BERLIN CHRONOLOGY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00472A001200010002-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
20
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 17, 2001
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 12, 1965
Content Type: 
PAPER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00472A001200010002-6.pdf1.07 MB
Body: 
C ~ 1. d//Vc SE ET App red For t* Iep8$,K t6%q%s?lP-RDPKT00472AOOl 00010002- OCI No. 0521/65 Copy No . '.' Ij 12 January 1965 BERLIN CHRONOLOGY A Chronology of Reports Concerning the Berlin Situation (Received During the Week Ending at 1200 EST 12 January 1965) This is a working paper prepared in the EE Division, Sino-Soviet Bloc Area, Office of Current Intelligence, CIA Prepared by Ext 7441 State, DIA, Army, JCS declassification & release instructions on file Approved For Release 22ECAC?IA-RDP7 NO FOREIGN DISSEM Appd For a SECRET RDf00472A001200010002-6 28 Dec Moscow beamed to the UK an English language commentary reiterating the Soviet UN proposal for a nonaggression pact between NATO and Pact countries. The commentary suggested that FRG policy, termed "revanchist concepts and militarist plans," should be "thrown overboard." (UNCL) .29 Dec Soviet Ambassador to the GDR, P. A. Abrasimov, gave a reception to all diplomatic representations accredited to the GDR at the Embassy in East Berlin. GDR deputy foreign ministers Koenig and Krolikowski attended the affair, which Neues Deutschland termed "cordial and friendly." (UNCL Both the Embassy and the Mission continued to sample reaction to the announcement of the synthetic fiber plant utilizing a US chemical process slated to be built in East Germany. In his press conference, Brandt expressed "regret" that the West had not made more progress in developing a unified trade policy toward the bloc. However, he thought press treatment of the transaction was "too narrow" since the projected fiber plant was not the first instance of Western trade with the East Germans. The FRG Foreign Ministry issued a press statement pointing out that trade between East Germany and the US totalled ?or.y $4.5 million for the first six months of 1964--after deducting $13.5 million in agricultural products and coal. It further stated that the terms of the transaction only called for the transfer of "technical data"--not an entire plant facility--and no US technicians were expected to go to the Soviet Zone.. Bild Zeitung printed the Embassy statement about the USG never maintaining that it had informed the Fed Rep in advance of the transaction but the tabloid charged that the Germans "were at least supposed to be tricked." They also intended to print an open letter asking Litwin Engineering Company of Witchita to "drop its plans in view of political implications." Frankfurter Rundschau said the affair was "becoming a matter of first-rate political significance" and the Neue Rhein Ruhr Zeitung cited "discord between Bonn and Washington." General $nzeiger said the Germans had been made o look like is. (UNCL) Approved For ReleaseSK4& : Coq RDP79T00472A001200010002-6 NO FOREIGN DISSEM Appro ed For Release j NO FORE fl P7 0472A001200010002-6 29 Dec Aleksandr Galkin, broadcasting from Moscow in German, Cvn't said the rltons?betweendthenGermandFederal Republicent in the relati and the GDR. He called the Berlin pass agrement an omen of a fresh approach to existing p e Charging that failure to obtain an initiative at the NATO conference in Paris in December was due to FRG designs on nuclear armaments, Galkin said politicians holding such views must be dumped or "failure and .disaster will be constant companions" of West German foreign policy. .(UNC ) 31 Dec in an attempt to "explore every avenue," the Mission asked a Soviet Embassy East Berlin official,conveying New-:Year's greetings to inform Panin that the USG would like the Soviets to use their good offices to obtain Van Altena's release. A Departw4ent suggestion for using the synthetic fiber plant transaction as a lever to obtain Van Altena's release was thought by the Mission to be of "doubtful utility." The Mission further felt that the East Germans would not be moved by any suggestion that the USG was "under pressure"--presumably from the FRG--since Pankow is "never disturbed by anything which produces strains in Washington-Bonn relations." (SECRET) Approved For Release 2001/A 0e .: 11-~~pppp__JJ-~gg T00472A001200010002-6 NO FOREIGN DTSSEM Approved For Release 2001/09/06 : CIA-RDP79T00472AO01200010002-6 Approved For Release 2001/09/06 : CIA-RDP79T00472AO01200010002-6 Appftm d For ReleasSE0R906 : CIA-RD f00472AO01200010002-6 NO FOREIGN DISSEM 31 Dec The Embassy agreed with the Department's view that Con't progress toward Van Altena's release had been unsat- isfactory. However, it opposed as too complicated a suggestion to use the synthetic fiber plant deal as a lever. Since FRG criticism of the transaction already was vociferous, the USG would run the risk of "increasing the difficulties on this score." The Embassy suggested that possibly other licenses or wheat orders, for example, might be used. It agreed that an approach to Panin was in order; the US Charge had authorized such an approach that day. The Embassy commented that "US interest has been cynically manipulated by Kaul, and has not been particularly taken into consideration in Senat and West German deliberations on the matter of lawyer exchange." (SECRET) After reviewing the Embassy's comments on linking the synthetic fiber plant transaction with the Van Altena affair, the Department reconsidered its suggestion. Faced with the prospect that the USG might have been duped by Kaul and slighted by the Senat and FRG in deliberations for a lawyers' exchange, the Department advised the Embassy and the Mission to impress upon the West Germans the importance the US attached to Van Altena's release as a precondition of a lawyers' exchange--particularly one that included Kaul. (SECRET) 1-3 Jan A 21-year-old women and 19-year-old man escaped into West Berlin by mingling with returning Passierscheine crowds at the Friedrichstrasse U-Bahn station in East Berlin. (CONF) Approved For ReleaseSE(ICj(1 (T6 : CIA-RDP79T00472AO01200010002-6 NO FOREIGN DISSEM Approved For Release 2001/09/06 : CIA-5EUp472A001200MO02-6 NO FOREIGN DISSEM 2 Jan Speculating on the outcome of the Bundestag elections, the Embassy emphasized the close race between the SPD and the CDU/CSU for a plurality. Recent local elections and opinion polls indicated an upsurge in SPD popularity--presumably because many West German voters view Brandt's party as one of progress and initiative. Removal of the threat of a Franco-German confrontation, a miscalculation on the part of the SPD in its dealings with the East, or improved relations within the CDU/CSU all would tend to lessen SPD chances and enhance those of the Erhard administration. Whatever the outcome, the Embassy felt that present US/FRG relations, based on efficient administration and a consonance of objectives in foreign affairs, would not be effected. (CONF) 3 Jan The Mission felt that recession of the ban on Kaul was the most promising lever for obtaining Van Altena's release available to the West. Since several East German lawyers--Vogel for example--already practice in West Berlin, GDR interest in arranging for a mutual exchange probably is less than that of the West--leaving only the ban on Kaul. (SECRET) -4- Approved For Release 2001/09/06 : CI/E Q- 0472A001200010002-6 NO FOREIGN DISSEM Appd For a SECRET RDI00472A001200010002-6 4 Jan East Berlin domestic service commentator Fritz Klein discussed "Washington's rather brusque rejection of Bonn's proposal for an initiative in the German question." He interpreted the US statement calling upon West Germans to submit concrete plans for European security, disarmament, and borders as a way of saying the US must not be "harnessed to the Federal Republic's revanchist electioneering purposes." (UNCL) Neues Deutschland called Erhard's proposal for an Iin tiat ve a campaign device." ND said the result was the Americans "turned up their-noses" because they did not want to promote a "West German election campaign