COMMENTS ON ' DRAFT ANNEX A OF 1 OCTOBER REVIEW OF NSC 68 PROGRAMS.'

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79S01011A000500020026-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 3, 2000
Sequence Number: 
26
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 4, 1951
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79S01011A000500020026-5.pdf65.46 KB
Body: 
~C ved o Release 200 8/2Y:'C1A RDP79SQ1011A000500020026-5 eemorium ? UNITED STAT GOVERNMENT 25X1A9a DATE: a ep . 1951 SUBJECT: C`o- umients on )':draft Annex A of 1 October Review of NSC 6 Progr^.ms." Your draft is an excellent one; I am especially pleased ,:ri th the "conclusive nature' of yo !r Conclusions (Sed IV). The ;in ;le major change which I would like for - ou to consider, if this late hour Tou a e able to render c' ian? es to the drat t i aims to the section on I ATO (Sec II) . f In evaluating; ~`ATO strength and will to fight you refer only to the European situation. You made no reference to US rearmament. T e latter is lLndoubtedly of greater significance in evaluating power position of the West vis-a-vis the Commmniat orbit than is the J .iropean situation. I recommend that an additional paragraph; perhaps following par. 27, be included to cover the US position in 1953. Since, as an intelligence study, your draft should be concerned with foreign affairs, you would probably only very briefly consider trends in US arms_-nrients production and military strength. The importance of these trends to the total ik:Jestern position should then he emphasized, The influence of the US program upon the European programs m ght also be included, along :rich the _ dverso consequences of a US inflation a ion u Dl- ropean stab i lit r. t. eh inclusion, we m~,Cht render an additional impetus to apeedin the domestic rea_.? is ler_t nrograa~n. The speed of US recc..i a ent see-,is to me equally as imnorta-rit as pushing US orei^n arc. pro ^rams. I note that the second sentence of 1par. 111 1, i n effect, surima-rizes what I have in mind. The body of : otrc discussion, however, overlooks this all-important factor. 25X1A9a a r;d NGUE sy CLASS. ^ tLaSSIPEO GL SS. C ii)J G D TO, TS S 0 Approved For Release 2000/0 ~:iL M1 1142$ , "El DATE:l N 9k RLVIEWEn:_018557