Job Tenure and Job Security

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-01826R000500140003-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 21, 2000
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 3, 1953
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-01826R000500140003-3.pdf125.69 KB
Body: 
~.. _ Approved For Releee 2001/03/04: CIA-RDP80-018000500140003-3 MCKOLAMM4 C 1t 1 A9a Present: Messrs. jams Mitchell, 8ecretegy of Labor; In Office of Secretary of Labor, 3 Nov 1953, 4:30 - 5:15 P.M. SUaJECT: Job Tenure and Job Security 1. The purpose of the coaversatioo was to determine from a responsible Cover- ,t official, not associated with security sensitive affairs, who has bad wide experience both in Governaoent and in private eWloyment, and who is a recognized expert in personnel and labor matters, his views respecting job tenure and job security. No classified matters were discussed. 2. Tenure. Mr. Mitchell expressed the view that tenure is a relative matter; that die no such thing as absolute tenure; and that teaure either in Govern sat or in civil life was subject to such considerations as adlmini.stratlvo necessity,, or the wires of Congress, or the condition of the budget., etc. He used the a ple that if the Congress decided to wipe out the Departmtot of Labor by legislation, the tenure of all the persons now working in the Departaient of Labor was worthless; that it the Board of Directors of idacy'aa should decide to substantially change the aper- stion of Maaicy's Department Store the tenure of all. emlcyees would be substantially affectad. He stated that in the past year more than 8,000 comissioii officers in the Armed Forces had been separated, and therefore the tenure of cc io io ed per- sonnel was also subject to qualifications. The quea3tiout of a aapplioaable law and legie_ laation on the matter of tenure was also discussed, and it was recognized that in. Government, Civil Service atattu2 conveyed a degree of tenure, mile in civil e aloy- ment tenure of unionize employees was conveyed thrav h the contractual agreemats bsty an employer and the applicable union. Generally speaking, in civilians em- ployment the white-collar worker, the executive, the "inn .ectua1" io rlkr, had no tenure. Tenure could be carve re4 by contract vbioh would state the degree of teruase with respect to the time factor as well as to the conditions of employment. This le reeextiphasized the fact that tenure as such was relative and condition by the terms of the particular tenure that was under consideration. In Mr. t-iitchell's view the consideration of tenure was a vii1-o-thecrisp. He also express the vier that the veakness of civilian employment of the U.S. Government mw that such tenure as existed created a false sense of security, inhibited initiative and sti3malatea the retention of adequate though mediocre workers. 3- Job Security in W. MitcheU'a view "job security" was all lsportant, even thou& it was more of an intangible and, in a sense, similar to "manrale". An individua..t act s sense of job security by having confidence that he would not be ssrated from his job for ax'bitraary or frivolous reasons. In Mr. Mitchell's view job security vans the product of a good, and demonstrated personnel policy. Three elements are essential: (1) The policy suet bed1 ax inclusive. All essential favors such as grievance procedures, employee evaaluaatiacs, pramation for merit, etc., must be present. (2) The policy mast be known throughout the organization and thorough- ly understood not only by supervi6ors but by all. =ployees. (3) The esaaployee must have an opportunity to see that the announced policy is actually put into practice. Until an individual has confidence that the announced policy is actually being followed, there can be no feeling of job security. Approved For Release 2001/03/04: CIA-RDP80-01826R000500140003-3