WESTERN EUROPE CANADA INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00865A002100240001-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 12, 2001
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 12, 1975
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00865A002100240001-3.pdf189.41 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2001/08/08 :CIA-RDP79T00865A002 0024 p 1-3 on i ential NOFORN ~Ilestern Europe Canada International Organizations Confidential No. 0304-75 November 12, 175 Approved For Release 2001/08/08 :CIA-RDP79T00865A002100240001-3 Approved For Release 2001/08/08 :CIA-RDP79T00865A002100240001-3 Warning Notice Sensitive Intelligence Sources and Methods Involved (WNINTEL) NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION Unauthorized Disclosure Subject to Criminal Sanctions DISSEMINATION CONTROL ABBREVIATIONS NOFORN- Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals NOCONTRACT- Not Releasable to Contractors or Contractor/Consultants PROPIN- Caution-Proprietary Information Involved USIBONLY- USIB Departments Only ORCON- Dissemination and Extraction of Information Controlled by Originator REL . , . - This Information has been Authorized for Release to .. . ClaasFfied by 010725 Exempt from pensral declassMicetbn sehaduk of E.O. 11652, exsmptbn cateynry: $ 68(11, (2), and (3) Automaticsly daclasalfled on: Date Impoaalble to Determine Approved For Release 2001/08/08 :CIA-RDP79T00865A002100240001-3 Approved For Release~2D01/US/~~'C~A?RbP79T00865A002100240001-3 WESTERN EUROPE -CANADA -INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS This publication is prepared for regional specialists in the Washington com- munity by tl~e Western Europe Division, Office of Current Intelligence, with occasional contributions from other offices within the Directorate of Intelligence. Comments and queries are welcome. They should be directed to the authors of the individual articles. Italians Demand Step Toward a "Europe of the R~=_gions" 1 Iceland?-UK Fishing Dispute at an Impasse :3 November 12, 1975 -i~ Approved For Releasg~QQ1~Q$~Q$~C,rI~;~D~~9T00865A002100240001-3 Approved For Rele~s(~I~/C~I,~~i~P79T00865A002100240001-3 Italians Demand Step Toward____a "_Europe of thP_ Regions" How would the European Community look if the Nine's regional units got "equal representation" in :B.russe:Ls with the member states? Such a region- al Europe is in fact a long way from achievement, but Italy's twenty regional governments have now moved the issue from the realm of philosophy to politics by requesting representation in order to engage in a "direct dialogue" with community aut:horitif~s . That Italy's regions are the first to take this step is not surprising: they have greater responsibilities in certain fields than other regions among the Nine. In Italy the regions are now responsible for agriculture, some social ser- vices and some aspects of regional development-- all of which get monies from the EC. Moreover, regional acts are reviewed by the community to en- sure consistency with EC rules. In pursuing its program to decentralize government functions, Rome will be transferring additional responsibilities to the regions in the future. The constitutional arguments in Italy give the regions a good case. Also the regions are justifiably disturbed by the bureaucratic inefficien- cies in Rome that result in the loss of EC funds to projects that are under their jurisdiction and want to be able to discuss funding directly with the EC. The .Italian foreign affairs ministry will have trouble handling the regions' request. The ministry recognizes the constitutional justification, November 12, 1975 Approved For Relea~~~d$/~~~~B79T00865A002100240001-3 Approved For Relea~~Q~TQ~~~~1~79T00865A002100240001-3 but does not want to see its own position in Brussels further undercut--other ministries already are repre- sented separately there. More important is the un- comfortable precedent regional representation would set for other EC members, especially the UK and France, which have serious problems with regions seeking greater autonomy. One Italian official has noted that a "pragmatic compromise solution" is needed, but had no idea what such a solution might be. The regions' request has additional political ramifications for Italy--and the community. Five out of Italy's twenty regional administrations have direct participation by the Communist Party. The party would obviously be bolstered by an effective extension of its governmental role, even if the regions do not contest the constitutional right of Rome to conduct foreign affairs. Communist partici- pation in direct bargaining with EC authorities would also tend to counter the arguments of some of the party's opponents that the communists are not serious in their support of the community. The request of the Italian regions was accom- panied by two specific proposals: that the presi- dency of the EC Council establish a "link" with an "inter-regional commission" and that a "regional center" be created in Brussels. Delay, anc~ possibl~.* even ministerial disapproval in Rome, seems in store for the regions' request. It is virtually certain nevertheless that only the open- ing shots have been fired in what will be an import- ant debate about Europe's future organization. (CONFIDENTIAL NOFORN) November 12, 1975 Approved For Relea~e~1~~~1~~~79T00865A002100240001-3 Approved For Releas~_~~'9T/~/.ID6~~~~7,9T00865A002100240001-3 Iceland-UK Fishing Dispute at an Impasse A high ranking Icelandic official confirmed to ?the U~ ambassador on November 11 that Iceland and the UK remain far apart on a prospective fishing agreement. ExpE=_rt-level talks last week apparently ac:h:ieved nothing, and a behind-the-scenes Icelandic effort to sound out possible compromises has also fai:Led. The official, in a private meeting wi?t)i a UK representative, had been authorized to raise Britain's annual fish catch to 65,000 tons. Until now, Reykjavik has refused to go beyond 50,000 tons and the UK has been pressing fo:r 130,000 tons. The Icelandic official thought that: the British might agree to an 80,000 ton catch but coulci not sell the new figure to the Icelandic government. The current agreement between Iceland and thE~ UK expires tomorrow. Unless negotiations gel= off t:he ground soon, there is a growing likelihood of a new round of clashes between Icelandic and Brit;ish vessels. Unconfirmed reports are circulating in Reykjavik that UK warships are poised for an '"attack" and the Fish Trawlers Captains Association has called for a break in relations with London. Meanwhile, negotiations for an agreement wi:t:h West: Germany are proceeding apace, with the only unresolved issue being the location of fishing zones. Members of parliament representing constituencies that border the proposed areas have objected to what they regard. as West German int:ru~sion. into Iceland's fishing waters. (CONFIDENTIAL NOP'ORN November 12, 1975 Approved For Relea~`260~~8t08"? ~fAIF~flP79T00865A002100240001-3 Approved For Release 2001/08/08 :CIA-RDP79T00865A002100240001-3 Confidential Confidential Approved For Release 2001/08/08 :CIA-RDP79T00865A002100240001-3