RETROACTIVE PAY FOR CIA EMPLOYEES. REPORT 12.

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80-01240A000500050015-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: October 15, 1998
• Sequence Number: 15
• Publication Date: May 23, 1952
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2001/07/31 : CIA-RDP80-01240A000500050015-7
23 may 1952
Memorandum for: Deputy Director (Adrninistratio
pproprtation bill which has passed both the House and the
Subject: Retroactive pay for CIA employees.
Report No. 12.
1. The retroactive pay provision is contained in a supple -
e. The bill went to conference to iron out differences in the,
two versions of certain provisions, but the conference did not
affect the retroactive pay provision which is identical in both bills.
2. AU differences between the two bills have now been
resolved except one which involves a rider providing that no
funds contained in the bill may be utilized in connection with the
,inure of the steel industry. The House conferees
up the decision on this provision until the Supreme
Court has ruled on the legality of the President's seizure of the
steel industry, and as of 22 May no further conference on the bill
has been scheduled. In view of the uncertainty as to when the
Court will act upon the steel seizure, no firm prediction can now
be given as t
to say it
1 July.
handing down
the date of the final passage of this bill other than
doubtedly be passed prior to adjournment on or about
will happen to thi.
be passed without the steel rider which will then be transferred to
ther appropriations bills.
3. The fact that this appropriation bill contains funds urgently
needed by certain agencies to continue operations for the remainder
to fiscal year may be meet, I am Informed, by the passage of an
ltihi
resouon autorzing these agencies to continue
rate.
4.
answer to
into law.
Orig. & 3 - Add.
1 - Col. Hansen
1 - Comptroll
other words, there is at the present time no defin
0i 7
Legislative Counsel
Court recesses as scheduled in June without
el opinion, it is impossible to predict what
Oactive pay provaion will be finally enacted
1 - Stayback 25X1A9a
station, although the odds are that it will