US AND SOVIET STATEMENTS ON THE TERMS OF A CUBAN SETTLEMENT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00428A000200050019-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 13, 2007
Sequence Number: 
19
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 2, 1962
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00428A000200050019-1.pdf251.37 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2007/11/13: CIA-RDP79T00428A000200050019-1 "A' DIAL ';q 11 2 November 1862 NSC REVIEWED DOCUMENT AND HAS NO OBJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION. 9/28/07 Director of Central intelligence US and Soviet Statements on the leans of a Cuban Settlement 1. jhrushchev's initial overture for a settlement was net forth in guarded language in his private letter of 26 October to President gennedy. This letter was in- tended as a "feeler" to probe the President's willing- ness to provide Xbrushchev with a face-saving formula to cover a major backdown. It was, therefore, cast in vague and imprecise language as regards the specific terms of a settlement. dhr'ushchev, however, made it clear that the basic formula he was offering the Presi- dent involved Soviet withdrawal of offensive weapons in exchange for a US guarantee that it would not attack Cuba: "If assurances were given by the President and the government of the U9 that the USA itself would not participate in an attack on Cuba and would re- strain others from actions of this sort, if you would recall your fleet, this would immediately change everything. I an not speaking for Fidel Castro, but I think that he and the governaeart of Cuba, evidently, would declare demobilisation and would appeal to the people to get down to peacfal labor. Then, too, the question of armaments would disappear, since, if there is no threat, then arma- ments are a burden for every people. Then, too, the question of the destruction, not only of the armaments which you call offensive, but of all other armaments as well, would look different.... "Let us therefore show ^tatasaatnlike wlado-m. I propose: we, for our part, will declare that our ships bound for Cuba will not carry any kind of armaments. You would declare that the US will not invade Cuba with its farces and will not sun- port any sort of forces which might intend to carry 4TE _P; I DOCUMENT NO. V` F t LJ_.; tQ, g f;- A$ NO CHANGE IN CLASS. AUTH; Hip IJ-2 Approved For Release 2007/11/13: CIA-RDP79T00428A000200050019-1 ERA Approved For Release 2007/11/13: CIA-RDP79T00428A000200050019-1 CONFIDENTIAL Out an invasion of Cuba. Then the necessity for the presence of our military specialists in Cuba would disappear." 2. In less than 24 hours Ihrushchev sent another letter which was publicized insediste1y and was prob- ably designed to stimulate pressure on the US to begin negotiations at once. This letter, which centsined 10mushchev's first public proposals for a settlement, called for reciprocal Soviet-US withdrawals of offen- sive weapons from Cuba and Turkey under international supervision and for mutual non-aggression guarantees covering thee* two countries. ghrushchov expressed the belief that his scheme for a Turkey-Cuba exchange pro- vided the "basis for a settlement." 3. O 27 October, President Kennedy replied to ghrushchev's private letter of the previous day and ig- nored the subsequent public letter. The President ac- cepted the basic formula presented in the 26 October letter, made procedural proposals for negotiating a for- mal agreement, and not forth his understanding of Khru- shchev's proposal in sore precise term. The President made it clear, however, that the "first thing that needs to be donee... is for work to cease on offensive missile bases in Cuba and for all weapons system in Cuba capa- ble of offensive use to be rendered inoperable, under effective T arrangements. " The President then stated that, "assuming this is dome promptly," 98 representa- tives at the Op had been given instructions which would permit then to work out, is cooperation with g Thant, "an arrangement for a permanent solution to the Cuban problem along the lines suggested in your letter of Oc- tober 26th." President Kennedy then specified the "key elements'" of ghrushchev's proposals which, he said "seen generally acceptable as I understand then." Those were : "1) You would agree to remove these weapons systems from Cuba under appropriate tlaite d Nations observation and supervision; and undertake, with suitable safeguards, to halt the further introduc- tion of such weapons system into Cuba. 412) We, can our part, would agree---upoa the establishment of adequate arrangements through the Approved For Release 2007/11/13: CIA-RDP79T00428A000200050019-1 i'nnicincMTI?I Approved For Release 2007/11/13: CIA-RDP79T00428A000200050019-1 United Nations, to ensure the cars ing out and con- tinuation of theme commitments--(a) to remove promptly the quarantine measures now in effect and (b) to give assurances against an invasion of Cuba. I an confi- dent that other nations of the Western Hemisphere would be prepared to do likewise." 4. Nhrushchev'a public backdown letter of 28 Octo- ber was confined to stating the =BR's intention to dim- mantle and remove the weapons under some undefined form of U[ verification. No did not elaborate on the terms of his 28 October proposal, and he did not challenge or ques- tion President Kennedy's definition of the proposed mutual undertakings .. But he did not specifically accept the Pres- ident** statement of tie comalt-111 to "The Soviet government, in addition to earlier instructions on the discontinuation of further work on weapons construction sites, has given a now or- der to dismantle the arms which you described as of- fensive, and to crate and return thou to the Soviet Union. " Khrushchev represented the President's 27 October of- for to give assurances against an attack on Cuba as a for- mal commitment "I regard with respect and trust the statement you made in your message of 27 October IOU that there would be no attack, no invasion of Cuba, and not only an the part of the US9 but also on the part of other nations of the Western Hemisphere, as you said in your nano massage. Then the motives which induced us to reader assistance of such a kind to Cuba disappear." Khrushchev added: "We are prepared to reach agree- ment to enable tS representatives to verify the dis- mantling of these means. Thus in view of the assur- ances you have gives sad our instructions on disman- tling, there is every condition for eliminating the present conflict." Approved For Release 2007/11/13: CIA-RDP79T00428A000200050019-1 Qrmk~ Approved For Release 2007/11/13: CIA-RDP79T00428A000200050019-1 CONFIDENTIAL S. President Kennedy's 28 October reply to [hru- ehchev's usage of the same date concluded the ex- change: "1 consider my letter to you of October 27 and your reply today as firm undertakings on the part of both our governments which should be promptly carried out," May 8, Cline uty Director (Intelligence) C P-1 Approved For Release 2007/11/13: CIA-RDP79T00428A000200050019-1