NOTE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79M00095A000100050011-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 2, 2005
Sequence Number: 
11
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 24, 1977
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79M00095A000100050011-7.pdf157.42 KB
Body: 
Approved FoQRelease 2005/02/14,: CIA-RDP79M000 000100050011-7 ? INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY STAFF 24 March 1.977 Here are three paragraphs you requested from me for your PRM-11 outline. They are pretty bare-bones but can be expanded if necessary. Please let me know if you need Attachments: As stated INFORMATION ,4pproved For Release 2005/02/14.' CIA-RDP79M00095A000100050011-7 25X1 25X1 IAL Approved For,elease 10 /1 IA-RDP79M0009000100050011-7 III-A-3. Spokesman on operations The DCI's role as spokesman on intelligence operations within his responsibility as the President's foreign intelligence advisor is exercised primarily through the mechanism of the Special Coordination Committee (SCC). The SCC is the successor to the Operations Advisory Group (OAG) and the earlier 40 Corn- mittee, both of which were similar in purpose to the SCC. The SCC is charged, inter alia, to deal with oversight of sensitive intelligence activities, such as covert action, which are undertaken on Presidential authority. The SCC routinely reviews all peripheral reconnaissance operations, overhead reconnaissance operations, and other sensitive, covert or clandestine intelligence operations which require NSC-level attention. The DCI is the sponsor or senior intelligence spokes- man for all intelligence operations reviewed by the SCC. How- ever, except for special and limited situations, the staff support for the DCI in SCC matters is provided by CIA, and the recommended positions are almost wholly representative of CIA interests. Thus, the DCI position in support of specific peripheral reconnaissance operations is based entirely on the value to CIA of the data to be collected. Occasionally CIA provides to the DCI comments on perceived political risks entailed in reconnaissance operations, but normally the SCC looks to State Department, Defense and JCS representatives Approved For ReleasMI TTY RT ff [7 CONFIDENTIAL Approved For,Release 2005/02/14,: CIA-RDP79M000W000100050011-7 for risk assessments. Operational feasibility and the value of collected intelligence from military reconnaissance operations are also addressed by Do.D representatives. Normally, the DCI is the operational spokesman only on CIA-proposed operations. It seems appropriate to consider recognition of a broader DCI role in all intelligence operations reviewed by the SCC wherein the DCI would be the primary spokesman on :intelligence value in satisfaction of requirements and the principal evalua- tor of risk versus gain on all reconnaissance, sensitive, covert and clandestine intelligence collection operations. Approved For Release QAG J2/j4.tE1-~ L9M00095A000100050011-7 Approved FoQRelease 200Q /'1 PcL'lLicfl00OA000100050011-7 V-A. The DCI role as protector of sources and methods Protection of sources and methods is one of the few DCI responsibilities having a statutory basis. Despite the assignment in law, however, the DCI has been provided with no means of implementation or enforcement other than such rules and pro- cedures as he may devise and promulgate. The greatest single shortcoming of this situation is the complete lack of criminal or civil. sanctions which can be applied to persons who violate the procedures set forth by the DCI. Until this problem can be rectified by further statutory enactment, there is little or nothing additional that the DCI can do to enforce his current responsibility for sources and methods protection. Approved For Release 2005/02/14: CIA-RDP79M00095AO00100050011-7 CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL Approved For,.Release 2005/02/14: CIA-RDP79M000W000100050011-7 V-B. The DCI role as guarantor of propriety The DCI has no unique responsibility or authority to be the guarantor of propriety for the Intelligence Community. As an appointed public official, he is sworn to uphold the Con- stitution and to execute all duties of his office in a respon- sible manner. As the head of the CIA, he is of course provided with an Inspector General and the normal mechanisms for dis- covery and investigation of improprieties within the CIA structure. However, there is no existing or recognized structure or pro- cedure whereby he can extend such authority beyond CIA into the other elements of the Intelligence Community. His personal integrity and his authoritative influence over other elements of the Community represent the strongest means available to guarantee propriety outside the CIA. Executive Order 11905 created the Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB) for the purpose of discovering and reporting on improprieties throughout the Community, but the DCI has no responsibility to the IOB other than to ensure cooperation and compliance by the CIA. The absence of any sort of Community Inspector General and the stipulation that Inspectors General of all Intelligence Com- munity organizations should report discovered or suspected improprieties directly to the IOB effectively removes from the DCI any specific or directed role concerning improprieties throughout the Community. Approved For Release CMMMIT M00095A000100050011-7