RUMANIAN-SOVIET RELATIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00429A001100040004-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 24, 2006
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 6, 1963
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00429A001100040004-7.pdf108.81 KB
Body: 
Approved For Rele 201 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Office of Current Intelligence 6 May 1963 CURRENT INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Rumanian-Soviet Relations 1. We have noted a series of developments which leads us to believe that there has been a worsening in Rumania's relations with. Moscow. Bucharest's dissatisfaction with CEMA integra- tion plans has led the Rumanians to adopt posi- tions from which they cannot easily back down. There are also signs of Chinese interest in ex- ploiting this dispute. 2. Among the issues involved in Rumania's disagreement with CEMA are the 'following: a.. Drastic reduction or possibly elimi- nation of Soviet aid toward a mammoth metal- lurgical combine at Galati, which is the key project of Rumania's current economic plan. b. A formal request in February by the CEMA Executive Committee that Rumania in ef- fect abandon plans for most major new in- dustries, and concentrate instead on petroleum products, fertilizers, and agriculture. c. Rumania's refusal to accede to the CEMA request, coupled with a reported threat to withdraw from CEMA unless the request were withdrawn. 3. Other signs, while not conclusive, which contribute to a picture of discord between Bucharest and Moscow, are: a. Bucharest's criticism of Soviet party handling of the Rumanian party's part in World War II. Approved For Release 206/05/24 : CIA-RDP79T004P9A001100040004-7 Approved Foleas b04201100040004-7 b. Rumanian reticence last year to express an opinion about the Sino-Soviet dispute, and more lately the complete absence of commentary on important developments in the dispute which have received wide publicity in the bloc. c. Rumania's failure to restore party re- lations with Yugoslavia--the only Soviet satel- lite not to have done so. d. The return on 28 March of the Rumanian ambassador to Tirana. e. The signing in March of a Rumanian trade agreement with China calling for a 10 percent increase in trade--the first planned increase since 1960 between China and a Soviet bloc coun- try, f. The signing of top level officials of the annual Rumanian-Albanian trade protocol. This contrasts with the handling of other such satellite agreements with Tirana by lesser rank- ing officials and may indicate both countries attach unusual significance to the agreement, Communist China's People's Daily's re- h . rinting on 28 April of the early March.com- p munique of the Rumanian central committee plenum which revealed Bucharest's differences with CEMA. i. Rumanian diplomats have deliberately been cropping hints about the Rumanian-CEMA disagreement, possibly with the hope that it will receive publicity in the West. Approved For Release 25X1 Approved For Release 2006/05/24: CIA-RDP79T00429AO01100040004-7 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2006/05/24: CIA-RDP79T00429AO01100040004-7