CAREER SERVICE COMMITTEE WORKING GROUP ON EMPLOYEE RATING MINUTES OF 4TH MEETING, 7 NOVEMBER 1951 10:00 A.M.

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80-01826R000400040093-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: November 11, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 21, 1998
• Sequence Number: 93
• Publication Date: November 13, 1951
• Content Type: MIN

Approved For Relase 1999/0
p on M.L RATING
7 November L5 1. 3 s,.
25X1A9a
25X1A9a ac
25X1A9a
0-01826 R000400040093-6
161 "64 IWvI Ax+T 13
November 1951
0R1 SMECE, 00T
of the meeting of 30 October were read and
request to that Office from the Career
a working member to ;cart their
3. The proposed &L-en
of business for this met:
.
oblong on th3
, The Wore; Group agreed on the following definition of
'
sor
a *Performance Rating": "A Performance Rating is the superv3. opinion to the a alod ecss perforce on the Job expressed in
standardized categories.' such a rating has the fallowing poses!
re lar
the Raxopeek Act)
etion of a loyees for career sel
ce for pu osea of tern nati
introduced as an additional member of
who is a member of tom,, was selected
or .ng Group*
kind and accepted as the order
A co' is attached.. to these zsd.nuteso
for within-grade promotions under
A valid standard for deter;i:
A basie for deter i
~~~~ 2~JU n
OQB _.f!_ 11:-.V DATE t9~f} BY
OREO COMP OPI TYPE c' 1 11
ea e,
rvice a is deemed one
25X1A9a
service in
here 'two years
Cr
93-6
 Approved For Release 1999/09!JWOM'RDP80-01846R000400040093-6
25X1 C4a
in orc
A means for improv
h.psj
A procedure for str
ere under reduction-
mployee or
at` employee
hening super visorMe,ploy
(9) A method for advieirsg each officer and employee
' b3 current oinari
b. The is ries for which Perfoz
ahov*, could be used were dealt with as
t hroua
avalid hasis in a c
,L which has proA- ti
son:el rated satisfactory,
Performance Ratin , of satin
out syvt ' th in a career se;
Perforce Iating i
for 4 r &wction in force
detail On the A170 procedure,
6),* (7) (), (9) All these its
e e'luation system,
tj rwcedi re;
service to
percent, of the
,e dealt with under
The conclusion of the Working trrojp. is that we reeoo ^ nd.
or Service Comittes that V ,*re :ere be no Perforr~ ante fat tnf;
as such but that there will be pew-.fended an lo, oe eAv ..imt .on
aystea Which ',. evaluate every e +lo nee, For in the onion of
the Working Group them .e no Justification for ostablishing
a :uniateriz a separate system or s,jstert=. for
25X1A9a
employcea one ith another on the basi of their cur?nt jot: performance
but there is just;. f .cation for incluc in the current Jo' perafor. ance
s a .factor an emp -ore
e evaluation. s;rte;:
The proposed definition of a rota toz2 system was presented. his
p
A rov8*oleose lbwlbr GSA-
t up sue&;ested correction be made and that the definition be revi d. by
&ar .ttee.
 Approved For Release 10991091
the mfttinC
P80-01826R - 0040093-6
of 7 Novexn er,
axed at I1$ I.M.
25X1A9a
Approved For Release 1999/09/22: : CIA-R 3-6
 Approved For Ret4ase
SECURITY INFORMATION
18.26 R000400040093-6
/, November 1951
SUGGESTED AGENDA
for 4th Meet of
Working Group on EMPLOYEE RATING
CAR_gER SERVICE COMAITTEE
1. Review and definition of the purposes for which a Performance
Rating system or systems should be devised.
2. For what purposes is an Employee Evaluation system to be used?
3. Review and comment with respect to Performance Rating and evaluation
of the proposed definition of a rotation system.
Point-by-point discussion of Reference #1 in 15 October instruction
to Working Group on Employee Rating.
25X1A9a
Approved For Release"' ,_. -0182