FANTASIES FROM THE FUDGE FACTORY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-01601R001300430001-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 26, 2000
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 19, 1971
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-01601R001300430001-3.pdf146.95 KB
Body: 
By ITilli:'ain- L. Givens for his ac .rn s pa policies an ep nded. it a clear charter and the authority it. increasingly upon "a new breed of nail needs to cart} out its responsibilities, itary strategists and academic social For State, this has been done repeat- scientists"; and Lyndon Johnson, whose secretive, idiosyncratic ways, fondness for contrived diplomatic spec- taculars, and repeated tinkering with State's administrative machinery fur- ther eroded State's waning influence. Publicly exhorting the State Depart- meat to take charge of the foreign pol- icy-making process, Kennedy and John- i'son tacitly denied the department the backing it needed to do so, allov,-ed rival agencies to dominate State in the bureaucratic rough-and-tumble, and gradually transferred power to a bur- , geoning National Security Council staff in the White House, cc, 1 h.rorcl;liorrt the careerist rank's is a wistful ?yearrrini' for good old days that really never Were, a diplomatic falter Mittylwid in. which. G711 elite corps Of professional d iplonrats, all lookin and acting like George en.nan, have the President's ear ...s' ~_- Thy a?!~h_o~-sP~li1.-I~J_u.F6t~.C,s_.~~2'~e?,~tZ_sr..ri?~Se.~.i11c..?~r,_ 1" ALL THE foreign service offi- cers who have written ]Master ..Plans for reforming the State Depart- J Approved For Re -gjW&1/ /0,L STATINTL S_P 1911 ( A (' T ['itLxyl r ..' l~.nwmq he puts it, Hamiltonian-approach to the management of American foreign policy,. For all its stylistic superiority, however, "Fudge Factory" turns out to be yet another apologia for our career diplomatic establishment and a plea to the President to restore the' careerists to their "rightful" predominance in the foreign policy process. ment were laid end to end they would reach from Washington to Harvard University, where they would find still more foreign service officers, on leave or retire(], writing still more Master Plans. The latest and by far the best writ- ten work yet in this bottomless genre Is "The Foreign Affairs Fudge Fac- tory" by John Franklin Campbell, a 30-year-old former staff assistant to under secretaries of state George Dall and Nicholas Katzenbach. Camp- bell is a first-rate journalist and an ar- ticulate advocate for the elitist--or, as War II, the rationale oes, the State c,u~Ier W LI1L I I t:01UU11l . h form flan, v,ero pleading onco more Department has been badly used by a Well, fine. But if it is all so clear and for tho President to "mains clear that succession of Presidents, most notably simple, why don't they quit writing he regard: American ambassadors as Franklin Roosevelt, who distrusted Plans and do it.? The careerists appar- psis (their empbasi s) p: r;?onal ac-pre the.roreign service ("the profession of ently feel it is the President's responsi sentatives to exercise, o,i his beh zlf, perfection" and turned for advice to bility. )Iut, alas, the President can't ad- control over all United States govern- Appreimed}yForcl elea$ea i /OS~0 (:i (i lA RE)PS'l 9' O ROG1, 0"300+Or9 Er'1 4 r+ country." John Kennedy, who quickly -r0-,v Erns- other duties, All that a Presiden can trated with State's lack of enthusiasm do for any executive agency is to gWe Sireazriliriin Prescrilrecl 3\. A-S A CONSEQUENCE of all this, the careerists tell its, the State De- partment has lost control of the for- eign. affairs machinery it is supposed to be running. Its. ranks swollen by military,. intelligence and economic specialists, administrators, propagand- ists, and sundry other nondiplomatic .outsiders, the department is far too big, both in Washington and overseas, and its authority fragmented among other agencies, most notably the De- fense Department and the CIA. What must be done, Campbell proscribes, is. to streamline the State Department by reducing its personnel by half, reorganizing the remainder oil leaner lines, and trimming out, exc''ss layers and extraneous functions. Over- seas missions should be drastically I from the President." ense of the '- at the ex lar el ared p y g p , oher executive ^"encies and ttniba;sa_ At the swine tl.1o dorial authority restored over all per licked fig the State Dep t?tment a coon-., sonnel in each American embassy. tt?y director for etch naation, who was State should be given the authority to fts:iurea the interdcpaa imeutni and responsibility to prepare a single, "direction, coord.i.nation, and F;upe1 v'1- unified foreign affairs budget for the sory" role at the working level and entire government, and to control gov- serve as a FVa.shin ;t.on counterpart to ernment personnel assigned overseas the ambassador in the field, Hero, In a; by all agencies. Horizontal clearances pack-aga, was all the authority a Pros!- should be eliminated, and "each mat- d4nt eatz convoy. But tho dipi.orrtat.5 ter requiring action should he assignee] ha dle find the abl t - . e n o to a single officer who must himself were never S take responsibility for consulting (but Tougher, savvier bureaucrats from the not obtaining clearances from) other other sp.'cucles State was.aupkosed to interested parties in the decision" to be leading continued riding roughshod act. Finally, this new, ]can State De- over the department's . prerol;etives .drIvin"g ever deepening inroads partriient should be moved back into and the old, Executive Office Building, into its Influence. By mid-1968, the where it was housed in its prc-World 11 " ung Turks" of the' foreigt! r rvlce, halcyon days, and where it could be in that ye{ r?e version of th Master Re- edly; the foreign servico -imply Ii s nnt: been tip to the task. There is considerable evidence that the real problem is not State's orgrmiz- tion or lack of authority, but the- diplo- mats themselves--that they would be no more competent to manage the new, streamlined State Depat?til-lent they dream of. than they have been to run the old one, and that the authority they are pleading for would soon, like Pin.occhio's five gold pieces, slip again from their grasp into the hands of pred- ators. ITEM: One of John l ennedy's first acts upon taking office in 1961 was to issue a letter to all American ambasea- dors, authorizing and directing then to "oversee and coordinate all the activi-, ties of the U.S. government" in their. countries. Through Secretary of State Dean Rusk he expressed the "active expectation." that State would "in fact take charge of foreign policy." I'rdsi- dent? Johnson in 1966 instituted' a top- level foreign policy-staking body called the ' Senior Interdepartmental Grcup (SIG), installed State at the head of it,' and directed Secretary Busk -to "as- sume responsibility to the full extent permitted by law for the over-all direc- tion; coordination and supervision of interdepartmental activities of the U.S. government overseas," in what was pointedly identified as "formal specific over-all directive authority.'