MAJOR AWARDS

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 27
• Document Creation Date: November 17, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 2, 2000
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: June 10, 1977
• Content Type: AG

rr Approved For Release 2000/06/19 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
S
MAJOR AWARDS
Approved For Release 2000/06/19 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
 ^ UhICLASSA Poved IE R9 Rep Re 2000/06/19 : C1A1~DWFdBfQ 00200088004 RET
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
FROM:
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
EXTENSION
NO.
SUGGESTION AND ACHIEVEMENT
AWAPDS CO IMITTEE
DATE
1001 AME'S BUILDING
2086
6 June 1977
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
!
/OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
FO
RW RDED
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
b )tom
1-Chairman, SAA7 JUN 1977
5E 58 Headquarters
Attached is your AGENDA for
Mr. F` W M. Janney
the Su
e
ti
d A
hi
2
gg
s
on an
c
eve-
ment Awards Committee
Meeting on 10 June 1977 at
1000 in 5E 62
H
d
t
,
ea
quar
ers.
3
.
5.
,fir. Janne :
6.
MMr. Knoche has been interested
in the case under TAB A.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
I A.
FORM
No 3-62
5X1A
6IU USEDIT
Fxtvlo IONSU5 P SECRET ^ CONFIDENTIAL ^ USE ONLY ^ UNCLASSIFIED
 ~I IN1tRNAL
^ U?ICLASS yesil Rge 2000/06/19 : CIAt- Fd dM002000 o~ tRET
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
FROM: EXECUTIVE ST.C;ETARY
SUGGESTION AND ACHIEVEMENT
AWARDS COW`AMI_TTEE
1Q01 AXES BUILDING
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
25X1A
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
Attached is your AGENDA for
the Suggestion and Achieve-
ment Awards Committee
Meeting on 10 June 1977 at
1000 in 5E 62, Headquarters.
25X1A
SECRET ^ CONFIDENTIAL ^ USE ONLY ^ UNCLASSIFIED
 25X1A
25X1A
/DCI) ve
/DD/SST) ve Secretary
Incentive
I) Awards Officer
(0/DDA) Tp
1 10,
Approved For Release 2000/ / "p? ;CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
SUGGESTION AND ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS COMMITTEE MEETING
Friday, 10 June 1977
1000
5 E 62, Headquarters
CHAIRMAN
F. W. M. Janney
1. Call to order
2. Minutes of last meeting (TAB 1)
3. Executive Secretary's Report
4. Comments by Chairman
5. Discussion by Members
6. Vote on the following cases (TAB 2):
TAB NO.
75-201 Shifting Platen for Mann 1740
Stereo comparator
EA-76 Exceptional Accomplishment
Award - OWI
73-50 and Microfilm System in OC
74-387
AlUI,i~? / 4ji 7 1;,
E2 IMPDET CL BY Qc?1?4
Approved For Release 2000/06/19 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
SECRET
 Approved For Release 2000/06/ -DP80-00706A000200080001-6
7. Adjournment
*CODEWORD case to be distributed at the Committee Meeting.
_2_
Approved For Release 2000/061,10 - CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
cc
 Approved For Release 2000/ I DP80-00706A000200080001-6
25X1A
SUGGESTION AND ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
21 March 1977
On Monday, 21 March 1977 at 1000, Mr. F. W. M. Janney,
Chairman, chaired the regular meeting of the Suggestion and
Achievement Awards Committee in 5E 62, Headquarters. The
following were present:
Office of the Director
Directorate of Intelligence
Directorate of Administration
Directorate of Science and
Technology
Directorate of Operations
SA-65
Executive Secretary
Recorder
MINUTES The minutes of the 16 December 1976 Meeting were approved
as written.
.W
EXEC. Since the 16 December 1976 Meeting, 160 suggestions have
S'-'C. been received; 143 or 89% were eligible and 17 ineligible.
P PORT The Committee's Staff closed 84 cases. Three Exceptional
Accomplishment and ten Special Achievement Award nominations
were received since the last meeting.
Approved For Release 2000/06/19 : CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
 Approved For Release 20 RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
I 0911ft, in [
d MMITTEE The Committee took the following action on the cases
ACTION listed below:
mv~
25X1A
NO. SUBJECT
76-117 CODEWORD $200 award, equally
shared (MODERATE/
GENERAL). The Committee
invited NPIC to further
substantiate their $400
original recommendation
should they wish to
request reconsideration.
SA-65 Special Achievement Award $1,500 Special Achieve-
ment Award (EXCEPTIONAL/
BROAD).
25X1A SA-66 Special Achievement Award $400 Special Achieve-
ment Award (EXCEPTIONAL/
LIMITED).
25X1A SA-72 Special Achievement Award $1,000 Special Achieve-
ment Award (EXCEPTIONAL/
BROAD).
77-129 Modification of Sanders $340 award, equally
804 Memory Board shared, based on tangi-
STATSPEC ble savings of $5,624.
S-MTSPEC
75-354 $1,300 award based on
annual savings $34,537
($875), plus SUBSTANTIAL/
GENERAL ($425) intangi-
ble benefits.
Approved For Release 2000
$600 award, equally
shared, based on annual
savings of $7,108 ($405),
plus intangible benefits
of HIGH/LIMITED ($195).
Re-examine in 90 days
to determine evaluation
results by other Agency
components.
ILP80-00706A000200080001-6
 Approved For Release
NO.
25X1A SA-73
25X1A
k
T RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
SUBJECT ACTION
Special Achievement Award $800 Special Achieve-
- ment Award (HIGH/BROAD).
SA-75 Special Achievement Award $500 Special Achieve-
ment Award (HIGH/BROAD).
PT)JOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 1030.
25X1A
Executive Secretary
Suggestion and Achievement Awards Committee
Approved For Release 200, M } DP80-00706A000200080001-6
 Approved For Release 1 0 ~ 1 I /~ T -
OR&000200080001-6
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE COMMITTEE
SUGGESTION NOS. 73-50 and 74-387
A. Background
The Suggestion and Achievement Awards Committee
approved a $950 suggestion award on 24 March 1975 (case
summary attached).
B. Additional Information
STATSPEC
1. Since the Commit review, evaluations have
been received from OL and ' Both offices do not
consider the idea practical in their areas.
2. In February 1977, the originator of 74-387 noted
in an Office of Communications newsletter additional
savings have accrued since the award action of 1975 (copy
attached).
3. OC evaluation and revised annual savings figures
are attached.
4. C/Micrographic Program Branch concurred in the
OC cost analysis.
C. Recommendation of Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $660 supplementary award based on estimated additional
savings of $10,219, equally shared.
D. Decision of the Committee
Approved
Disapproved )LLf'\r 1t_! l ! Date
Approved FoAfMIJg
A,a
000200080001-6
 ;~O SINIS`f =~. TIV
Approved For Rel e 2000 Fffl IrY?F~%O-007~066A000200080001-6
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE COMMITTEE
SUGGESTION NO. 73-50: dated 28 Au ust 1972
11
Gs
-
STATINTL
Technical Writer
Directorate of Administration/OC
_ _ _._ ._SUGGESTION NO. 74-387: dated 8 March 1974
--.-.-.-.SUGGESTION
Communications Officer-Operations
Directorate of Administration/OC
A. Summary of Su estion
a. Place all OC engineering drawings, charts , graphs
and specifications on 35mm aperture cards. Three rolls of film
would be produced (one original and two ozaphanes); the original
would be forwarded to archives, and the ozaphanes would be put
on aperture cards (one ozaphane would be filed by location and/
or equipment, and one would be filed by number).
b. Place all engineering project reports and files on
16mm microfilm rolls and place the rolls in microfilm jackets.
Place the jackets in a central location for easy access. Each
jacket holds from 60 to 98 images or pages. A complete project
can be kept in one jacket for fast retrieval and easy reading.
Also place engineering field reports in microfilm jackets.
This would not only conserve space but would keep response
time to queries from the field to a minimum.
c. Also, place all engineering publications (Engineering
Technical Bulletins, Modification Work Orders, Test Procedures,
Maintenance Parts List, etc. ) on 16mm microfilm rolls and place
the rolls in jackets. Keep the jackets at Headquarters for easy
updating and revisions, and disseminate a microfiche copy to all
interested parties.
Approved For Release 2000/061~0-00706A000200080001-6
k~nLd71 , 13,
'.
 AD14INISTRATI 1
Approved For Release 200W' : 1 QR P80-00706A000200080001-6
Place OC cryptographic instructions, regulations and
procedures on microfiche for ease of transportation to and
storage at field stations. Transmit information documents,
such as the OC Newsletter, by microfiche. Updating of documents
would be accomplished by page changes at Headquarters, which
would then be reproduced as a complete fiche card for transmission
to the field.
B. Evaluations
1. OC originally declined Suggestion No. 74-387 in June
1974. They had. conducted a microfiche applications study in
June 1973, about the same time as the DDO initiated their
microfiche program. At that time, OC response was insufficient
to warrant going ahead on an office basis.
2. On 3 December 1974, the OC Executive Board adopted
a policy endorsing micropublishing of OC documents wherever
feasible. This is a significant and fundamental change in OC
paperwork management that can be directly attributed to the
subject suggestions.
3. OC is procuring and distributing 100 microfilm readers
and 20 reader/printers world-wide. Simultaneously, conversion
of OC production procedures is in progress. Full benefits of this
program will be realized beginning in FY 1976. Attached is a
detailed description of annual savings.
4. Intangible benefits are as follows:
a. Increased office efficiencies resulting from volume
reduction and increased ease of access.
b. Elimination of the problem of missing pages and
time-consuming page checks of registered documents.
c. Reduced emergency destruction time.
OC rated intangible benefits SUBSTANTIAL/ BROAD.
-2-
tCi IS`i'kl`l I TJJ
Approved For Release 2000JQ?f -R 80-00706A000200080001-6
 .. 1[IUSrtilr-.T1VE
Approved For Release 2000/0 -I80-0006A000200080001-6
5. OC recommended that the award be shared as follows:
80% for Suggestion No. 73-50 and 20% for Suggestion No. 74-387.
6. As a result of Suggestion No. 73-50, 45, 000 drawings have
been converted to microfilm to date. Savings in floor space have
avoided the need for an estimated additional ZOO square feet of
storage space in the Rosslyn area. At an annual cost of $9. 91
per square foot, the additional savings is approximately $2, 000
annually and justifies an additional $150 award for Suggestion
No. 73-50.
C. Recommendation of the Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
2. $950 total award based upon annual savings of $7, 000
($400), plus SUBSTANTIAL/BROAD intangible benefits ($400) +
$150 additional award for Suggestion No. 73-50, to be shared
as follows:
20% for Suggestion No. 74-387 $160
80% for Suggestion No. 73-50
($640 + $150 additional award) $790
3. Refer to OL-to determine if they can use this
for their engineering drawings.
D. Decision of the Committee
Approved
Disapproved ?'_
iqZ- Date
_
*% of combined $800 awards portion only.
-3-
STATINTL
",: i 1a'fittxl'1V I
Approved For Release 2000LQQA19,uCI DP80-00706A000200080001-6
 Approved For Release 2000/0~~'f9-:-`CIIA=1C5
..~
..
~
~~
0007066A000200080001-6
OC Micropublishing Cost Analysis
EQUIPMENT INVESTMENT
A. Microfilm Readers = $48,000 (expected life - 8 years)
B. Microfilm Reader/Printers = $60,000 (expected life - 5 years)
Amortized Cost = $48,000/8 years + $60,000/5 years = $18,000 Annually
ESTIMATED COST SAVING
An average of seven OC Handbooks are revised each year.
Printing, distribution, and storage costs for paper copy compared
to microfiche are:
Paper Copy
Microfiche
7 Handbooks - 200 copies ea.:
7
7
Printing Cost
$ 200.00
$ 15.08
$ 1,400.00
$105.56
$ 1,750.00*
$ 21.84***
Secure Storage Cost
$ 2,000.00**
$ 40.00****
$ 5,150.00
$167.40
Gross Saving =
$4,982.60
* 7 x 200 (8 oz) x $2.50 per pound
** 44' s 8 (4-dra.wer safe) = 5 x $400.00. (safe cost)
*** 7 x 200 (1/10 oz) x $2.50 per pound
***'" Storage Cost reduced 980
The above estimate of savings is based on a 20a sample of
OC publications. Therefore, total gross savings are estimated
at S x $5,000 = $25,000.
Net Saving = Gross Sa.v:i.ng - Annual Equipment Cost = $25,000-
$18,000 = $7,000
ti b J P0706A000200080001-6
Approved For Release 20Q0~0~/~.9,; ~ CJA`-~Q..~~Q~-
t
 Approved For Relo-~'e 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-007~,A000200080001-6
25X1A
During the travels of various Ileadquartcrs personnel this past year, i.t has been
repeatedly called to our attention that the Commo Newsletter has been missed,
Therefore, with this issue we are resurrecting the Newsletter. We appreciate your
comments which resulted in this action and solicit your future comments in order to
keep this publication tailored to your needs.
It is our intention to publish on a quarterly basis and distribute this newsletter
widely within Commo. In order for the content to be meaningful to you, we will
welcome your suggestions on content and editorial policy as well as articles for?
inclusion.
Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
25X1A
 25X1A
25X1A
25X1A
Approved For Rel~,se 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-007,~A000200080001-6
i ONFIDFNTIAL
addition to the nehvork were confirmed, The first field 25X1A
installation was recently completed in~
subset ucnt installations in earl 1977 arc lanced for
Once
sufficient data has been accumulated to verify
satisfactory operation, it is anticipated that future
.installations will be accomplished by the Area
technicians without Ieadquarters participation.
SKYMUX was planned to provide other users with
the capability for end-to-end cryptography to ensure
their privacy of communications. It should also
provide the necessary field station circuit capability to
tnect ever increasini; conununications requirements.
Our SKYLINK upgrade efforts are continuing in full
swing despite the satellite problems. SKYMUX, as the
replacement for the present multiplexer in the SC-1
terminal, is the major change being implernentcd in
t}re network at this time. SKYMUX will expand the
present two channel capability of the terminal up to a i
maximum of six. Normal configuration will allow
three channels of operation, one channel for CRU, one
fur TCU, and one spare for overload or other use.
Expansion to six channels to accommodate additional
fixed requirements or temporary support requirements'
such as VIP visits is possible by changing PC cards.'
Onc interesting facet of this new system is that the_
CRU interface will be BLr1CK, thus requiring that the
DOS provide and maintain their own KW-7s and
terminal equipment.
Hospitalization cards will now be immediately
available to employees returning from overseas when
checking in at Headquarters, Cards will still be sent
directly to the name leave point upon request.
Lateral Transfer Information artd Brief Post Reports
will now be forwarded along with the CSA that
announces the employees next assignment. I-candling
of the LTI's in this fashion should result in
substantially reduced cable traffic, and the post report
information will provide employees evith an
irntnediate basis for personal planning.
Effective 1 October 197G, employees PCS in
CONUS are entitled to be reimbursed for pre-
departure temporary lodw,ing expenses (TLA) when
assigned overseas. Regulations now provide for
reimbursement for all phases of temporary living
resulting from a tour abroad.
C I~ct1~[3f~8~ut~tT0el~bOdg0~f38~~ 1~~ pater
?,?~."-~- F1~C),^~t nRI~1T Tt~ !~'~3CR0
Many private business firms and large Government
organizations vrhich issue bulky handbooks, manuals,
and catalogs have found tnicropublishing to be one
answer to reducing their soaring printing, mailing and
storage costs. OC faces SlmllaC risini; costs and as we
entered the rnid-70s the cost of paper was skyrocketing.
An OC crnployee suggested, through the incentive
award program, that OC adopt microfiche as the
standard publishing rnediurn.
Studies and meetings on the feasibility of such a
program convitrced the OC Executive Board that the
benefits to be realized were impressive.
Implementation of the OC i~-tiemgraphics Program
was officially approved in :December 197~I. The
program encompasses all OC Orders, Handbooks,
Manltals, Parts L ]sts, Modificatia!t Work Orders,
25X1A
 CONFIDENTIAL
f' o~~t~?ra1~~~it~nR~' ~1~l~tPro~t~~i~~~c~?f'11tgd: ~elA- ]~I~~~tO'QQ4t~t~l~'D~c~r~tfcKi`,"~tSr7~i~;fs~ of a strcl
further OC Executive Roard consideration and the rectangular box and a separate one gallon container of
conclusion that while the decision to establish the OC methylene chloride. The destruction kit is suited for
Micrographics I'rogratn was justified and sound, office use, is non-flanunable and has a long shelf life,
universal implementation should be tempered by Although the device is intended for emergency
review and approval of justified exceptions. destruction and is not designed for re-use, microfiche
Accordingly, an OC Microform Publicakion Exception may be routinely stored in it. Tests to date indicate
Review Board was established to review the merits of that dry disintegrators ar paper shredders produce
requests from document originators for exception to residue which is large enough to contain significant
the micropublication standard and to recommend data and, therefore, constitutes a security hazard. One
approval or denial of such requests, alternative tinder consideration for the routine
The first official OC microform publications were destruction of superseded or obsolete microfiche at
produced and distributed in 141ay 1975. Since that facilities having no burn capability is to have
time, we have produced and distributed 382 OC microfiche returned to Headquarters for final
disposition. In the meantime, kec those teeth shar .
ni~hlirs~rinnc in n mi~rnt~intin .,,~~l:,,r? ~~~ncn ~R~. P p
MICROFICHE vs. PAPER COPY
C05T COM PAHISOA'
Paper Copy
Miarofiche
Publications 382
Publications 382
X $ 150.00
X S 6.65
Printing
Distribution
$57,300.00
$ 8,520.00
Printing
Distribution
$2,540.30
$ 448.00
((a; 2.80/16.)
Storage
$25,600.00
Storage
$2,560.00
Total
Sr31,420.00
Total
$5,598.30
Initial start-up cost, which included all mi-
crofiche reader/printers, readers and storage
containers which Headquarters provided to OC
con~tpnrments in FY-75, was X55,662.45. Ad itional
equipment purchased in FY-7G amounted to
X23,830.23, which brings the total cost of
implementing the program to ~89,492.G8. Comparing
these figures with those shown above, it can be seen
that we have approximately "broken even" in little
more than ore and one-half years. ~Ve are now looking
forward to the savings to be realized as more OC
publications are produced and distributed in a
microform medium.
One problemm does remain, namely, that of
destruction. Predictions that a microfiche destruction
kit would bccornc a stock item by January 1977 were
The kit is still utmderl;oing tests by
25X1A,~~`~ and no date for availability rtrr be given.
OC is once again trying to develop a better method
to estimate field station workload. Everyone will agree
that we will never develop a statistical method of
'' measuring workload which can be relied upon for
every decision concerning field station activities. ~'~~hat
we hope to develop is a system which will provide part
of the information required by OC managers when
making decisions. It is hoped that we can develop a
better method of determining gross field station work
load, of estimating the utility of propos,,d systems, e.g.,
the Automated Field Terminal, of selecting stations
where improvements are required, e.g., SKYLINK
installations, and for identifying problem areas, e.g.,
personnel shortages. 1~~e started by utilizing the
information contained in CATRAN/BYRES reports. A
weight H?as assigned to the various types of messages;
for instance, outgoing Agency traffic was assigned the
highest weight because of the poking time involved.
Circuit quality was factored into the workload formula
by comparing the number of transmissions against the
nurrrber of messages handled. The result was a number
which represented the narrative traffic workload
handled by each operator at a field station. This
number was used for comparison purposes and we
were able to determine which stations were above the
average narrative workload figure, which were below,
what was the most significant workload for various
stations, etc. Next, we decided to incorporate "other
work" into this basic data base, The recent request to
expand CATRAN reporting to include information
concerning time obligated for covert support, 'I'DY,
etc,, was the first step in this effort. When this
information is added to the other data, we hope to
have a meaningful workload figure for each station.
The day nmay well come when the STRF,S report not
only contains information concerning narrative
y~+ CONFIDENTIAL '~_..__._,-_..__'".'`---?--""'~, 3
Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
 Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-OO~A000200080001-6
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY
OCIC M77-034
18 May 1977
STATINTL
MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary
Suggestion and Achievement Awards Committee
THROUGH Executive Assistant, OC
Chie , In ormation Control Staff, OC
SUBJECT OC Micropublishing Program - Suggestions
73-50 and 74-387
1. The microfiche. vs. paper. copy cost comparison chart
recently published in the. OC Newsletter article was not
intended to be misleading in showing the cost effectiveness
of the OC micrographics program. The. microfiche. vs. paper
copy comparison was intended to dramatize the cost effective-
ness of the program and the statement, "...we have approxi-
mately "broken even" in little more than one and one-half
years...," was intentionally placed in quotation marks to
imply a further detailed explanation is required.
2. Many of the already .existing paper copy. OC
publications were converted to microfiche just to eliminate
the paper copy; they were not new publications per se, nor
were they of a type which are routinely revised. Therefore,
the printing and distribution .cost for those publications
cannot be considered savings. The only true savings in
having microfilmed the previously .existing paper publications
are the. potential savings in reduced storage space require-
ments, minus the cost of microfilming.
3. Micropublishing does reduce storage space require-
ments; however, secure storage containers are not actually
being returned to stock. Further, if micropublishing reduced
storage requirements by two cubic feet (one safe drawer) in
every OC component, the possibility still exists that not one
safe would be returned to stock. Also, the space that is now
occupied by the microfiche readers and reader/printers have
not been computed into the cost analysis.
4. We have prepared a cost analysis (see attachment) in
a conscientious effort to determine the monetary savings, both
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
 Approved For Rel~,se 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-007A000200080001-6
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL. USE. ONLY
SUBJECT: OC Micropublishing Program - Suggestions 73-50 and
74-387
factual and potential, that have been realized by implementing
the micropublishing program.- The analysis is based. upon the
following:
a. The printing and microfilming costs are
based upon estimates furnished by Printing and
Photography Division, OL.
b. The savings in mai
estimated by using the STATINTL
STATINTL
ailing cost estimates are based .upon an average
50-page OC publication weighing 4 ozs. The
total pages revised and distributed in microfiche.
are divided by two, to reflect two-sided
printing, and then divided by 200 .(200 .pages =
1 lb.) to derive total pounds and multiplied by
$2..80 (bulk rate) to arrive at the mailing cost.
The cost for mailing microfiche is based upon
five (5) microfiche cards weighing one (1) oz.
c. The. estimated storage savings-are based
upon the total pages revised and distributed in
microfiche, divided by two. (2) to reflect two-
sided printing, .and then divided by 2000 (2000
pages = 1 cubic foot) to derive total cubic
feet. The total cubic feet is divided by 8 (8
cubic feet = one 4-drawer safe) to determine
number of storage containers required. New
secure storage containers cost-approximately
$800..00 each.- Estimated storage savings are
based upon microfiche reducing storage require-
ments ninety percent.
5. We feel both suggestions, No. 73-50 and No. 74-387,
were instrumental in implementing the overall micropublishing
program; however, we feel Suggestion No. 73-50 provided the
initial impetus.- Based upon that fact, we believe the awards
were equitably distributed between the. two suggestors.
Approved For ~el~ease ~1
~11 ~N~I~~D~~~-t~6A000200080001-6
 Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-007~A000200080001-6
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY
OCIC M77-034
SUBJECT: OC Micropublishing Program - Suggestions 73-50 and
74-387
6. The cost analysis shows the total first year net
savings to be $17,218.90 vice the previously estimated
$7,000.00. An additional award of .$335.00 appears to be
justified. This additional award should be equally shared,
Attachment:
OC Micropublishing Cost Analysis
Distribution:
Orig. - Addressee w/att.
STATINTL
Approved For R~~~SaD~'D~~1 ~~'~14~R~J0~0~~6A000200080001-6
 Approved For Rele 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-OOA000200080001-6
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY
Attachment to OCIC M77-'034
OC Micropublishing Cost Analysis
First Year Equipment Cost - $66,000.00
Amortized Cost =.$66,000.00 6 yrs. life =_$11,000.00 Annual
Paper
Microfiche
118 Handbooks
118
118
(145 Cys Ea.)
x $125.00
x $8.85
(30-page average)
14,750.00
1,044.30
Mailing:
3,592.40
599.20
Storage:
12,800.00
1,280.00
31,142.40
2,923.50
SAVINGS GROSS = $28,218.90
$28,218.90
- 11,000.00
NET SAVINGS FIRST YEAR - $17,218.90
Approved For F~~~~~W~~T~I ~~~A~DR83EOO~D~A000200080001-6
 Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN
SUGGESTION N0. 77-293: dated 11 Februar 1977
GS-06 STATINTL
ecre ary
Directorate of OperationsJCI Staff
A. Summary of Suggestion
Paint large graphic designs?in the long hallways
and corridors of Headquarters Building. The designs
would break up the length of the carridars and make
the space more pleasing to the eye.
B . Evaluation STATINTL
1. submitted her proposal to Chairman,
Fine-Arts ommission via memorandum of 22 June 1976.
As a result, FAC obtained DDA approval and issued Employee
Bulletin No. 573, Competition for Design of Large Graphic
Mural, dated 18 February 1977 (attached). The suggester
officially reported her ideas to the Suggestion and
Achievement Awards .Committee 11 February 1977.
2. In May 1977, the winners of 'the competition
were announced in EB No. 601 (attached) and Special
Achievement Awards were approved for -the winners in June
1977 (case summary attached).
3. The DDO representative to the- Fine Arts Commission
recommended an Advisory Award of at least $S0. Chairman,
FAC concurred.
Recommendation of the Executive Secretary
1. Not line of duty.
Z. $50 Advisory Award.
Approved For Release _2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
 Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
Decision of the Chairman
~. ~`~ ~ "~
Chairman, Sug estion and Ac~ieV' ement Date
Awards Committee
Approved For Release 2000/06/192 CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
 Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE COMMITTEE
SA N0. 82: Nomination Date: 8 June 1977
STATINTL
, GS-13 STATINTL
fining ids
Directorate of Adrriinistration/OTR
oto Technologist
GS-13
ODE STATINTL
Directorate of Science and
Technology/NPIC
ui ing rchitect
A. Summary
The attached nominations from Chairman, Fine Arts
Commission and concurred in by the Deputy Director for
Administration recommend the following awards fox the
Headquarters Tunnel Design competition winners:
1st -
- $600
2nd -
- $100
3rd -
- $ 50
(Copy of Employee Bulletin No. 573, dated 18 February
1977, announcing the competition and Employee Bulletin
No. 601, dated 31 May 19.77, announcing the winners are
attached.)
B. Additional Information
STATINTI
1. The work on the design for the tunnel area STATINTL
started on 7 June 1977. The Fine Arts Commission is
considering the use of the entry in some
other area of Headquarters ui ing or some other STATINTL
Agency-occupied building. The design by
is being considered for the Gym at Headqua
Building.
Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
 Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
2. The Deputy Director for Administration and
the Fine Arts Commission have discussed the advisability
of future competitions for mural designs. Present plans
are to repeat tliis type of competition in about three
years to seek designs that, if appropriate, would
replace the murals used as a result of the most recent
competition.
3. According to the Tangible Awards Scale, a cost
avoidance of $4,000 (estimate of a similar design from
a commercial firm), would warrant an award of $400 alone.
C. Comments by Executive Secretary
1. The purpose of the Committee's review of this
case at this time i.s to authorize award processin
action in accordance with para c (2) (b) (2) STATINTL
2. A total. award payment of $750 for this competi-
tion would seem to coincide with SUBSTANTIAL/GENERAL
categories on the Intangible Benefits Guide to be
shared as follows:
WLNNER: - $600
Second: - $100
Third - $50
D. Decision of the Committee
STATINTL
-~'~ Approved ~~ ~~ Award
Disa roved ,~ C
PP l i~; _, ~..~~')~. ~ ~t 1 Date
-2-
Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
 STATINTL
Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
Next 31 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
 AIA~IINISTRATIVE - IIV"IIiFu'~~1L USE ONLY'
p~rve~'r Release 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
.~` . ~, _
~~~ ~~
18 February 1977
COl~iPETI TI ON
FOR DESIGN OF LARGE GR4FIiIC A}[.JRAL
1. The CIA Fine Arts Commission is sponsoring a competition?
for the dosign of a large graphic mu al. 'I7ie objective is to add
color, warrrth, and visual excitement to the Headquarters Euilding
ground floor tu-in.el area and to encourage aricl utilize creative design
talents,
2. All Agency emplo}tees, except members cf the Fire Arts
Commission, are eligible to participate. Entries shculd be submitted
in the form of full color kale drawings. Interested em to ees shculd
first obtain technical information by calling orL STATINTL
extension b101. Completed entries should be submitted to the Chairman
of the Fine Arts Commission, Room 6GOQ, Headquarters Building no later
than 29 April 1977.
3. The Fine Arts Commission wi11 judge the designs and select
winners with the assistance of outside graphic consultants. .The
creator of the winning design will be ati?rarded a X600 honorarium by
the Fine Arts Comrr~issian under the Agency's Suggestion and Achievement
Awards Program. Awards for second and third places will be X100 and
X50, respectively. Production of the mural will be supervised by the
winning designer.
DISTRIBUTION: ALL f~~il'LOYF,L'S
Approved For Rel-ease 2000/06/19 :CIA-RDP80-00706A000200080001-6
t~~I~vilsr~i Tr~. L - I,~~:r~:~F, 1JSr c ;LY
 STATINTL
or Re~~~~/'~9~~'~~14~.~.D~i~~~1Y06A00020008~001-6
WTN~'ERS I~1 Trt `II'C111?~~~~l~L DESIGN ~:OI~~ETITION
31 May 1977
1. Pur~al.oyee Bulletin No. 57:x, datef~ l8 February 1977, aruzounced
that 3 c~r::petition :~~euld be held for a r~~tr~~l design. for one of the walls
in the Headc{t~arters Tt.l~-~e1.
2. The CIA Fine Arts Co~rurission is plea:~ed to annotmce the winners
in tl~e Tulinei Desi~~ +:,onrpet~_tion.
Winner:
Second
Third .
S. Three? prominent grapl~.ic desi~,n~ers were invited to judge the
33 entries. They were ~lrin Chaperos, Chapero5 Productions, Ltd;
Dave Sutton, Design Director, Department of Agriculture; and Jerome
Perlmutter, Na-tional EndoC~rr~ent for the Arts. Their decisions were
unanimous.
4. All entries will be on display iii Exhibit Mall in June. The
cJinna.ng design tvil:l be painted an the tunnel t~rall in the near future.
~~.