PROJECT PROCEDURES UNDER NSC 10/2; NATURE AND EXTENT OF POLICY REVIEW BY THE STATE DEPARTMENTAL OF PP PROJECTS AND PROPOSALS.
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80-01065A000500140001-7
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date:
May 7, 2002
Sequence Number:
1
Case Number:
Publication Date:
July 24, 1953
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 138.58 KB |
Body:
Approved For ~iwtease 2002/06/1
SUBJECT
FOR: CHIEF, POLITICAL ti PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE
STAFF
Chief of Operations. DD/P
Project procedures under NSC 10/2; nature and
extent of policy review by the State Department
of PP projects and proposals.
NCES a. Memorandum from C/PP to COP /DD /P, dated
24 July 1953.
b. Memorandum from C/PP to DD/P, dated
2s May 1953.
I. The reference a. memorandum states that the time has come
solve the question of what advice should be obtained from the State
made in connection with the obtainment of such advice. This
nt in connection with covert operations and what disclosure
memorandum also calls attention (correctly) to the variation and degree
of disclosure as between the different Area Divisions in their dealings
with State.
Z. I agree that the time is nearly ripe for the resolution of this
oWAesome issue, but for two reasons I should prefer to defer it until
ometime during; the first week of August. I understand that Mr. Horsey
will not return from his vacation until on or about I August and I feel that
he should be present at, in order to be bound by, any major decision
wbich may be taken. But even more important is the fact that there has
In other words, if we are in a position to argue our case on
NSC 10 /2--without the trammeling effect of pars, -
gras 2 and W4 10/5--we can make out a much stronger case against
the submission of 0Vtual information.
Approved For Release 2002/06/13 : 0-01065A000500@',. 10o
fECHRJTY iNFURMATION
submission of detailed factual information than we are at the
pted, and if so we will be on much stronger ground to contend
avorable indications that these recommendations for rescission
`final resolution of the NSC consideration of the Jackson
s and recommendations, including In particular our
bone that paragraphs 2 and 3 of NSC 10/5 should be rescinded.
Approved For Fiariease 2002/06/13 : QLAMjk@ffO-01065AG&0500140001-7
blew will remain with us even in the event of the rescission
. None of this is to say that I do not agree with your assumption
o paragraphs of NSC 10 f.5. On the contrary, I agree that we
net meet this issue squarely--but at the right time and on the most
un. It would seem wiser for us to start off at my level and
Agency and in the State Department for the attempted resolution
ither necessary or desirable for us to proceed to the highest levels
bi+e gr ound s . I do not believe that in the first instance it would
reserving the position and weight of r. Dulles
the event that the first should prove unsuccessful.
4. I should appreciate receiving your reactions to the foregoing.
it
ctor (Plane)
Attachmen
References a. end b.
cc: COP/DD/P
U ' PFRObe
Appro re 02/0 I - t;e-01065A000500140001-7
"Ulm I O~~ c it 6