THE MALTA IMPASSE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
13
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 5, 2012
Sequence Number: 
43
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 2, 1967
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1.pdf574.39 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05 :CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 i ? Secret DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE Intelligence Memorandum THE MALTA IMPASSE Secret 23 2 February 19 67 No. 0791/67 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05 :CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05 :CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05 :CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 SECRF,T CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Directorate of Intelligence 2 February 1967 INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM The Malta Ia:;passe Summary Malta's abrogation of its defense agreer~2ent with the UK is tied up in the island's internal pol- icies, in the economic problems of both countries, and in the frustrations of a newly independent nation. The present bitter impasse has been caused by Malta's allegation that London's decision to reduce British military forces on the island by two thirds violates the agreement, and that therefore all Brit- ish forces must leave the island "forthwith." The British action is in keeping with the letter of the treaty, but the Maltese Government's reaction has been unexpectedly abrupt. It seems almost a strik- ing out in frustration with little regard for the possible loss of UK~financial aid, even though the Maltese must certainly have some hope they will be able to force the UK to negotiate. Valletta no doubt expects the US or NATO to fill any void left by the British, but should the US fail to respond, Malta has said it will seek aid elsewhere, presumably from Communist or neutralist Arab states. London, for its part, hopes that by playing the matter down, and by pointing out that Bx~,tai,n's commit- ment to provide Malta with extensive financial aid is tied to retention of the defense agreement, the Maltese Government will in time find a face-saving way to retract its ultimatum.. The British have told US officials, however, that any major harassment of. their forces on Malta will cause them to consider an immediate and complete withdrawal. NOTE: This memorandum was produced solely by CIA. It was prepared by the Office of Current ?ntel- ligence and coordinated with the Office of Re- search and Reports and with the Office of Na- tional Estimates. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05 :CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 ? MALTA STATUTE MILES 48178 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05 :CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 ` * SECRET Background 1. When Britain granted Malta its independence in 1964, London agreed to retain full responsibili~~ty for the island's defense and to provide extensive financial assistance to help transform Malta from a military base by developing industry and tourism. The garrison economy of Malta--the small, strate- gically located island south of Sicily (see map)-- had developed over 150 years of British rule, and had given the island a higher standard of living than many of its Mediterranean neighbors. In early 1966 London announced that as part of its efforts to effect sharp reductions in defense spending over- seas, it would cut British military forces in Malta by two thirds and its expenditure there by one half, with a consequent reduction in the number of Maltese civilians it employs. 2. The reductions are to begin this spring. There are now some 1,825 British Army, 1,000 shore- based Royal Navy, and 1,540 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel on the island. By the end of 1967, the Royal Navy presence in Malta will be reduced to a small housekeeping unit, with the removal of all navy shps,and i,he naval air squadron, and the clos- ing of the fleet maintenance activity. Two Canberra reconnaissance squadrons and a number of RAF main- tenance facilities will also be phased out by 1969. Finally, both the infantry battalions and their support services on the island will depart by 1970. One squadron of aircraft with additional air force personnel--approximately 940 men--and ~o^~e 460 navy men in various capacities will be left on the island. 3. The effect of these withdrawals on Malta's already shaky economy will be severe. In addition to a reduction of $21.5 million in direct British military spending, the Maltese economy will be jolted by the loss of some 1,400 military and 6,000 civilian jobs over the next four years. With an unemployment rate now of about eight percent, Malta will have 15 percent of its labor force out of work in 1970 if no alternative employment is found. As a result of earlier cuts, the three British services have already reduced the number of their civilian employees by some 4,500 since 1960. The effect of such cuts is considerable in a total labor force of just under 100,000. SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 The Defense Agreement 4. Britain is on sound legal ground. Under the Agreement ozi Mutual Defense and Assistance, signed on 21 September 1964, Malta granted the UK the right in peace and war to station armed forces on Malta and to use base facilities there, In re- turn London agreed to defend Malta, but was not committed to maintain any specific level of forces on the island. The British~asSert that this part of the agreement remains unchanged, and that troops necessary to reinforce those already on the island could readily be airlifted from England. In the agreement the UK also undertook to consult the Maltese Government when major changes in British forces in Malta were contemplated, The Bri~icish did this, first a year ago when the cuts were initially proposed, and again in mid-January of this year when Commonwealth Secretary Bowden visited Malta. 5. It was London's refusal during the latest series of talks to reconsider the planned cutback of its forces on Malta that triggered Valletta's denounciation of the defense agreement. The Brit- ish did agree to stretch out the reductions over four rather than two years, but would make no other concessions. Actually, there appears to be little difference in the timetable, except that the wi~Ltz- drawals, which were to be accomplished in somethYng less than three years, will now take a little more than three years. 6. Td~e Maltese Government is dissatisfied with another facet of the Western presence in Malta, the NATO Mediterranean Command. Specifically, Valletta is protesting part of a proposed NATO reorganization plan which would subordinate the Commander in Chief Allied Forces Mediterranean (CINCAFMED), now a ma- jor NATO command reporting directly to SACEUR, to the Commander in Chief Allied Forces Southern Eur- ope. The Maltese suspect the reorganization is only a prelude to the removal of CINCAFMED, which will be redesignated Naval Command South (ICOMNAVSOUTH), to Italy. NATO Secretary General Brosio has con- sidered proposing such a move to NATO policy makers. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 ~ SECRET 7. It appears that the pro-Western govern- ment of Malta's Prime Minister Borg Olivier con- cluded it could best halt what it considered Western disregard for the island's welfare only be taking a strong initiative. Left to his own devices, Borg Olivier would probably have moved more slowly, but strong pressures were brought to bear on him by former prime minister Dom Mintoff, left-leaning leader of the opposition Malta Labor Party, and by Attard Kingswell, leader of the General Workers' Union (GWU). Although Kingswell is pro-West, he is deeply concerned about the economic effects of the British cuts on his 16,500-member union. Mintoff would like to see Malta break its ties with the West and align with the neutralist Arab states. 8. The abrogation of the defense agreement with the UK appears certain to intensify Malta's problems. Perhaps the Maltese Government believed the planned reduction of the British presence would itself be a national disaster and iihat it had to gamble to force further negotiations. Nonetheless, if the British do pull out now, Malta will suffer direct economic losses that would have been spread over a four-year period. Without British spending the present unemployment rate of eight percent will quickly double. Malta will face a huge balance-of- payments deficit in addition to a large decline in national income. In 1964, for example, UK military expenditures and aid covered all but $3 million of Malta's $57 million balance-of-payments deficit on goods, services, and private transfers, excluding UK military expenditures. 9. The most severe consequence, however, will be the loss of $87 million in British financial aid over the next seven years. In 1964, London agreed to provide $140 million in development aid during the first ten years of independence to help Malta make the transition from a British-supported gar- rison economy. London has already made $53 million of that aid available. It is explictly stated that the financial agreement, also signed in September 1964, is "subject at all times to the continued op- eration of the defense agreement." During the cur- rent dispute London has made it clear it considers its defense and financial obligations unalterably linked. ~cR~T Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 SECRET ? 10. The Maltese Government's immediate options are very limited. Borg Olivier has said he will seek US aid, and has suggested that should the US fail to respond he or his successor will be forced "to look elsewhere." He would like the US to station military forces on the island or in lieu of that to provide extensive economic aid. The Maltese might also ask IrTATO to help out by increasing its contin- gent on the island or by paying more for those al- ready there. The prime minister's claim that he could continue to secure Western military spending for Malta, together with a timely visit by the US Sixth Fleet, helped his successful 1966 election campaign, His Nationalist Party holds 28 or the 50 seats in the Maltese Parliament. The remaining 22 are held by the Malta Labor Party. 11. Another possibility, but more long~~ange, is greater commercial exploitation of Malta's large dockyards and deep harbor. The dockyards, once used almost exclusively for maintaining ships of the Royal Navy, were turned over by London to private interests in 1959. The dockyards are operating be- low capacity and the excellent harbor, which is con- trolled by the Government of Malta, has not been developed to its full capacity. A number of foreign interests--US, Italian, West German, and Japanese among others--have shown interest in various schemes for expanding the use of the port as well as for developing new industry in Malta. The Maltese Government allows 100 percent foreign ownership and a ten-year tax holiday, and provides generous sub- sidies to attract new industry. In time this ef- fort might well prove worthwhile. A major effort has been made to build up tourism, but this has had only a limited economic effect. 12. Even though Borg Olivier says he might seek aid from some country other than Britain or the US, he no doubt prefers to remain with the West. Opposition leader Mintoff, on the other hand, leaves little doubt where he means to seek assistance. He has long argued that Malta is undercompensated for the Western presence, and has claimed he could ob- tain economic assistance from Communist and neu- tralist countries, He has visited Cairo, Algiers, SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 SECRET and Moscow, and he has '.had contacts with other Communist and nonaligned countries in recent years, but there is no hard evidence he has gotten more than vague promises of political support and limited aid from any of them. The Egyptians and Algerians cannot afford to provide sizable amounts of eco- nomic aid, and the Soviets have shown little inter- est in replacing the Western presence in Malta. The Political Impact in Malta 13. Mintoff speculated to the US ambassador on 29 January that the present situation, as it develops, could lead to another election. An elec- tion is not required until 1970. The government might resign, but it shows no inclination to do so. It could be voted out, but so far the Nationalists appear to be holding together. It could be forced out by strikes and demonstrations. Mintoff re- signed as prime: minister in 1958 after a dispute with London over the level of British economic aid, and subsequently fomented a general strike which caused London to suspend the constitution and rule directly for the next four years. 14. Barring economic chaos, Mintoff would find it hard to stir up demonstrations large or violent enough to bring down the government, partly because the Maltese are not given to violence. The leadership of the powerful General Worker.s:'~ Union is moderate and, although it supports Mintoff's Labor Par't'y, i:t.cannot be .counted on to do Mintoff's bidding. Trie Maltese police force number's 1,100 and is fairly efficient, though it lacks modern equipment. Many policemen are members of the Labor Party, but most are also probably loyal to the gov- ernment. In addition there is a national guard type force, the Malta Land Forces, numbering 1,000 men, and units of the Royal Malta Artillery, with 400 of its 1,170 men now stationed in the British Army of the Rhine. The British View 15. London has rejected Malta's abrogation of their bilateral defense agreement, and has no imme- diate plans to comply with Maltese demands for a Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 ? SF(~RFT i withdrawal of all British military forces from the island. The British hope that, by playing the matter down and by hinting that Britain's commitment to provide Malta with extensive financial assistance for the next several years is tied to retention of the defense agreement, the Maltese Government will in time find a face-saving way to retract its ul- timatum. The British have told US officials they are prepared to live with minor pressure against their forces on Malta, but that major harassment will cause them to consider other alternatives for their forces there, including an immediate and com- plete withdrawal. 16. The Maltese have begun the test of nerves. On 28 January, Maltese tugboat men boycotted the British carrier Hermes, which put in and out of the harbor with the help of a tug manned by British naval personnel. On 30 January 16,000 employees of the Maltese Government and their supporters staged a silent march in Valletta to protest Brit- ish defense cuts. On 31 January the Maltese cut off the supply of duty-free aviation fuel, which forced the grounding or diversion from Malta of British military aircraft. Civilian aircraft were not affected by the cut off. The Maltese Govern- ment has drafted amendments to the Visiting Forces Act which would remove the privileges and immunities granted British forces on the island. Borg Olivier has indicated to the US ambassador, however, that he would prevent the amendments from coming to an early vote. Prospects 17. One way out of the present impasse might be through greater involvement of NATO, which, by virtue of its Mediterranean Command in Malta and because of the island's strategic location, has a vital interest in seeing that stability and a Western orientation is maintained. The US Government has suggested that NATO expand its planned study on the implications for Malta of the reorganization of the NATO command there to include a detailed review of the consequences of the UK force reduction. Such a study might last several months, and would, iz Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 SECRET undertaken provide a needed cooling-off period and time for the UK and Malta to reconsider their pres- ently frozen positions and arrive at a compromise. The Maltese Government leaders have indicated that they would agree to such a cooling-off period if Britain would not implement its planned reduction while the study was being made. The British have the question of a possible NATO study under active consideration. London would probably not defer action on the force reduction for an indefinite period but might hold off for a short time. The cuts are not scheduled to begin until ometime in April. The US NATO representative thinks. that there is a fair prospect the North Atlantic Council will agree to study the consequences of the pro- posed UK cutback if the council were informally assured that it would be helpful in forestalling precipitant Maltese actions. SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05: CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05 :CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 25X1 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05 :CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05 :CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1 -;.. ~ ? 2 ~ebrurars~ I9f:7 fi~~~ PAS R "~+~ ~lt~ I~~88+~kn the Pie t~f this ~r is tt~ lay t~-u t the tox~ e~tt~ Diu detai~,e at soother ease its r~hieh curtail~er~t ~'~ the ?e Coe~aiteeats +G~`e~e~ts he8 treated the ,- eibi~,f ty ~~ tx~ub~.e f'or the ~. 'the d+~sire tt> see that ~JS ~~e porte~.biX~.ty in the s?Etuet~,~-~, ie exp~.i~it ~~ the psr.7rt of the ~a1telc~e, aztd i,n+~at on the part ~rf the 9l~rit~,eh. Tt the ir- ~`ati~d~a3, ~ualitiee iz~ the ~aitsae ~oves~sment ~s detre2op_ ~.n~ attit~tries preaail, they may refiue~e tv ba~Ck dawn Qtt the at~rargativn of their d+rtr~n~te a~r~--~aent with the UU~C, and the 'l~ritish quid th$n praba~-~g atteesgt tt~ wash th~ti.r han+d~ r~~ the entire prohle~a? leavl8~ it tra HA~t3 a~td the ~~. the ~#,nancee inwalv?d are by as e,esae in- s~.~ail.`iC~t.nt, a~td arithout ~-xceedit~~I~t car+~iul handling, thy: lte~te +~a-uld hstx~e a t3sat~rce of trt~ubie for yenx~e tt~ cva~e . the ~+~aoranc~Yt~t was t~ordiuated with t~tR stn+d 'w~.th +~I3~. Routine dist~ributivn ie x~~em~ed. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/05 :CIA-RDP79T00826A001600010043-1