BLOC PROPAGANDA COVERAGE ON THE VICE PRESIDENT
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80B01495R001400070009-0
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
4
Document Creation Date:
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date:
November 13, 2001
Sequence Number:
9
Case Number:
Publication Date:
March 22, 1971
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 173.97 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80BO1495R0014000700
'2 2 MAR 1971
"N Review Completed"
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Kent B. Crane
. Assistant to the Vice President
SUBJECT : Bloc Propaganda Coverage on
the Vice President
1. Per your 15 March letter, here is a sample of
Bloc press and radio references to Vice President Agnew.
As you can see, we had to go back fairly far to find
rhetoric directed at the Vice President personally and
none of it is particularly abusive.
2. We found no personal attacks from Peking, whose
portrayal of a predatory, aggressive "U. S. imperialism"
tends to ignore personalities as unimportant. In denouncing
the Vice President's December 1969-January 1970 trip to
Asia, Peking carped at the "puppets" he visited and roundly
denounced the U. S. imperialist" policy he represented
but did not attack Mr. Agnew as a person. As a rule,
Moscow also concentrates on issues rather than on person-
.- 72.45 _
Chief
DDI Executive Staff
Attachment s
ODDII :tb (22 Mar 71)
Distr u ion:
Original - Addressee w/att
1 ER w/att & Basic
DDI w/o att (cy Basic) (u'h ttlh
- ODDI Chrono w/o att (cy Basic)
25X1
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80BO1495R001400070009-0
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80B01495R001400070009-0
sw~
The Honorable Richard Helms
Director
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D. C.
March 15, 1971
The Vice President's thoughts are again turning to the
media--this time theirs, not ours. He has concluded that although
many of our correspondents portray the Communists as mellowing,
their newsmen do not reciprocate in kind in their stories about us.
Moreover, the Vice President has the distinct impression
that although we are making genuine efforts to begin an era of
negotiations, Communist leaders, while showing interest in reducing
tensions, seem to feel free at the same time to attack our policies,
our leaders and our way of life.
If these impressions are correct, the Vice President
would like some notable examples of ''inflamed rhetoric" which has
appeared in the other side's media during the past two years--Tass,
Izvestia, NCNA, Radios Moscow and Peking, etc. Without wishing
in any way to limit the scope of your response, one example of what
might be included are any particularly potent personal attacks made
by the Soviets and the Chinese Communists on the Vice President
during his Asian trips.
May we please hear back from you in ten days or so.
Since rely,
Kent B. Crane
Assistant to the
Vice President
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80B01495R001400070009-0
Approved For Release /
El 10119: CIA-RDP80BO1495R001400070009-0
UNCLASSIFIED ONL n COrwIDFNTIA
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
0/DDI
Attn:
Room 7L 41+s 110auquar-cer?
FORM 610 USE PREVIOUS
3-62 ,Dpprove or Re 20
E
DATE
OFFICER'S
INITIALS
FORWARDED
^ SECRET
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
We found no personal attacks
from Peking, whose portrayal of a
predatory, aggressive "U.S.
imperialism" tends to ignore
personalities as unimportant. In
denouncing the Vice President's
December 1969-January 1970 trip
to Asia, Peking carped at the
"puppets" he visited and roundly
denounced the "U.S. imperialist"
policy he represented but did not
attack Mr. Agnew as a person. As
a rule, Moscow also concentrates
on issues rather than on
personalities.
Here is a sample of Bloc
press and radio references to
Vice President Agnew, which you
requested on 17 March. As you
can see we had to go back fairly
far to find rhetoric directed at
the Vice President personally and
none of it is particularly abusivea
Let me,.know if you need
anything further on this.
0P THOMSOB C^94A p0700( 0 UNCLASSIFIFn
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80BO1495R001400070009-0
. _ a r
SEND, --R WILL CHECK CLASSIFICATION TOP AND BOTTOM
UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
TO
NAME AND ADDRESS
DATE
INITIALS
I
The Director 1 5
R 1971
2
4
5
6
ACTION
DIRECT REPLY
PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL
DISPATCH
RECOMMENDATION
COMMENT
FILE
RETURN
CONCURRENCE
INFORMATION
SIGNATURE
Remarks s
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.
DATE
UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL
SECRET
FORM NO. 237 Use previous editions
1-67 237
(40)
Approved For Release 2006/10/19: CIA-RDP80B01495R001400070009-Q