FIGURES ON USSR ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION AND OUTPUT
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
5
Document Creation Date:
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date:
August 11, 2011
Sequence Number:
378
Case Number:
Publication Date:
November 14, 1952
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 198.73 KB |
Body:
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
INFORMATION FROM
FOREIGN DOCUMENTS OR RADIO BROADCASTS CD ~:0.
CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL
SFS'UFiLTY' TNFdRMATION
COUNTRY USSR
SUBJECT Economic -Electric paver
HOW DATE DIST. ~~'~' Nov 1952
PUBLISHED Daily nevspnpers, monthly periodicals, book
DATE
PUL''.ISHED Jun 1949 - 13 Oct 1952 SUPPLEMENT TO
LANGUAGE Auseinn REPOkT N0.
nu oocu+ur eo+nm urouano+ unrn+a m +rnouc omw
or rx+ u+ino amt nnn r++ +uun or unouac am +a
+. a. c..uue u.u uuoco. mnauumo+o+m+n+uno+
or m co+n+n a an +~+0+ n q V+~VnO+n~+ RUO+ If rro?
xnnm n w. orwonrna+ or rxu rou a rroxwns.
fIG(.'RFS ON USSR ELEL?TRIC POWER
MNST?79 ()V'I'ION AND OUTPUT
rNumbers in parentheses refer to appended eources_7
According to the Fifth Five=fear Plan, the total capacity of steam electric
power stations will be doubled msinly by enlarging existing ones. The total
capacity of the hydroelectric Hower stations will be tripled by having in
operation the Kuybys`.evekaya i,ES with a capacity of 2,100,000 kilowatts, the
Kamakaya GEE, Gor'kovehaya GF3, Mingechaurokaya GEE, Usti-Kameniogorskaya Gffi,
Narvskaya GES in the Estonian SSR, and others with a total capacity oP 1,916,000
kilowatts.
In addition to tae Stalingradekaye GF8 and Kakhovekaya GEE, which are now
being built, construction of a number of ew GFS will be started during the
Five-Year Plan. These include the Cheboksarskays GES on the Volga River,
Votkinekaya on the Kama River, bukhtarminskays on the Irtyah River, Kaunaeskeyn
on the Neman River in the Lithuanian SSSR (1), and a GFS on the Obi River near
Novosibirek.(2)
Since the Elektrosile Plant imeni Kirov in Leningrad manufactures most of
the hydroturbines for the GE3, the plant will have to increase its production
7.B times over 1950 by the end of the Fifth Five-Year Plan to equip the pro-
tected GES.(3) The production of steam turbines will be increased 2.3 times
in the same period.(4)
Construction of the Nizhsie-Svirekaya GEE, which was put into operation on
19 December 1933 with as i^eTnlled capscit of 116,000 kilowatts, coat 2,600
rubles for one kilowatt of its capacity.(5~
- 1 -
CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL
STATE
ARMY
NSRB
FBI
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
(~
Ia connection vith determining ccefficieata for converting 1945 prices into
1949 prices, Cidroenergopn'oyekt has aim],yzed the estimates for construction o1
the Ramaka~ga, Mingechauraksga Verldioturekays, Duudzhil~uskayn, and Rhx'emakaga
GSd. The work resulted is the tables given below which contain figures
repa~esent?.i.n~~g~ percentages of the total amounts of the estimates sa well ea
overage +~C1es for comparison.
C~
Fa.,:oli
Cost of Materiel
at the Conatr
Site Nerehouse
Exploitation
Coet of
Machinery
Other
Direct
Expenditures
~~9a
16.1
59.9
22.5
1.5
Mingechaurakaya
602
495
31.5
2.8
HI~remak~
15.3
63.0
13.2
g,g
Verkhoturskaya
20.5
61.9
15.0
2.6
Dzaudzhikauekays
24,5
658
7.0
2.7
Average
16.2
55.4
25.9
2
5
indexes
,
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
A further percentage breakdown of estimates for two GFS ie given in Table 2
belox:
Items of Estimates
Kamsknva GES
M
iagechaurskaya GES
Basic pay
Construction workers
13e7
14
7
Installation workers
2.4
.
1.5
Total
!faterials
16.1
16.2
Pur:hase price
43,1
30.4
Railraed freight
5.5
Local transportation charges
5,7
4.3
Handling charges
2.9
3.9
Coat of packing materials and
packing charges.
1.4
0
8
Procurement and storage charges
1.3
.
n_o
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
T:~le 2 (Conid)
Items of Estimates
Qperation of Machinery
~ Regular expenses inr_lude costa of transportation of machinery, their
mounting and dismantling, amortization, repairs, lubrication, including the
coat of lubricants, and expenses of the organization in charge of the machinery.
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
* 31nce the costa of clearing and preparing the sites of the reservoirs
included is the general estimates are not based on engineering estimates but on
fiaenclal considerations, they cannot be too accurate; consequently, the second
column under the heading "Percentage of Total Leas Scpeadituree oa Reservoir"
ie la?ovided.
Table 4 shows the average outlay of basic materials per one million rubles
of the coat of conatructloL Ind 1a9tn11eti0II work based On the norms and prices
of 1945. The table ie compiled from ;tie estisntea far seven GES: Kemskaya,
Miagechausskaya, Verkhne-Svirakaya, Verkhoturakays, Khramakaya, Krasaopolgan-
keys, and Dzaudzhilrauakaya. It also shwa the minimm, and ma:;imum outlay of
material,,, a'A, for comparison, the actual figures on the Dnepro GES construction
converted ii.to 1945 prices.
~t~Y of Materials per One Million Rubles of
Coat of Construction sad Installatio
W
n
ork
Materiels
Actual at
Ave a
re
~~
Minimum
Dnepro GES
Round timber, (cu m)
1,020
1,525
679
1,739
Cement (tone)
382
657
338
476
Steel (barn, structural and
sheet piling) (tone)
171
~6
~
79
Re.ils and parts (tone)
10.6
32,5
0
14,5
sans (cu m)
1,241
1,637
1,070
683
Gravel and crushed atone I,cu m)
1,733
2,352
1,413
1,550
Stone (cu m)
770
1,109
520
663
Bricks (thousands)
ll7
154
32
48
Lime (tone)
32
39
19
20
Table 5 shwa the costa of basic materials expressed is percentage of the
costs of construction and installation work, and in percentage of the total
estimated costa for the Kamskays and Diingechauraksya GES.
Conatr..and Instal-
lation Work Total Estimate
Luaber
3.06
1.42
Cement
3.38
1.57
Ferrous
met8ls
12.11
S (,o
Min echaurekaya GES
_ Percentage of Coat of?
Conetr and Instal-
lation Work Total Estimate.
2.55 1.66
2.86 1.86
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
-5-
CONFIDENTIAL
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
Coastr ana Instal-
lation Work
Total Estimate
Constr e~ Instal-
]ation Work
Total Estimate
Bails
0.24 '
0.11
0.39
0.25
sand
0.67
0.31
0.31
0.20
Gravel
1.31
0.61
1.42
0.92
stones
0.56
0.26
0.65
0.42
Bricks
2.43
1.13
1.44
0.94
Lime
0.24
O.u
0.57
0.37
Total
24.0
u.15
16,30
10.59
nand
total
including
trans-
portation
charges 33.36 15.50
26.56
17.26
(6)
Volkhovskaya GES was put into operation on 19 December 1926; during 5a5Go
hours of annual operation, it produces 356 million kilowatt-hours at the rate
of 1.8 kopek for one kilowatt-hour. A large steam electric pager station
produces one kilovatt-hour at the rate of 5 kopeks.
ftizhne-Svirskaya CES, which was completed on 19 December 1933, could at
flat time develop up to 125,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 600
million kilowatt-hours. It has four hydroturbinea of 29,000 kilpwatts each and
two 6f 2,500 kilowatts each. Its power costa 2.1 kopeks per kilowatt-hour.
The completed Dnepro GES had nine aggregates of 62,000 kilowatts each
totaling 556,000 kilowatts and a tenth aggregate for its own use of 3,500
horsepower. Annual output was 2.9 billion kilowatt-hours at 0.6 kopek per
kilowatt-hour.(51
The scat of electric paver in 1950 was below the coat in 1945 in comparable
prices by over 25 percent. The Five-Year Plan for reducing the cost of
electric paver was fulfilled in 3,i-, years. Daring the last 4 years of the
planned period (1948 - 1951), about one billion rubles oP extra profit xere
made over the planned profit by improving the performance of paver systems
and power stations, by reducing losses of power through leaks, and by reducing
the number of personnel.(7)
Moscov, Pravda, 20 Aug 52
Moscow, Vechergyaye Moskva, 13 Oct 52
Petrozavodsk, I.eninekoye Znauq+s, 2 Sep 52
Pravda, 18 Sep 52
A. V. Vinter, Ot Perventsev Sovetskogo Gidrcelektrostroitel~etva k Velikim
Stroikam gommunizma (From the Beginnings of Soviet Hydroelectric Power Con-
struction to the Great Constructions of Communism), Moscow, 151
Moscow, Gidrotekhnicheakoye Stroitel~stvo, No 6, sus 49
Moscow, Elektricheskiye Stanteii, No 8, Aug 52
-END -