MEMO FOR MR. DULLES FROM L.K. WHITE

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80B01676R001100080005-9
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 27
• Document Creation Date: December 14, 2016
• Document Release Date: November 12, 2002
• Sequence Number: 5
• Publication Date: March 3, 1956
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
MEMORANDUM FOR: MR. 1)ULLES
Attached is a proposed reply to Mr. Bartholomew=
letter of 2 March with which he enclosed the final
report of the National Capital Planning Commission
concerning the Langley site.
I believe it is important that we respond
promptly, inasmuch as it is now generally known that
we have received the final report. Also, I under-
stand that there is a meeting of the Fairfax County
Board on Wednesday, 7 March, and that Roger Fisher
is on the agenda. I think that it would be well
to have it generally knoim that we have made our
choice prior to that time.
Recommend signature.
3 Mar 56
(DATE)
FORM NO. REPLACES FORM 10.101
I AUG 54 101 WHICH MAY BE USED.
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 DD s-5-7;0
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO011000800 05-9
e,fVfgii
wft
National Capital Planning Gomaisston
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Mr. Bartholoaasw s
Thank you very auch for your letter of 2 March 1956 with
which you a losed the final report of the National Capital
Planning Co fission concerni air proposal to establish a new
headquarters for the Central Intelligence Agency at Langley,
I appreciate very a cob the recognition given the special
situation confronting this Agency in the selection of a proper
site and your thoughtful final report. We shall give most sari
Qua consideration to all aspects of this report as we proceed
with our planning and the establishment of oar now headquarters
at Wiley. In particular, we believe that it need not have an
adverse long-range effect on the established land use of the
surrounding territory, and it will be the policy of the Agency
to do everything in its power, in cooperation with the local
authorities, to maintain the present nature of the area. I are
confident that we can develop a headauarters at this site of
which we can all be proud.
;iz erely,
DD/S : LK4:1aq
Distribution:
0 & 1/Addressee
E.R.
1 - DCI
1 - Gen Coun
1 - SA-DCI (Grogan)
1 - D/Log
Approved I1orF49 '9 2/11/13 :
1 - DD/S chrano
Allen *. Dallas
Director
L. K. WHITE
CIA-RDP80BOl676ROD~540PP95 9
STAT
j'
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13: CIA-RDP80B01676R001100f8OOD - C
c;r,V- J-981JV.4
That you very mob for Yom' letter of 2 /rcb 1.956 with
flanndrW ao s j= cf a ng Propo toe biieh * h
'
e r
tere for the ti X 11
rs.nigetme Age,c 4t L ley,
h the r"o ition given the ep
emp in the selection of a
;ht , final report. we 5i 1. ii. ., c
end the estIb iii nt of
a nom,,
re
In pearttcu1er, we beli.vs that it neap not have en
effect on. '!he eateb ish l* use of the
be the policy
_
s p `er, ie ooeperat# oc t : the I so&
iu the present new Of the ar'e&- Ian
which we can nll be ice'-id.
01
DD/S:LKWsla.q
Distribution:
0 & 1 ddressee
7"E-R-
- ICI
1 - Gen Coun
1 - A.-ICI (Grogan)
1 - B/Log
Approved FJkW2002/11/13: CIA-RDP80B01
ono
1 - DD/S subject
C ONCURI
L. S. ' WNI'Tj
IUPPr -9
tit
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
NATIONAL ClLPITAL PLANNING COl,11_ sION
Washington 25, D_ C,
P~tarch 2, 1956
Mr. Allen V. Dulles, Director
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington 25, D, C
As indicated in my letter of February 6 and pursuant
to your request, the National Capital Planning Commission
reviewed further your proposal to establish a new head-
quarters for the Central Intelligence Agency at Langley,
Virg!-r2-as and approved this proposal,
In its new findings the Commission has a..corded over-
riding importance to th,, emphasis placed upon your state-
ments contained in your letter of January 23., .1956, that you
are not free to select a location within the District and. that
by virtue of emergency measures already taken it is important
for you to locate on the west side of the Potomac River and
that you desire that the location be at Langley,
The Commission has approved the enclosed final repor
prepared by a Committee of the Commission, The Committee
has set forth in this report the obstar.'Les which it feels
must be overcome by the federal and local governments to
solve problems connected with this site,
Sincerely yours,
(Signed) Harland Bartholomew-
Harland Bartholomew
Enclosure Chairman
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COI4NISSION
March 2, 1956
FINAL REPORT
ON THE
PROPOSMJ TO LOCATE T}fl CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
HEADQUARTERS BUILDING AT LANGLEY, VIRGINIA
At the request of the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, the
National Capital Planning Commission at its meeting on February 3, 1956,
reconsidered the action taken at its December meeting on the proposal to
establish A new headquarters for the Agency at Langley, Virginia, and voted
to approve the location considered by the Agency to be the most suitable
site for its purposes;
The undersigned committee was appointed by the Chairman to draft and
submit the final report on this proposal, as required by the National
Capital Planning Act of 1952,, Membership of the committee includes those
who have been for and against the Langley site,,
As the Commission had been very evenly divided in both its initial
opposition and subsequent approval of the Langley location, the committee
has chosen to present the differing points of view on the basic planning
issues involved.
Concern of Commission and Council in Decision
Under the Planning Act of 1952, the Planning Commission and Regional
Planning Council have collaborative responsibility to prepare and maintain
a comprehensive plan for the development of the National Capital and its
environs. As the central planning agency for the Federal and District
Governments, the Commission has the prime duty of reviewing Federal agency
development programs in order to advise as to their consistency with the
Comprehensive Plana
It is now widely recognized that the most important single factor
influelrodaei~9?~i~a/ip~fi'd~$f~~810~i~1~86A8O5f9 the
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
Washington region has been the growth and spread of Federal establishments,,
Consequently, the Commission's 1950 Comprehensive Plan laid great emphasis
on the size and location of governrient agencie so In order to produce an
orderly and uniform expansion of the region, new Federal establishments
which could be appropriately located outside the Central Area were to be
distributed on the periphery of existing development or beyond., at such
locations as to encourage local development that would be harmonious with
other requirements of the Plan,, Except in Bethesda and Suitland, where
commitments had already been made., no single installation larger than
employees was recommended. Furthermore, new installations were lo-
cated at least five miles from each other or from other large established
agencies.
The Comprehensive Planp while serving as a general guide and directive
for decisions on Federal establishments., also sets forth a general philoso-
phy on land use and population distribution throughout the area, These
basic policies provide the foundation or reason for a Regional Thoroughfare
Plan and policies for the provision of community facilities, such as water
supply and sewage disposal,, The development of such plans is the joint
and collaborative responsibility of the National Capital Planning Commiesioa
and the Regional Planning Council under the provisions of the 1952 P?lanriing
AL-t,
Impact on the Comprehensive Plan
The Commission's proposals for the location of future Federal establish-
ments in the environs of ?-ashingF;on did not contemplate a large Federal es-
tablishment in the Langley area, On the contrary., its Plan for the location of
Federal Employees limited the number of those ultimately necessary to compietc
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/i3~.: CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
the Public Roads Research Laboratory development, then estimated in round
figures not to exceed 1.9000. The principal reasons for this were that the
location lay within an area traditionally developed and developing with
small estates and single-family homes of low density, which it was
generally agreed as desirable to encourage and protect. Furthermore,
there was already located or committed in the northwest sector outside of
downtown Washington a disproportionately large distribution of Federal
employment, tending in the long run to encourage an unbalanced and in-
tensive growth in that direction.
To offset this tendency, the Comprehensive Plan proposed in the
Virginia sector generally west and southwest of the center, four loca-
tions for Federal establishments of approximately
employees each.
STAT
These would have the effect of stimulating intensive suburban growth of
a satellite character in localities where there is already established
a nucleus for an urban environment and to public facilities already
projected or needed,
'r'hereas the location ofF-Iemployees, more or less, at Langley
does not accord with the 1950 plan, a majority of the Commission believe
that a revision of the plan to accommodate CIA can be appropriately made,
The minority does not agree to this revision and believes that a location
in Virginia west or southwest of the center of Washington would promote
growth of territory better adapted for intensive stimulation.
The position of the majority of the Commission is that there will
be no adverse long-range effect of the CIA installation upon the estab-
lished land use of the surrounding territory, They believe that in the
imnediate future employees will continue to live very much where they now
live and that traffic to and from the installation can be handled over
bridges, highways and parkways already planned though not necessarily
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001100080005-9
programmed.
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
However, there is general agreement by both the Commission and the
Regional Council that improvements proposed in the Commi'-sion?s report
of December 16 will need to be programed at an earlier date to accommo-
date the traffic volumes generated by the installation.
The other point of view, represented by the minority, is that there
will be a very profound effect upon the surrounding community with an
installation of this size. The reasoning is that inevitably there will
be created a demand for more intensive development of tributary territory
than has heretofore been contemplated- The fact that only about one-eighth
of the employees of C Lf own their own homes lends support to the viewpoint
of the minority that a marked change in land use for the Langley area is
inevitable. The ensuing economic pressure upon land will make it in-
creasingly difficult, if not impossible, for the Fairfax County authorities
to maintain the same land use policies through zoning and subdivision con-
trol that have heretofore been envisioned as most appropriate and de-
sirable for this area,, This feeling is very sarong among many property
owners in the Langley area, is widely supported by professional planners
and, perhaps most significantly. by the current waves of land speculation:,
in this connection, the minority draws attention to the change that has
taken place in Arlington County since the construction of the Pentagon.;
In 191i0 nearly three-fourths of the dwelling units in the county were of
the single-family type. Today, more than half of all units are apartments
which have increased eight-fold against only a doubling of the single-
family type,,
The Langley site meets the general requirement, set forth in the
Commission9s April resolution, that it be in close proximity to the
outer Circumferential
For Release 2 /1'f r~ ~P> 0 6 ~ I OOO O O -9t'~ th the
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
Commission's Proposed Regional Thoroughfare Plan, now generally accepted
by the highway authorities. However, the-oriority for construction of
major features of that plan will have to be advanced, as herein dis-
cussed, if it is proved that the traffic circulation facilities which
the installation will require are inadequate.
Community Facilities
The Regional Planning Council, in approving the Langley location
last December, voted also to request that the Central Tntelligence Agency
request appropriations for certain improvements which it considered
would be needed at the time the CIA headquarters is opened at Langley.
The purpose of this action was, of course, to imp1ci.ont planning recom-
mendations to which the local or state authorities v,ere not financially
committed,,
It would seem that the first step towards putting into effect the
Councilgs recommendation would be the development and agreement upon a
program setting for?t,h bhe specific community facilities required, and
the estimates of cost and methods of financing. The latter is particular-
ly important because of the different jurisdictions involved and the
necessity for coordination in the programming of improvements. Following
is a list and brief discussion of the important improvements which the
studies of the Commission and the Council, during the last year have re-
vealed as being necessary to program definitely if the Langley site
were chosen,
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
George Washington Memorial Parkway
The construction of the George ."Tashington I emorial Parkway from
Spout Run to Langley is universally accepted as having top priority,
The Clarke-Rapuano report also recommended that the parkway be extended
to the Cabin John Bridge along with useful segments of the Outer Loop,
in which recommendation this Committee concurs,
While the legislation authorizing the use of the Langley location
anticipated the construction of the parkway to Langley and provided for
the allocation of necessary funds, the land acquisition program cannot be
completed without additional contribctions from Virginia to match.
Federal funds already available or to be made available for this purpose,.
Surveys and appraisals are required before precise costs can be ascer-
tained? in all, probability; several hundred thousand dollars will be
needed from state and county authorities?
Other Recommended Projects
The Regional Tanning Council has recommended the following improve-
meats be financed at Federal expense concurrent with construction by the
Agency unless state or local financing is or can be secured-,
(a) Route 123 U - The widening to four lanes of Route 123 from
Langley Corners to Chain Bridge (1,100,000)q The State of Virginia has
agreed to widen that portion of Route 123 from Langley Corners to the
Parkway ($,350;,000)0
(b) Glebe Road. The widening of Glebe Road to four lanes from
Lee Highway to Chain Bridge, estimated to cost $19300,000,
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
(c) Chain Bridge Widening, ?.. The District Highway Department has
estimated the widening of this structure to a capacity of four lanes
to cost $$19320,000, The studies made by Clarke and Rapuano and others
indicate the need of additional capacity at an early date, especially if
present CIA employees are to be encouraged to maintain their present
residences, Otherwise, additional traffic will be brought into and out
of the ventral district over central area bridges, especi&lly Key Bridge,
(d) Canal Road and Weaver Place, - Required in connection with the
widening of Chain Bridge will be improvements to approach roads on the
District side, estimated at a cost of $900,000?
(e) Cabin John Bridge and Segment of Outer Circumferential, ? While
the Cabin John Bridge and the adjoining segments of the Outer Circumfer-
ential have been indorsed by the Highway Departments of Maryland and
Virginia and the Bureau of Public Roads, no program for their financing
and construction has been agreed upon lilithout this facility, trans-
portation to and from the Langley site will be inadequate, causing
serious congestion on existing highways,, If the CIA desires to locate
at Langley, based in part upon the proximity to the Outer Loop9 the
Agency should take the initiative in advancing the priority of this
important improvement by endorsing Federal aid to this end.
(f) Water Supply and Sewage Disposal Problems, - So far as the
Agency is concerned, it would seem to have solved its own :Immediate water
and sewage problems through commitments already made by Federal and local
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
authorities, Left unsolved, however, are services to any areas that
may develop ahead of scheduled improvements due to the CIA installation.
(g) Reservations for Park and Recreational needs. -- Regardless
of any stimulus to local development from CIA, it has been estimated that
based on present standards and ultimate development of this section of
Fairfax County at low density that at least four times the present park
and recreational area will be required to meet future needs. Should the
growth of the area be accelerated, as sormanticipate, a program for
financing advance acquisition of suitable open lands according to the
plan should be initiated by the county authorities,
Recommended Pl~nning Controls
All those who have favored the Langley site have expressed great
confidence in the ability of the county authorities, in cooperation with
the interested agencies of the Federal Government,to control the charac-
ter and extent of development which may either be required or which will
take place as the result of the CIA installation. A clear understand-
ing of mutual responsibilities should be formally established. To this
end, it is suggested that the Central Intelligence Agency enter into a
form of agreement or memorandum of understanding as to the policies of
mutual concern that will be followed and financial responsibilities
undertaken.
More than a year ago consultants for the Fairfax County Planning
Commission completed a comprehensive plan for the county, including a
land use plan, setting up standards generally designed to maintain the
single-family, low density, open type of development for the Langley
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001100080005-9
and adjoining areas.; This plan has not yet been adopted, It becomes
imperative., therefore. in the interest of CIA as well as that of the
home owners in the area who have become concerned about the effects
of the installation., that the CIA impress upon the (.-ounty authorities
its desire and expectation of maintaining the low density character of
the Langley area through immediate adoption of the county?s comprehen-
sive land use plan.
Co clusiona
The committee has endeav'riod to point up the planning problems
connected with the development of the Langley site as a location for
CIA headquarters, in the hope that their inclusion in this report will
serve a useful purpose in effecting their ultimate solution:,
The majority of the committee in arriving at its recommendations
has accorded overriding importance to the emphasis placed upon the
statements contained in Mr. Dullest letter of January 239, 1956., that
he is not free to select a location within the District and that by
virtue of emergency measures already taken it is important to him to
locate on the west side of the Potomac River?
L. L. Hunter
C. McKim Norton
Claude W, Oven
David H4 Tulley
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA- 8(RBOAgJ8 0%10g8On 05-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001100080005-9
NATIONAL CAPITAL PIANNING C CMMISSION
March 2, 1956
Checklist of Reference Data Relating to CIA Headquarters Location
National Ca ip tal Planning Commission Report
Resolution dated April 8, 1955 (general criteria)
Committee report April 7, 1955
Joint Commission-Council report on alternate sites
Committee report December 1.6j. 1955
National Capital Regional Planning Council
Staff summary report -- March 11, 1955
Staff report March 31, 1955
Committee report April 7, 1955
Staff report and recommendation December 5, 1955
Member statements approving Langley
Fairfax Co u my
Resolutions inviting CIA to County
Central Intelligence Agency
Report of Clarke and Rapuano - October 25, 1955
Other consultant reports
Consultant - Draper report
Consultant - Upham report
Miscellaneous reports, documents and letters
Committee of 100
Virginia Department of Highways
Alexandria Chamber of Commerce
Fairfax Chamber of Commerce
Federal City Council
Washington Board of Trade
Citizen organizations
Letters from many interested citizens
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13: CIA-RDP80B0l676R00110008f10 5-~_
Of course, to 61ve full a iSaration to
the ..Si is acroval of the Langley site an the coWid-
been g ven to this i rteat matter.
, preeittee very
ke its fib. report a
STAT
W. Du11eu CONCUR t
ultimate removal of the temporary b ?ildinga which we
vacate.
report vhiob I mte rstand. the
a per+e riztg. We a"y bowevir,* extreme 34, hora-
pre for tine as air anti required af` r / 4eteina-
tion, p aa tie rly action in any involvi C .&s, must
be Akan vim' so= a.eet ire O%dyW a mwjoiz d*IW not
only to i orta nt Problem =M ting U& bait also to the
DD/StLKW laq
Rewrit n OGCs4Htjeb
cc: . I (2)- Q u~ce G fi r.
SA/DCI (Grogan) w/cc of 6 Feb ltr
jS (2) if n n n
to
Legislative Counsel
D/Log & C/BPS/Log in turna-l
General Counsel " " it
'- "
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B0l676R00110008
tic Pa
Tnw* you for yon' letter of 6 7eb r7 56 a Bing
the Plan=ing c i io has voted to wove of -
ce &garnoy at LM91MY, rg#i1i . deep ? date
locate the hdquwters bu11d1 g for twe
"a. (nme
.
 NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION I /
P
February 6, 1,956
Mr. Allen W. Dulles, Director
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington 25, D. C.
In accordance vith your request, the National
Capital Planning Commtesicn at its meeting on
F& rua zy 2, 1956, reconsidered the adverse recom-
mendation submitted to you in its preliminary report
of December 16, 1955, concerning your proposal to
locate the headquarters Wilding of the Central
Intelligence Agency at Langley, Virginia.
I am 'writing now to confirm officially what you
have already heard,, that the erasion has now voted
to approve of your proposal and will as soon as
possible submit the "final report" provided for in
the National Capital Planning Act of 1952. To this
end, I have appointed a s uttee of five, repre-
senting the varied viewpoints prevailing on our Com-
mission in connection with your proposal.
Sincerely yours,
Harland Bartholomew
chairman
nf1 I r- c.
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
MEMORANDUM FOR: MR. DULLES
While I don't believe that a reply to Mr.
Bartholomewfs last letter is essential, I feel
that we should press him as much as possible to
expedite the final report, and, therefore, have
drafted the attached proposed letter which I rec-
ommend for your signature.
I have good reason to believe that Barthol-
omew will delay the final report and may insist
that it be considered at the March meeting of
the Commission.
L. K. WHITE
FORM NO. 101 REPLACES FORM 10.101
1 AUG 54 WHICH MAY BE USED.
9 Feb 56
(DATE)
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
Capital Planning Cowiisadon
Washington 25i D. C.
VJ56
n you for your letter of 16 December 19955 with .ch you
transmitted (1) the reeport and rec tiara prepared Cocaz-
a re-
, mitt" of the National. Capital RLaetrtning C lssionj and 12) a
port and re , ions of the Ifttional Capital v P .ennins
Cocil, together with statements of certain local ply agencies.
I mamas of course., disappointed in the adverse action taken by
the Nations? Capital Planning C omission in a vote of 6 to 5 Against
our proposal to locate the headquarters of the Central Intelligence
Agency at Lnngley, particularly in view of the earlier action of the
National Capital Region el Planning Council to approve of the Langley
site by a vote of 5 to 3.
my staff our consultants have caws ally reviewed
ban submitted.. together with the acccauVaanying re-
nftttons, and it is requested that your Coeeissioa review further
establish a r*w dgaarters for the Centel Intelli-
Agency at Lamleey, the most suitable site that we have found
he one which will best enable us to carry out the went
era that the Congrew of the United States bas entrusted to us.
oxid appropriation were obtained with the clear
uaersting that wbile we were ated from ' d,tspter. we would
at the a time definitely not locate in the District of Columbia
but, rather, on the fr: of the met litn area Of eter
Washington. It is i +a it to us to bum the Agency headquarters
situated on the west side of the Pat= ac in order to c ores with
asures that already have been taken.
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
k r, we ave
Obmw.f off` 1955, and I M
Lou whit the ass#on
:drat :off r.W to interest i
a Of t Wa l
mwm .4 m d tsion at a Vwf eaz'1
is na to t pmLU"W7 cwt aet
anted to the r a his 009GLOn , I o f
re ject my be did at loot aot r
I qnst that t C ,ssioa xeco er this a att+ at its
br a Ott its -MrAl ram as sow t ea r as
pos blo. W and our Q t ta, > Vim.,
wtsmdrevAr at t to asst iaw t odble t . :.Le 3
adftUoml forte gmsentation seams to s .z I believe
that it wald be loreflaial to have MOSSTO. Clark* OVA RPVW=
3 of this AV=y, pmt at your t
it1ox st1ch the C s oa MV VINU to ...
Ys this e ri to ywar L ent
IS/
-lieu W. Dulles
Director
H. S. CH.UtDL R. M.
6-
L. K. WE
Deputy Director
(support)
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
MEMORANDUM FOR: MR. DULLES
Attached is a proposed letter to the Chairman
of the National Capital Planning Commission request-
ing further review of our request for the Langley
site. The letter is rather lengthy, but is Mr.
Clarkets idea of the most effective way to present
our request. It has been coordinated with Messrs.
Clarke & Rapuano, as well as with Max Abramovitz.
The next meeting of the Commission will be on
2 and 3 February. I think that we should get this
over to them as early as possible next week in
order to ensure that it is considered'at that time.
L. K. WHITE
Deputy Director
(Support)
20 Jan 56
(DATE)
FORM NO. IQI REPLACES FORM 10-101
I AUG 54 V WHICH MAY BE USED.
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 BUILDING
isle 2002/1X7.1 -RD 80B0l676R0 1100080005-9
F
r~ 7
FES M 55 24 I REPLACES FORM 36--8
R
t
WHICH MAY BE USED.
STAT
 Appro
4~1113 ~--RaDPUWMR001100080005-9
1,4-3 14
-4
e~
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
 Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9
TRANSMITTAL SLIP
STAT
STAT
Approved For Release 2002/11/13 : CIA-RDP80B01676RO01100080005-9