STAFF NOTES: SOVIET UNION - EASTERN EUROPE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00865A001800290001-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
14
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 13, 2001
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 29, 1975
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00865A001800290001-2.pdf467.88 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2001/09/04: CIA-RDP79T00865A0018012ap)8aret No Foreign Dissem 2~11TITT HOUE50 Soviet Union Eastern Europe Handle via COMINT Channels Top Secret September 29. 1.975 SC No. 00515/75 Approved For Release 2001/09/04: CIA-RDP79T00865A001800290001-2 Approved For Release 2001/09/04: CIA-RDP79T00865AO01800290001-2 No Dissem Abroad Background Use OnZy/ControZZed Dissem Warning Notice Sensitive Intelligence Sources and Methods Involved NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION Unauthorized Disclosure Subject to Criminal Sanctions Classified by 010725 Exempt from general declassification schedule of E.O. 11652, exemption category: ?5B(1), (2), and (3) Automatically declassified on: Date Impossible to Determine Approved For Release 2001/09/04: CIA-RDP79T00865AO01800290001-2 Approved For Fff(3e9142: ~p1&T00865A001800290001-2 SOVIET UNION - EASTERN EUROPE This publication is prepared for regional specialists in the Washington com- munity by the USSR - Eastern Europe Division, Office of Current Intel- ligence, with occasional contributions from other offices within the Directorate of Intelligence. Comments and queries are welcome. They should be directed to the authors of the individual articles. CONTENTS September 29, 1975 The Zarodov Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Yugoslav-US Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Groundwork Laid for Tito-Ceausescu Meeting Next Month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Romanians Feted in Peking--Again . . . . . . . . 11 Czechoslovakia: Campaign Against Dubcek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Editor's Note: The author of the September 26 Staff Note item entitled Soviet Dissent: Names in the News was Approved For F #0SB(N J C(AN(WRA00865A001800290001-2 Approved For F16"e% BT: BRATL 00865A001800290001-2 The Zarodov Meeting Nearly two weeks have passed since Brezhnev and Konstantin Zarodov met in Moscow, but opinions con- tinue to differ over the implications of that remark- able event. Most observers see a message in the meeting for West European communist parties, with Brezhnev throwing his support behind a tougher line on the issue of cooperation between communist and non-communist parties. Some, but not all, observers see a message directed particularly at the Portuguese communists. There seems general agreement that the meeting has implications for the European Communist conference, but disagreement as to whether it will anger the more independent-minded parties--and thus make the road to a conference even more difficult-- or whether the Soviets have chosen to make a state- ment unilaterally and thereby remove one of the con- troversial issues from the conference agenda. There is even less agreement on what implica- tions the meeting may have for broader Soviet policy-- including Soviet policy toward the US. Today we run three related articles, one noting the unusual as- pects of the meeting, and two others commenting on the question of whether or not it has broader im- plications. Some Unusual Aspects It is virtually unprecedented for Brezhnev to grant a publicized audience of the sort he had with Zarodov on September 17. His reported meetings with Soviet officials over the past five years or more have been confined to important working conferences or ceremonial occasions such as anniversaries or awards. His reception last week of a group of Stakhanovites in connection with the 40th anniversary of the movement was a typical example. He does meet with local. officials when out on junkets around the country, but this is not a parallel, and there was no ceremonial. reason for the Zarodov meeting. September 29, 1975 Approved For Re(e}je S1 ` BT. dl S00865A001800290001-2 Approved For Relea~0 ~(UITA-F65A001800290001-2 The fact that Zarodov is a key figure in an ideological controversy only makes Brezhnev's meet- ing with him the more noteworthy. As noted before, he usually leaves the field of ideology to Suslov, and it is quite out of keeping with Brezhnev's political style to associate himself with an extreme stance publicly. He runs an open office and sees people of all ranks and political stripes, but these meetings are not publicized, and he has sought gen- erally to accommodate opposing views and find a com- promise position in private while standing above the fray in public. Soviet press treatment of the event spotlighted it to an unusual degree. The announcement was car- ried on the front page of Pravda under a headline, "A Conversation with Comrade L. I. Brezhnev," that was apparently intended to attract attention. The same announcement has also appeared on the front pages of the four republic newspapers (Belorussian, Latvian, Lithuanian, and Ukrainian) available in Washington thus far. (CONFIDENTIAL) The Foreign Policy Pulse Seems Normal It is hardly long enough since the Brezhnev- Zarodov meeting to draw an indelible picture of the meaning or significance of that event. Still, a number of things have happened over the intervening days, and they tend to argue against the case that Brezhnev's embrace of Zarodov symbolized a signif- icant, or early turn toward tougher Soviet policies. --Brezhnev himself seemed to be back in the balancing business only a few days after praising Zarodov, when he saw the US astro- nauts in the Kremlin. Given the hoopla that September 29, 1975 Approved For ReleaTsOMOFY II k-F 0 65A001800290001-2 Approved For RelatseP2t/WIA'865A001800290001-2 had surrounded the joint space mission, Brezh- nev probably could not have avoided greeting the astronauts. But still, he did not seem anxious to pull any stops either. A Soviet audience would probably view the lengthy television coverage of the Brezhnev-astro- naut session as a sign of normality in US- Soviet relations. --A similar sense of normality emerges from Foreign Minister Gromyko's UN speech. It has the usual good words about the benefi- cence of detente, the Soviet Union's major contribution to this "main feature" of the international scene, and has some unexcep- tional words about the importance of US-USSR summit meetings, and other efforts to improve relations. Gromyko also went relatively easy on the "opponents of detente," making mention of their invidious work but without naming any names or dwellinq on their threat to the "main feature." It might be possible to read a domestic angle into Gromyko's refer- ence to "all those" who oppose overtly or "semi-overtly" the "policy line" on detente, but it is more likely that he was referring to critics in the US or elsewhere in the West. Gromyko also took the occasion to make what may be the leadership's first public prediction concern- ing the coming party congress. He said that the congress "will" confirm and develop the foreign policy line, but he seemed to balance that promise a bit by saying that those who struggle for "social progress" etc., can continue to count on the USSR's active support. --Gromyko's remarks on the Middle East in his UN speech and, more importantly, his three-hour session with Israeli Foreign Minister Allon, do not give evidence of September 29, 1975 Approved For RJ1 'e 2$F1F Tc1W %h0865AO01800290001-2 Approved For RdIFO'2 ET IA-LI13CTA0865A001800290001-2 any new tough policy that would match Mos- cow's displeasure with Sinai II. Indeed, Israeli press accounts of the Allon meeting indicate that Gromyko is prepared to go along with Secretary Kissinger's proposal for informal, multilateral Middle East negotiations. True or not, the very fact that Gromyko saw Allon indicates that Mos- cow is not about to associate itself firmly with the Arab rejectionists. In short, there seems to be little evidence of dis- continuity in Moscow's Middle East policy. --Moscow is going ahead with the visit by Portuguese President Costa Gomes this week. This is more important than most visits, and could even be directly related to the Zarodov affair, because of the centrality of Portugal to the ideological debate in Moscow. The Soviets are, in effect, putting their stamp on the sixth provisional govern- ment, despite the fact that that government represents a major setback to the Portuguese Communists. Their way has been made easier by the fact that Cunhal has been compelled to go along publicly with the government, but nonetheless it is not hard to imagine that there were those in Moscow prepared to argue against receiving the Portuguese. The piquancy of the situation will be in- creased if Costa Gomes is accompanied by his foreign minister, Melo Antunes. It was the latter who has been criticized by the Soviet media for leading the fight against the Portuguese Communists. It is not inconceivable that one reason that Brez- nev saw Zarodov and thereby made a gesture toward those favoring a tougher line on Portugal, was to clear the way for a Portu- guese visit that would otherwise be inter- preted as a major victory for the pragmatic approach to Portugal. (CONFIDENTIAL) September 29, 1975 Approved For RelefrV5120(~1K4.EqtAJW"B iIOA865A001800290001-2 25X1D Approved For Release 2001/09/04: CIA-RDP79T00865AO01800290001-2 Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2001/09/04: CIA-RDP79T00865AO01800290001-2 Approved For Re" 2810@V1,fj"nR0865A001800290001-2 Yugoslav-US Relations Yugoslav media, responding to directives from top party leaders, are becoming decidedly more favor- able toward the US and more critical of the Soviets. The new trend reflects both growing differences between Belgrade and Moscow and Yugoslav determina- tion to reduce ideologically satisfying--but polit- ically disadvantageous--attacks on the US. Tito wants to maintain good relations with Washington so long as tensions with Moscow continue and par- ticularly as the succession period looms on the horizon. In late 1971, Tito began a political rapproche- ment with Brezhnev that lasted until early 1974, when the Soviets were discovered giving aid to pro- Soviet subversives in Yugoslavia. Throughout this period, Yugoslav media took a harsh anti-US stance that sometimes exceeded the sharpest Soviet criticism. Yugoslav party leaders began to press for a more critical public stand against Moscow in January of this year. In June, Tito lent his personal authority to the drive. He criticized a select audience of publishers for failure to appreciate the gravity of the situation in Soviet-Yugoslav relations, and explicitly ordered a tougher line on Soviet affairs. Belgrade is currently accusing Moscow of fail- ing to take a constructive attitude toward the prob- lems of the Third World, using the Sinai accords to divide the Arabs, and trying to dictate policy to foreign Communist parties. In one exceptional case, a Yugoslav newspaper even criticized Soviet accounts of assassination attempts against President Ford as "conjuring up an atmosphere in America" that en- courages such actions. September 29, 1975 Approved For Re ~2a / tr lfit FftTA0865A001800290001-2 Approved For ReTe?IR 26@(0R0Xj1U$4$ftjV0865A001800290001-2 Meanwhile, Secretary Kissinger's speech to the UNGA and the US role in negotiating the second Sinai accords have been given unusually favorable press treatment. The Yugoslavs are taking care, however, to couch all their compliments in terms that leave no room for doubting Belgrade's continuing commit- ment to nonalignment. (SECRET NO FOREIGN DISSEM/ NO DISSEM ABROAD/BACKGROUND USE ONLY/CONTROLLED DIS- SEM) September 29, 1975 Approved For R 2g(B@RGF'jC1UI ?Q0865A001800290001-2 Approved For Reed 1 0S 4E'VA1 M' 1865A001800290001-2 Groundwork Laid for Tito-Ceausescu Meeting Next Month The stage has been set for the first bilateral summit between Tito and Ceausescu in over a year. The two leaders will meet sometime in late October. Arrangements for the meeting were made by Romanian Premier Manescu during talks over the week- end with his Yugoslav counterpart, Dzemal Bijedic, and later at Tito's island retreat on Brioni with the Yugoslav President. Both sides assessed the talks in effusive terms and heralded the good pros- pects for a Tito-Ceausescu meeting. During their last meeting in July 1974, Tito and Ceausescu agreed to set aside temporary differ- ences over the Middle East--specifically Romania's recognition of Israel--and to re-emphasize their common opposition to Soviet moves in the world com- munist movement and in the Balkans. Subsequent Yugoslav contacts with Ceausescu have been handled primarily by Tito's principal subordinates, Stane Dolanc and Edvard Kardelj, who will play major roles in any collective leadership after Tito goes. The atmosphere for the October talks seems especially favorable in view of recent Romanian co- operation with the Yugoslav internal security serv- ices in bagging one of the most dangerous emigre leaders of pro-Soviet subversives in Yugoslavia. Few substantive details on Manescu's talks have been released, but both sides are forecasting that annual bilateral trade will treble to around $1 billion by 1980. On the political side, it is safe to assume that Premier Bijedic outlined for Manescu his plans for a trip to China--the first ever by a Yugoslav Premier--early in October. (CON- FIDENTIAL NO FOREIGN DISSEM/BACKGROUND USE ONLY) September 29, 1975 Approved For Rele FOCSIg 14- ROIV65A001800290001-2 Approved For RR1 ype grM ft ^ C(~N IK00865A001800290001-2 Romanians Feted in Peking--Again The visit of Major General Gomoiu, Romanian deputy defense minister and head of the military's higher political council, to Peking is sure to ir- ritate Moscow. At a reception in Gomoiu's honor on Sunday, the Chinese toasted the "profound and revolutionary friendship" between the two countries in their com- mon "struggle against imperialism, colonialism, and hecfemonism"--the last a codeword for Soviet efforts to dominate the international Communist movement. Gomoiu responded by underscoring the "fundamental interests of the two peoples." He lauded the army's role in defending the Chinese revolution and in safeguarding the nation's independence and sover- eignty. The Romanian characterized his talks as a new contribution to cooperation between the armed forces of the two countries. Four years ago, similar toasts during Ceausescu's visit to Peking touched off several months of Soviet pressure on the Balkans, including a well-orchestrated campaign against an alleged "pro-Peking, anti-Soviet, Tirana, Bucharest and Belgrade axis." Gomoiu is the latest of a number of high-level Romanians who have traveled to Peking this month. Ilie Verdet, the party secretary for cadre affairs was there from September 5 to 9. Josef Banc, the party secretary for economic affairs is currently in China, along with Major General Dumitru, the head of Romanian military intelligence. (CONFIDEN- TIAL) September 29, 1975 Approved For R#10'Fe M_(/J j'CTAA00865A001800290001-2 Approved For Rely 0%1&?IA@%865A001800290001-2 Czechoslovakia: Campaign Against Dubcek Prague has launched a propaganda campaign which appears intended to demonstrate to critics at home and abroad that domestic dissidence is minimal. The regime recently began to release letters attacking Dubcek that were ostensibly written by in- dividuals who were purged in the aftermath of the "Prague Spring." The letters seek to show that the former leader enjoys little support among the half million former party members. On September 17, for example, the party's hard- line ideological weekly, Tribuna, published a letter by Jiri Cvekl, a former party member. The letter is a comprehensive attack both on Dubcek as a person and on the political philosophy of the Prague Spring. Another, attributed to Vaclav Simecek, who served on the party presidium in the 1968-69 period but was subsequently expelled for his "right-wing" ac- tivities, constitutes a significant endorsement for the Husak regime. In addition to "proving" that support for Dubcek is dwindling, letters of this sort imply that those who were expelled from the party, but now realize the error of their ways, can expect rehabilitation and perhaps even a return to the party. Dubcek and his remaining friends, however, are viewed as guilty of both "subjective" and "objective" treason, and are beyond the pale. (CONFIDENTIAL) September 29, 1975 Approved For Rele lOO 141 A-tqM-R%65A001800290001-2 Approved For Release 2001/09/04: CIA-RDP79T00865AO01800290001-2 Top Secret Top Secret Approved For Release 2001/09/04: CIA-RDP79T00865AO01800290001-2