CAREER SERVICE COMMITTEE WORKING GROUP ON EMPLOYEE RATING MINUTES OF 4TH MEETING, 7 NOVEMBER 1951 10:00 A.M.

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-01826R000400040093-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 21, 1998
Sequence Number: 
93
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 13, 1951
Content Type: 
MIN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-01826R000400040093-6.pdf252.4 KB
Body: 
Approved For Relase 1999/0 p on M.L RATING 7 November L5 1. 3 s,. 25X1A9a 25X1A9a ac 25X1A9a 0-01826 R000400040093-6 161 "64 IWvI Ax+T 13 November 1951 0R1 SMECE, 00T of the meeting of 30 October were read and request to that Office from the Career a working member to ;cart their 3. The proposed &L-en of business for this met: . oblong on th3 , The Wore; Group agreed on the following definition of ' sor a *Performance Rating": "A Performance Rating is the superv3. opinion to the a alod ecss perforce on the Job expressed in standardized categories.' such a rating has the fallowing poses! re lar the Raxopeek Act) etion of a loyees for career sel ce for pu osea of tern nati introduced as an additional member of who is a member of tom,, was selected or .ng Group* kind and accepted as the order A co' is attached.. to these zsd.nuteso for within-grade promotions under A valid standard for deter;i: A basie for deter i ~~~~ 2~JU n OQB _.f!_ 11:-.V DATE t9~f} BY OREO COMP OPI TYPE c' 1 11 ea e, rvice a is deemed one 25X1A9a service in here 'two years Cr 93-6 Approved For Release 1999/09!JWOM'RDP80-01846R000400040093-6 25X1 C4a in orc A means for improv h.psj A procedure for str ere under reduction- mployee or at` employee hening super visorMe,ploy (9) A method for advieirsg each officer and employee ' b3 current oinari b. The is ries for which Perfoz ahov*, could be used were dealt with as t hroua avalid hasis in a c ,L which has proA- ti son:el rated satisfactory, Performance Ratin , of satin out syvt ' th in a career se; Perforce Iating i for 4 r &wction in force detail On the A170 procedure, 6),* (7) (), (9) All these its e e'luation system, tj rwcedi re; service to percent, of the ,e dealt with under The conclusion of the Working trrojp. is that we reeoo ^ nd. or Service Comittes that V ,*re :ere be no Perforr~ ante fat tnf; as such but that there will be pew-.fended an lo, oe eAv ..imt .on aystea Which ',. evaluate every e +lo nee, For in the onion of the Working Group them .e no Justification for ostablishing a :uniateriz a separate system or s,jstert=. for 25X1A9a employcea one ith another on the basi of their cur?nt jot: performance but there is just;. f .cation for incluc in the current Jo' perafor. ance s a .factor an emp -ore e evaluation. s;rte;: The proposed definition of a rota toz2 system was presented. his p A rov8*oleose lbwlbr GSA- t up sue&;ested correction be made and that the definition be revi d. by &ar .ttee. Approved For Release 10991091 the mfttinC P80-01826R - 0040093-6 of 7 Novexn er, axed at I1$ I.M. 25X1A9a Approved For Release 1999/09/22: : CIA-R 3-6 Approved For Ret4ase SECURITY INFORMATION 18.26 R000400040093-6 /, November 1951 SUGGESTED AGENDA for 4th Meet of Working Group on EMPLOYEE RATING CAR_gER SERVICE COMAITTEE 1. Review and definition of the purposes for which a Performance Rating system or systems should be devised. 2. For what purposes is an Employee Evaluation system to be used? 3. Review and comment with respect to Performance Rating and evaluation of the proposed definition of a rotation system. Point-by-point discussion of Reference #1 in 15 October instruction to Working Group on Employee Rating. 25X1A9a Approved For Release"' ,_. -0182