CRITICISM OF V. M. MOLOTOV
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80-00810A006100160003-7
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
1
Document Creation Date:
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date:
June 19, 2008
Sequence Number:
3
Case Number:
Publication Date:
March 1, 1955
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 71.49 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2008/06/19: CIA-RDP80-0081 OA006100160003-7
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
This material contains information affecting the National Defense of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Laws, Title 25X1
18, U.S.C. Secs. 793 and 794, the transmission or revelation of which in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law.
COUNTRY USSR
DATE OF INFO.
PLACE ACQUIRED
DATE ACQUIRED
Criticism of V. M. Molotov
1 March 1955 25X1
NO. OF PAGES
REQUIREMENT NO. RD
REFERENCES
DATE DISTR.
1. The prestige of V. M. Molotov suffered a setback because he did not
believe that the Western powers would succeed in finding an alternate 25X1
solution to their security problems after the failure of EDC, although
Soviet diplomatic representatives in Western countries had warned about
such a dcvolopment. The stand taken by Molotov was severely criticized
by officials of the Soviet-Ministry of Foreign Affairs anc' by members
of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union,
Molotov's opinion that the rejection of EDC by the French Assembly had
created a deep gulf between t western European countries and the USA
was particularly discredited. such a victory for Soviet
policies, if possible, would come only after a Long period of time.
2, a group within the Central Committee closely connected
with Khrushchev was making efforts to overthrow Molotov as Minister of
Foreign Affairs and to retain him only as First Deputy Chairman of the 25X1
Council of Ministers.
Comment. It may be correct that Molotov was criticized by Party
circles in connection with the drafting of the London agreements. That
the opposition against him has assumed such serious proportions that his
removal as Minister of Foreign Affairs is expectea has not been evident.
It is, however., not impossible that such a step will be taken in Moscow
after the ratification and implementation of the Paris agreements.
03
raD om QEpOo nu
Approved For Release 2008/06/19: CIA-RDP80-0081 OA006100160003-7
X I FBI, I I AEC I I I I I
(Note: Washington distribution indicated by "X"; Field distribution by "#".)