ENGINEER MATROSOV'S ANCHOR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-00809A000600060219-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 17, 2011
Sequence Number: 
219
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 1, 1954
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-00809A000600060219-3.pdf160.61 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/18: CIA-RDP80-00809A000600060219-3 - 50X1-HUM- CLASSIFICATION S E C E T CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY REPORT INFORMATION REPORT NO. OF PAGES 3 PLACE NO. OF ENCLS. I ACQUIRED (LISTED BELOW) DATE. SUPPLEMENT TO ACQUIRED REPORT NO. 50X1-HUM THIS IS UNEVALUATED INFORMATION 1. Much importance is given to the anchor in the Soviet fleet. The holding power, its benavior from the mament it is dropped from the ship to the time it acquires complete holding ability, plays a decisive role in determining the quality of the anchor. 2. Although there are many fore. of anchors, they can be divided into two groups. To the first group belong all anchors whose stocks cannot be drawn into the hawsepipe and which dig into the ground with only one fluke. The other group includes all anchors which do not have a stock and which dig into the ground with two flukes. 3. The admiralty anchor which belongs to the first group is must widely used. This anchor penetrates into the ground very well and has a hold- ing power which is equal to 15 time the weight of the anchor and is easy to handle. Hove'ier, in the case of a long fluke much difficulty is encountered in drcpping and recovering the anchor and the fluke which protrudes out of thc, ground, sometimes catches on the bottoms of passing ships or on anchor cables of other ships and also frequently daeages fishing nets. With progress in shipbuilding technology the admiralty anchor does not satisfy all the demands required of it as a holding ap- paratus. New anchor designs were originated which belong to the second group. These anchors do not have long flukes and can easily be drawn into the havaepipe. The navy and the merchant fleet predominantly use the Hholl (Hall) anchor which belongs to the second group and all Eholl-type anchors meet Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/18: CIA-RDP80-00809A000600060219-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/18: CIA-RDP80-00809A000600060219-3 All-union cords. 5, The anchors of e second group have 1?1ide-spaced flukes. This construc- tion feature did not justify the expectotions of the designers. The ability of the Anchor was disproved in practice. In reality the resis- t.arce -f the nund or each fluke proved different because of the non- unifor:nity of the ,'round. The result of this that, when the anchor cable receives :its. :iixiinum stress, a rotating -orce couple is set up which tends to twist the anchor loose from the Lrouncl, depriving it of its holding ability until it again digs into the -ro,Lnd. This maneuver is repeated. This circumstance explains the low holding; ability of the 10holl (HHall) - type anchor which has a holding power of only four to five t;nes its own weight. Engineers and designers have frecuently thought about improving; the anchor design. 7. The anchor proposed by Engineer (fnu) Mlatrosov, in comparative tents under various natural conditions, proved significantly better than, all 50X1-HUM other anchors. In order to simplify production of the anchor, Engineer 'a`crosov nroposed_a welded variant of the retractable anchor of increased Flukes (7) adjoin the stem (1) on ---e :e. LL, ^ ent. from I s h e this drawing, in contrast to the previous anchor aesi. ns, ,, placed as close together as possible. For the pturpose of increasing the rigidity, the flukes (7) are reinforced with ribs (6). The edges of the surfaces of the flukes (7) are beveled so that they will better cut into the ground. In the lower p t of the fluke, approximately one-third of the distance from the base, are the rods (3) with flanges (4) (stock flanges) at their ends which prevent the anchor from overturnin. ':3slaa the rods (3) are adjoined two brackets which assist the flukes to dig into the :ground. Because the axis of the rods (3) are located above the axis of the swivel (joint) of the stem (1), it has become possible to equalize the holding ability of the anchor in various types of ,;round. H. In soft, sandy-muddy ground the anchor, with its rods and Ala fee, digs in and thus increases it- holding power. In fir: and in pebble rounds, the position of the joints, as shown on the drawing, increases the sta- bility of the anchor and keeps it from ovortarni'!,,. 9. The approximation of the axis to a line passing throu:;h the gravitational center of the flukes contributes to the initial nuick h syirr; of the anchor into the -round and the moving of the flukes on the side joints. The eccantric position of the joint of the stem in r 1, lion to the --.::is of the stock contributes to this condition. 10. F perimonts showed thct i'atrosov's anchor ste:.i :c ''cd. tile ship Lickker and safer with a better burying of the anchor into ;round with no overturning. 11. With increased pull the anchor plows both a strai,:ht and a zigzag furrow, depending upon the direction of the pulling force d:_gs deeper and deeper and submerges entirely into the around, hr.- increasing its hold- ing ability. The following comparative table oU tt:e maxJ-mum holding power of anchors obtained in tests under the on c natural conditions graphically illustrates the superiorities of h',: freor i-aatrosov's anchor over all other types of anthers! Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/18: CIA-RDP80-00809A000600060219-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/18: CIA-RDP80-00809A000600060219-3 Type of Maxi mum holding power of the anchor in units to be multi- Ground plh thn ~ Hi i ra ty Mat roaov Mad silt Fi 4.8 5.3 23.9 rm sand L 2.3 7.5 51.5 arge stones ;t S.6 23.8 45.3 As is apparent from this table the holding ability of Matrosov's anchor in muddy ground is five times that of the Kholl anchor and more than four times that of the Admiralty anchor. Similar observation can be made with other types of ground. At the same time the merchant fleet was given an order to adopt this system gradually. 12. The Matrosov anchor system began to be used more widely in 1950. It was at this time that the merchant fleet was ordered to make a gradual adap- tation of this system. Enclosure: (A) Sketch of Matroaov'a Anchor with legend. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/18: CIA-RDP80-00809A000600060219-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/18: CIA-RDP80-00809A000600060219-3 ENCLOSURE (A) SECRET SKETCH OF MATROSOV'S ANCHOR WITH LEGEND Legend: 1. Stem (shank) 2. Hinge pin 3. Fluke stock 4. Stock flange 5. Check fins 6. Fin web (rib) 7. Outward fin 8. 1--rd fin 9. Bracket (. t plate) 10. Shouldn elbow or angle bracket 11. Knee (bracket) 12. Cleat (baffle plate) 13. Shackle 14. Shackle p!n Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/18: CIA-RDP80-00809A000600060219-3