COMPETITIVE EVALUATION PANELS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-01341A000100030001-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 13, 2000
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 24, 1959
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-01341A000100030001-6.pdf251.03 KB
Body: 
Approved For_Release 2000/080151: I. Administrative Officer, Office of the Comptroller Chief, Budget Division Competitive Evaluation Pane DP80.01.341A000100030001-6 2 4 JUN 1959 1. The proposed guide, to provide uniformity and assist panel members in arriving at employee rankings, has been reviewed by the Budget Division panel. 2. The adoption of this guide by all of the Comptroller's divisions would meet the need for uniformity and help the Career Service Board in their review and consideration of the panel reeommendations. The proposed factors and the point evaluatioa to apply may still result in some variances between the rAnkirapenels due to: the varying standards or judgment considerations of the different panels. This aspect, however, is to be expected in the system. To mininlize the variances it is suggested that the factors susceptible of uniformity be so defined. For example, under length of service, 2 points could be given for each 2 years of service with 10 points maximum for 8 years or more. Likewise, the acceptance: of career Obligation may be more definable. Does acceptance of overseas duty rank over those that cannot take overseas duty because of family or health reasons? 34 SObject to the above comment, this office concurs in the proposed guide. The memorandum and proposed guide on this inject has been retained in the Budget Division panel files. lot REY OW- SY onto -0,00 epi __ trot CMG MASS PAGES COAS JUST NEXT REV?!VIZ? *UTH Hit 11-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/15 ? CIA-RDP80-01341A000100030001-6 FIR .1."'IY 25X1A Approved For Rlease 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP80-"01-341A000100030001-6 FISCAL DIVISION COMPETITIVE EVALUATION GUIDE 1. Tbe Fiscal Division Competitive Evaluation Panel is composed of three members, in grades 08.15, 14 and 13. All members viii oollectively evaluate persons in grades up to 08-12. Persons in grade GS-13 will be evaluated jointly by the ti o members senior in grade to 08-13. 2. The evaluation of each 'splayse viii be recorded on a form vhich provides for ratings on four major elements based on the individual's Fitness Report and Biographic Profile. Etch of the four major elements listed below is assigned a maxima numerical value of 10 points: a* Performance b. potential c. Value to Agency d. cmalifications 3. PERFORMANCE The performance rating in the Fitness Report, Section B and C furnishes the basic numerical rating far the individual, that is, how well be did the work be vas assigned to do. This numerical rating is arrived at as indicated below end may be adjusted by the panel, based on other information show on the Fi Wee* Report. =TVS B 7 - Outstanding 6 Superior 5 - liseellent 4 - Competent 3 - Acceptable 2 . Barely Adequate 1 - Unsatisfactory SECTION C 6 - Outstanding 5 - Superior 4 Exceeds basic requirements 10 points 9 Points 8 points 7 pOintS 6 points 4 points 2 ointe 10 points a points 7 points Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP80-01341A000100030001-6 Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP80=01-341A000100030001-6 SZ(O C Fitness Report ting for the indivi that of at c,n be ted of the individual with respect to future aesiewnt to a different, eon responsible position. This section is the beet judgment of the Sugierriaor in sppreising the eaDebititias and potential of the individual in terms of elements of general applicability libieb can be related to other positions to vbieb the individual say be promoted. This numerical rating is arrived at as indleatsd beim, end mey be adjusted by the panel, based on other Lamest on shown in the Fitness Report and DiogrePhie Profile- tatanding Degree Above Average Degree licesal Degree 2- Liaitsd. agree Lease Possible Degree te arrived at in this sec of items rated to arrive 10 point. 8 points 6 points 1/4. points 2 points on are added and divided at the basic numerical The velue to eSency is based on the all knowledge end skill, demonstrated ability, and personal suitability of en individual to perform in a specific type of position. A numerical rating of from I - 3.0 is based on the opinion of the puma as to how well the individual will norm in the specific type of position. - 2 - Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP80-01341A000100030001-6 Approved For IR.lease 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP80Z1341A000100030001-6 The Valifications rating is based on he in1'oruticm shown in the biographic profile and the Mums Report. The profile contains information pertaining to the individual's educational background, volt experience prior to CIA, vorX experience in CIA end erinial training. In arriving at the qualification rating consideration is given to the individual's Unovledge and Mall; personal suitability applicable to a specific type of position. Work performance of the individUal and an appraisal of his capabilities and potential is also considered. These considerations are reasonably applied vith fairness and. equity vitt' the intent of obtaining the highest degree of validity and reliability possible under the circumstances. This numerical rating la arrived at as indicated beim Superior 10 points Xxcellent 8 points Very Good 7 Points Good 6 points Fair 5 points Approved For Release 2000/08/15 :VA:RDP80-01341A000100030001-6