IMPROVEMENT OF INTERNAL SECURITY IN LATIN AMERICA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
11
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 3, 2003
Sequence Number: 
65
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 22, 1960
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9.pdf531.01 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9E .2 Approved For Rele`p-f23IQ4/24 CI4-RDfi'60130167 Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000900050065-9 cc: 1 ICI D$P `CI ImId (19 January 1.960 ) Distribution: Orig & 1 Addressee Signer 2 - W 1 - CQPB I - C/CI Z-CIAI Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000900050065-9 Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000900050065-9 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Dulles I have sent a copy of this memorandum td After you have noted, I will show this to General Cabell and send it on to DD/P I -jar comment. STAT STAT ATE) FORM O. ioi REPLACES FORM 10-101 1 AUG54 Y WHICH MAY BE USED. Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000900050065-9 Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT . Improvement of Internal Security in Latin America REFERENCES : A. B. OSD (80) Memorandum to CIA dated 31 December 1959, same subject CIA Memorandum for Members of USIB dated 22 October 1959, same subject 1. Paragraph 6 of this memorandum recommends your action in the form of a memorandum for the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense (Special Operations) replying to reference A. 2. General Erskine's memorandum, which comments on reference B. makes the following principal points: (a) Defense concurs in CIA's view that USIB shoul3 remain primarily responsible for coordination of the U. S. intelligence effort in support of Latin American programs. (b) While the Department of Defense will be most happy to explore ways to coordinate joint efforts in improvement of internal security in Latin America, it considers that such improved coordination can best be achieved by utilizing existing mechanisms. General Erskine's office therefore does not believe that creation of a new coordinating group or committee would contribute toward the end of improved coordination. SEC E i Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9 Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9 (c) Particular note is made of revised procedures currently being worked out between the Departments of Defense and State for handling Mutual Security Program matters. These procedures are stated to envision the development of jointly agreed Mutual Security Objectives Plans (MSOP's) for each country being assisted under the program. Guidance on internal security assistance will be included in the ? OP's, including programs of assistance to foreign military forces in the internal security field. 3. You will recall that paragraph 5 of reference B stated that CIA was contacting Assistant Secretary Rubottom's office at State to recommend the establishment of a working group t undertake overall coordination of programs designed to strengthen internal security in Latin American countries. In Agency discussions with State in this regard it had been emphasized that what was required was an informal inter-agency group at the Assistant Secretary level, composed of individuals with direct responsibilities for operations of their respective d part- ments or agencies. It was felt that participation of Departauent of Defense representatives in such a group would most readily ensure overall coordination of State, CIA and Defense activities in terms of U. S. political objectives. Such an informal group has been established composed of Assistant Secretary Rubottara, Robert H. Knight, Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Security Affairs at Defense, and the Chief, Western Hemisphere Division, DDP/CIA. The extent to which this informal coordination may be extended further to the working level is still under consideration at State. 1+. General Erskine's memorandum has been discussed in- formally with the working level in his office and it has been determined that CIA's memorandum to members of the USIB was interpreted in Defense as proposing the establishment of another OCB-type working group. It was not clear to Defense that CIA was proposing to the State Department establishment if a higher level group that could deal more directly with operational matters. On the basis of informal discussions with General Erskine's Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9 Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000900050065-9 office, it is believed that Defense recognizes the advantagei? of establishing such a coordinating group on an informal basis at the level indicated. 5. In regard to the revised procedures currently being worked out between State and Defense for the Mutual Security Program, country MSOP's which contain guidance on operational planning on internal security are of direct interest to CIA. In practical terms, these documents will include statements of courses of action to improve internal security such as were formerly included in Overseas Internal Security Program documents. It is considered essential that CIA participate in formulation on the internal security sections of MSOP's that may be developed under these revised procedures. 6. It is therefore recommended that the following action be taken in regard to General Erskine's memorandum: (a) The attached memorandum be forwarded to General Erskine over your signature to clarify CIA's thinking in regard to the coordinating group which was proposed by the Agency to the Department of State and its current status. (b) That DDP/CIA be authorized to contact the office of the Coordinator of the Mutual Security Program in the Department of State for discussion of the revised procedures for handling the Mutual Security Program. CIA's interest will be emphasized in regard to MSOP's which contain guidance on internal security assistance with a view to inclusion of appropriate CIA representatives in discussions leading to formulation of these documents. James Angleton Chief, Counter Intelligence Staff 1 Attachment cc: DDCI ~lV The recommenda s c ntained in DDC. paragraph 6 a e s re~ed: CONCUR: n Deputy c r (Plan ) 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2003104324: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000900050065-9 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON 25. D. C. b o -c1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCI AGENCY SUBJECT: Improvement of Internal Security in Latin America REFERENCE: Your memorandum for Members of USIB, subject as above. dated 22 October 1959 Your memorandum focuses attention on several matters of irtsmerti.=te interest to this office. We share the concern which you express that our overall effort to counteract subversion in Latin America be as mutually supporting and well-coordinated as possible. This is essential in other parts of the world as well, especially the unstable areas of Asia, the Middle East and Africa. With respect to the role of the various inter-agency coordinating mechanisms to which you refer, we feel that the following principles sho;;ld generally apply: (a) The USIB is and should remain, in our view, primarily responsible for coordination of the U. S. intelligence effort. With specify: reference to countering communist subversion, USIB and its component members should insure that the most accurate and up-to-date opera:iona-, intelligence possible is available to the various departments and agencies responsible for conducting programs in this field. (b) The overall coordination of various departmental an r, programs designed to counter communist subversion is the responsibility of the Operations Coordinating Board. Within the OCB framework necessary coordination should continue to be accomplished through the variety of ex- isting mechanisms presently organized on both a functional and geographi?: basis. Overall coordination of various programs in specific parts of the world should be the responsibility of the various country and regional work- ing groups. Functional coordination on a world-wide basis should be ac- complished through the various mechanisms in existence for this pur-oose_ i. e. the "Task Force" on psychological matters, the "points of contact" established by the OCB Ad Hoc Working Group on Overseas Internal Eecuritl, Program, etc. The latter groups should maintain contact and coordinate with the various geographic working groups as appropriate. To further comp i ate this process by creating still another coordinating body would seem bath duplicative and unnecessary. However, we share your belief that greater coordination is possible. Therefore, it is suggested that ways be sought Approved For Release 2003/04/24-: C1 - DP80BOl 25X1 Approved For Release 2003f2$ CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9 For Release 2003/04DP801301676R000900050065-9 Approved to utilize the various existing mechanisms referred to above in order to make them more useful and productive. This office is responsible for functional coordination at the Washington level on behalf of the Departme:a- of Defense on foreign counter subversion matters. We will be most. happy to explore ways of making our joint efforts in this field as closely coordi- nated as possible. In addition to better coordination, we feel strongly that a revital- ization of some of our programs is also desirable especially in the field of internal security assistance to other nations under the Mutual Security Program. As you may know, revised procedures for handling MSF are currently being worked out between State and Defense. These procedures envision the development of jointly agreed Mutual Security Objectives Plans (MSOPs) for each country being assisted. Thus one document will serve as guidance for the appropriate courses of action under (SF in order to assure more integrated effort towards achievement of U. S. objectives in each country. Guidance on internal security assistance will be included in the MSOP. Within this general framework we hope to develop specific and meaningful programs of assistance to foreign military forces in the internal security field and develop a mechanism for irnple menting these programs in timely manner. In summary, this office concurs in the need for a more effective program of anti-Communist effort in Latin America as well as other regions; however, we do not believe that the creation of a new group or committee would contribute toward this end. Please be assured that I am anxious to contribute in any way possible,, using machinery now avail- able toward elimination of Communist influence in Latin America. r General, USMC (Ret.) Assistant to the Secretary of Defense (Special Operations) Approved For Release 2003/041 T SECRET Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000900050065-9 USIB -D-4E. 4/ 2 22 October 195c) CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON 25, D. C. MEMORANDUM FOR : Members of the United States Intelligence Board SUBJECT Improverrent of Internal Sec!ur;ty in Latin America 1. The trend of events in Latin America gives cause for.in- creasing concern with particular attention to the development of conditions which can be profitably exploited by the Communists. Therefore, it is essential that U. S. efforts to counteract the Corr, munists be conducted on an across-the-board basis, be mutually supporting, and be well coordinated from planning to execution. 2. Current U. S. activities to counter Communist subversion in Latin America involve numerous elements within the Govern- ment. The over-all coordination of these activities at the "summit" stems from the NSC, but below that level is divided between the OCB and the USIB. There is, of course, continuing day-to-bay coordination between the departments and agencies involved, and some ad hoc working groups are in operation. However, in con- sidering ways and means to achieve the highest degree of effective- ness in this effort, I believe that a more comprehensive coordina- tion between all operational elements involved would be beneficial., 3. The primary role of the intelligence community win- respect to the U. S. effort to counteract Communist subversion in Latin America is to collect the esse,:Z.ial information required and pro- duce the intelligence necessary to support this effort. In addtion_ there are resources under the control of various Board members that are now participating in the effort and can, in the future, play a more aggressive role. A case in point is the program being developed by the Army which General Willems described to us soma Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000900050065-9 SECRET SECRET Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9 USIB -D-48.4 /2 22 October 1959 months ago. You will recall that this contemplates a revitalized joint program involving full participation by all of the Military Departments. Specifically, the Army program envisages increased i Admiral Frost proposed consideration of the establishment of a Special Cor-imitt??e within the Inter-American Defense Board to provide for a more effective exchange of information concerning Communist subversion and related matters. 4. We should examine all possibilities for improving the effec - tiveness f o any resources we may have available f6r'thi$ effort. activities in Latin America. ersion and relat,id support of U. S. efforts to counter Communist -7-, y ec e to thc~ The primary objective of the USIB should bet sseek ways and means for ensuring the participation of every resource within the intelligence community that can be appropriate) dir t d 5. Within the area of the OCB's cognizance, a wide range of activities are carried on in furtherance of the U. S. counterattack against the Communist effort in Latin America. These incluc owever, over-all co- ordination is lacking and should be provided, particularly at this time when we are trying for increased efforts all along the line. CIA is contacting Assistants-&cretary Rubottom's office at the Department of State to recommend the establishment of a working group to undertake such over-all coordination. 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9 SECRET . 11 SECRET Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9 USIB -D-48.4 /2 22 October 1959 6. With regard to those activities that are under the cog:-izance of the USIB and pertinent to the problem of countering Comniunist subversion in Latin America, I suggest that those members of our respective organizations who are responsible for the day-to-day running of the activities involved make every effort to ensure tha . the intelligence community will provide full support to the w--rkinw group noted in paragraph 5 above. Careful coordination in this regard within your organization should result in making possible a U. S. effort of maximum effectiveness. ALLEN W. J~ftJLLES Direc r 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/04/24: CIA-RDP80B01676R000900050065-9 SECRET