DEAR MR. MCCONE:
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80B01495R001400120005-9
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
6
Document Creation Date:
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date:
November 20, 2000
Sequence Number:
5
Case Number:
Publication Date:
June 8, 1964
Content Type:
LETTER
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 224.97 KB |
Body:
Approved ForRellea%e 2001/08/31: CIA-RDP80BO1495RQ01400120005-9
UNITED STATES ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY
OFFICE OF
THE DIRECTOR
June 8, 1964
State Dept. declassification & release instructions on file
SECRET
'Dear Mr. McCone:
'I I JUN1964
In connection with the proposals that the U. S.
has made at the ENDC, you may recollect that we have
proposed with our freeze on strategic delivery vehicles
a freeze on anti-ballistic missile defenses as well.
Questions have arisen as to whether it would be either
feasible or desirable to try to include under the freeze
some defense systems that might have capability primarily
against relatively short-range ballistic missiles and
high-altitude aircraft. During the last few weeks we.
have been attempting to determine where the limits might
most desirably be drawn, and which criteria might be most
useful, in distinguishing between those defense systems,
-the development and production of which would be
prohibited and those that might be permitted.
Also, the question of the desirability of trying
--
tc impose limitations on testing of ABM systems has
arisen in connection with the report of the Interagency
Task Force on Prototype Testing and Bill Foster's letter
to you recommending a U. S. position based on the findings
of that Task Force. Finally, it has seemed to us desirable
that we consider whether a. freeze on strategic d?livery
systems that did not include an ABM freeze could'?"be
acceptable to the U. S. since the USSR can probably be,
expected to prefer, and might raise, such an alternative,
GROUP ~. 'Downgraded at
3 year intervals; de-
classified after 124years.
SECRET
The Honorable
John A. McCone,
Director of. Central Intelligence.
'Approved For Release 2001/08/31 CIA-RDP80BO1495R001400120005-9-
Approved For Rele 2001/08/31 : CIA-RDP80B01495R00 0120005-9
SECRET
Considering that these questions regarding the
way in which ABM defenses should be handled in the
context of the SNDV freeze proposal have not been
resolved by our efforts to date, we have concluded
that probably we should now attempt to deal with
them by convening a task force consisting of experts
from the DOD, CIA, this Agency, and others from out-
side the government.
We believe the task force should consider in
the context of our SNDV freeze proposal:
w
, r.
Wheelon on
the question of desirable participation by personnel from
his office. We would, of course, also elcome participation
from other parts of the CIA if you t ink it app1
discussed with, and are in agreementN
th
i D
l1
If you concur in our suggestion that such an effort
iC!
y
e
ommittee of Principals.
u
en be
used in developing a U. S. position on the above questions
for consideration b
th
C
orce would meet
intermittently during the next two months and deliver a
report of its findings in August which wo
ld th
It is anticipated that the task f
ng
p
c
ons of including
those limitations on testing of ABM systems that the Task
Force on Prntotr7mre Testi
cons' - .---,
(4) the desirability and im
li
ati
o
ng so;
e qu
stion of acceptability to us of
not d
i
(3) the implications of including a freeze on ABM
deployment and th
e
a
might constrain both;
y and feasibility of including some
limitations th
t
on
on
BM and
air defense systems, including the defenses of our allies,
and the desirabilit
(2) the interaction between limitati
s
A
requirements and capabilities;
(i) the question of the definition of ABM systems
to be affected by the freeze and the associated verifica-
jion
Sincerely,
Adrian S. Fisher
Acting Director
Approved For Release 2001/08/31: CIA-RDP80B01495R001400120005-9
SECRE'T'
Approved For Release 2001/08/31: CIA-RDP80B01495R001400120005-9
Standard Form 63
November 1961
GSA Gen. Reg. No. 27
^ PLEASE CALL
^ WILL CALL AGAIN
^ RETURNING YOUR CALL
^ IS REFERRED TO YOU BY:
^ WAITING TO SEE YOU
^ WISHES AN APPOINTMENT
Approved For Release 2001/08/31: CIA-RDP80B01495R001400120005-9
I' - ,w
or~~IPA(IcH?al~ci~L; B~dBOd
Appr
ov 9
UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL X SECRET
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
TO
NAME AND ADDRESS
DATE
INITIALS
1
ONE
-
2
m q is
.
3
ORR
4
Hqs.
5
6
Rm 7E31
ACTION DIRECT REPLY
PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL DISPATCH'
RECOMMENDATION
X
COMMENT FILE
RETURN
CONCURRENCE X INFORMATION
SIGNATURE
Remarks :
3t,-6', All Y4oA T-(4-
See last sentence.
cCq ' cC-
VIXAQ Sc,
ItLb~ -7
el-q-T I, R-,--
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.
DATE
o
4ddb
N A SIFTED CONFIDENTIAL
SECRET
FORM 6i0- 237 Use previous, editions
(40)
? U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1961 0-587282
Approved For Release 2001/08/31: CIA-RDP80B01495R001400120005-9
Approved For Release 2001/08/31 CIA-RPP80BO1495R001400120005-9
Approv
f P WEMi49&
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
DD/I
APPROVAL
COMMENT
CONCURRENCE
RECOMMENDATION
For information.
DD/S&T has for action.
DCI and DDCI have copies.
FROM: NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.
App
IFD CONFIDENTIAL SECRET
FORM NO. 237 Use previous edition
11 (
?4-9