CHANGES RECOMMENDED BY THE DIRECTOR OF INTELLIGENCE, USAF IN NIE-9: TURKEY'S POSITION IN THE EAST-WEST STRUGGLE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79R01012A000300020001-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 20, 2000
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 13, 1951
Content Type: 
NIE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79R01012A000300020001-4.pdf353.82 KB
Body: 
MCI= Approved For~Rej ease 200'T M: CIA-RDP79R01012 Ag00300020001-4 *USAF Declass/Release `Instructions On File* Changes Recoiamended bye Director of Intelligence, USAF In N:C. T. IJIMPYOS POSITION IN TIE WT- +"T ST1WGGLE (13 February 1951) 5. Itef erenc? 11-age 3i,Add the f ollov ing as Para 5, a, b, and c : - Jy-a1 1. Hcference _l'a&e 1, fare 1,14a?, . Revise as follows: + -p event-the-t~ #s One of the main objectives of Turkish foreign policy is to secure continued US assistance ands 20 I efsrence Page 2,, Par, 2. Add the following sentence to end of paragraph: Howeverin this case Turkey would. still atterapf; to maintain a policy of neutrality and, in any eventewould resist with force any direct attack on Turkish territory. Reference Pars. 3 and 4. Page 2. and to of Pa a Change to Par. 5, a, and b, as indic4.ted in Par, 5 below. 4, Reference Pars. wand 6, Page 3, Change numbers of paragraphs to 3 and 4. Doe ment No, 5s In the event A*" I3oyiet -twee in the kiddle East (against Iran, Irate and Syria on one flank of Turkey and'Against Greece on the other do not result in general. war Turks ?e foreign olic would probably be as follows:. a. Turkey would probably not alter its alignment Alfto*ibs -L QWM,%B4Q.W X"# even if it nth theatestwn-kaw. e- *. & cut off, by Soviet conquest or absorption of Iran, Iraq, and Syria, In. this event, Turkey would probably be obliged to adopt a more cautious policy tonard the UtiSR but would almost certainly not grant tho USSR territorial or other major concessions leading to -e~1o--sw a policy DeYilw of Nis doouplsnt appeasement, determined that a Q CIA has no obleotton to doolass - It oontales Information of CIA Interest that most remak tU _{ "?,$InssHied at TS Antborit~-r Hit pr~v For Release 001/0 lA-RDP7.9RG 1 ( 0' A O #a%- iz/ 2~2ISJ .., $nVUWK Approved For eflease 2001/8AZCIA-RDP79R01012A0 0300020001-4 4w . b. sating at the the US failed to oppose militarily Satellite occupation of Greece or refused to consider ~a t, attack on GreaceAeufficient justification for against the USSR, then Turkey's attitude would depend on broader strategic considerations. It the US left no doubt of its determination to support and supply Turkey to the utmost of its ability, Turkey would probably still maintain its pro.US alignment, ., n the other hand, Turkey here unable to obtain assurances of such support, Turkey would probably attempt to adopt a -~xswri policy a. In event that Turkey were outflanked completely b Soviet control of Greece in the vest and jran Ira and S ria in the oast and 6 make substania]. R f concessions ' God, oil, 0 e erence Page Par, 7. Change number of para ra h to 6 7. Reference Pao 2, Par, 8, g p . Change number of para ra h to d g p 7, an revise to read as follows: 8v In the event of general war, Turkeys if not itself attacked, probably would initially maintain a her non-belligeren44 eta4og but would do everything compatible with that status to facilitate a Western victory, SECRET - Approved For Release 2001J.: CIA-RDP79RO1012A000300020001-4 Approved For of lase 2001/08/31 : CIA-RDP79R01012AO000300020001-4 MW ~Ww S. Reference Par, 1. P re 4. of DISCUSSION. Revise as follows: 1. Turkey is determined to .resist Soviet expansion, She t. e Howwev rp, a US retreat into hemispheric isolationism, or the outfla of SR through the control of Greece Iran riajL ~-o,_?_Uld force Turkey to abandon her pro-US alignment and attempt to maintain ap 1icy_of neutrelit9a ee:d--eye-- a .-~- .. e-net-eea~lete3 eut--s?f--foie 9. Reference Faro 3. Page 5, navies first sentence to read as follows: 3. pAsec-tl3er One of the main objective! of Turkey C a foreign policy is to obtain a US commitment to come to Turkey's defense in event of a Soviet or Soviet-Satellite attack. 10. Reference Par. -Page 6. End Paragraph 4 4 at and of sentence,, line 7. Change remainder of paragraph to 5, a, as indicated below in new paragraph 5. lie Add ne'wParagraph as follows, 5. In the event that possible Soviet moves in the Middle East (against Iran. Iraq, and Syria on one flank of Turku and age net Greece on the other do not-tesuzt in general war. Turke 's foreign policy would probably be as follows,_ a. Men if its land communications with the West were virtually out off by Soviet conquest or absorption of Iran, Iraq, and Syria, Turkey would probably not alter its alignment with the Went. In this event, Turkey would be obliged to adopt a more cautious policy toward the USSR, a .)~ Approved For Release 2001/08/31 : CIA-RDP79R01012A000300020001-4 S + T Approved For Release 2001/08/31 : CIA-RDP79R01012A000300020001-4 A number of individuals not unacceptable to the USSR might be brought into the government, and internal security measures would be tightened. It is unlikely, however, that Turkey would agfee to territorial orother concessions, request the US military mission to leave Turkey, or otherwise appease the USSR. /v b, Assuming that the USS11 has not ts, over Iran Iragv and Syri a._and if -a ka~~-Sev#et-see e-R-e#--~~ra~as ~ -a - #~' the US failed to oppose militarily Satellite occupation of Greece or refused to consider a Soviet attack on Greece as sufficient justification for US declaration of war against the USSR, then Turkey's attitude would depend on broader strategic considerations, These considerations would includes (a) the degree of military preparedness in Western Europe; (b) Western military strength in North Africa and the Eastern Mediterranean; (a) the attitude of the UPS toward Turkey and US strategic plans concerning Turkey; and (d) the attitude of the Western Pourers in general and of the US in particular toward Soviet aggression. We believe, however, that Turkey would probably maintain its pro-US alignment, provided the US left no doubt of its determination to oppose the USSR globally and to support and supply Turkey to the utmost of its ability. If Turkey were unable to obtain assurances of such support, it would probably attempt to adopt a seutra &e policy of neutrality, a, In the event that Turkey were outflanked completely bye Soviet control of Greece in the westq and Iran,, Iraca, and Syria in the east and eouththe turkur probably would conclude that the US would be MEET Approved For Release 2001/08/31 : CIA-RDP79R01012A000300020001-4 SECRET Approved For I e Jease 2001/08/31 CIA-RDP79R01012A0 0300020001-4 ,unablety a port and sup them in the event of wars In such aircum- stances Turke would still attempt to maintain a olic of neutralit. In this isolated position, however Turkey wouldRrobably be et;entualk forced to make substantial territorial or other ma or concessions lac to a policy -of appeasement. 12. Reference Par. 6, Page 6. Revise Par, 6 to read as follows: 6,#~-eke-end--s#ra~at.~aee-wte3~ The adoption b the US of a policy of hemispheric defense would cause Turkey automatically to abandon its pro-US alighments weu -iae_bhe-adept#en-icy-tire-I~B-sf-a-~aei e ea+#epheP#e der-ohno i 1 di i . r e n t w d ; 4-? However, even if Turkey were isolated from the ;eat in this way, the Turks would continue to resist Soviet pressure, and would attempt to maintain a -policy of neutrality. In time, a body of opinion favoring appeasement and accommodation with the USSR would probably grow up and might eventually dominate Turkish policy, but at present it appears more likely that the Turks would -- if necessary fight for their independence, no matter how suicidal such a course might be. SECRET Approved For Release 2001/08/31 : CIA-RDP79R01012A000300020001-4 Approved For Release 2001/08/31 : CIA-RDP79R01012A000300020001-4 FORM 11 - 77 2406 DATE TYPE RECEIPT NO,a4, ~ } 'OFMATERIAL SIGNATURE.-OF ?F (-OURIER DATE = QTY aw E (S) PREVIOUS COURIER'S CLASSIFIED MAIL RECEIPT AND LOG RECORD EDITIONS Approved For Release 2001/08/31 : CIA-RDP79R01012A000300020001-4 Approved For Release 2001/08/31 : CIA-RDP79R01012A000300020001-4 MISSING PAGE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT MISSING PAGE(S): Approved For Release 2001/08/31 : CIA-RDP79R01012A000300020001-4