NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

SOVIET EXPLOITATION OF THE BALTIC COUNTRIES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-00926A005200020030-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 23, 2001
Sequence Number: 
30
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 13, 1952
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-00926A005200020030-1.pdf314.31 KB
Body: 
pp roved For Release 2001/11/21 : CIA-RDP80-00926AO05200020030-1 25X1A CLASSIFICATION COITIIDENTIAL/US OFFICIALS ONLY/SECURITY INFORMATION CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY REPORT NO. INFORMATION REPORT CD NO. USSR/Lithuania/Latvia/Estonia Soviet Exploitation of the Baltic Countries DATE DISTR. . / J 1952 NO. OF PAGES 3 1. "Baltic complaints of Soviet oppression recently submitted to the 1711 are tragic- ally confirmed by the USSR's own publications. Analysis of the budgets and plan reports of the three Baltic republics and of such copies of their Communist press as have become available abroad, shows that the Balts are suffering a harsher fate than the Soviets themselves. The twenty years of national independence they enjoyed in the inter-war period seem to have enhanced their martyrdom. Since the re-incorporation of the Baltic countries, the Bolsheviks who resent, the contrast between the monotonous poverty of the present-day Soviet Union and the variegated pattern of the more developed countries on their periphery, have tried to wipe out every vestige of Western influence and to assimilate the Balts by telescoping thirty years of Communist tyranny into three. 2. "The three Baltic countries, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia,, vogether nearly the size of Missouri with nearly 2,000,000 more inhabitants,?,)re being tyrannized politically, economically, and financially. Bolshevik pu itical tyranny, accord- ing to Baltic spokesmen abroad, has led to the deportation of at least 1,000,000 people into the interior of the Soviet empire. On 8 Apr 52,,. by decree of the Supreme Soviet in Moscow, Estonia and Latvia were subdivided into provinces in accordance with the Soviet model. Each of these provinces now has its own bureaucratic party and police" organization, which adds some 10,000 more parasi- tical officials to the ranks of an already oversized administration. Russian' names are more and more in evidence. The majority of the Baltic members of the governments are Soviet-reared. Nov, according to the Moscow press, dictionaries are being re-written with a view to expanding the large influence of Russian on the three national languages. STATE ARMY NAVY CLASS IFtCATI0NCONFIDE?~TIAL/US OFFICIALS ONLY/SECURITY INFORMATION NSRB DISTRIBUTION I X I I I I i I X FBI _ n ' pprove or a ease 7001 f 11/21 : CIA-RDP80-00926A005200020030-1 I ] Approved For Release 2001/11/21 : CIA-RDP80-00926AO05200020030-1 CONFIDENTIAL/US o ICIALS ONLY/SECURITY INFORMATION 3. "Economically the once well-to-do Baltic peasants seem to be worse off than their Soviet neighbors. On 6 Jun, 52 Lithuania's rural population-9--more than three quarters of the total7.reported.to 'Dear Comrade Stalin' :.in 1951 year the cattle herd of the collective farms increased by 61.9% over 1950. Since this is be- tween four and five times the normal growth, most of the private cattle of the kol- khozniksr-.One cow per householdg,must have been collectivized. In other parts of the USSR where a similar process of expropriation is going on, the cattle herd of the col- lectives usually increased by less than 20$$. ,? . 4. "Latvia's plan report for 1951 boasted that the peasants had delivered two and a half times more wheat to the state than they sold in. the market prior to collectivization; in other words, that the countryside today consumes much less good bread than in former times. The fact that wheat production has been expanded at the expense of other cul- tures cannot have had so great an influence. "According to Raahva Haa7., the leading Estonian Communist. newspaper, last year's annual share of a member of one of the most 'advanced' collective farms in the money income of 'his' kolkhoze can be computed at rubles 400, or about Wix per eaxt 'b't the ai nual earn- ings of the average Soviet worker. From the kolkhoze harvest each peasant further re- ceived approximately 240 lbs of rye and the same quantity of potatoes. Then there is the small additional income from the produce of the kolkhoznik's small one-acre home- stead economy, part of which has to be sold in the market to buy clothing,, footwear, and other indispensable manufactured goods, while the major part goes for taxes. Cal- culated on this basis, the average Estonian peasant's gross income is but a fraction of what it was before .Wortt!~ Vir,,II. the LIGSR', . on ? h&.,, other'-'.hand, Bolshevik No. 10 calculated recently that the average peasant's real income was 30 above 1940. 6. "Industrial workers are not much better off. r,lx. 95i 86k-- is reported to have earned rubles 300 a month which is less than half of what Lithuania most students. of.Sovaet affa acs believe to be the Soviet average wage. Even a'skilled worker's; earnings were below the overall average. In Latvia and. Estonia too workers are reported to; e less than in the Soviet Union. 7. "While living standards in towns and country have declined sha.ply, official plan re- ports for 1951 register a large increase in industrial production for each of the three republics. More specific data shows that the output of the Baltic industries, once re- nowned for their accuracy, reflects the miserable living conditions of the population. Thus we read in Raahva Haal that Vladimir Stolboy. Estonia's.Minister of Light Industry, complained. earlier ' .* 71952 .that the dobhttry ,* latgeit textile, 'works - turfled out i`t ??,eudh poor quality that they were useless and entailed losses of many mil- lions of rubles. Minister of Trade., Rudolf Vester, publicly displayed socks and stock- ings of unequal size and one pair of rubbers,.one rubber with a broad, the other one with P. narrow heel. Minister of Local Industries, Nikolai Kx' lov, stated that produc- tion of essential building materials was far off schedule and, apparently, below 1950. In order to make a, good showing on paper, industrial cooperatives doubled the price of their. products and then declared that they had doubled their production. In Latvia the leading Communist newspaper, Cina, reported that in Riga where three quarters of the country's industries are concentrated., the principal shipyard and the largest electrotechnical factory were seriously behind quota. Conditions were especially bad in?the,food industry: Slaughter houses, for instance, supplied less than half the meat they were supposed to turn out. In Lithuania,. where the Vilna newspaper Tiesa pub- lished a detailed report on plan fulfillment during the first quarter (of 1952,.. ' Q1as~ d . z': F~ y rse i t ec xsf~t a mi lk :'.' butter 'prod oars .:, ac t:.2,3 off buckets for farms, the plan. was fulfilled only to 16%. While this _seems to '.be an exceptionally poor showing, it-~s characteristic of the unevenness with which pro- grams are carried out. 8. "This travesty of a planned industrial production at wages fax below the overall Soviet average yields substantial profits for-Moscow. The full measurejof the financial ex- ploitation of the Baltic countries ip revealed a *.. aanalytig of the LithuaIian budget which balanced at rubles 1,1+71:,000,000: ' The.country's total tax receipts, including C011FEENTIAL/US OFFICIALS ONLY/SECURITY INFORMATION Approved For Release 2001/11/21 : CIA-RDP80-00926AO05200020030-1 Approved For Release 2001/11/21 : CIA-RDP80-00926AO05200020030-1 CONFTDFNTTAL/US OFFICIAL O1 GY/SECURITY f`FORMATION 3 - irofitRs "from., state . industries, . are to ;yields rubles: 3.,918.,, 000,000.:.. The. balance :of roughly: rilbles: 2;500,000.,000represents: the ~ share.. of the central government. of the USSR, of- which only one.-third is. returned to Lithuania.. In. ' the .case..of ?the_ other two Baltic countries,,;_the.contribution of the USSR to the republican. budget is much . smaller Yet the. -.USSR arrays receives the lion's share of all taxes .and profits a .Soviet .financial ecperts.maintain that a large part of these amounts is reinvested-by the various all- Uriion-.1ninistries in 'industrial enterprises ' in the various , republics, .and that the .- balsaice.:represep.ts.a contribution to general-services. These intricacies of the Soviet budget may never be fully revealed to the world as long as the present regime is in'power.. It-is a fact, however,.that the real income of the workers and peasants in the. Baltic lands has declined, whereas according to data released:br the Soviets. themselves,,. the real income , of 'the workers in the USSR has increased.-" CONFIDENTIAL/US OFFICIALS ONLY/SECURITY INFORMATION Approved For R&Iease 2001/11/21 : CIA-RDP80-00926AO05200020030-1