From this relative distribution another evaluation criteria is derived, which is called the 50% Fall-off Angle. This is the angular position off-axis where the luminance intensity drops to 50% of the on axis value. These are arranged in order in Table II. The "Axial Gain", or luminance divided by the illumination (foot Lamberts divided by foot candles, on axis)8 is calculated and recorded for each screen as a "power" rating of the screen's performance and direction ability. Hill also developed a single number figure of merit to indicate luminance characteristics called the "Shape Factor. "9 It is based on an empirical formula derived by treating the screen as a type of diffuser which redistributes the light as a calculated power of the cosine of the angle of observation. The theoretical values were computed and plotted in dashed line against the actual bright- ness values for comparison purposes. Departure from the two curves can be attributed for the most part to absorption and other losses within the screen. Further discussion of the formula, its derivation and an example of a calculation is included in Appendix G. 8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 t=71 r-- fl r" "71 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 fli fl Li Li Li fl Transmission Tests Two measurements in percent are given in the data sheets for each sample, i. e. , matte side facing the light source, or reversed. Table II records the values With the smooth side toward the source in order of decreasing transmission. Polarization Tests The first phase examination resulted in the selection of 19 samples out of the 114 worthy of further testing. Eight of the 19 were ground glass materials. The performance of each sample is rated in order in Table II and individually on their respective data sheets. Profilometer Tests The test results expressed in micro-inches (rms) for #74 through #80 are given in the individual data sheets. Photomicrography and Microdensitometer Scanning Results. These results are pictorially illustrated in the Appendices. The measured value of the spread effect of the microdensitometer tracings at the 50% level (halfway between peak and base) is ratioed with the "no sample" aerial condition and the results tabulated in Appendix C. t- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 IV SUMMARY In the process of determining which screen materials are most suit- able-for various categories of rear projection under cOnditions of high definition, 114 specimens were collected, various testing tech- niques and equipment were developed, and performance ratings were established. Five basic and three selective tests were performed on these materials. A special test was devised which represented a realistic, high quality projection system using a transparency of an aerial photograph as a target object. The selection of this target object in lieu of test objects such as bar resolution charts, point sources, squares, discs, was to provide the necessary realism rep- resenting the conditions of photographic interpretation. Thendefini- tion threshold" of each of the sample materials was established as one of the parameters of rating. Contact resolution tests provided a rapid and simplified means of performance rating although these results were not directly correlative with the projection date. It was generally observed, as a result of definition and luminance distribution tests that, as the granularity of a screen material in- creases, the brightness distribution becomes more uniform, the image spread factor increases, the definition threshold rises numer- ically (quality decreases), and the transmission value decreases. The results of each of the tests defining a screen's performance must therefore be carefully weighed according to the use of the material. The data from this investigation are sufficient to permit the selection of the most suitable material from among the samples tested for particular rear projection applications. Some of the requirements might be; availability of illumination, number of observers, image quality desired, screen size, ambient lighting conditions, brightness uniformity, stereo or non-stereo application, sensitivity to damage, and cost. None of the screens tested in this project is capable of handling all the requirements that might arise in rear projection systems specifications. The selection of a "most suitable?' screen for a given a-pplication is governed by the importance of each requirement at a sacrifice to the least important factors. 10 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 tz Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 7 fl fl V CONCLUSIONS The following screens are suggested in the order of their listing for each of the general categories. A. Most suitable group viewing screen (3 to 5 persons) Samples, #106, 113, 41, 104, 59 B. Most suitable group viewing screen (6 or more persons) Samples, #59, 47, 66, 83, 8 C. Most suitable individual viewing screen (without auxiliary viewing aid) Samples, #97, 114, 42, 105 D. Most suitable individual viewing sereen (with auxiliary viewing aid) , Samples, #35, 104, 63, 97, 16 E. Most suitable stereo group viewing screen Samples, #64, 6 3, 7 F. Most suitable stereo individual viewing screen. Samples, #84, 56 11 r- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 REFERENCES 1 Moroz, L. P., "Imaging of Separate Linear Objects of Different Width and Contrast with Surrounding Field by a Combination of an Optical System and A Granular Layer," Optics and Spectro- scopy, Vol. X, No. 2, Feb. 1961, p. 124-127. 2. Perrin, F. H., "Methods of Appraising Photographic Systems," Journ. SMPTE Vol. 69 Nos. 3 & 4, 1960. 3. Selwyn, E. W. H., "Theory of Resolving Power", Optical Ithage Evaluation, NBS circular #526, 1954, p 228. 4. Crandell, F. F. and Freund K. "A Photoelectric Telephotorneter of High Sensitivity and High Angular Selectivity", Illuminating Engineering Vol. LII, No. 6, June 1957, p. 319-22. 5. Snyder, E., and Shuh, L., "Study of Rear Projection Screen Characteristics," a summary report for U.S. Naval Photo- graphic Interpretation Center, Contract No. NOas 55-775-c, by Mast Development Company, Inc., May 1956. 6. Bausch &/ Lomb Incorporated, "B&L Illumination Analyzer, Model 3, Operating Manual," Class #80-2-51, #054101-4 under contract No AF33(601) 2440 with Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio. 7. Jenkins, F. A. , and White, H. E. , Fundamentals of Physical Optics, McGraw-Hill Book Co. , 1937. 8. Hill, A. J. , "Analysis of Background Process Screens," Journ. of SMPTE, Vol. 66, July 1957, p. 396. 9. Hill, A. J., "A First-Order Theory of Diffuse Reflecting and Transmitting Surfaces," Journ. of SMPTE, Vol. 61, July 1953, p. 19-24. 12 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 ?, 1" r?? r=3 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 fiyai-e 40e//)7th:oi? Thres4o/c1 Te-st LC-743.177e/7t Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 r=) 17=721 -I --=-1 1=-7 r=t r=1 r? r-=1 r= r=.1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 /42:re/re 2 .67/0/ye/7/e/9t afhi.r.yet-04Afr4.410e/0/..0/ Jr.e/le Cocyvt,;:v7 ',Jed /i7davniwil/4.0/7 0,eurho/o/ %es/ JA014//7 04,14k7e01) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 3 avitact /17etro4iI1'w? 7Astof /Pew, /9,.4yece/or, cietwe/7 AfalsetVgis Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 /4";:fy......6. 4 6or4o4otome ter Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 CL5 rP P! f= r= f= C=1 1= 1= 1= 1= 1=n ==4 CZZ1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 /5:9c/re .5- Z um/i7oziot7/4/Alryze,; Mode/ 3 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 f71 r:=1. 1=1 1==! =3 0=1 1=1 1=Z Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 _ ,4",eipe 6 AbiwvizaPIXor, 71st 4a0v#,e/7e Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 IZZ1 r=4 C=S i=1 1=1 = =O ir=f Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 01 /53X /2V-X-306 \ ,i/Y...9Ce, et,z."?' A 45'43gW 4:51?272,f2"eW /1200.0,6-4 frieeZeze-4 /2 ,47i7,4-/-va,/ L.7.0..-,-7,:vg' A/ecizon /37;ci-ove-c3eve ..0,otto,77a/b/.,?? Teide ,74-To."7/r ',rotor- 4...r.a"aiwetc:27.-k, lie 4:04,s-crewv&4..friv/IIZE-w4" Za/ele e..ross/e;.g, _ _ z Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 APPENDIX A fl 7Li LJ r71 r-1 TABLE I List of Rear Projection Screen Materials by Sample Number Sample No. Manufacturer Identification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Trans-Lux Corp. Trans-Lux Corp. Trans-Lux Corp. Trans-Lux Corp. Trans-Lux Corp. Trans-Lux Corp. Trans-Lux Corp. Luxchrome "50" Luxchrome "70" Stewart Black TV Blue S-50-R Luxchrome Hi Trans. 8 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS6OVSR 9 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS6OF 10 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS6OUR 11 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS6OPL 12 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS75PL 13 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS6OG 14 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS75G 15 Celanese Plastics Co. S-719 16 Celanese Plastics Co. S-704 17 Celanese Plastics Co. Acetate A-78, L822 18 Nylco Products, Inc. White plastic matte one surface 19 Nylco Products, Inc. White plastic matte one surface 20 Nixon Baldwin Chemicals, Inc. VCU 3047 15 21 Nixon Baldwin Chemicals, Inc. CX 9642 22 Nixon Baldwin Chemicals, Inc. CX9643 23 Nixon Baldwin Chemicals, Inc. CX 9644 24 Nixon Baldwin Chemicals, Inc. CX 9645 25 Union Carbide Plastics Co. KDA 2905 White 164 26 Union Carbide Plastics Co. KDA 2930 Blue 811 27 Union Carbide Plastics Co. KDA 2930 Clear-21 28 Union Carbide Plastics Co. VCA 3353 White 154 29 Union Carbide Plastics Co. VCA 3353 White 203 30 Union Carbide Plastics Co. VCA 3353 White 363 Matte 02 31 Union Carbide Plastics Co. VCA 3353 White 363 32 Union Carbide Plastics Co. VCA 3604 White 1023 33 Union Carbide Plastics Co. VCA 3604 White 1023 34 Keuffel & Esser Co. Stabilene Film 130 35 Keuffel & Esser Co. ? R-133H 36 Keuffel & Esser Co. R-132H 37 Keuffel & Esser Co. Y132H 38 Keuffel & Esser Co. 130T 39 Keuffel & Esser Co. R 133H 40 Keuffel & Esser Co. Opaque Drawing surface 41 Gordon Ent. 332 GE-1 42 Gordon Ent. 332 GE-2 43 Gordon Ent. 3D-332GE-3 44 Gordon Ent. 3D-332GE-4 45 Gordon Ent. 3D-332GE-5 46 M. M. M. TiO -1 47 M. M. M. ? TiO2-2 48 49 M. M. M M. M. M. TiO2-3 2 TiO -4 50 M. M. M. Tiq-5 A-1 L- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Sample No. Manufacturer Identification 51 M. M. M Ti02-6 52 M. M. M ZnO 53 Monsanto Chemical Co. Ultron UL-3 54 Monsanto Chemical Co. Ultron UL-15 55 Monsanto Chemical Co. Ultron UL-50 56 Transilwrap Company VCA 3310 Matte 57 Transilwrap Company VSA 3310 58 Picture Recording Company Solarbrite 59 Eaton Paper Corp. Drafting Paper (tracing bond) 60 Kalvar Corp. Kalvar 61 Eastman Kodak Co. Kodak Dayview Black 62 Eastman Kodak Co. Kodak Dayview Type 4R 63 Eastman Kodak Co. Kodak Dayview Type 1 64 Eastman Kodak Co. Kodak Dayview 65 E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. HE 1169 66 *Union Carbide Plastics Co. Vinylite Sample #30 & Vinylite (clear) 67 No 'particular manufacturer Acetate, matte one surface 68 No particular manufacturer Acetate, matte two surfaces 69 No particular ? manufacturer Acetate, matte one surface 70 No particular manufacturer Acetate matte two surfaces 71 No particular manufacturer polaroid material 72 .No particular manufacturer polaroid material 73 No particular manufacturer plexiglass 74 No particular manufacturer Ground Glass RMS 30-40 75 No particular manufacturer Ground Glass RMS 15-18 76 No particular manufacturer Ground Glass RMS 20-25 77 No particular manufacturer Ground Glass RMS 35-40 78 No particular manufacturer Ground Glass RMS 5-6 79 No particular manufacturer Ground Glass RMS 28-30 80 No particular manufacturer Ground Glass RMS 30-35 81 No particular manufacturer Emulsion on glass 82 No particular manufacturer White coating on glass 83 No 'particular manufacturer Blue coating on glass 84 No particular manufacturer Vinylite 85 No particular manufacturer Plastic matte one surface 86 Union Carbide Plastics Co. Krene type (white) 87 No particular manufacturer Transparent plastic 88 No particular manufacturer Green plastic 89 No particular manufacturer Lucite or plexiglass 90 No particular manufacturer Plastic matte two surfaces 91 No particular manufacturer W 2447 white 92 No particular manufacturer Lucite 93 No particular manufacturer Plastic matte two surfaces 94 .No particular manufacturer ? Plastic green 95 Union Carbide Plastics Co. VCAL 3354 white 64 96 Da-Lite Screen.Co. , Inc. Da-Tex 97 Eastman Kodak Co. Translucent Plate type 3 98 Fast Fold Polavue PV-60 99 Raven Screen Corp Thruvision 100 Keuffel & Esser Co. Herculene 1630 101 Keuffel & Esser Co. E-132n 102 Keuffel & Esser Co. 130 103 Keuffel & Esser Co. 130H 104 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS6OSTG 105 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS6OVR A-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Sample No. Manufacturer Identification 106 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS60GPL 107 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS6ONG 108 Polacoat, Inc: Lenscreen LS6 OPL 109 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS75G 110 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS7 OBFM 111 ?Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen 0C5OFM 112 Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS6 OBFM 113 ? Polacoat, Inc. Lenscreen LS6 OFM 114 Polacoat, Inc Lenscreen LS75BG *This sample is a combination of Vinylite, Sample #30 and clear Vinlite A-3 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 The table following gives the ratings of the screen samples by num- ber in the order of their performance for each of the various tests. The various categories of rating are listed across the top of the table with the data progressing in columns beneath. A use of this reference data is indicated by the following example of screen selection. If a screen ma.terial is desired for use in a rear projection system ,by on individual with the possibility of using auxiliary viewing aids (normally not exceeding 60x) the following selection procedure might be used. The strongest requirement in this case would be informa- tion capacity so the best values of the definition threshold magnifica- tion test would be chosen from the table. Thus sample #35 becomes the choice in this respect. Fifty % of its relative luminance occurs within 3? from its axis, the "axial gain" is relatively high, and the transmission of 54% is about normal. If the auxiliary viewing is an important requirement and would be in use most of the time, Sample 35 would be the choice. However, if auxiliary viewing is to be only moderately used, sample #104 would be preferable because of its better brightness distribution (12? for 50% Fall-off angle). A-4 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 CDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 U U 0 Table II Definition Threshold Mag. Sample# Peak Contact Resolution l/mm Sample# Transmission T% Sample # Axial Gain ft.c. Gain Sample# Angle(0)507. Relative Luminance /c) Sample# Polarization % Samble # ON ON ON ONON ON ON ON 0% V V ???.I ??..I ????4 03 CO 03 03 CO CO CO 03 CO 1/40 I-' Lo 1/4/1 ***?1 00 0 0 1.?.) ts.) tA 1.4 ?P'? -P- tit CS ON V V V CO 03 1/40 1/40 1/40 ?0 0 0 I-, t1/4.) IV CS\ 0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? tit 1/4.n 1/4./1 VI VI U Ui lfl ln TRANSMISSION (%) (smooth side toward light source) Lri 1-4 t.n 0 0 0 %.C1 0 00 1/4C1 ON 0 ln ?-.1 V 01/4 la 01/4 vo 03 03 oN o'N .L???? Ln tv Co ON W4:- 0 O.) Ln La C1/4 cs. co co ra .L?-? co La -a ks) Lri ON ON -P??? ?-?.1 03 312.0 46 ,9995 I99.87 78 11:1 35 142 87 68.75 92 99.93 84 15 104 142 88 62.5 54 99.92 56 15.5 41 141 71 55.625 84 92 61 141 72 52.5 56 99.86 79 62 127 16 51.3 26 99.852 81 105 127 94 50.0 27 99.850 77 16.5 II 64 113 35 48.75 34 99.80 74 .8 106 11346 43.8 19 99.79 63. 17 H 42 113 2 67 43.75 ,9 89 99.76 7 63 101 p 69 40.6 18 99.68 64 17.5 9 1 100 4 17 38.2 38 99.60 61 97x 100 .?1, 38 36.9 35 99.47 93 18 5 5 90 R 18 36.25 H 16 >1 99.36 76 0 16 W 0 114 90 90 H c., ;11 15 19 35.0 33.33 .< 67 69 99.33 , 62 18.5 19.5 4 H 6 90 80 0 0 56 34 32.25 31.25 15 97x ANGL (a. ?c) co ln ON 0 VD Ul t`) h. 0 ?.0 g 39 80 92 30.00 79 H 98 E-4 71 :.1 54 28.75 102 21 H 113 z 43 71 64 N 89 39 28.1125 27.5 77 103 21.5 w 2 74 63 85 25.6 17 76 57 77 25.0 85 89 57 84 24.375 65 92 57 100 22.5 93 22 46 57 102 19.375 90 75 51 12 16.25 109 100 51 14 14.375 57 , 22.5 103 50 53 13.75 68 111 50 103 13.75 100 23 109 45 97 12.5 43 23.5 96 40 109 12.5 53 112 36 30 12.5 70 24 82 36 114 11.25 7 24 110 32 104 10.625 63 24.5 10 32 10 10.625 74 24.5 18 32 11 10.0 114 24.5 19 32 13 9.38 12 24.5 101 32 36 9.375 64 25 102 32 58 9.055 45 25 10$ 328.75 77R 2 25.5 11 32 8.75 14 34 32 101 7.825 104 85 28 37 7.5 81 107 28 64 6.88 3 rDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 fl L Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 fl fl LJ 171 Table II (continued) 7, Definition Peek Contact Axial Gain Angle(?)50 Threshold ? Resolution Transmission Relative ft.c. Luminance Mag, Sample #.1/mm Sample# T7. Samp1e# Gain Sample4 ? /0 SampleIV 25.5 26.5 27 27.5 28 29 29.5 29.5 30 31 31.5 31.5 32 32.5 33.5 34 35 35 37 37. 37. 37. 38. 39 39 39. 40 out at 40X Iddric 13 28 53 28 12 28 58 28 83 26 15 25 59 25 Z 14 25 H 17 25 `4 44 25 81 22 z 8 20 9 20 27 20 p) 67 20 x 7 20 ,E 80 18 54 18 3 18 8 26 18 0 66 18 30 16 44 38 16 56 16 52 16 47 16 77 14 69 14 2 13 20 13 21 13 22 13 23 11 24 11 25 11 28 11 29 10 31 10 32 10 33 10 36 10 37 10 40 9 45.9 48 9 49 9 PEAR CONTACT RESOLUTION 81 105 106 108 79 74 47 52 63 42 76 161 27 51 62 65 66 7 31 43 48 50 9 26 49 68 107 29 70 3 5 41 44 1 42 59 80 6 8 82 96 98 113 4 110 111 112 60 14 58.5 75 58 80 57.5 111 57 107 56 42 56 6 55.5 105 55 9 0-... 55 8 2 54 P 91 54 ? 10 m 5435 .IJ 53.5 IS 30 53 ;I:', 98 53 ,0 104 52.5 til 87 52.5 B 112 52 "J 82 w 99 52 - a 51.5 1.4 5 51 ?a 60 4-) 51o 11 o 51 e 4 50.5 .5 41 50.5 .... 106 0 49 ...., 96 48 z 1 484) 62 H m 48 m 88 45 M 31 44.5 Z 8 43El 113 42.5 29 41 83 40.5 59 40 28 39.5 86 39 33 38.5 95 38 47 38 110 38 71 37.5 52 35.5 72 35 44 6.875 6.18 6.125 6.125 5.937 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.6875 4.685 4.685 4.68 4.375 4.375 4.3125 4.25 4.0625 4.0 3.875 3.8125 3 .31 3.25 3.185 2.875 2.875 2.8125 2.81 2.81 2.5 2.22 2.1875 2.125 1.5625 1.5 1.375 1.3125 1.25 1.0 0.9375 0.875 0.875 0.7825 0.75 0.688 0.656 0.625 0.618 44 113 13 190 96 17031 199(c; 75 190 111 106 105 18? 12 107 18? 105 9 18? 107 96 170 6 58 17? 76 17o 110 6 16? 112 z H 42 16? 13 Lo LA LC 4> La ON CN N) La co Na Ln CO ON C) Co cn 1,.) h. CD LA/ Ln 0.562 32 Na Lo La 4> 4- ln LA Ln Lii Ln Ln Ln ON ON ON ON CN 0 ? 0 ? ? ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. Ln LA 0 LA Ln 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE (P) (50% Rel. Luminance 4> -.4 La Lo ln Na CD CD Co 08 ln ln v) Co Ln ON CO ln CO 00 LA -.4 0?X ESHOLD MAGNIFICATION co CO CO -.4 -4 -4 -.4 ON ON ln ln ln co Up CO La 0 Co Ln *-4 Ln ha C 0,55 20 0.50 25 0.362 37 0.25 51 0.25 24 0.25 48 0.2375 z 49 0.23125 1 108 0.222 ? 50 0.1625 22 0.106 >1 36 1_1 ( CONTACT N, Na Na Na Na 4> La Na i-0 0.03 '14 40 0.01875 21 0.0106 23 60 71 omitted 72 not 78 applicable 87 88 94 ** * #71 & #72 Polaroid Materials not applicable, hence not included. ** 114 Samples recorded. *** H&V indicate horizontal and vertical orientation of sample for measurement of values. **** Out at 40:1 indicates that the definition threshold magnification is beyond the range of the test instrument. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 rDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 APPENDIX B DATA SHEETS The following data sheets are provided as reference data for each of the individual rear projection screen materials tested and evaluated. B- 1 'Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 /sZif AVAW C TaPER 0.415 6W/9 77 0/Y P11)07C/IL" 457XE/C7eaz- 3.1 AIRL A.-Zer-l'/ZrZe* 1/147,-/4557/0/1/ (r,7):E 7/04/Y45.A7/67.57 o r,e7 44/Z4 6:4 //Y ? .17'7,4 6 .45/57e-Afre,f3WAG/Y/#7a41-70/Y /47C2Z A47/04 270/Y 9li4Z/77E-45' Th'/C/IMCY'S ,4w-azzyse 2 %, Ame-z..see,Ao) ??//???????? ????????11111111 tv",1- eae;f. de-re,era,7a- Z.So'" eleZzzarze- Web T.41, .020. C7,?41, ? 75' 45-.X /Ategi ,e CO/Y/,79677 /9:67OLV/A/6" AVA/Elf ZU/V/N/4 NCE awA/ pgazrzz- Aro .ea a -so a 2, A140/1//A7C,47744/ O.dxsv?E'efVE/9 4? ....-6?86.479P44 , /0 O s adzsz-nwr/o/v 4/v6z. E. KV cenpyz" 4.57-/Age- /546.70,1, Form 1926 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 A-1/4A/e//54Craf:447E' ,OZY/O/1//11770/Y PM'S/C/1Z c.57;17e/C7e//fe- 4.5:4114cZ, 72757A6'-4'er:r 4'0,63.P .e.e4c/V,eaktfe-70' 47/ ve - en v/1; "zz nVeZe. 677-/M ez ? 7/139/VOW/4.5'4.570/Y (77:6)? T/F4A/4.577/OZ570A/ P7A-10c27/7-- /-4/1'44L 6;4//1/? ? /ct2L/Ifi2/2/4770/V 7-1//C/TA5' -4/vazEY.f2 za-A-7) c / 9 7 ei 5 '0 L// 1 /6 70 A /a--/ f Ai4G/W17CA1747/V 045:5'4c41.-.4" ,4 ? aeoleM/029 4./Z /41C/17/4 ? ? ? Le/AWN/VI/GE 6:9/1/ /WO/47ZZ- la ,e0 4 .50 a451,5:4-.4?-7o/v ANsz.z- cez/g. Form 1926 1926 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 CDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 64AIRL #4.7 Azifiva,,,vcr/pei? 72-474es:/,), erae/ei .044-676A/,417-/o/Y .57-e-A/./oe7,4for?X-- /01-fisia4L 4.57Re/cretx:0- A-7,4e-or.e.47/4/ exvieez-Zzvi1.ste-/z4e,/ 49,0,4(5,9' ,.q4SVA-7,Ze,/sfie.0.,D:.5'7700/4t4"-.47.e7/4/Gy,401sCP1oU/-/"..411" 7.9,47vorw.5.57/04/ rAw-7-2-) TRAwe.59A7/6757.0A/ or/V? r4A'az 6;4/A/ ZA7.4 41/7'e;4/cfr/c"/I-A7G/V/#7a4770/1/ -- .4:32z,4/7/2.47/0/1/ 12a-VZ/774425' ? .1.4.11?111.6 r/r/C/11/1/E753" 0" ? rf:Xe. co/Y/7967-/fX5'0L/A/6' /Ss ea ,fo -ea ../-a co /114GA//.47C-4770/V af54.5".E?91,',474' .4 0.515:65w2. a .406' --- 8? ?ZU/V/NANGE671/A1 /WO/47Z E /14ocr.0,-12r,e /0 ,e0 04515Z-iFe4r/ON /V6Z, E fr1.64.57/AWD CZ/4"Y'E" ? Form 1926 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 45:4micx #4e /szifivexe-,4cre./474-R /241576A/,9 T/O/Y P1778/C14L c.577.7e/G7al- /7/YE-gie,9/A/#247)zeze- .6/70e 6zzajza52-- KiE7zz) 0 1/14.5wAgsvoN ? 7;f344/475'?Y2/3' or,V? ? /4.-7AL a4//Y / ZA-7,4 6 " 47/4154/a/..?A-AIG/Y/A7C-4770A/ - /9. 6-X p9. "vozv24r/7/v 9a-4z/77z-c5- ? ? Co/Y/;ICTR6.5"OLV//1/6" Pa/476f /?a 0 /0 .20 SO -ea .0-4) /114 a/V/1?70.4770W aff5P.5769/4:42 A ? 0496:(41,Z4;4213 //VC/7/43' ?. O zeftv/A/Awcz- adm/ Pgaz--/zz- /41 ,'o 30 4 .3z, 4wk;4r7on/ "vivaz KKS') /9.64.5?/6:0 Form 1926 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 fr1,4/1/474C1V/PeR Dec5'/6W/9770/Y Ph/1076W c.57;47E/C7e17Z- 453 el AIRZ E. #5 ? p/vs-2,4' ec./e/F e / 92e dzr?2Jte- 7.9,1/145.,-/Agsvew r/v,47-7-.E.)-- TANA45P77(575-7ew p"tfoor AXML 9/4/A4--- .17'146744-41/PE-A47/761Y/#7a477C2/1/? A7OZAR/24770/1/ 9a4Z/77EZ5' Th//6WA/EaS AA/O.Z4Y..a-c; .41PZ.Le/*/?-0) co/Y/7967-42.447.50L/A/9 AVI-Ve-r? /0 30 30 .10 CO /X146/1/44-/CA 770/ V 045LSTE/FVE,P A --045.8:69Vd.?? /e57.5- - ?oZ/ /Ate/a:5' ea a z/v///vez- aov ragac-/zz- fee /0 00 .6 4 aeoziwrzoN frxe-AsinTeD capfr-e- Form 1926 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 0 AZ4/1V/54 Cra'PER DES/944T/0/Y Ph/KS/CAL e.572R/C7e/nr- 45: 4 A1RL 4"" # z;e9,/vs-ze elazzi7 /7/vd- aepyry e7,ofez-zzz/-za.s4-- cozae- aary .3-7. ex, Tei/vorw,gsvoA/ (4-irvri-E)? 145.A7/6Z.570A/ .5-7/$10 Or/V? /4174Z 9A/A/ .I117,4 E 49/FEA/a//cW/46A//,70,4770/1/ ? /20Z/4/9/24 770/1/ 9a:9Z/77.E-c5'- 7-17'/C/fA/EZYS .17/YO.G.e" (-Co "X; Ze/71-7.) ?o//' //re/a-s ? /7.2 CD497467 ii",65VZ V/A/6" P0Mc1' U4i/N/4/1/CE 6W/V Pg0/47Z 7.5e2C7A-g- CA 77N - ?a e. 511 SEA: VEX' A - 0.9,5:69c",4? deg .20 ? 4 .50 ezegore;f:wrioNANaz.4- ("L'?.) Axe-4szhirez, A7467-arr Form 1926 1926 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 CDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 fr1,49Ve/ANCTOPER .0.415'/64;9770/Y /017007CAL'c.577R/C7eaz- 674111/7L E /47/Ye" ae5W/c16749Z 7:9,47147,-/Agsr/e24/ r/v,47-714-.)? TRAW4)77/(7,57/oAr 9,4/N 1.4674 ifrz4z2/1-/,4a7a4/-42,1/--- /0044,67/2,477ow 42a-VZ/77EZ.7? ? 7-17VC/IIVESYS-- -- ,4/vaz4-(:5-c7 CONT:967-42.6.579L//1/6" /IV/Vt.?? /W4G/1/1/476:47761/V 0.5.S:691i'EA7 A ? 431 7-/egys-laicae,p ? /7//-xey,46- E7-4.92 CZ-LIZ/Lard- exaP-75 liwriey,s7z) /NC/WU' /oe Z U/V//1/A/VCE SAY / WO/ -/Z oeto,c2I AO 00 3 4 ...10 ezeyes-AwrioN 4ivegz.E Axe-4.5?/-4-.4-z7 .474677,4" Form 1926 UDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 0 6" Aiez E. 8 fr1,4/1/e/54Craf14721 .0.4C.7/6/VA1770/Y ial/K5/C/IL 37/7C/C7l//f7Z- TA7,A45,17/.7,5v0A, r/v4.77-E)? 7-434445-,w67.5yaA/ (6-Aioor/V-- /4.47AL 9,4//Y? .17'7,46'i"..:9A7t74/(U/='/V4a/Y/f-70,477.0A/--- /47049C0,97- /VC Zrearig-Al ?,0 147e ./Y/62ZZ2 /31f2Z,4.57/247/01V Qa-VZ/77E2.5".?(zite) ?`"4-A,A;re,d7r.pfezi../er;677 T///e/TA/Ea'S ZZ/-A-X.) conV",:967-#.65vOLV/A/g POIVEW ./ante a /a ,ea so 41.4G/W/c76..4770/V 049:5":47.0"4?.47 ,4 0445:eill,Ei? LV/V/A/ANCE 6',4/1/ /0/70,7ZE -07.5-so /-2f. ,ea s 40 o e7,esz-Awr/e/v ArA/6Z. E. KV. A7,6451/4'fD Cer/pvi- - A-,46?-04'e?G-, fy4, Form 1926 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 ['Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 ?????,.. i=7 r7.7. .5-rAmiaz e #.9 Arrifiva5icraf:ex, .0Z5/621/,41770/Y /01/1S/C4L'ZTAT/C7Z/A:e" 1704vormAgsvaN r/v,477)-- 7/52,444.571774.57ow 9,441/ /APS .6/PE,4/(/V,4a/W,7a47-70/1/ ? /C2OZ/1/?/247/0/V sc,a4/Z/77E-e--7- 73//C/i/VZ-cfS A=EZ.. ? /4104,9COn'T //VC: /121"0/r/vK de:67,-PTEW7d 1822 ?A-472972- ???m?M?10110 ??????????? ????MIMM? emir. ZAZ4S4',8/57E-4/rfr/cWAG/Y/#7a4770/1/? A2OZAW/Z4r/0/1/ 47f/;;VZ/77E-c5' ThYar/Vea'S d77 A. Z) ,e5a -----80 I-43 - ?0/0 //1/C/ZZ'5' 6..07 a cay7,7967-49.6-,5-ozv/A/6- zu/v/Nxivez- 6:4/4/ ,vgaz--/zz- AIAGN/A7C,477ew aes7e,w4--,.? ?4 15 Forrn 1926 10 4 ea azo-ve/Ffr/o/v ..4A/61. .-431 ? /6,2345Z4F.E.0 et747ve" ? 4-/-/-4/74-,;46-7-47,,r nDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 0 Aldf/Vaileraf:Ei? Dec5V9A/A7770/11 PIIKY/C/IL 37271/C72/A70- (54AIRL e #.457 /CO /3e0.0e/CX-1 //VC ,ZE-A'/A5ZE /4%7Z". A7Crg57-7e AAVT-1L 7.9,47145w/..515vew r/v,47-7-4-.)? !74N5r7/ozsy6w or,V? AWAL 6:4//14? .2-Ai,4 Asviy--4/17.4.0/1-/,4a/w/e-ia4,76w ? /9C2Z/4/57/04770/1/ .9a4Z/77E25' TH/GITNEOZY ,4/1/6ZZ-1,5-0 /FEZ. mom...011M awn+ I loom. ??????dam?No . oo-15/4/617,1:5' /a ? CON7,-967-/94475OLV/A/6" /20/V6f ZU/V//10/1/CE 6:4/4/ PA70/4"-/ZZ- ao Aez. /fri4G11//,76:4770/V adia',60/4";4"14 ? 0.615Teh'I'Zci. /4 00 4 ..it) a6L5-2-AwrioN ,e1A/6L t "2"4.5-1/47.67, ? 45W,444" AWC7.0/e Form 1926 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 fl Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Th ?/1-/X/Ye/49C TU/P.447F .04157671; 9 770/K PI/K7/C14L' ..57/1T/Cre/iPE- 534/111:"L E" /..9 ? Av,ZCO ..qectex,e7-,5" /A/c erAe4-7vo,Avyv Azz--75ze- zorree 770 47145,-//..576Y0/1/ 7727-) ATA" 44.57A7/c50 %DA/ 6.5741c, ( 7/ ? ,i,74 6;4//17? ?=? ZA-7,4644-,6>FE,4/rez"/"A-7;4G70.,477c2,1/? /c1044/7/2.4770,4/ Z / 77E25' ---- .717//671(//t7.53' ,47A/CL zr/v) - ? - //1/C//i15" .6-0/Y7,967"/FS5'0Zk'//1/6' AV/VEX' ZU/7//144:A/CE 6',14/1/ /0/?0,-/ZE /1146A/he7C,4770/V .0.5.-TX.0"4-/P ae38:694v6LE- N.,6457/77.6-z) e'er/pv.6- - .67/..4"4" /474670/,' CZ-% 91S7t74/reZAW4G/Y/F7a4770,4/ ? A7DZAW/24770/t/ .Pf7A;" /77E-e-5. 777 //GP& NEWS .44/6ZZ" ,z. *r.. ...roma ....m.o. .4;457: A2240 Aeefier4cqi- - Xed-4z4aCe-- _21 ? 40//' //VC/7/115' Co/Y// 767 .826.5"OL////l/G' /q9.4447?' ZU/V/M9/Ver 61//V Pg0A7LE ./Gls Form 1926 /0 .80 S0 .da ra ca ,414G/Vhcia,4770/1/ ? ? ,ee; So 4 Jr) -0.45eS4AW //ON A /1/SL /4.5-1/4-ED cUri71- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 fli fl fl '71 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 ctst-AA/Rze 99 fri.fivb,--)fereneeig .0.4-676W,41 770/V /0111.'457C14L '4.5-727e/67ef/at- 7??,A45,7/4.57,57/0/1/ (A-1477-E) 7/04 /Y457776I57o/V..57/Vc) c','7? GA ? ..1-A-1,4en'E4/a4cW,4G/Y/.47G477e2A/ /00Z,4,9/4 770/Y 42a-7Z / 77E3' Th'/G7M/Z-4.51.7 ? ,44/6Z2- ? Zi/fri 91-291/ ur.C4W-/Kelle,F.7 7:4(errfr7...5"/O/V zeiY77ei,%/ge /4407a- 6-2 - ? ? oa8 //VC/7/4.5' C049,7967- vOLV/A/6' AVA/69 ZU/V/A/r9A/CE 64/AV "gaz7ZE ,e0 SO .."0 /fr/4 GA/447a4 77tON - 0.6:5'.4741,2-A2 - arficzeipkIew /0 ,ea qo 4 .50 azuz-ile r/oN Naz /-14:45///rED et,/pv*e- --SW-4er /4,-467-42/r n Form 1926 - Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 (5"4 AIRL E #4.9o fri,i/ve45-9cr/PER .0.441576A7, 4' 770/Y /21778/CAL c,STRe/C7Z//fe" 7704WorAfx..5-17/04/ (iv,47-,77)-- 7/04Mp7/sz5Y7A' AWAL ? .TA-7,46'Ee/re--,4A-v/c>/wa/w,-7a4,-/o/v? mmeim? MMwr 4(ix rz a2 -,f we /6. .47, 9/ -A .,- .59 eeWe -A zo.yo /1-?497-27-emo- /470Z AR/Z4 770/1/ 9t7,4z/77z25' TX/G./WE-cr.-5' 4A/GZ "ePZ-Z . //VC/7/45' 8? CO/Y/7967- 47.44750L/A/6' AVIV62? Le/AWN/4/1/CE 601/ I7A'O/47LE A-1.4GA///c76;477ew 0.615`,?WPZ-/P Form 1926 /0 ,e 4 .50 ?261.52wkw--/o/v xwaz /3-746-45I/4 P:6:0 ev/pk-e- /-746-7-47,4- Declassified in in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 (?) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 fl 45"4MPL 916/0/ A-1,411/67Z4Fe2g .0.65/6./1//9770/Y PHKS/C.4L '45777e/ne. Tgrfivorw.515voN (/v,47-7)? 77F/4/10-A7/6-zsyew 65-Afoor/V---- /WAG 6;441/ 4 6 .:9/57E-4/a//4W4G/1/4470.4 770/1/ ? 19C2L/4/5:712:4770/1/ 9a:9Z/7/E5' -- 777//C/1/1/EXS-- Zz",71 -z fisfe-,op 44- 2,z/it Ax9/7-6---42/w-..syze-- -Jew*/ ,tcy4y, ????????11??? ...EMMY* crow 0.Mm. ???????????? ?????????? 6-9 ? ? 40.07...17r //1/67/4.5" --- /::5.o ?Co/YZ-467-/WOLV/A/G AZVA/LW ZU/V/A44 A/C ke" 64/N Pg0F/ZE ..-cz tr,0 c)c IMO o, A z, Co 4-14GA/g7C-4776:4/ e4 0.861:9kei9 .9 ,90 3 /57:5-,4S4Y/rz-D Form 1926 [-Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 ,5"Afrier-71. E /02 NX/Ve454677//feR DE,5*/9A44 770/Y 12177,57GWL',57774/67Z4f0" Txxiv,..5wx.57,3704/ riv,477-4--)-- rhx/14.5-A7/oz574oA/ (?'.7/10.07)V? a4/A/? ? .1"-A7.4SE,6/FE;41-467Y//470.4770/1/ ? A'OZAW/24770/1/ 4,&:4Z/T7S-e-S 1-17//6777VeZSZY? ? ..44'2ZE" ,PZ-Z Z?v",A1/ ? -s /80 rx-,;5777-2-GWS-17Zee- --70 - e.sx 42: ? Ce2/Y/67-/e557(2//1/6" /VM-7/9 ZU/V/A49NCE 6:1/1/ /2/70/c/L /114G/Vhc76',477c,iV Form 1926 sz-z7K4r/o/v 4A/81. (171 /-1.6-4,5?/,,F.E.D CZ/if:Yea 5 4 ,46747/5-- ce,/,pp-z- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 17" I fl fl r-71 C-0 El Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 ? fl n Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 AVArl//79C7V/PeR ? Z2441576'A;9770/Y ? /WS/CAL 457Re/C7l4PE-Z6'6Y /l7? 4M1' LE /06Y (A-1/1177:E:)-- 7247/1/1/4.57,1/ouxo/v p-7/1o(97-//2? ? .4744Z 9A/A/- -17V, 4 67E ,e/a54/(l7/1 A.-1,4/1///7a47/0/1/ ? ?/4"OZA/?/2.4 770/1/ 57e/XL/17447.5' ? 771/C/1/17,51S f:exasex' ea ./.30 z7.4,0zc 75 - 74 c>.-s 04275 /4/r/te's CONT,q67-5vOLV/A/61 /70/4/69 ZU/V/A1/1/CE 61//1/ /2/?'0/47LE 6.0 - o. ia .ea sa eV GO Form 1926 friAGN47CAT/e),V 0.81.14691-2ir? /0 ?,a0 3o 40 .50 aessz?k;4r/oN ,4/vsz Kt:7 ,fr1.64.5',//KEZ? Cezr77-4,-- _-4.5W-4/ge,--;46-704- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 45:04,112Z E. #/047 Nrif/vu"-xcret/P44-/F Z2E(.576A/4 770/Y /2//Kg/CielL ,5-7--/Fe/cre//aL-- 7/04714.5/1/45-15770A/ r/17:4,77:6-) ? 4"/7h5Z5YOA/ (.5-A -70 74,1"/AZ 9,4/ /1/? zt- .8.47t74.447;4/1///c70,4770/1/ ? /620Z /4/7/04 r/C2/V ic"&"-VZ /77ZZ57 ? 777/67-1:NEZ5Z.7 ,9WZE (50 ?V. A=L4?ZZ&'42) ,z7e7z,47ear;-,7- //ye. zd-rv.,76-',ez-eyv2,..SWar, re: eZrur 4r,97/ -7%,z,57/4a47 eor7,7-7/v&? 55 5:5 7e3Z-5- DA' ? /2.5- /Ategi-.5) /geo C677e6C5OLA/6' POI-Vt-r? ZU/1'//1441/1/CE 6',1/1/ /2/?0/47ZE "---21. Form 1926 ,e0 SO .41 A1-4GN/7C-4770A/ 049,57677/4a-r? ad- 40- ,e0 L-2,5e5z-h-w7o/v ,4/1/67L .E. fride-,45///rEz, .6".enPvz- - ,zzz z4- 41'47 .ef0G2,,Y 6/ 467 4607 /r27,42.950 Cie:4e eoo x 7i,:e.y.rxeA4er,/, pDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 CDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 .4-zez,i, so; ,z7z/KiKoz 4O.a..e/r Z2,4r,"76:4" z',IcA- 2O, GC- c.57,4,A7,,qe4,---73f6e 4Z4r22' 42S .4-eac).x kii--/2/4e A7z/v/7'04 e.5:4,1/eZZ-65 iv = $.7 ,4:-//9vx, .eG7C, .26t, Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 ? ., -: L . ' - _ . :..1__-: -1-. 7 ? , _-_t : 17' _T- -_._12-. =.____ =1=-4-- c-___=-1--.-_-.7 . ?? ,.- ? _,_ _ 1 . ,_ t1-' , .... ? .,._ -,.. 4 _ .,..- 1 ...1 1 --1-7--= =.1-.- Li - . , - "rg ' ? -rt. L_-__ -71- , , -7-=: _ __ , L _- 44= -- --1: -:1 , . - .,. . ... _ - =. _,_ __. - .- . '--r? - - Imo:M ---4----r -i - -- -4- - :+---- --'- . sq-- -i--1.--=- --*-,-:-.- -, ,--,- 1--- - , f - ..... -. . - . e. n -Ts' - _,_ ? ,- ..? :_,=__ J__-, --, - Li: I -;-----, 1 : -,- i --.? .. ISLIMii. .?.......ami --4--- 1 -1--= -1"--? '- _ E t-- ? = ..... t , I_ L .--_1-t-.-__ . I - T - --l'- -1- --t -1-- --f.- 4 --. - -f--- ' ____, ...... s?-j--4- ""._-_k-d-- --1! , -1 i -. -t_."-- ---i + 'I_ ' .. ? -- - 4 1a? _ _ a :. - -4 -- -. _-_a.L_ - iIi:E : 4 1-...2_-.-7 -1..-7-f-A.-1-- _t :-: _ , - a r- . . i L. . --? hi--_-:: I 7-8 . 1. -- fi -- _r_ I..- ...-. _ -_i - - - -.-- ? - __..... . t---,. __ :_ . , _ -i- - _ __, . . - . 1,_. -i-h - - t---,- -.. .-L-1:Fi-.7-P. , -- t - 1 - 8 ?-- _ . . - _ _r__,..:_ , . _ ? ___1__:__ s _ _ ?.-- - ? -I-7- ? _ - ? 17-47-..-__' .- ? - I. . , 5 ? __I_ . 4:- : 1_ I__ t --t---4---r--4- I--1, -1----t--i-_:- =_-, - r- - ? - ? - ' -_J___ . . , . I i11- f--1_ +_ _ ? . i . 8 17? '..1H-. :177_ ..... --I- _._ -r- ? -- ? I- .. t - i ..: r - 1-4:, i _ . . 4 8- -8 . - . . . . .. - , -'1.? ? 4- I . ? _ . _ . _ ? - __T_ - _ --L4 I. 1 i L - -F-: 4 :._ 8 _ce_-t---i-4=__ _ Li= - ? .:....=:_ - --, -.- _, .,. t ...: -?-- ---= -J . ' I 6 _ ? ? :ill: 4 . ? : . .HT I 1 i f , - Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 CDeclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010116-6 : . 1 ' ? ... . 1 _ 'Lt.-I.:- ---- - .5. ? -:, ? - ' - . . i :;.: -. --, ----7- - . i- - .- I- -1-- ---r" ---- :---r-E-,- - , -4 - - . --: .?'-- ' ? ? ' .. - ' -1 8-`17- .---r---.- t. _ I - -74---2,7;;=1.:?-?:-?-.:.- T.:.; - i - -.'7: + - - - ? --. _ !_._:- --4,-=_-=4_,?----,..4_ -,---- =-----i- .-_-,---r-, :--4--i-- i----- -- ? .,,-.--.-1- -I_ -.., ? , - - - :Hi_ ? -,-.- - ..1_,___-,- _ ? 'St:: .2- -4-1. .. ? t - ? ... 4 -- .;#?_ t ? -t--4- ..7::.---- , ? ' ". t? ? 4 --L--i- -4 - 4. - _t_ --t.::-- - i ? .8 ' ?ch ? ?? . ,.. . 7 , ? '- ? --' 8 -1,-- , _L. ., _ .. ? ? t - I-- , ?? - :. 4--1..-Li.: -11-_- .:_-? " . . ,L. :- -: ? . - --t- . '". ?-' ? ;::.t_ 1 _ i -....7.-7 r.. i .- _ .. ._ - - ? .. !7_: 1 .Z7 7 - .-t.--t":. 7- - :----_-,1-_-:.,. _I. -. . P-- - ? .-- 1 . _LA ? I- ?:..,.. _.:.1.-_7:17-- t-:-"T -i-ri; , - t ' ! 4 : - 1-_ :L. _ ? - -r ' . ? ? . t 1- f -?-i-..211----_, t__-,_-_ ? . : J._ -. t- + .4 - ; La -_-=_-_.',7.- -1-:- =----_L-7=' --Ft-----1 I- '----..--- ---'2::- .-_-*4-.._T__-_,-.--1-..4.71-LIF-it-.--11: _?._' - ? - 1 :8 : I ' ? -` ' / t -18 .. ,-- 1- ._I _ .4-__,_??-_-_t__ ..,_L-1.7_--L-ni-.=.?,=:_=_I_=,- .._=, ._-_-'-, - ?__4_4__,..-:.71--t_771.. 3_---7-4....--.1_4_-71-1-; -1-_-...t_": --:;_--4-,:r_' .1 :7__1_ ': ., - t::.....,_ -r. -, - -_-...;--,----4.-. .., ? : "-?" ? - .I.: . - - 1-:"..7-_ .I.-'2 ''.. _ _ .?-.=_:Z. -.1.,:. __, - ' ? . . .. r- , 1 . . - :- 1 :..-.. : s.. . i-.': .L.j.. .7 ? - -_-i_-_-t_-_-::_..,. . -- ? . T- 4 4- ,- ? -;-_-;_ -J-L? ? - -4_7. :.I 4 ..-....__ _ -. _r_ ..1_-....::: L. L _- r: .: .7_,.7.-_-_-_ . . _. . ? : . 1 -- - 1--j-,7 " - 1 ? i ' ' ' - - 7.- - - _r. "....--. 1.- ' -,.. --... _ - - - ? - - 1 - - -, - . ..--? .-i 1- 1.2_, , - - . - ' ? ._ . ? ? .:Z.- -_7-1-..,--1-".71.-.;: -I'r - i.-- - -? 1 r- ' ? ? -J-? i---i.- -t zi-:- . = 4.-_-_-.-_-"..t.L .-.-..-_-r-:_L7.:.. . a_._. - --t-7-1. -i: -1----._'L 1.......r_ ',. '.7.. - IH1. 1' '" I: -_. - ? ? ...- - i ....:. L ,. ..: .. -_,_ ,_ T ?+- :?:- - :: - , -? ,--- t ?,...- . : .1-L.- - ?-? _.t -?- -4 . ,...4 .._:.- _-,.- _i__-...:.,_-.:_.: ,, -;- -t? .,:? _2.-_:.:_._ -7.L. ."__ L.'... .t.:_- 4 - ' " - " - 4 I -:? ' ...., . ? . 1 i._ : - ? } . ' ' op : - . . ? . .. . __-_ . . . -..-,3 . , . .. --?+? - ? -, -i.t...-- ' '---t -. -1-- -- : _ - _:.t.7-:, . -+-:71- ---?