FIGURES ON USSR ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION AND OUTPUT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 11, 2011
Sequence Number: 
378
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 14, 1952
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2.pdf198.73 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2 INFORMATION FROM FOREIGN DOCUMENTS OR RADIO BROADCASTS CD ~:0. CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL SFS'UFiLTY' TNFdRMATION COUNTRY USSR SUBJECT Economic -Electric paver HOW DATE DIST. ~~'~' Nov 1952 PUBLISHED Daily nevspnpers, monthly periodicals, book DATE PUL''.ISHED Jun 1949 - 13 Oct 1952 SUPPLEMENT TO LANGUAGE Auseinn REPOkT N0. nu oocu+ur eo+nm urouano+ unrn+a m +rnouc omw or rx+ u+ino amt nnn r++ +uun or unouac am +a +. a. c..uue u.u uuoco. mnauumo+o+m+n+uno+ or m co+n+n a an +~+0+ n q V+~VnO+n~+ RUO+ If rro? xnnm n w. orwonrna+ or rxu rou a rroxwns. fIG(.'RFS ON USSR ELEL?TRIC POWER MNST?79 ()V'I'ION AND OUTPUT rNumbers in parentheses refer to appended eources_7 According to the Fifth Five=fear Plan, the total capacity of steam electric power stations will be doubled msinly by enlarging existing ones. The total capacity of the hydroelectric Hower stations will be tripled by having in operation the Kuybys`.evekaya i,ES with a capacity of 2,100,000 kilowatts, the Kamakaya GEE, Gor'kovehaya GF3, Mingechaurokaya GEE, Usti-Kameniogorskaya Gffi, Narvskaya GES in the Estonian SSR, and others with a total capacity oP 1,916,000 kilowatts. In addition to tae Stalingradekaye GF8 and Kakhovekaya GEE, which are now being built, construction of a number of ew GFS will be started during the Five-Year Plan. These include the Cheboksarskays GES on the Volga River, Votkinekaya on the Kama River, bukhtarminskays on the Irtyah River, Kaunaeskeyn on the Neman River in the Lithuanian SSSR (1), and a GFS on the Obi River near Novosibirek.(2) Since the Elektrosile Plant imeni Kirov in Leningrad manufactures most of the hydroturbines for the GE3, the plant will have to increase its production 7.B times over 1950 by the end of the Fifth Five-Year Plan to equip the pro- tected GES.(3) The production of steam turbines will be increased 2.3 times in the same period.(4) Construction of the Nizhsie-Svirekaya GEE, which was put into operation on 19 December 1933 with as i^eTnlled capscit of 116,000 kilowatts, coat 2,600 rubles for one kilowatt of its capacity.(5~ - 1 - CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL STATE ARMY NSRB FBI Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2 (~ Ia connection vith determining ccefficieata for converting 1945 prices into 1949 prices, Cidroenergopn'oyekt has aim],yzed the estimates for construction o1 the Ramaka~ga, Mingechauraksga Verldioturekays, Duudzhil~uskayn, and Rhx'emakaga GSd. The work resulted is the tables given below which contain figures repa~esent?.i.n~~g~ percentages of the total amounts of the estimates sa well ea overage +~C1es for comparison. C~ Fa.,:oli Cost of Materiel at the Conatr Site Nerehouse Exploitation Coet of Machinery Other Direct Expenditures ~~9a 16.1 59.9 22.5 1.5 Mingechaurakaya 602 495 31.5 2.8 HI~remak~ 15.3 63.0 13.2 g,g Verkhoturskaya 20.5 61.9 15.0 2.6 Dzaudzhikauekays 24,5 658 7.0 2.7 Average 16.2 55.4 25.9 2 5 indexes , Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 A further percentage breakdown of estimates for two GFS ie given in Table 2 belox: Items of Estimates Kamsknva GES M iagechaurskaya GES Basic pay Construction workers 13e7 14 7 Installation workers 2.4 . 1.5 Total !faterials 16.1 16.2 Pur:hase price 43,1 30.4 Railraed freight 5.5 Local transportation charges 5,7 4.3 Handling charges 2.9 3.9 Coat of packing materials and packing charges. 1.4 0 8 Procurement and storage charges 1.3 . n_o Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2 T:~le 2 (Conid) Items of Estimates Qperation of Machinery ~ Regular expenses inr_lude costa of transportation of machinery, their mounting and dismantling, amortization, repairs, lubrication, including the coat of lubricants, and expenses of the organization in charge of the machinery. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2 * 31nce the costa of clearing and preparing the sites of the reservoirs included is the general estimates are not based on engineering estimates but on fiaenclal considerations, they cannot be too accurate; consequently, the second column under the heading "Percentage of Total Leas Scpeadituree oa Reservoir" ie la?ovided. Table 4 shows the average outlay of basic materials per one million rubles of the coat of conatructloL Ind 1a9tn11eti0II work based On the norms and prices of 1945. The table ie compiled from ;tie estisntea far seven GES: Kemskaya, Miagechausskaya, Verkhne-Svirakaya, Verkhoturakays, Khramakaya, Krasaopolgan- keys, and Dzaudzhilrauakaya. It also shwa the minimm, and ma:;imum outlay of material,,, a'A, for comparison, the actual figures on the Dnepro GES construction converted ii.to 1945 prices. ~t~Y of Materials per One Million Rubles of Coat of Construction sad Installatio W n ork Materiels Actual at Ave a re ~~ Minimum Dnepro GES Round timber, (cu m) 1,020 1,525 679 1,739 Cement (tone) 382 657 338 476 Steel (barn, structural and sheet piling) (tone) 171 ~6 ~ 79 Re.ils and parts (tone) 10.6 32,5 0 14,5 sans (cu m) 1,241 1,637 1,070 683 Gravel and crushed atone I,cu m) 1,733 2,352 1,413 1,550 Stone (cu m) 770 1,109 520 663 Bricks (thousands) ll7 154 32 48 Lime (tone) 32 39 19 20 Table 5 shwa the costa of basic materials expressed is percentage of the costs of construction and installation work, and in percentage of the total estimated costa for the Kamskays and Diingechauraksya GES. Conatr..and Instal- lation Work Total Estimate Luaber 3.06 1.42 Cement 3.38 1.57 Ferrous met8ls 12.11 S (,o Min echaurekaya GES _ Percentage of Coat of? Conetr and Instal- lation Work Total Estimate. 2.55 1.66 2.86 1.86 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2 -5- CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090378-2 Coastr ana Instal- lation Work Total Estimate Constr e~ Instal- ]ation Work Total Estimate Bails 0.24 ' 0.11 0.39 0.25 sand 0.67 0.31 0.31 0.20 Gravel 1.31 0.61 1.42 0.92 stones 0.56 0.26 0.65 0.42 Bricks 2.43 1.13 1.44 0.94 Lime 0.24 O.u 0.57 0.37 Total 24.0 u.15 16,30 10.59 nand total including trans- portation charges 33.36 15.50 26.56 17.26 (6) Volkhovskaya GES was put into operation on 19 December 1926; during 5a5Go hours of annual operation, it produces 356 million kilowatt-hours at the rate of 1.8 kopek for one kilowatt-hour. A large steam electric pager station produces one kilovatt-hour at the rate of 5 kopeks. ftizhne-Svirskaya CES, which was completed on 19 December 1933, could at flat time develop up to 125,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 600 million kilowatt-hours. It has four hydroturbinea of 29,000 kilpwatts each and two 6f 2,500 kilowatts each. Its power costa 2.1 kopeks per kilowatt-hour. The completed Dnepro GES had nine aggregates of 62,000 kilowatts each totaling 556,000 kilowatts and a tenth aggregate for its own use of 3,500 horsepower. Annual output was 2.9 billion kilowatt-hours at 0.6 kopek per kilowatt-hour.(51 The scat of electric paver in 1950 was below the coat in 1945 in comparable prices by over 25 percent. The Five-Year Plan for reducing the cost of electric paver was fulfilled in 3,i-, years. Daring the last 4 years of the planned period (1948 - 1951), about one billion rubles oP extra profit xere made over the planned profit by improving the performance of paver systems and power stations, by reducing losses of power through leaks, and by reducing the number of personnel.(7) Moscov, Pravda, 20 Aug 52 Moscow, Vechergyaye Moskva, 13 Oct 52 Petrozavodsk, I.eninekoye Znauq+s, 2 Sep 52 Pravda, 18 Sep 52 A. V. Vinter, Ot Perventsev Sovetskogo Gidrcelektrostroitel~etva k Velikim Stroikam gommunizma (From the Beginnings of Soviet Hydroelectric Power Con- struction to the Great Constructions of Communism), Moscow, 151 Moscow, Gidrotekhnicheakoye Stroitel~stvo, No 6, sus 49 Moscow, Elektricheskiye Stanteii, No 8, Aug 52 -END -