PROBABLE SHORT TERM COMMUNIST COURSES OF ACTION IN THE POST-GENEVA PERIOD

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
10
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 17, 2004
Sequence Number: 
47
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 29, 1954
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5.pdf594.62 KB
Body: 
---Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79TO0937AO00300030047-5 00momw. ?r __ it .._ NO CHANK IN UAU. CD JlCG C1^j T!t TR Q P . ",",-F .11` I D 140. 59-54 13JECT a I Tob b Short Tko- l:"i Ccaikinrni it amour " Of d_3:~: C s n ." e Po Gene ' Per: od c r e; o bel:5 v8 that t o :limnist accc'pfiia?~c1-3 t tuts a major ah t it v:i..et lic s but, is consistent with our p,revla'-av ` ei of th :.-a policies the Ua R been p s i for sore the pr1..rripa]: Soiiaet strategic m has been the weakening and c utu si. disc i4)tion of the _. 3-{le-d anti- Con.nu .st alliance, Thrr origom of this policy pr olWo-ly back to the check which Cor;imunt.st ac,- ession encountered tzz Kor' a. In 125D- and the steps talln the arouse d !,'e stem Power?, to build a heavily- armed and closely- a of alliance,, These v lc +ument. apparently led the Oorrtunist leaders to conclude that if they continued on their provocative court e3 they would not only risk a general conflict Vat soon be Beech with a military combination highly dangerous to their sva rityQ They reacted in tern; s of their tray. tionK: , 71.ita ~ political concepts: a dangerous opponent must be attacked on his political Blanks and re v.r in order to tndorr r and split up the uses of his povr,, Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 Approved For Reeeape 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937AO00300030047-5 3MW 20 The first indication of a developing change in Soviet policy was Probably the 11alik proposal of June 1951 for tie talks in Korea. The USSR also avoided further aggressive moves on the pattern of the Berlin blockade and Korea, and began to adopt a more "conciliatory" line which held out hope to the hard-pressed Western states that the burdens of reatzinament could be escaped through, negotiated nett nts, Stalin's death apparently facilitated this shift, and was employed to encourage Western hopes of a genuine change in Soviet lipo rya At the same tame, the Co mmmist leaders apparently believed that the continuation of "national liberation movements" in colonial areas, such as the armed insurrections in Southeast Asia, was not incompatible with the main line of their policy, Not only did theme actions tax Western resources, but they were themselves the source of divisions. among the Western allies, and between them and the free nations of Asia. There was, however, a shift in emphasis to political rather than military action in Indonesia, Burma, Waya and the Philippines, and eventually in Indochina, 3, When direct negotiations on Europe Were ultimately resumed in 1953 the USSR felt no necessity to make genuine concessions. To have done so would have meant to sacrifice positions of real power In Germany and Austria. It wea apparently thought sufficient to slow Western re nt and to promote disunity by keeping alive the hope Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 N of successful negotiation. At this bastion the deteriorating 3 ah position in Indochina opened a vadge which the USSR exploited at Geneva. 4. Cwt Alm at LWtm_M.9 In view of the considerable Viet Minh military successes betweon the Berlin and Genera meetings, the Cc mumists do not seen to havo capitalized as fu3)y on their Indochina military opportunities as Would have been possible. By further deleting tactics at Geneva, they might have hoped to seise the whole of Indochina in a relatively short time. In addition, by causing T ndes.?Franoe to fail in his cheanatic bid for peace, U W might have intensified the internal cries in Framcea 5. That the Caen umist leaders chose to sacrifice these isanediate gains was probably due at lest in part to their fear that continued war in Iona would greatly increase the rink of US intereantion0 At a minimum they probably co7sidered that to inflict a costly and huani L'I.ating defeat in Indochim would lead to aol.id3 fissatioa of an anti. C t Alliance in. Asomast Asia, perhaps even ineltx ng raw Asian states* Hut their decision was probably also in large pmt due to a conviction that the course they did choose would bring them still greater advantages then conqu g an of Indodhina, the nniug of which they probab3,v regard as only temporarily postponed in ate caw. fiat more inpo ant advantage mut have been the creation of a favorable situetton in iC ch they could sneoesafuliyr page their Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 ,- Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937AO00300030047-5 main strategic aim of splitting the Western Powers, The C is probably calculated that a cromise ova settlement would enhance their reputation for moderation and thus sharpen the divisions among non.-Communist countries over the policies to be pursued from this point forwrard, II, PROBAELE POST-GENEVA CQZIUNIST COURSES OF ACTION 6, lnsz , In view of the success of their tactics in Indoehin4 we believe that the Ceesmmists are unlikely to follow up the Geneva settlnmant by major new aggressive "pressures" elsewhere, although existing pressure points in such areas as Southeast Asia will continue to be exploited, The Kremlin probably recognizes that such now "pressures" might stiffen rather than weaken the Western alliance. Instead we believe that, for the short term'future at least, the USSR will. seek to capitalize on the favorable ataoosphere created by Geneva through intensi.f ed efforts at negotiation designed tot (a) forestall EDC and Garman rearmament; (b) forestall creation of a SEATO alliance or of a US-backed Middle East defense grouping; and (a) further split the chief Western allies, It apparently hopes to profit more from a further relaxation than from a sharpening of East-West tensions, 7. Soviet propaganda and diplomacy since Geneva iztdicate that the Soviet leaders are eager to press their advantage and maintain 4a. Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937AO00300030047-5 the mon sntum of negotiations on at least of teak about negotiationo Ca aunist propaganda is bearing doun hard on the themes of nuclear onerg7 control and dis is the Molotov European collective security plan' admission of Cor st China to the UN, even Korean unification. The Soviet note of 25 duly states that Geneva gave "fresh proof of the fruitfulnevs of efforts directed at normalising international relations, at resolving Important probe not on]y in Asia but in Europe as hello'' 8o Western Euro c The soviet cell for a new allr.European ^~.rwue.~r.a conference i ates that the USSRs which still regards prevention of West German re nt as a objective,, is seeking to forestall the TTSUK drive for EDC ratification by creating the Inpression that,, in the light of Geneva, a successful East-West conference on Europe in also possible, The Soviet 7aaders t baw recognized that in allowing an ochiua sett nt they risked brInging about a situation more favorable to French ratification of EDC o Their proposal for a now Europee conference seens calculated to minimize that risk. The USSR probably hopes that the T ochina cease fire will "induce" a mood in Pram receptive to Soviet European proposals, and win attempt to concentrate on Fray 0 Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 9o I7tothor or not the inLtwi Soviet proposal Is re jee d,, ge believe that the USSR will fallow it 'with f m-thw p is aid at meeting; Pfewh apposition to E;C, West German dead es for reun .fication,, aid Brit h doubts on German re nt by offering the alternati of a disarmed and neut lined rm r hold down by all uropeen collecti eourity guaranteee#, The Kremlin also vM further develop the line that rejection of its propo wni lead to aux " a ,a " between the USSR and East Germ:~ and "end foxr" hopes of peaceful r+eua ioationo Hmv er,, we no evidence that the tSSR 'will basically revise the position it took at Derlin4 tie still believe that it will not accept free aUc.German elections or d.thdra'r its tamps from East Gex' W until it feels conf nt that all qwmw would thus nose under its effea-tiw control IN Along with gr+e ntir West German rearenment, the Soviets aim at disrugibing the Western 7-1li n by enter the European m a rs of NATO into an alternative cal stive security o set forth in the Soviet notes of 31 1,42h and 25 July, this aches ul,d require the abandonment )f NATO comitmentg.. derv r West GermMy to the NATO Alliance, and end In the 'wit UMI of tL5 forces fxrom Europe and isolates of the US., b ,s taw Kremlin hazy its such ar ping 5uccesa es, it aap r regards the Molotov plan as I useful gambit for appealing to Europe a. opinion. As in the case of the Danish-t SR trade talks in 2bmw,, the IBM continue exploit the d i m? ye pobilities of Esvill 81W st--West trade negotiatdo p Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 no The USSR hoes been rae'cb g efforta to tie F gwjd more cxloee] ' to the Bloc; in the recent Fir .sh-Set trade negotiations, it nought to secu aoMM political commib*n from the Finn,asa However, e no indications that unusual Soviet ptasure is lilmaly to be applied, l2m The Far F4Wt. The prineipa1 irr is Coimnunist effort in the Far Eaat is likely to to prevent the als'vel t of ax We 'rn red collective c1 fens arrar> nt in the area, Partie1 ]y' one which would find the Colombo powers joined with Fr>, e* Brtaift, and the US. The Caam twists will feed Asian neutreltpt son nt by ising "Asia solidarity, and the prospects for peaceful co-existence via negotiated settl , as d ,astrated by Goer (, Peiping may propocs an Asian "collective security" pact as a count to Mol otov's European security plan, or a aeries of bilateral pacts along the lines of Chou alrla. a s "Five Pri miples" a 3,3e At the same time Pei.-ding is likely to attempt to frighten prospective Asian m rbers of a SEATO by threats as to the cro s Of Joining such organization. Cast successes in Indochina allo give new impetus to gIM-111a warfare and dare acti, Itiea In Southeast Asian areas where they now extata In particular, there Is likely to be a stepping up in Communist pshological warfare and perhaps also subversive ac'ivities in fide to serve as a Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937AO00300030047-5 raminder to Asian rmutr t : hat al i t with the US invites Con mri$t aggression. We believe it unlikely, hmiever, that the Coamnunists will make any m j. nou aggmssim moves in Soffit Asia, lest they solidify anti-Ccumaist opposition and undermi their own efforts to encoumsm neutralism0 1 b In the xake of GsmTm,, the Cats will probably intensify their long sta ndi efforts to pr emote frictions between the US and other non-C states over Asian issues, and create situsti a in which Cc=md8t China can appear to *w1d. Asian solidarity against US "war.: ." ea desigm. The stion of Coiinj.st Ch se a sion to the UN -111 almost ce tly be v ously exploited for this pro 15. In addition, Peipim7, xi l probably attempt to make the status of 151"n a =3or issuer over the next Y OW. With its fly in North Korea and Tonkin nco secured by at a arrangements, it x-n feel that the risks iu 1ved in a more aggressive policy have been ado Toile a Chines:: Communist i ion remalm unlikely, Peiping mw feel that "mi taa?y inoidentsn in the Tait area can be exploited to create apprebrnsion in the nor Cemmnaiat world concerning US poly in the Par East0 l6c In we eath hate that for the next year or so the 'Indoddm CCUMMIiSI-A Will not deliberat y break the armistice ant by mUng large ftale attaeft -joss the ova dimmawtion lines, Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 'Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937AO00300030047-5 V t,~- We belies that the Comunists will not give up their objective of securing will. lndocliina, but vd ] l pursue their objective by pares i tary, political and psychc ogical. =aroma The Viet flir h will probably bee no opportunity to interpret the loaeelyy-drawn armistioe to its image; eubive wad local guerrilla. actions against the Fore a and Vieta sm authorities will probably- continua m Hmever, we believe that Soffit and/or Chime Cc um ist control over the Viet ninh will reana.in effective eno to Insure that no local. devel is will contravene the broader Moscow and Peiping desire that pv re3y* local gains must ba subordinated to their general strategic aims 17 The C 3,et probably regard the situation in Korea as stabilized for the present, ari believe that their prospectet in Korea will not be worsened by the indefinite continuance of this stalemate. To score a propag.:da point agaimt the ITS, haver, t MW a "new" proposals for z ificati on and advocate the resumption of negotiations, 18. do not believe that the .Cats will f ,t up their Geneva success with azV ineret d pressures on JM a? Instead they probab expect Japanese neutralist sentiment to be - strengthened, and will approach Japes, with attrt: ;tine economic indueements in order to encourage such neutralland Be ping and Moscow mey even offer Japan a favorable peace treater in or ler to mDrmelize relatims, although territorial issues will. prove ?.n obstacle to this coined Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79T00937A000300030047-5 'Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79TOO937AO00300030047-5 19, The Riddle East, We belies that Geneva a2d post-Geneva de lope n#a will not of t he ,Av a have much significant effect on the scale and nature of Coast activities in the Middle East, The USSR is alreactr pursuing a more active poli(*r in the area than it has in the past' but this pt:)liey appears to be privar.ly in respor to US efforbs to strengthen Middle East defenses, This Soviet, actiii $ n a'ked by offers of economic assistance and other friendly gestures as wel`L as ' propoganda and diplomatic pressures asm' t potential participants in a US-backed defense grouping will probably be inteiaified to the extent that the US vad its allies appear to be zing progress to=rd bolstering the Western position in the 20. However, the indiaat.'Lons are that in the short term at least the USSR will use in ucementa more than threats, The USSR still appears to have no sense of urgency about achieving actual Commmmist control over the areas While ?t might be tempted to turn to the Middle East as offering fruitful opportunities for presze on its Western adversaries, it is dif i oult to see bow it could underta3 e air drastic action without alienating the neutralist opinion it is sockLtg to cultivate in the Middle East as well as in other areaan a ca rated vitk OCX Approved For Release 2006/11/05: CIA-RDP79TOO937AO00300030047-5