PRESENTATIONAL MEANS WORKSHOP

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-00473A000100090017-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
17
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 28, 2001
Sequence Number: 
17
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 15, 1977
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-00473A000100090017-8.pdf602.81 KB
Body: 
dmin~ a ~rsti re Approved For Release qz1_ !0 80-00473A000100090(178? c>~/ ~T 5 APR 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Administration FROM: SUBJECT: Jack: James H. McDonald Director of Logistics Presentational Means Workshop 1. Attached is a memorandum from ith a STATINTL draft of a proposed memorandum from the DD/S&T and DD/I to the DDCI on the presentational means workshop. As Bob points out, the impact on the Office of Logistics is not insignifi- cant both in space as well as production support. I am also of the opinion that the ORD proposal is somewhat at odds with DDA and Office of Training plans for TV. 2. Suggest, after your review of this,.you may wish to get together with the Offices of Training and Logistics and discuss. STATINTL OL 7 1705 ~d:rznis~l~~ivo Approved For Release 2002 IS6n 6AUwbO60473A000100090017-8 Approved For Release 2002/91/30 1CIA-F'kP801 004f3Af00100090017-8 1 ti , 8 PPR 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of an r. :..;toFr:tphy Division, OL Presentational '1,orkshop 1. The attachment is ;j d ra z t : ..o to the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence (MCI) fn_c the Deputy Director for Science & Technology (DD/S&T) and the b putt' ;director for Intelligence (DDI) requesting funds for the .orks}:op. Deletions and additions (under- lined portions) were made by the .)i)l :rnd agreed to by the Officeo# Research and Development ((.'RD). 2. A arently ccrord;ra ion with the Deputy Direct - Asiministra-tion (ii is not rrcir: so1wht. ,vee ess to say, the impact on the is not insignificant. It is, however, difficult to assess in that space, procurement, site preparation et al are not spelled out. Ibellove that the originators feel that the question of funding must be resolved, i.e. how much, if any, and when, before greater specificity can be applied to support require- ments. I was asked if I had any wording on DDA support. I declined in that it would be difficult to define with the information available. Also, any words fror.: me could, of course, have to haieJack's blessing. I am inclined to be nonce :r1ittal until funding is settled. 3. Space requirements on the tuuntunbered page in the overview are hard to decipher. Apparently, the "colocatable with present DDI functions" space has not. been identified, but rather is some kind of a comnittment by the I)DI to "carve it out" somehow. 4. First year funding for the paper portion of the workshop in the amount of $170,000 is for an Atex module. (You may _-r . that their original idea, to which I objected, was to fund the proposal.) First year funding for video (900K) includes $140,000 for e artist console of,a Gonigr.iphics system. Second year funding for video STATINTL includes record in equipment for the system, which they hope can be located in Shop. Approved For Release 2002/01/30: CIS-.13D 01' OP 34D 0I}00090017-8 ! Approved For Release 2002/01430-"--RYP80~004OQp100090017-8 SUF_JECT: Presentational 14c;t;fs S. If this whole scherx, sh? uld, per chance, fly, Printing and Photography Division (PUD) i 1 1 bbe ~,rc than slightly involved, but not to any greater extent than our prc ent co:nmittments to publications support, preparation of graphics for video disk, Genigraphics, film duplication and processing. 4v view is that we will support the DDI in the workshop concept to the "1e';ree that we can while continuing to give timely support to current.l.rc hiction. I'm sure that their priorities are in the same order. STATINTL r It .,t . ?i ~, , to ~t . ~v cY.1< .. rR. } Lti , test c" - / I:', C I f, t- LQ f(r ~..r 6: "~', Cpl y iii >ti.