SUGGESTION NO. 2632

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-00832A000200070023-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 10, 2000
Sequence Number: 
23
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 19, 1957
Content Type: 
SUMMARY
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-00832A000200070023-3.pdf90.45 KB
Body: 
Approv~wvor Ref a 2000/08/15: CIA-RDP80-00832A0 0070023 3 19 F ehr?ta: 1957 Suggestion No, 2632 Date of Suggestion: 26 0ctoboo 1956 Office of BD/P Intelligence Asst. 5 . of the Su eetiions tggester proposes that one dispatch with the app ap :gate a e ' of a tanct trtaa be sent to the field in response to a naa trace request instead of separate dispatches to each indt.vid al, Then these attachments could then be placed in each . ajectt s 201 file, Evaluation of the Concerned Offices t ef5 P,1 on 9 November 1956 stated the folio wing: "Bnaause the Field nam check form and procedures have not as yet been for alined by the Records Integration Division,, the subject suggestion is considered by Rr to fall, within tea pp. Lion category. Although the subject of this suggestion has been amda c :ncideraation, the suggester is considered by Nl to be QU Aibic oar an tnu rdY 'a h . ac efits to be derived from the subject suggestion M i be af? an intaang ble nature, It is considered:]. that the use of the Field xnama the form would r es i in i i rove ent in the files and a decrease in the in ng re gtair, sta. It uculd 'stub .de a preclassification of data5 and it Matid e?pedite the ~"Iwv of paper:, Other benefits w uld be the furtherance of ate.- `io n records proceerii res in the Fields and an 3aa prove. t In the MIT, Zuactions of the Clandestine Sor.ces. The attendant increase in filing, ettn, would be negligible in view of the advantages, It is estimated that the degree of benefit * su: be moderate in nature with an extended application. It is questio n however,, that in view of 1I $ s having considered the subject covered by the suggestion itself that the a tar? range of from $150.00 to 200.00 should apply in this case. It is suggosted that instead of the a oder?te extended =nets' rates that the low moderate limited monstaay rate apply*4 R oaaa ndation of the Executive Secrete n moderate benefit - limited application) "' , Approval? Award of $504100 based on intangible benefits