YOUR MEMORANDUM OF 4 DECEMBER ON TNF (S)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80B01554R003300190039-8
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
T
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date:
December 6, 2004
Sequence Number:
39
Case Number:
Publication Date:
December 7, 1979
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 60.77 KB |
Body:
Approved For Reisase 2005/.
I RpP ~554ROU300190039-8
OPA
FROM: Director of Central Intelligence
SUBJECT: Your Memorandum of 4 December on TNF
1. I have read your memorandum of 4 December on "Possible Soviet
Responses to an Affirmative NATO Decision on TNF Modernization"
I was very much intrigued by the line of reasoning on
the bottom half of page 4, page 5, and the top half of page 6. 1 have
been seeking for some time to understand the different perspectives on
who is ahead in TNF. It is difficult to get a U.S. presentation of
this that doesn't show us hopelessly behind. You, I believe, have
summarized it here in what is a more realistic manner--it could be
viewed as though we are behind, about even, or well ahead depending upon
the counting rules.
2. Could you reduce this to a matrix? The first row would show
comparison of U.S. and Soviet systems with ranges in excess of 1000
kilometers. A column at the right-hand side would indicate that in
this category the Soviets would have to see themselves as coming out on
top.
Next, there would be a row for systems with ranges less than
1000 kilometers. Graphically, this could be divided into systems that
we would count and systems that the Soviets would likely count--taking
into account your point on the capability of aircraft versus the avail-
ability of pilots. A ain in the right-hand column we could show how
this one could tilt. I
A final row would add in the non-U.S. NATO systems and show
now that again tips the balance.
0
3. In addition to this table, we would then go on with your
discussion as to the acceptability of a freeze if the Soviets do look
25X1
25X1
Approved For Release 2005/01/13 : CIA-RDP80BO1554R00330019 o. 25X1
Tr" N
Approved For Real ase
1/k3~ 4?), 180B01
at themselves as ahead, and hence the possibility that they would be
willing to freeze. Hopefully, this might be reduced to short enough
25X1 length for a PDB annex.
NSFIELD TURNER
25X1
25X1
Approved For Release 20T/ : J > 11554ROO3300190039-8
~