OPERATIONAL FACTORS FOR SOVIET SHORT- AND MEDIUM-RANGE OFFENSIVE MISSILE SYSTEMS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00428A000200010017-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 8, 2004
Sequence Number: 
17
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 6, 1962
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00428A000200010017-7.pdf87.9 KB
Body: 
25X1A Approved For Release 2004/12 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND REPORTS 6 September 1962 MEMORANDUM Copy No. SUBJECT: Operational Factors for Soviet Short- and Medium-Range Offensive Missile Systems 1. This memorandum is for information and outlines some of the factors required to set up op- erational units equipped with Soviet short- and medium-range offensive missile systems. 2. Transportability: Soviet ballistic mis- sile systems o 1.";1 , 700, and 1,100 n.m. ranges, as well as 300 n.m. cruise missiles, are designed for road transportability. Ballistic missiles of 1.50 n.m. are mounted on tracked vehicles having cross- country mobility, while the longer range systems are transported by trailer, require good roads, and have more extensive ground support equipment. The cruise missile system is mounted on a special wheeled trans- porter and has a very limited cross-country capabil- ity. 3. Fixed Facilities: Permanent launching sites with extens-ivex'ed facilities have been iden- tified in the USSR only for offensive missiles of MRBM range and greater. Although permanent sites are preferred, the MRBM systems also can deploy to alternate field-type installations. The shorter range ballistic and cruise missiles are deployed at relatively simple presurveyed launch positions. In all cases permanent depot and maintenance facilities are required to support each system in the field. In general deployment of these offensive systems prob- ably can be accomplished with fewer prominent and distinguishing site characteristics than, for exam- ple, current SAM systems. i 5, rc L)Lii 16Tli Approved For Release 2004/' l .JZI DOCUMENT NO. -- NO CHANCE IN CLASS. ^ RI;CLASSIFiL ) CLASS. CI{ARC O TO: TS P79T00428MQO Of QOt?t7 _ RUTH: HR 10.2 DATEC i,y REVIEWER:_ 25X1 co Approved For Release 200411 4. Time Required to Become Operational: De- pending on the missile system involved an assuming trained personnel, from several weeks to several months would be required to process an offensive mis- sile system from shipboard to operational status in Cuba. The construction of an MRBM site would require between three and four months assuming the effort was concentrated on the operational elements as opposed to the support facilities. 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/12/21 ; CIA;RDP79T00428A000200010017-7