ADENAUER'S ATTITUDE TOWARD DE GAULLE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00429A001100020003-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 13, 2006
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 4, 1963
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00429A001100020003-0.pdf166.98 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP79T00429AO01100020003-0 SECRET OCI 0749/63 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Office of Current Intelligence 4 February 1963 CURRENT INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Adenauer'sAttitude Toward De Gaulle The followin received from our comments are attached. 1? Adenauer spoke of the treaty with pride, saying a felt it was West Germany's guarantee against a possible French move to seek a separate arrangement with the Soviets. Further- more, he said, the treaty gave West Germany the ad- vantageous position of having a voice in both French and NATO nuclear defense policies. He said French President De Gaulle considered separate arrangements with the Soviets necessary because of the US attitude on defense matters. De Gaulle also wanted to reach an agreement with the Soviets before the US. did. Adenauer attacked the US for having driven De Gaulle to extremes by refusing to cooperate with him in nuclear defense. 2. Adenauer said De Gaulle had told him that the French president's reason for refusing to accede to the Nassau agreement was because'this agreement deprived Europe of the ability to use,the nuclear deterrent as a counterthreat to any Soviet threat. Any such.counterthreat would, under the agreement, require prior US approval. In these circumstances, De Gaulle had said, Europe would not be able to speak authoritatively in times of crisis or to determine independently when Soviet threats were strong enough to require counteraction. According to Adenauer, De Gaulle claimed the Cuban crisis had shown the US SECRET Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP79T00429AO01100020003-0 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP79T00429AO01100020003-0 *Age SECRET W ability to deal with problems in the western hemisphere in a determined way, which, in itself,'was proof that the Europeans, too, could best deal with threats to Europe. Adenauer also said De Gaulle had been justifi- ably furious over the US trickery-in the Nassau agree- ment of offering to supply only Polaris missiles for which the French had neither warheads nor submarines. Adenauer said De Gaulle thought the US move was a deliberate effort to humiliate France by. demonstrating for all the, world that the French were not ready for such weapons. De Gaulle had also told Adenauer that he did not consider the Polaris to be the ultimate weapon. De Gaulle thought this weapon, as well as long range bombers, might become obsolete, especially for the. European powers which had the advantage of the element of surprise inherent in the relatively short distance between western Europe and the Soviet Union. 3. Adenauerl basically agreed with De Gaulle on a issue of r sh membership in EEC since the inclusion of Britain in the European Community would be another means for the US'to dominate political decision-making in Europe. British member- ship in EEC would also, according to Adenauer, have serious repercussions on Europe's future role in Africa. He said the Americans were jealous over the strong French influence in Africa, as was evident in the current Congo crisis, and that the US wanted to reduce Europe's role on the dark continent. Adenauer said, however, that Franco-German cooperation in Africa was very promising and also desired by the Africans. AI 25X1 25X1 SECRET Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP79T00429AO01100020003-0 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP79T00429A001100020003-0 Nw~ SECRET .e B. In respect to the passage in the current report dealing with Adenauer?s views on the nuclear --- -_ r I ------------- Germany, of course, is not involved in the o aris question, and Adenauer has enthusiastically supported the idea of the NATO multilateral force, in sharp contradistinction to De Gaulle. But in visiting De Gaulle and listening to the General pour out his woes about France'snationalnuclear position, Adenauer is most likely to be sympathetic. C. In regard to paragraph 3, we have known that Adenauer does not really want the UK in the EEC, though he has had to go along with the overwhelming sentiment in Bonn in favor of British membership. The reasons given here for Adenauer?s. negative at- titude should probably not be taken seriously. For one thing., Adenauer's policy has not been to eliminate US influence from the Continent. For another thing, the language of the report on this-point is open to varying interpretation. Obviously no European states- men wishes the US to "dominate" decision-making in Europe. Adenauer's more likely reasons for doubting the wisdom of British membership are that he is not convinced that Britain could ever work toward his cherished federation of Western Europe, and that he is worried about tendencies in the UK toward a "soft" policy in the event of negotiations with the USSR on central Europe. SECRET Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP79T00429A001100020003-0