LETTER TO MR. PETER J. KAHN FROM W. E. COLBY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80B01495R000200030019-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 18, 2005
Sequence Number: 
19
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 16, 1974
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80B01495R000200030019-0.pdf152.83 KB
Body: 
Executive Rc-jistry Approved For Release 2005/08/24: CIA-RDP80BO1495ROO0200030019-N; 16 August 1974 Mr. Peter J. Kahn Thank you for your very kind invitation to speak at the Duke Law Fora. I accept with pleasure. With respect to dates, I believe my schedule indicates that something in November would be most suitable. Perhaps I could ask my Assistant, Mr. Angus Thuermer, to work this out with you. As for the arrangements, I believe that arrival in time for dinner would be most conveaisnt from my point of view, skipping the press conferee. I would also hope to return to Washington that evening, and I will probably have transportation of my own. Sincerely, ot L.- WE C: blp Distribution: Original - Addressee I - Mr. Thuermer w/cy basic 1 - ER w/basic 1 - DCI w/cy basic 1 - DDI C..CoJ, W. E. Colby Director Approved For Release 2005/08/24: CIA-RDP80B01495R000200030019-0 Appro0VFI BelDJ?e 2PP/(l 14 August 1974 NOTE FOR THE DIRECTOR FROM: Ed Procto~ This concerns the invitation you received to speak at the Duke Law Forum (attached). You asked that I draft a reply saying you could not accept for yourself but would offer a substitute. There are some arguments against taking this course: - - This is a very prestigious group and it would be inappropriate to offer a substitute. -- The invitation provides you with a real opportunity to make some points with the public on our posture with respect to protection of intelligence information-- proposed legislation, Marchetti, and all that. You might also talk about your role in providing policy makers with the information and assessments they need to do their jobs. -- The invitation is wide open as to timing. It would be difficult to say you can't make any kind of commitment. To say that you don't speak to out-of-town groups would be countered by your past appearances. Approved For Release 2005/08/24: CIA-RDP80B01495R (continued) Approved G*FW asCM05710 `i:j? DP80B01495R00 Page Two As I see it, you have two courses of action: a. Say you will accept the invitation and make the most of it, or b. Turn it down with a polite letter giving no explanation or substitute. My recommendation is that you take Option a. The Legislative Counsel and the General Counsel concur in this view. Approved For Release 2005/08/24: CIA-RDP80B01495R0 Approved For Release 2005/08/24: CIA-RDP80BO1495R000200030019-0 13 August 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR: The DDI Ed, I hope that this draft letter for the DCI doesn't reflect too clearly my lack of enthusiasm for his proposed refusal to speak. In fact, I think this could be a good forum for him, even though it is in the Fourth Circuit where the Marchetti case was fought. I know he doesn't want to become regular guest speaker all over the country, but his announced attitude toward openness should square with a program of at least semi-public appearances. A forum like this should be a high quality opportunity. I don't think they will take any sub- stitute we can offer. He could avoid the press part by saying "no press". Furthermore, they have offered him a total of 80 possible days to appear, too large a number to protest sched lems. Approved For Release 2005/08/24: CIA-RDP80BO1495R000200030019-0 Approved For Release 2005/08/24: CIA-RDP80BO1495R000200030019-0 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505 I was flattered to receive your very kind invitation to speak before the Duke Law Forum later this year. As you may know, it has been the policy of past Directors of Central Intelligence to avoid becoming "public figures" in the same sense that other members of the government are able to do so. This is due in large part to the fact that the nature of the position prevents the kind of unrestrained discussion which makes your forum and others most interesting. I am sorry that I must refuse your offer. While I feel rather strongly that the place of intelligence in our society should be more widely understood, I believe that the best way to achieve this end is not to offer you a speaker whose position requires him to proscribe many areas of discussion. Our analysts and operating officials do participate in the meetings of many professional societies, and they write books and articles for scholarly journals. For now, this approach to greater openness seems to suit us best. Perhaps when we have more experience with our changing attitudes we will be able to respond more positively to a request such as yours. Sincerely, Approved For Release 2005/08/24: CIA-RDP80BO1495R000200030019-0 Approved For Release 2005/08/24: CIA-RDP80BO1495R000200030019-0 MEMORANDUM FOR: --Mr-- rroc orb' Mr. Colby has been invited to address the Duke Law Forum but probably can't make it. He wants us to draft a reply stating this, adding that he might send a substitute (prefer- ably a Duke graduate). Personally, I don't feel the Forum would want taensubstitute, unless he were General Walters. Note that past speakers were Rehnquist, Ken Rush, and Sam Ervin. What Give toL Other Inn kt~ovt G-n 29 July 74 (DATE) FORM NO. REPLACES FORM 10.101 1 AUG 54 I O I WHICH MAY BE USED. Approved For Release 2005/08/24: CIA-RDP80BO1495R000200030019-0