RECKLESS CONCESSION - RE BACKFIRE STUDY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79M00467A002500080013-3
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 4, 2005
Sequence Number: 
13
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 1, 1976
Content Type: 
PREL
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79M00467A002500080013-3.pdf63.83 KB
Body: 
X44 Approved For L ase 2005/01/31 : CIA-RDP79M00,6M~5pa '.'W- e eckless Concessions SLIPPERY DEFINITIONS mot. It seems inclined to accommodate the brazen Soviet claim that Backfires are not "heavy" bombers. Until recently U.S. intelligence sources agreed that Back- fires, like the less competent Soviet Bi- sons (which count as "heavy" bombers), can strike the U.S. on unrefueled mis- sions. Hence, Backfires, like U.S. B-52s, should count as "heavy" bombers under Vladivostok limits. But suddenly the CIA under George Bush (former GOP chairman) has produced a report, based on partial data, that says Backfires have only about half the range previously thought. This report is politically con- venient if the Administration wants to rationalize a concession. Another concession may concern cruise missiles - pilotless, subsonic, nonhallistic winged aircraft. Using them, American-bombers could stand off from Soviet targets and still hit them. (The ability of B-52s to penetrate Soviet air, defenses is limited and will become more so, especially if we continue to sell the Soviets sophisticated computers) Ballistic, not cruise, missiles were dis- cussed at Vladivostok. But U.S. cruise missiles are superior to Soviet models. So now the Soviets insist sea-launched cruise missiles must have only a 370- mile range. That means few Soviet tar- gets would be in range of U.S: missiles while 125 million Americans would be in range of Soviet missiles.. 'Norse than that Soviet impertinence was the gratuitous Administration offer to count each bomber carrying cruise I missiles against the limit of 1,320 MIRV missiles. This means that unless the U.S. dismantles some of the 1,286 MIRVed missiles deployed or planned, the U.S. can have only 34 bombers carrying cruise missiles. This probably would kill the cruise-missile program. (Feel ing a twinge of deja vu? U.S. anti- ballistic missiles were much superior to Soviet ABM's in 1972 when Nixon agreed to it virtual ban on ABM's.) ,' . CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY TUN DIRECTOR % - _ zec::tive Registry For: Brent Scowcroft and Bill Hyland Re" Backfire study. Here is the kind of leaked ( I assume) article that makes me want to climb a wall. UGH!!!! =~o Approved For Release 2005/01/31 : CIA-RDP79M00467AO02500080013-3