CAREER SERVICE COMMITTEE WORKING GROUP ON EMPLOYEE RATING MINUTES OF 8TH MEETING, 5 DECEMBER 1951, 10:30 A.M.

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80-01826R000400040088-2
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: November 11, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 21, 1998
• Sequence Number: 88
• Publication Date: December 12, 1951
• Content Type: MIN

L
0-0U26 R000400040088-2
25X1X8
12 December 1951
CAREER. SERVICE COMMITTEE
Working Group on EDAPLOYEE RATING
Minutes of 8th Meeting., 5 December 1951, 10:30 A.":T.
25X1A9a
1. The minute f the 7th meeting of 28 November were approved
25X1A9a as distributed. vas commended on his excellent preparation of
his notes.
2. The factors to be appraised for use in an employee evaluation
25X1A9a form were selected in a wide range by
25X1A9a The wide range approach was intentionally used as it is felt
that final selection should be made by the Wdorkins- Group after thorough
consideration of all factors.
25X1A9a 3. stated that he felt there were two ways of
installing an evaluation system. (a) the very specific and systematic
method of obtaining factors for success or fa:lure in job performance
by c 'reful research and thorough interviewing of supervisory personnel;
(bh) the method of taking a large range of factors,defining them, prunin
out those that are overlapping or vague, then having final coordination
-,j-ith the operating offices. The Group agreed that the second method is
the one most practicable for our purposes and, therefore, the one we wil
follow.
25X1 A9a I - IM 25X1 A9
erformance
n work
in crit
ria
e
t
d th
t cert
1
p
a. sug,
e
a
a
e
o
s
be set up and that factors applicable to our employees be selected with
a possible limit of ten factors as our first approach to an evaluation --_-
form. From this start, the Group must decide on an empirical basis whether
one system will evaluate all or whether we must break the system into 25X1A9a
several as applying to a specific job family. recommended
that the "criteria" follow the Working Group's statement on an evaluation
of "aptitudes, knowledges, skills, and interests". The Group agreed in
this principle and that a common form should be evolved if possible.
5. To determine the personal interest of the employee _n developing
a career, it was agreed that each employee should state his interest or
inteAPNQM d Err 6 2 01926R? i 0088-2
 Approved For Releai!P 19 / A RDV$0-04426R0-00460040088=2
should relate to the factors under "aptitudes, knowledges and skills"
so that three vain groups of fctors would be considered.
6. The agenda for the 9th meeting is to be as follows: (a)
presentation of a proposed evaluation form by (b) "installing 25X1A9a
an appraisal system". The next meeting was set for 10:30 A.M., 12 December 1951.
7. The meeting adjourned at 12:35 1'.M.
Approved For ReIeWe 1999/09/22 : CIA-RDP80-01826R000400040088-2